Voice and communication after open partial horizontal laryngectomies: A cross‐sectional outcome study
Objective The present study evaluates voice and communication after open partial horizontal laryngectomies (OPHLs), according to surgery and patient‐related variables. Methods Fifty‐eight patients were included: 18 type I OPHL, 20 type II OPHL and 20 type III OPHL. Acoustic, aerodynamic, endoscopic,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Head & neck 2022-10, Vol.44 (10), p.2248-2256 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2256 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2248 |
container_title | Head & neck |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Fantini, Marco Crosetti, Erika Pizzorni, Nicole Sprio, Andrea Elio Bertolin, Andy Rizzotto, Giuseppe Schindler, Antonio Succo, Giovanni |
description | Objective
The present study evaluates voice and communication after open partial horizontal laryngectomies (OPHLs), according to surgery and patient‐related variables.
Methods
Fifty‐eight patients were included: 18 type I OPHL, 20 type II OPHL and 20 type III OPHL. Acoustic, aerodynamic, endoscopic, perceptual and self‐assessment analyses were carried out. Surgery‐related variables and patient‐related variables were considered for the analysis.
Results
Type I OPHL revealed the best phonatory outcomes. Type II and type III OPHL showed similar and poor results, with a highly deteriorated voice quality. A significant difference in MTP was found for patients who had both arytenoids/cricoarytenoid units preserved. Age and time from surgery showed significant correlations with voice quality after OPHLs.
Conclusions
Voice and communication outcomes after OPHLs are heterogeneous and might be influenced by several factors. Knowing variables with a substantial impact on phonatory outcomes may help clinicians in the preoperative decision‐making process and the postoperative rehabilitative program. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hed.27132 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2685447333</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2709675481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-350c147006f81a01c3aa7ea878d087a27fcf9d0782577e91b12540b2399bedb23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4AaW2MAi7fgnccKuKoUiVWIDbCPXcVpXSRzsRKisOAJn5CS4LSskZjOj0feeZh5ClwRGBICO17oYUUEYPUIDApmIgHFxvJs5ixgIforOvN8AAEs4HaDVqzVKY9kUWNm67hujZGdsg2XZaYdtqxvcStcZWeG1debDNl0YK-m2zUqrztZG-1s8wcpZ778_v3xYBn1gbN8FS4191xfbc3RSysrri98-RC_3s-fpPFo8PTxOJ4tIsSSmEYtBES4AkjIlEohiUgotU5EWkApJRanKrACR0lgInZEloTGHJWVZttRF6EN0ffBtnX3rte_y2nilq0o22vY-p0kacy5YqCG6-oNubO_C5YESkCUi5ikJ1M2B2j_odJm3ztTh_ZxAvos8D5Hn-8gDOz6w76bS2__BfD67Oyh-ABDog60</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2709675481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Voice and communication after open partial horizontal laryngectomies: A cross‐sectional outcome study</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Fantini, Marco ; Crosetti, Erika ; Pizzorni, Nicole ; Sprio, Andrea Elio ; Bertolin, Andy ; Rizzotto, Giuseppe ; Schindler, Antonio ; Succo, Giovanni</creator><creatorcontrib>Fantini, Marco ; Crosetti, Erika ; Pizzorni, Nicole ; Sprio, Andrea Elio ; Bertolin, Andy ; Rizzotto, Giuseppe ; Schindler, Antonio ; Succo, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
The present study evaluates voice and communication after open partial horizontal laryngectomies (OPHLs), according to surgery and patient‐related variables.
Methods
Fifty‐eight patients were included: 18 type I OPHL, 20 type II OPHL and 20 type III OPHL. Acoustic, aerodynamic, endoscopic, perceptual and self‐assessment analyses were carried out. Surgery‐related variables and patient‐related variables were considered for the analysis.
Results
Type I OPHL revealed the best phonatory outcomes. Type II and type III OPHL showed similar and poor results, with a highly deteriorated voice quality. A significant difference in MTP was found for patients who had both arytenoids/cricoarytenoid units preserved. Age and time from surgery showed significant correlations with voice quality after OPHLs.
Conclusions
Voice and communication outcomes after OPHLs are heterogeneous and might be influenced by several factors. Knowing variables with a substantial impact on phonatory outcomes may help clinicians in the preoperative decision‐making process and the postoperative rehabilitative program.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1043-3074</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hed.27132</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>communication ; Decision making ; Laryngeal cancer ; laryngectomy ; Patients ; Surgery ; voice</subject><ispartof>Head & neck, 2022-10, Vol.44 (10), p.2248-2256</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-350c147006f81a01c3aa7ea878d087a27fcf9d0782577e91b12540b2399bedb23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-350c147006f81a01c3aa7ea878d087a27fcf9d0782577e91b12540b2399bedb23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4007-6259 ; 0000-0001-5891-871X ; 0000-0003-0375-6623 ; 0000-0003-4340-9677</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhed.27132$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhed.27132$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fantini, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crosetti, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pizzorni, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprio, Andrea Elio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertolin, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizzotto, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schindler, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Succo, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><title>Voice and communication after open partial horizontal laryngectomies: A cross‐sectional outcome study</title><title>Head & neck</title><description>Objective
The present study evaluates voice and communication after open partial horizontal laryngectomies (OPHLs), according to surgery and patient‐related variables.
Methods
Fifty‐eight patients were included: 18 type I OPHL, 20 type II OPHL and 20 type III OPHL. Acoustic, aerodynamic, endoscopic, perceptual and self‐assessment analyses were carried out. Surgery‐related variables and patient‐related variables were considered for the analysis.
Results
Type I OPHL revealed the best phonatory outcomes. Type II and type III OPHL showed similar and poor results, with a highly deteriorated voice quality. A significant difference in MTP was found for patients who had both arytenoids/cricoarytenoid units preserved. Age and time from surgery showed significant correlations with voice quality after OPHLs.
Conclusions
Voice and communication outcomes after OPHLs are heterogeneous and might be influenced by several factors. Knowing variables with a substantial impact on phonatory outcomes may help clinicians in the preoperative decision‐making process and the postoperative rehabilitative program.</description><subject>communication</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Laryngeal cancer</subject><subject>laryngectomy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>voice</subject><issn>1043-3074</issn><issn>1097-0347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4AaW2MAi7fgnccKuKoUiVWIDbCPXcVpXSRzsRKisOAJn5CS4LSskZjOj0feeZh5ClwRGBICO17oYUUEYPUIDApmIgHFxvJs5ixgIforOvN8AAEs4HaDVqzVKY9kUWNm67hujZGdsg2XZaYdtqxvcStcZWeG1debDNl0YK-m2zUqrztZG-1s8wcpZ778_v3xYBn1gbN8FS4191xfbc3RSysrri98-RC_3s-fpPFo8PTxOJ4tIsSSmEYtBES4AkjIlEohiUgotU5EWkApJRanKrACR0lgInZEloTGHJWVZttRF6EN0ffBtnX3rte_y2nilq0o22vY-p0kacy5YqCG6-oNubO_C5YESkCUi5ikJ1M2B2j_odJm3ztTh_ZxAvos8D5Hn-8gDOz6w76bS2__BfD67Oyh-ABDog60</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Fantini, Marco</creator><creator>Crosetti, Erika</creator><creator>Pizzorni, Nicole</creator><creator>Sprio, Andrea Elio</creator><creator>Bertolin, Andy</creator><creator>Rizzotto, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Schindler, Antonio</creator><creator>Succo, Giovanni</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4007-6259</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5891-871X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0375-6623</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4340-9677</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Voice and communication after open partial horizontal laryngectomies: A cross‐sectional outcome study</title><author>Fantini, Marco ; Crosetti, Erika ; Pizzorni, Nicole ; Sprio, Andrea Elio ; Bertolin, Andy ; Rizzotto, Giuseppe ; Schindler, Antonio ; Succo, Giovanni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3652-350c147006f81a01c3aa7ea878d087a27fcf9d0782577e91b12540b2399bedb23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>communication</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Laryngeal cancer</topic><topic>laryngectomy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>voice</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fantini, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crosetti, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pizzorni, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprio, Andrea Elio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertolin, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizzotto, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schindler, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Succo, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Head & neck</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fantini, Marco</au><au>Crosetti, Erika</au><au>Pizzorni, Nicole</au><au>Sprio, Andrea Elio</au><au>Bertolin, Andy</au><au>Rizzotto, Giuseppe</au><au>Schindler, Antonio</au><au>Succo, Giovanni</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Voice and communication after open partial horizontal laryngectomies: A cross‐sectional outcome study</atitle><jtitle>Head & neck</jtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2248</spage><epage>2256</epage><pages>2248-2256</pages><issn>1043-3074</issn><eissn>1097-0347</eissn><abstract>Objective
The present study evaluates voice and communication after open partial horizontal laryngectomies (OPHLs), according to surgery and patient‐related variables.
Methods
Fifty‐eight patients were included: 18 type I OPHL, 20 type II OPHL and 20 type III OPHL. Acoustic, aerodynamic, endoscopic, perceptual and self‐assessment analyses were carried out. Surgery‐related variables and patient‐related variables were considered for the analysis.
Results
Type I OPHL revealed the best phonatory outcomes. Type II and type III OPHL showed similar and poor results, with a highly deteriorated voice quality. A significant difference in MTP was found for patients who had both arytenoids/cricoarytenoid units preserved. Age and time from surgery showed significant correlations with voice quality after OPHLs.
Conclusions
Voice and communication outcomes after OPHLs are heterogeneous and might be influenced by several factors. Knowing variables with a substantial impact on phonatory outcomes may help clinicians in the preoperative decision‐making process and the postoperative rehabilitative program.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/hed.27132</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4007-6259</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5891-871X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0375-6623</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4340-9677</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1043-3074 |
ispartof | Head & neck, 2022-10, Vol.44 (10), p.2248-2256 |
issn | 1043-3074 1097-0347 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2685447333 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | communication Decision making Laryngeal cancer laryngectomy Patients Surgery voice |
title | Voice and communication after open partial horizontal laryngectomies: A cross‐sectional outcome study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T11%3A21%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Voice%20and%20communication%20after%20open%20partial%20horizontal%20laryngectomies:%20A%20cross%E2%80%90sectional%20outcome%20study&rft.jtitle=Head%20&%20neck&rft.au=Fantini,%20Marco&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2248&rft.epage=2256&rft.pages=2248-2256&rft.issn=1043-3074&rft.eissn=1097-0347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hed.27132&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2709675481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2709675481&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |