Vertebroplasty with high‐viscosity cement versus conventional kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta‐analysis

Background To evaluate outcomes following percutaneous vertebroplasty with high viscosity cement (PVP‐HVC) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) with normal‐viscosity cement in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Methods Pertinent studies were retrieved by searching five...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ANZ journal of surgery 2022-11, Vol.92 (11), p.2849-2858
Hauptverfasser: Kou, Yu‐hui, Zhang, Dian‐ying, Zhang, Jin‐dong, Han, Na, Yang, Ming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2858
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2849
container_title ANZ journal of surgery
container_volume 92
creator Kou, Yu‐hui
Zhang, Dian‐ying
Zhang, Jin‐dong
Han, Na
Yang, Ming
description Background To evaluate outcomes following percutaneous vertebroplasty with high viscosity cement (PVP‐HVC) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) with normal‐viscosity cement in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Methods Pertinent studies were retrieved by searching five electronic databases up to July 2021. Additional records were identified via hand‐searching of related references. Risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD), with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated. A trial sequential analysis (TSA) was done for cement leakage. Results Twelve studies, embracing 1050 patients with OVCFs, were included. PVP‐HVC was superior to PKP with normal‐viscosity cement regarding risk of cement leakage (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.54–0.83, I2: 45.1%) and operation time (WMD: −11.26, 95% CI: −14.78 to −8.34, I2: 88.8%). However, TSA revealed that a sufficient level of evidence for leakage reduction may have yet to be reached. PKP groups had a significant decrease in Cobb's angles postoperatively (within 1 month, WMD: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.85–3.48, I2: 0%; after 1 year, WMD: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.35–4.01, I2: 0%). There are no significant differences between the two procedures pertaining to injected cement volume, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and risk of adjacent vertebral fractures. Conclusion PVP‐HVC and PKP with normal‐viscosity cement are safe and effective treatments for the management of OVCF, but the former is superior to the latter in terms of procedure time. The potential of PVP‐HVC in reducing cement leaks remains to be validated by more well‐designed studies. 1. This is the first meta‐analysis to directly compare vertebroplasty with high‐viscosity cement versus kyphoplasty with normal‐viscosity cement for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. 2. Overall results indicated a trend that vertebroplasty with high‐viscosity cement may help cement leakage reduction but trial sequential analysis revealed the need of additional studies for confirming this trend.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ans.17894
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2685039416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2737313031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3134-7d6cf3a0810f15f34aed1213513ad282a25a70f5ee1def5b3f080c706a34fd1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhS0EomVgwQsgS2xgMa0d20mGXVXxU6miC362kce5ZlySOPg6U2XHG8Az8iTc6UxZVMKS5Xut7xxf6zD2XIoTSevUDngiq3qlH7BjqbVZFnJVPTzUUit1xJ4gXgshy3JlHrMjZara6FIds19fIWVYpzh2FvPMb0Le8E34tvnz8_c2oIsY6NZBD0PmW0g4IXdx2FIb4mA7_n0eN3diHxOPmCGOMcUc3E6wMyfMxX5MgEgi7pN1eaLuDbe8h2zpLUteMwZ8yh552yE8O5wL9uXd28_nH5aXV-8vzs8ul05JpZdVWzqvrKil8NJ4pS20spDKSGXboi5sYWwlvAGQLXizVl7UwlWitEr7Vq7Vgr3a-44p_pgAc9PTb6Hr7ABxwqYoayPUSsuS0Jf30Os4JZqXqEpVNI-gvWCv95RLETGBb8YUepvmRopml1JDKTW3KRH74uA4rXto_5F3sRBwugduQgfz_52as4-f9pZ_ATLvolA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2737313031</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vertebroplasty with high‐viscosity cement versus conventional kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta‐analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kou, Yu‐hui ; Zhang, Dian‐ying ; Zhang, Jin‐dong ; Han, Na ; Yang, Ming</creator><creatorcontrib>Kou, Yu‐hui ; Zhang, Dian‐ying ; Zhang, Jin‐dong ; Han, Na ; Yang, Ming</creatorcontrib><description>Background To evaluate outcomes following percutaneous vertebroplasty with high viscosity cement (PVP‐HVC) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) with normal‐viscosity cement in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Methods Pertinent studies were retrieved by searching five electronic databases up to July 2021. Additional records were identified via hand‐searching of related references. Risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD), with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated. A trial sequential analysis (TSA) was done for cement leakage. Results Twelve studies, embracing 1050 patients with OVCFs, were included. PVP‐HVC was superior to PKP with normal‐viscosity cement regarding risk of cement leakage (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.54–0.83, I2: 45.1%) and operation time (WMD: −11.26, 95% CI: −14.78 to −8.34, I2: 88.8%). However, TSA revealed that a sufficient level of evidence for leakage reduction may have yet to be reached. PKP groups had a significant decrease in Cobb's angles postoperatively (within 1 month, WMD: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.85–3.48, I2: 0%; after 1 year, WMD: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.35–4.01, I2: 0%). There are no significant differences between the two procedures pertaining to injected cement volume, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and risk of adjacent vertebral fractures. Conclusion PVP‐HVC and PKP with normal‐viscosity cement are safe and effective treatments for the management of OVCF, but the former is superior to the latter in terms of procedure time. The potential of PVP‐HVC in reducing cement leaks remains to be validated by more well‐designed studies. 1. This is the first meta‐analysis to directly compare vertebroplasty with high‐viscosity cement versus kyphoplasty with normal‐viscosity cement for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. 2. Overall results indicated a trend that vertebroplasty with high‐viscosity cement may help cement leakage reduction but trial sequential analysis revealed the need of additional studies for confirming this trend.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1445-1433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1445-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ans.17894</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35785463</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Bone Cements - therapeutic use ; Bone surgery ; Cement ; Compression ; compression fractures ; Fractures ; Fractures, Compression - surgery ; Humans ; kyphoplasty ; Kyphoplasty - methods ; Leakage ; Meta-analysis ; Osteoporosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk ; Searching ; Sequential analysis ; Spinal Fractures - surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Vertebrae ; Vertebroplasty ; Viscosity</subject><ispartof>ANZ journal of surgery, 2022-11, Vol.92 (11), p.2849-2858</ispartof><rights>2022 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.</rights><rights>2022 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3134-7d6cf3a0810f15f34aed1213513ad282a25a70f5ee1def5b3f080c706a34fd1b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5002-9256</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fans.17894$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fans.17894$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35785463$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kou, Yu‐hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Dian‐ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jin‐dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Na</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Ming</creatorcontrib><title>Vertebroplasty with high‐viscosity cement versus conventional kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta‐analysis</title><title>ANZ journal of surgery</title><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><description>Background To evaluate outcomes following percutaneous vertebroplasty with high viscosity cement (PVP‐HVC) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) with normal‐viscosity cement in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Methods Pertinent studies were retrieved by searching five electronic databases up to July 2021. Additional records were identified via hand‐searching of related references. Risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD), with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated. A trial sequential analysis (TSA) was done for cement leakage. Results Twelve studies, embracing 1050 patients with OVCFs, were included. PVP‐HVC was superior to PKP with normal‐viscosity cement regarding risk of cement leakage (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.54–0.83, I2: 45.1%) and operation time (WMD: −11.26, 95% CI: −14.78 to −8.34, I2: 88.8%). However, TSA revealed that a sufficient level of evidence for leakage reduction may have yet to be reached. PKP groups had a significant decrease in Cobb's angles postoperatively (within 1 month, WMD: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.85–3.48, I2: 0%; after 1 year, WMD: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.35–4.01, I2: 0%). There are no significant differences between the two procedures pertaining to injected cement volume, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and risk of adjacent vertebral fractures. Conclusion PVP‐HVC and PKP with normal‐viscosity cement are safe and effective treatments for the management of OVCF, but the former is superior to the latter in terms of procedure time. The potential of PVP‐HVC in reducing cement leaks remains to be validated by more well‐designed studies. 1. This is the first meta‐analysis to directly compare vertebroplasty with high‐viscosity cement versus kyphoplasty with normal‐viscosity cement for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. 2. Overall results indicated a trend that vertebroplasty with high‐viscosity cement may help cement leakage reduction but trial sequential analysis revealed the need of additional studies for confirming this trend.</description><subject>Bone Cements - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Cement</subject><subject>Compression</subject><subject>compression fractures</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Fractures, Compression - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>kyphoplasty</subject><subject>Kyphoplasty - methods</subject><subject>Leakage</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Searching</subject><subject>Sequential analysis</subject><subject>Spinal Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><subject>Vertebroplasty</subject><subject>Viscosity</subject><issn>1445-1433</issn><issn>1445-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhS0EomVgwQsgS2xgMa0d20mGXVXxU6miC362kce5ZlySOPg6U2XHG8Az8iTc6UxZVMKS5Xut7xxf6zD2XIoTSevUDngiq3qlH7BjqbVZFnJVPTzUUit1xJ4gXgshy3JlHrMjZara6FIds19fIWVYpzh2FvPMb0Le8E34tvnz8_c2oIsY6NZBD0PmW0g4IXdx2FIb4mA7_n0eN3diHxOPmCGOMcUc3E6wMyfMxX5MgEgi7pN1eaLuDbe8h2zpLUteMwZ8yh552yE8O5wL9uXd28_nH5aXV-8vzs8ul05JpZdVWzqvrKil8NJ4pS20spDKSGXboi5sYWwlvAGQLXizVl7UwlWitEr7Vq7Vgr3a-44p_pgAc9PTb6Hr7ABxwqYoayPUSsuS0Jf30Os4JZqXqEpVNI-gvWCv95RLETGBb8YUepvmRopml1JDKTW3KRH74uA4rXto_5F3sRBwugduQgfz_52as4-f9pZ_ATLvolA</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Kou, Yu‐hui</creator><creator>Zhang, Dian‐ying</creator><creator>Zhang, Jin‐dong</creator><creator>Han, Na</creator><creator>Yang, Ming</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5002-9256</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Vertebroplasty with high‐viscosity cement versus conventional kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta‐analysis</title><author>Kou, Yu‐hui ; Zhang, Dian‐ying ; Zhang, Jin‐dong ; Han, Na ; Yang, Ming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3134-7d6cf3a0810f15f34aed1213513ad282a25a70f5ee1def5b3f080c706a34fd1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bone Cements - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Cement</topic><topic>Compression</topic><topic>compression fractures</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Fractures, Compression - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>kyphoplasty</topic><topic>Kyphoplasty - methods</topic><topic>Leakage</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Searching</topic><topic>Sequential analysis</topic><topic>Spinal Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><topic>Vertebroplasty</topic><topic>Viscosity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kou, Yu‐hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Dian‐ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jin‐dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Na</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Ming</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kou, Yu‐hui</au><au>Zhang, Dian‐ying</au><au>Zhang, Jin‐dong</au><au>Han, Na</au><au>Yang, Ming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vertebroplasty with high‐viscosity cement versus conventional kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2849</spage><epage>2858</epage><pages>2849-2858</pages><issn>1445-1433</issn><eissn>1445-2197</eissn><abstract>Background To evaluate outcomes following percutaneous vertebroplasty with high viscosity cement (PVP‐HVC) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) with normal‐viscosity cement in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Methods Pertinent studies were retrieved by searching five electronic databases up to July 2021. Additional records were identified via hand‐searching of related references. Risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD), with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated. A trial sequential analysis (TSA) was done for cement leakage. Results Twelve studies, embracing 1050 patients with OVCFs, were included. PVP‐HVC was superior to PKP with normal‐viscosity cement regarding risk of cement leakage (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.54–0.83, I2: 45.1%) and operation time (WMD: −11.26, 95% CI: −14.78 to −8.34, I2: 88.8%). However, TSA revealed that a sufficient level of evidence for leakage reduction may have yet to be reached. PKP groups had a significant decrease in Cobb's angles postoperatively (within 1 month, WMD: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.85–3.48, I2: 0%; after 1 year, WMD: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.35–4.01, I2: 0%). There are no significant differences between the two procedures pertaining to injected cement volume, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and risk of adjacent vertebral fractures. Conclusion PVP‐HVC and PKP with normal‐viscosity cement are safe and effective treatments for the management of OVCF, but the former is superior to the latter in terms of procedure time. The potential of PVP‐HVC in reducing cement leaks remains to be validated by more well‐designed studies. 1. This is the first meta‐analysis to directly compare vertebroplasty with high‐viscosity cement versus kyphoplasty with normal‐viscosity cement for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. 2. Overall results indicated a trend that vertebroplasty with high‐viscosity cement may help cement leakage reduction but trial sequential analysis revealed the need of additional studies for confirming this trend.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>35785463</pmid><doi>10.1111/ans.17894</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5002-9256</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1445-1433
ispartof ANZ journal of surgery, 2022-11, Vol.92 (11), p.2849-2858
issn 1445-1433
1445-2197
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2685039416
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Bone Cements - therapeutic use
Bone surgery
Cement
Compression
compression fractures
Fractures
Fractures, Compression - surgery
Humans
kyphoplasty
Kyphoplasty - methods
Leakage
Meta-analysis
Osteoporosis
Retrospective Studies
Risk
Searching
Sequential analysis
Spinal Fractures - surgery
Treatment Outcome
Vertebrae
Vertebroplasty
Viscosity
title Vertebroplasty with high‐viscosity cement versus conventional kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta‐analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T07%3A23%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vertebroplasty%20with%20high%E2%80%90viscosity%20cement%20versus%20conventional%20kyphoplasty%20for%20osteoporotic%20vertebral%20compression%20fractures:%20a%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=ANZ%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Kou,%20Yu%E2%80%90hui&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2849&rft.epage=2858&rft.pages=2849-2858&rft.issn=1445-1433&rft.eissn=1445-2197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ans.17894&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2737313031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2737313031&rft_id=info:pmid/35785463&rfr_iscdi=true