Participation in community-based lung cancer screening: the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial

Screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces lung cancer mortality; however, the most effective strategy for optimising participation is unknown. Here we present data from the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial, including response to invitation, screening eligibility and uptake of communit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The European respiratory journal 2022-11, Vol.60 (5), p.2200483
Hauptverfasser: Crosbie, Philip A J, Gabe, Rhian, Simmonds, Irene, Hancock, Neil, Alexandris, Panos, Kennedy, Martyn, Rogerson, Suzanne, Baldwin, David, Booton, Richard, Bradley, Claire, Darby, Mike, Eckert, Claire, Franks, Kevin N, Lindop, Jason, Janes, Sam M, Møller, Henrik, Murray, Rachael L, Neal, Richard D, Quaife, Samantha L, Upperton, Sara, Shinkins, Bethany, Tharmanathan, Puvan, Callister, Matthew E J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2200483
container_title The European respiratory journal
container_volume 60
creator Crosbie, Philip A J
Gabe, Rhian
Simmonds, Irene
Hancock, Neil
Alexandris, Panos
Kennedy, Martyn
Rogerson, Suzanne
Baldwin, David
Booton, Richard
Bradley, Claire
Darby, Mike
Eckert, Claire
Franks, Kevin N
Lindop, Jason
Janes, Sam M
Møller, Henrik
Murray, Rachael L
Neal, Richard D
Quaife, Samantha L
Upperton, Sara
Shinkins, Bethany
Tharmanathan, Puvan
Callister, Matthew E J
description Screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces lung cancer mortality; however, the most effective strategy for optimising participation is unknown. Here we present data from the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial, including response to invitation, screening eligibility and uptake of community-based LDCT screening. Individuals aged 55-80 years, identified from primary care records as having ever smoked, were randomised prior to consent to invitation to telephone lung cancer risk assessment or usual care. The invitation strategy included general practitioner endorsement, pre-invitation and two reminder invitations. After telephone triage, those at higher risk were invited to a Lung Health Check (LHC) with immediate access to a mobile CT scanner. Of 44 943 individuals invited, 50.8% (n=22 815) responded and underwent telephone-based risk assessment (16.7% and 7.3% following first and second reminders, respectively). A lower response rate was associated with current smoking status (adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.42-0.46) and socioeconomic deprivation (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.54-0.62 for the most the least deprived quintile). Of those responding, 34.4% (n=7853) were potentially eligible for screening and offered a LHC, of whom 86.8% (n=6819) attended. Lower uptake was associated with current smoking status (adjusted OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.87) and socioeconomic deprivation (adjusted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.98). In total, 6650 individuals had a baseline LDCT scan, representing 99.7% of eligible LHC attendees. Telephone risk assessment followed by a community-based LHC is an effective strategy for lung cancer screening implementation. However, lower participation associated with current smoking status and socioeconomic deprivation underlines the importance of research to ensure equitable access to screening.
doi_str_mv 10.1183/13993003.00483-2022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2684104578</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2684104578</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-d5960f04ca2069ec8d62290581a4543d900e0b26961c61254d70a831a85775243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMotn78AkFy9LJ18tnEmxS_oKBgPeglpNm0je5ma7J78N_bta1zGXjnfWeYB6ELAiNCFLsmTGsGwEYAXLGCAqUHaNirRS8foiFoYAXRTA7QSc6fAERyRo7RgIlxX2KIPl5saoMLa9uGJuIQsWvquouh_SnmNvsSV11cYmej8wlnl7yPIS5vcLvy-L1JX3kVksfT3vS6n-JZCrY6Q0cLW2V_vuun6O3-bjZ5LKbPD0-T22nhmIC2KIWWsADuLAWpvVOlpFSDUMRywVmpATzMqdSSOEmo4OUYrGLEqs0TgnJ2iq62e9ep-e58bk0dsvNVZaNvumyoVJwAF2O1sbKt1aUm5-QXZp1CbdOPIWB6qGYP1fxBNT3UTepyd6Cb1778z-wpsl-grXCO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2684104578</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Participation in community-based lung cancer screening: the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Crosbie, Philip A J ; Gabe, Rhian ; Simmonds, Irene ; Hancock, Neil ; Alexandris, Panos ; Kennedy, Martyn ; Rogerson, Suzanne ; Baldwin, David ; Booton, Richard ; Bradley, Claire ; Darby, Mike ; Eckert, Claire ; Franks, Kevin N ; Lindop, Jason ; Janes, Sam M ; Møller, Henrik ; Murray, Rachael L ; Neal, Richard D ; Quaife, Samantha L ; Upperton, Sara ; Shinkins, Bethany ; Tharmanathan, Puvan ; Callister, Matthew E J</creator><creatorcontrib>Crosbie, Philip A J ; Gabe, Rhian ; Simmonds, Irene ; Hancock, Neil ; Alexandris, Panos ; Kennedy, Martyn ; Rogerson, Suzanne ; Baldwin, David ; Booton, Richard ; Bradley, Claire ; Darby, Mike ; Eckert, Claire ; Franks, Kevin N ; Lindop, Jason ; Janes, Sam M ; Møller, Henrik ; Murray, Rachael L ; Neal, Richard D ; Quaife, Samantha L ; Upperton, Sara ; Shinkins, Bethany ; Tharmanathan, Puvan ; Callister, Matthew E J</creatorcontrib><description>Screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces lung cancer mortality; however, the most effective strategy for optimising participation is unknown. Here we present data from the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial, including response to invitation, screening eligibility and uptake of community-based LDCT screening. Individuals aged 55-80 years, identified from primary care records as having ever smoked, were randomised prior to consent to invitation to telephone lung cancer risk assessment or usual care. The invitation strategy included general practitioner endorsement, pre-invitation and two reminder invitations. After telephone triage, those at higher risk were invited to a Lung Health Check (LHC) with immediate access to a mobile CT scanner. Of 44 943 individuals invited, 50.8% (n=22 815) responded and underwent telephone-based risk assessment (16.7% and 7.3% following first and second reminders, respectively). A lower response rate was associated with current smoking status (adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.42-0.46) and socioeconomic deprivation (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.54-0.62 for the most the least deprived quintile). Of those responding, 34.4% (n=7853) were potentially eligible for screening and offered a LHC, of whom 86.8% (n=6819) attended. Lower uptake was associated with current smoking status (adjusted OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.87) and socioeconomic deprivation (adjusted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.98). In total, 6650 individuals had a baseline LDCT scan, representing 99.7% of eligible LHC attendees. Telephone risk assessment followed by a community-based LHC is an effective strategy for lung cancer screening implementation. However, lower participation associated with current smoking status and socioeconomic deprivation underlines the importance of research to ensure equitable access to screening.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0903-1936</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-3003</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00483-2022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35777775</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Humans ; Lung ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Mass Screening ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>The European respiratory journal, 2022-11, Vol.60 (5), p.2200483</ispartof><rights>Copyright ©The authors 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-d5960f04ca2069ec8d62290581a4543d900e0b26961c61254d70a831a85775243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-d5960f04ca2069ec8d62290581a4543d900e0b26961c61254d70a831a85775243</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8157-0803 ; 0000-0001-9468-7947 ; 0000-0003-4512-2899 ; 0000-0002-4489-0282 ; 0000-0002-4918-6382 ; 0000-0002-0273-3094 ; 0000-0002-6634-5939 ; 0000-0002-1768-2971</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35777775$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crosbie, Philip A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabe, Rhian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmonds, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexandris, Panos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Martyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogerson, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Booton, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darby, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckert, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franks, Kevin N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindop, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janes, Sam M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, Henrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Rachael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, Richard D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quaife, Samantha L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Upperton, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinkins, Bethany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tharmanathan, Puvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callister, Matthew E J</creatorcontrib><title>Participation in community-based lung cancer screening: the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial</title><title>The European respiratory journal</title><addtitle>Eur Respir J</addtitle><description>Screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces lung cancer mortality; however, the most effective strategy for optimising participation is unknown. Here we present data from the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial, including response to invitation, screening eligibility and uptake of community-based LDCT screening. Individuals aged 55-80 years, identified from primary care records as having ever smoked, were randomised prior to consent to invitation to telephone lung cancer risk assessment or usual care. The invitation strategy included general practitioner endorsement, pre-invitation and two reminder invitations. After telephone triage, those at higher risk were invited to a Lung Health Check (LHC) with immediate access to a mobile CT scanner. Of 44 943 individuals invited, 50.8% (n=22 815) responded and underwent telephone-based risk assessment (16.7% and 7.3% following first and second reminders, respectively). A lower response rate was associated with current smoking status (adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.42-0.46) and socioeconomic deprivation (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.54-0.62 for the most the least deprived quintile). Of those responding, 34.4% (n=7853) were potentially eligible for screening and offered a LHC, of whom 86.8% (n=6819) attended. Lower uptake was associated with current smoking status (adjusted OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.87) and socioeconomic deprivation (adjusted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.98). In total, 6650 individuals had a baseline LDCT scan, representing 99.7% of eligible LHC attendees. Telephone risk assessment followed by a community-based LHC is an effective strategy for lung cancer screening implementation. However, lower participation associated with current smoking status and socioeconomic deprivation underlines the importance of research to ensure equitable access to screening.</description><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0903-1936</issn><issn>1399-3003</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMotn78AkFy9LJ18tnEmxS_oKBgPeglpNm0je5ma7J78N_bta1zGXjnfWeYB6ELAiNCFLsmTGsGwEYAXLGCAqUHaNirRS8foiFoYAXRTA7QSc6fAERyRo7RgIlxX2KIPl5saoMLa9uGJuIQsWvquouh_SnmNvsSV11cYmej8wlnl7yPIS5vcLvy-L1JX3kVksfT3vS6n-JZCrY6Q0cLW2V_vuun6O3-bjZ5LKbPD0-T22nhmIC2KIWWsADuLAWpvVOlpFSDUMRywVmpATzMqdSSOEmo4OUYrGLEqs0TgnJ2iq62e9ep-e58bk0dsvNVZaNvumyoVJwAF2O1sbKt1aUm5-QXZp1CbdOPIWB6qGYP1fxBNT3UTepyd6Cb1778z-wpsl-grXCO</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Crosbie, Philip A J</creator><creator>Gabe, Rhian</creator><creator>Simmonds, Irene</creator><creator>Hancock, Neil</creator><creator>Alexandris, Panos</creator><creator>Kennedy, Martyn</creator><creator>Rogerson, Suzanne</creator><creator>Baldwin, David</creator><creator>Booton, Richard</creator><creator>Bradley, Claire</creator><creator>Darby, Mike</creator><creator>Eckert, Claire</creator><creator>Franks, Kevin N</creator><creator>Lindop, Jason</creator><creator>Janes, Sam M</creator><creator>Møller, Henrik</creator><creator>Murray, Rachael L</creator><creator>Neal, Richard D</creator><creator>Quaife, Samantha L</creator><creator>Upperton, Sara</creator><creator>Shinkins, Bethany</creator><creator>Tharmanathan, Puvan</creator><creator>Callister, Matthew E J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8157-0803</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9468-7947</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4512-2899</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4489-0282</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4918-6382</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0273-3094</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6634-5939</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1768-2971</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Participation in community-based lung cancer screening: the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial</title><author>Crosbie, Philip A J ; Gabe, Rhian ; Simmonds, Irene ; Hancock, Neil ; Alexandris, Panos ; Kennedy, Martyn ; Rogerson, Suzanne ; Baldwin, David ; Booton, Richard ; Bradley, Claire ; Darby, Mike ; Eckert, Claire ; Franks, Kevin N ; Lindop, Jason ; Janes, Sam M ; Møller, Henrik ; Murray, Rachael L ; Neal, Richard D ; Quaife, Samantha L ; Upperton, Sara ; Shinkins, Bethany ; Tharmanathan, Puvan ; Callister, Matthew E J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-d5960f04ca2069ec8d62290581a4543d900e0b26961c61254d70a831a85775243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crosbie, Philip A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabe, Rhian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmonds, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexandris, Panos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Martyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogerson, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Booton, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darby, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckert, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franks, Kevin N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindop, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janes, Sam M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, Henrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Rachael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, Richard D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quaife, Samantha L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Upperton, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinkins, Bethany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tharmanathan, Puvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callister, Matthew E J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The European respiratory journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crosbie, Philip A J</au><au>Gabe, Rhian</au><au>Simmonds, Irene</au><au>Hancock, Neil</au><au>Alexandris, Panos</au><au>Kennedy, Martyn</au><au>Rogerson, Suzanne</au><au>Baldwin, David</au><au>Booton, Richard</au><au>Bradley, Claire</au><au>Darby, Mike</au><au>Eckert, Claire</au><au>Franks, Kevin N</au><au>Lindop, Jason</au><au>Janes, Sam M</au><au>Møller, Henrik</au><au>Murray, Rachael L</au><au>Neal, Richard D</au><au>Quaife, Samantha L</au><au>Upperton, Sara</au><au>Shinkins, Bethany</au><au>Tharmanathan, Puvan</au><au>Callister, Matthew E J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Participation in community-based lung cancer screening: the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial</atitle><jtitle>The European respiratory journal</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Respir J</addtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2200483</spage><pages>2200483-</pages><issn>0903-1936</issn><eissn>1399-3003</eissn><abstract>Screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces lung cancer mortality; however, the most effective strategy for optimising participation is unknown. Here we present data from the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial, including response to invitation, screening eligibility and uptake of community-based LDCT screening. Individuals aged 55-80 years, identified from primary care records as having ever smoked, were randomised prior to consent to invitation to telephone lung cancer risk assessment or usual care. The invitation strategy included general practitioner endorsement, pre-invitation and two reminder invitations. After telephone triage, those at higher risk were invited to a Lung Health Check (LHC) with immediate access to a mobile CT scanner. Of 44 943 individuals invited, 50.8% (n=22 815) responded and underwent telephone-based risk assessment (16.7% and 7.3% following first and second reminders, respectively). A lower response rate was associated with current smoking status (adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.42-0.46) and socioeconomic deprivation (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.54-0.62 for the most the least deprived quintile). Of those responding, 34.4% (n=7853) were potentially eligible for screening and offered a LHC, of whom 86.8% (n=6819) attended. Lower uptake was associated with current smoking status (adjusted OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.87) and socioeconomic deprivation (adjusted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.98). In total, 6650 individuals had a baseline LDCT scan, representing 99.7% of eligible LHC attendees. Telephone risk assessment followed by a community-based LHC is an effective strategy for lung cancer screening implementation. However, lower participation associated with current smoking status and socioeconomic deprivation underlines the importance of research to ensure equitable access to screening.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>35777775</pmid><doi>10.1183/13993003.00483-2022</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8157-0803</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9468-7947</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4512-2899</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4489-0282</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4918-6382</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0273-3094</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6634-5939</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1768-2971</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0903-1936
ispartof The European respiratory journal, 2022-11, Vol.60 (5), p.2200483
issn 0903-1936
1399-3003
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2684104578
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Early Detection of Cancer - methods
Humans
Lung
Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Mass Screening
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
title Participation in community-based lung cancer screening: the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T19%3A32%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Participation%20in%20community-based%20lung%20cancer%20screening:%20the%20Yorkshire%20Lung%20Screening%20Trial&rft.jtitle=The%20European%20respiratory%20journal&rft.au=Crosbie,%20Philip%20A%20J&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2200483&rft.pages=2200483-&rft.issn=0903-1936&rft.eissn=1399-3003&rft_id=info:doi/10.1183/13993003.00483-2022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2684104578%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2684104578&rft_id=info:pmid/35777775&rfr_iscdi=true