Participation in community-based lung cancer screening: the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial
Screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces lung cancer mortality; however, the most effective strategy for optimising participation is unknown. Here we present data from the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial, including response to invitation, screening eligibility and uptake of communit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The European respiratory journal 2022-11, Vol.60 (5), p.2200483 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2200483 |
container_title | The European respiratory journal |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Crosbie, Philip A J Gabe, Rhian Simmonds, Irene Hancock, Neil Alexandris, Panos Kennedy, Martyn Rogerson, Suzanne Baldwin, David Booton, Richard Bradley, Claire Darby, Mike Eckert, Claire Franks, Kevin N Lindop, Jason Janes, Sam M Møller, Henrik Murray, Rachael L Neal, Richard D Quaife, Samantha L Upperton, Sara Shinkins, Bethany Tharmanathan, Puvan Callister, Matthew E J |
description | Screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces lung cancer mortality; however, the most effective strategy for optimising participation is unknown. Here we present data from the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial, including response to invitation, screening eligibility and uptake of community-based LDCT screening.
Individuals aged 55-80 years, identified from primary care records as having ever smoked, were randomised prior to consent to invitation to telephone lung cancer risk assessment or usual care. The invitation strategy included general practitioner endorsement, pre-invitation and two reminder invitations. After telephone triage, those at higher risk were invited to a Lung Health Check (LHC) with immediate access to a mobile CT scanner.
Of 44 943 individuals invited, 50.8% (n=22 815) responded and underwent telephone-based risk assessment (16.7% and 7.3% following first and second reminders, respectively). A lower response rate was associated with current smoking status (adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.42-0.46) and socioeconomic deprivation (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.54-0.62 for the most
the least deprived quintile). Of those responding, 34.4% (n=7853) were potentially eligible for screening and offered a LHC, of whom 86.8% (n=6819) attended. Lower uptake was associated with current smoking status (adjusted OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.87) and socioeconomic deprivation (adjusted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.98). In total, 6650 individuals had a baseline LDCT scan, representing 99.7% of eligible LHC attendees.
Telephone risk assessment followed by a community-based LHC is an effective strategy for lung cancer screening implementation. However, lower participation associated with current smoking status and socioeconomic deprivation underlines the importance of research to ensure equitable access to screening. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1183/13993003.00483-2022 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2684104578</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2684104578</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-d5960f04ca2069ec8d62290581a4543d900e0b26961c61254d70a831a85775243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMotn78AkFy9LJ18tnEmxS_oKBgPeglpNm0je5ma7J78N_bta1zGXjnfWeYB6ELAiNCFLsmTGsGwEYAXLGCAqUHaNirRS8foiFoYAXRTA7QSc6fAERyRo7RgIlxX2KIPl5saoMLa9uGJuIQsWvquouh_SnmNvsSV11cYmej8wlnl7yPIS5vcLvy-L1JX3kVksfT3vS6n-JZCrY6Q0cLW2V_vuun6O3-bjZ5LKbPD0-T22nhmIC2KIWWsADuLAWpvVOlpFSDUMRywVmpATzMqdSSOEmo4OUYrGLEqs0TgnJ2iq62e9ep-e58bk0dsvNVZaNvumyoVJwAF2O1sbKt1aUm5-QXZp1CbdOPIWB6qGYP1fxBNT3UTepyd6Cb1778z-wpsl-grXCO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2684104578</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Participation in community-based lung cancer screening: the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Crosbie, Philip A J ; Gabe, Rhian ; Simmonds, Irene ; Hancock, Neil ; Alexandris, Panos ; Kennedy, Martyn ; Rogerson, Suzanne ; Baldwin, David ; Booton, Richard ; Bradley, Claire ; Darby, Mike ; Eckert, Claire ; Franks, Kevin N ; Lindop, Jason ; Janes, Sam M ; Møller, Henrik ; Murray, Rachael L ; Neal, Richard D ; Quaife, Samantha L ; Upperton, Sara ; Shinkins, Bethany ; Tharmanathan, Puvan ; Callister, Matthew E J</creator><creatorcontrib>Crosbie, Philip A J ; Gabe, Rhian ; Simmonds, Irene ; Hancock, Neil ; Alexandris, Panos ; Kennedy, Martyn ; Rogerson, Suzanne ; Baldwin, David ; Booton, Richard ; Bradley, Claire ; Darby, Mike ; Eckert, Claire ; Franks, Kevin N ; Lindop, Jason ; Janes, Sam M ; Møller, Henrik ; Murray, Rachael L ; Neal, Richard D ; Quaife, Samantha L ; Upperton, Sara ; Shinkins, Bethany ; Tharmanathan, Puvan ; Callister, Matthew E J</creatorcontrib><description>Screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces lung cancer mortality; however, the most effective strategy for optimising participation is unknown. Here we present data from the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial, including response to invitation, screening eligibility and uptake of community-based LDCT screening.
Individuals aged 55-80 years, identified from primary care records as having ever smoked, were randomised prior to consent to invitation to telephone lung cancer risk assessment or usual care. The invitation strategy included general practitioner endorsement, pre-invitation and two reminder invitations. After telephone triage, those at higher risk were invited to a Lung Health Check (LHC) with immediate access to a mobile CT scanner.
Of 44 943 individuals invited, 50.8% (n=22 815) responded and underwent telephone-based risk assessment (16.7% and 7.3% following first and second reminders, respectively). A lower response rate was associated with current smoking status (adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.42-0.46) and socioeconomic deprivation (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.54-0.62 for the most
the least deprived quintile). Of those responding, 34.4% (n=7853) were potentially eligible for screening and offered a LHC, of whom 86.8% (n=6819) attended. Lower uptake was associated with current smoking status (adjusted OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.87) and socioeconomic deprivation (adjusted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.98). In total, 6650 individuals had a baseline LDCT scan, representing 99.7% of eligible LHC attendees.
Telephone risk assessment followed by a community-based LHC is an effective strategy for lung cancer screening implementation. However, lower participation associated with current smoking status and socioeconomic deprivation underlines the importance of research to ensure equitable access to screening.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0903-1936</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-3003</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00483-2022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35777775</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Humans ; Lung ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Mass Screening ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>The European respiratory journal, 2022-11, Vol.60 (5), p.2200483</ispartof><rights>Copyright ©The authors 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-d5960f04ca2069ec8d62290581a4543d900e0b26961c61254d70a831a85775243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-d5960f04ca2069ec8d62290581a4543d900e0b26961c61254d70a831a85775243</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8157-0803 ; 0000-0001-9468-7947 ; 0000-0003-4512-2899 ; 0000-0002-4489-0282 ; 0000-0002-4918-6382 ; 0000-0002-0273-3094 ; 0000-0002-6634-5939 ; 0000-0002-1768-2971</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35777775$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crosbie, Philip A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabe, Rhian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmonds, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexandris, Panos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Martyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogerson, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Booton, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darby, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckert, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franks, Kevin N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindop, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janes, Sam M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, Henrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Rachael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, Richard D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quaife, Samantha L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Upperton, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinkins, Bethany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tharmanathan, Puvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callister, Matthew E J</creatorcontrib><title>Participation in community-based lung cancer screening: the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial</title><title>The European respiratory journal</title><addtitle>Eur Respir J</addtitle><description>Screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces lung cancer mortality; however, the most effective strategy for optimising participation is unknown. Here we present data from the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial, including response to invitation, screening eligibility and uptake of community-based LDCT screening.
Individuals aged 55-80 years, identified from primary care records as having ever smoked, were randomised prior to consent to invitation to telephone lung cancer risk assessment or usual care. The invitation strategy included general practitioner endorsement, pre-invitation and two reminder invitations. After telephone triage, those at higher risk were invited to a Lung Health Check (LHC) with immediate access to a mobile CT scanner.
Of 44 943 individuals invited, 50.8% (n=22 815) responded and underwent telephone-based risk assessment (16.7% and 7.3% following first and second reminders, respectively). A lower response rate was associated with current smoking status (adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.42-0.46) and socioeconomic deprivation (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.54-0.62 for the most
the least deprived quintile). Of those responding, 34.4% (n=7853) were potentially eligible for screening and offered a LHC, of whom 86.8% (n=6819) attended. Lower uptake was associated with current smoking status (adjusted OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.87) and socioeconomic deprivation (adjusted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.98). In total, 6650 individuals had a baseline LDCT scan, representing 99.7% of eligible LHC attendees.
Telephone risk assessment followed by a community-based LHC is an effective strategy for lung cancer screening implementation. However, lower participation associated with current smoking status and socioeconomic deprivation underlines the importance of research to ensure equitable access to screening.</description><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0903-1936</issn><issn>1399-3003</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMotn78AkFy9LJ18tnEmxS_oKBgPeglpNm0je5ma7J78N_bta1zGXjnfWeYB6ELAiNCFLsmTGsGwEYAXLGCAqUHaNirRS8foiFoYAXRTA7QSc6fAERyRo7RgIlxX2KIPl5saoMLa9uGJuIQsWvquouh_SnmNvsSV11cYmej8wlnl7yPIS5vcLvy-L1JX3kVksfT3vS6n-JZCrY6Q0cLW2V_vuun6O3-bjZ5LKbPD0-T22nhmIC2KIWWsADuLAWpvVOlpFSDUMRywVmpATzMqdSSOEmo4OUYrGLEqs0TgnJ2iq62e9ep-e58bk0dsvNVZaNvumyoVJwAF2O1sbKt1aUm5-QXZp1CbdOPIWB6qGYP1fxBNT3UTepyd6Cb1778z-wpsl-grXCO</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Crosbie, Philip A J</creator><creator>Gabe, Rhian</creator><creator>Simmonds, Irene</creator><creator>Hancock, Neil</creator><creator>Alexandris, Panos</creator><creator>Kennedy, Martyn</creator><creator>Rogerson, Suzanne</creator><creator>Baldwin, David</creator><creator>Booton, Richard</creator><creator>Bradley, Claire</creator><creator>Darby, Mike</creator><creator>Eckert, Claire</creator><creator>Franks, Kevin N</creator><creator>Lindop, Jason</creator><creator>Janes, Sam M</creator><creator>Møller, Henrik</creator><creator>Murray, Rachael L</creator><creator>Neal, Richard D</creator><creator>Quaife, Samantha L</creator><creator>Upperton, Sara</creator><creator>Shinkins, Bethany</creator><creator>Tharmanathan, Puvan</creator><creator>Callister, Matthew E J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8157-0803</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9468-7947</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4512-2899</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4489-0282</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4918-6382</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0273-3094</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6634-5939</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1768-2971</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Participation in community-based lung cancer screening: the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial</title><author>Crosbie, Philip A J ; Gabe, Rhian ; Simmonds, Irene ; Hancock, Neil ; Alexandris, Panos ; Kennedy, Martyn ; Rogerson, Suzanne ; Baldwin, David ; Booton, Richard ; Bradley, Claire ; Darby, Mike ; Eckert, Claire ; Franks, Kevin N ; Lindop, Jason ; Janes, Sam M ; Møller, Henrik ; Murray, Rachael L ; Neal, Richard D ; Quaife, Samantha L ; Upperton, Sara ; Shinkins, Bethany ; Tharmanathan, Puvan ; Callister, Matthew E J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-d5960f04ca2069ec8d62290581a4543d900e0b26961c61254d70a831a85775243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crosbie, Philip A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabe, Rhian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmonds, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexandris, Panos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Martyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogerson, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Booton, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darby, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckert, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franks, Kevin N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindop, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janes, Sam M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, Henrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Rachael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, Richard D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quaife, Samantha L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Upperton, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinkins, Bethany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tharmanathan, Puvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callister, Matthew E J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The European respiratory journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crosbie, Philip A J</au><au>Gabe, Rhian</au><au>Simmonds, Irene</au><au>Hancock, Neil</au><au>Alexandris, Panos</au><au>Kennedy, Martyn</au><au>Rogerson, Suzanne</au><au>Baldwin, David</au><au>Booton, Richard</au><au>Bradley, Claire</au><au>Darby, Mike</au><au>Eckert, Claire</au><au>Franks, Kevin N</au><au>Lindop, Jason</au><au>Janes, Sam M</au><au>Møller, Henrik</au><au>Murray, Rachael L</au><au>Neal, Richard D</au><au>Quaife, Samantha L</au><au>Upperton, Sara</au><au>Shinkins, Bethany</au><au>Tharmanathan, Puvan</au><au>Callister, Matthew E J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Participation in community-based lung cancer screening: the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial</atitle><jtitle>The European respiratory journal</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Respir J</addtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2200483</spage><pages>2200483-</pages><issn>0903-1936</issn><eissn>1399-3003</eissn><abstract>Screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces lung cancer mortality; however, the most effective strategy for optimising participation is unknown. Here we present data from the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial, including response to invitation, screening eligibility and uptake of community-based LDCT screening.
Individuals aged 55-80 years, identified from primary care records as having ever smoked, were randomised prior to consent to invitation to telephone lung cancer risk assessment or usual care. The invitation strategy included general practitioner endorsement, pre-invitation and two reminder invitations. After telephone triage, those at higher risk were invited to a Lung Health Check (LHC) with immediate access to a mobile CT scanner.
Of 44 943 individuals invited, 50.8% (n=22 815) responded and underwent telephone-based risk assessment (16.7% and 7.3% following first and second reminders, respectively). A lower response rate was associated with current smoking status (adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.42-0.46) and socioeconomic deprivation (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.54-0.62 for the most
the least deprived quintile). Of those responding, 34.4% (n=7853) were potentially eligible for screening and offered a LHC, of whom 86.8% (n=6819) attended. Lower uptake was associated with current smoking status (adjusted OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.87) and socioeconomic deprivation (adjusted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.98). In total, 6650 individuals had a baseline LDCT scan, representing 99.7% of eligible LHC attendees.
Telephone risk assessment followed by a community-based LHC is an effective strategy for lung cancer screening implementation. However, lower participation associated with current smoking status and socioeconomic deprivation underlines the importance of research to ensure equitable access to screening.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>35777775</pmid><doi>10.1183/13993003.00483-2022</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8157-0803</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9468-7947</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4512-2899</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4489-0282</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4918-6382</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0273-3094</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6634-5939</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1768-2971</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0903-1936 |
ispartof | The European respiratory journal, 2022-11, Vol.60 (5), p.2200483 |
issn | 0903-1936 1399-3003 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2684104578 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Early Detection of Cancer - methods Humans Lung Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Mass Screening Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | Participation in community-based lung cancer screening: the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T19%3A32%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Participation%20in%20community-based%20lung%20cancer%20screening:%20the%20Yorkshire%20Lung%20Screening%20Trial&rft.jtitle=The%20European%20respiratory%20journal&rft.au=Crosbie,%20Philip%20A%20J&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2200483&rft.pages=2200483-&rft.issn=0903-1936&rft.eissn=1399-3003&rft_id=info:doi/10.1183/13993003.00483-2022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2684104578%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2684104578&rft_id=info:pmid/35777775&rfr_iscdi=true |