Intraocular lens power calculation in patients with irregular astigmatism

Purpose Accurate intraocular lens (IOL) calculation in subjects with irregular astigmatism is challenging. This study evaluated the accuracy of using Scheimpflug-derived central 2-mm equivalent keratometry reading (EKR) values for IOL calculation in irregular astigmatism. Methods This retrospective...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology 2022-12, Vol.260 (12), p.3889-3895
Hauptverfasser: Achiron, Asaf, Elhaddad, Omar, Leadbetter, Duncan, Levinger, Eliya, Voytsekhivskyy, Oleksiy, Smith, Katy, Avadhanam, Venkata, Darcy, Kieren, Tole, Derek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3895
container_issue 12
container_start_page 3889
container_title Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology
container_volume 260
creator Achiron, Asaf
Elhaddad, Omar
Leadbetter, Duncan
Levinger, Eliya
Voytsekhivskyy, Oleksiy
Smith, Katy
Avadhanam, Venkata
Darcy, Kieren
Tole, Derek
description Purpose Accurate intraocular lens (IOL) calculation in subjects with irregular astigmatism is challenging. This study evaluated the accuracy of using Scheimpflug-derived central 2-mm equivalent keratometry reading (EKR) values for IOL calculation in irregular astigmatism. Methods This retrospective study included subjects (31 eyes of 30 patients) who underwent cataract surgery and IOL calculation using the 2-mm central EKR methods. We compared prediction error (PE) and absolute PE (APE) outcomes using SRK/T and Barrett Universal II formulas for keratometry data obtained from the IOLMaster 500 and Pentacam (anterior corneal sim k ) devices. Results Cataract surgery and IOL calculation using the 2-mm central EKR methods resulted in improved visual acuity (uncorrected: from 1.13 ± 0.38 to 0.65 ± 0.46 logMar, p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00417-022-05729-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2684097168</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2736486017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-54bddd84f17d1657f63d32a70e89014df70b40eeab14078d0fefbf37948e165e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8FL16ik4826VEWPxYWvCjsLaRtsnZp05q0LO6vN7sVBA-eZph5nmF4EbomcEcAxH0A4ERgoBRDKmiO9ydoRjhLsQC6PkUzEJRgyej6HF2EsIXIs5TM0HLpBq-7cmy0TxrjQtJ3O-OTUjeH2VB3Lqld0sfOuCEku3r4SGrvzeZo6DDUmzYuQ3uJzqxugrn6qXP0_vT4tnjBq9fn5eJhhUsq6YBTXlRVJbkloiJZKmzGKka1ACNzILyyAgoOxuiCcBCyAmtsYZnIuTSRN2yObqe7ve8-RxMG1dahNE2jnenGoGgmOeSCZDKiN3_QbTd6F79TVLCMywyIiBSdqNJ3IXhjVe_rVvsvRUAd0lVTuiqmq47pqn2U2CSFCLuN8b-n_7G-AeXffkc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2736486017</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intraocular lens power calculation in patients with irregular astigmatism</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Achiron, Asaf ; Elhaddad, Omar ; Leadbetter, Duncan ; Levinger, Eliya ; Voytsekhivskyy, Oleksiy ; Smith, Katy ; Avadhanam, Venkata ; Darcy, Kieren ; Tole, Derek</creator><creatorcontrib>Achiron, Asaf ; Elhaddad, Omar ; Leadbetter, Duncan ; Levinger, Eliya ; Voytsekhivskyy, Oleksiy ; Smith, Katy ; Avadhanam, Venkata ; Darcy, Kieren ; Tole, Derek</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Accurate intraocular lens (IOL) calculation in subjects with irregular astigmatism is challenging. This study evaluated the accuracy of using Scheimpflug-derived central 2-mm equivalent keratometry reading (EKR) values for IOL calculation in irregular astigmatism. Methods This retrospective study included subjects (31 eyes of 30 patients) who underwent cataract surgery and IOL calculation using the 2-mm central EKR methods. We compared prediction error (PE) and absolute PE (APE) outcomes using SRK/T and Barrett Universal II formulas for keratometry data obtained from the IOLMaster 500 and Pentacam (anterior corneal sim k ) devices. Results Cataract surgery and IOL calculation using the 2-mm central EKR methods resulted in improved visual acuity (uncorrected: from 1.13 ± 0.38 to 0.65 ± 0.46 logMar, p  &lt; 0.01; best-corrected: from 0.45 ± 0.24 to 0.26 ± 0.20 logMar, p  &lt; 0.01) after surgery. The percentage of subjects with best-corrected visual acuity of 6/6 was 22%, &lt; 6/9 was 58%, and &lt; 6/12 was 71%. For both the SRK/T and the Barrett formulas, the PE was similar to those obtained by IOLMaster (&gt; 0.14) but lower than those obtained by the anterior corneal sim k ( p  &lt; 0.02). IOLMaster provided keratometry reading in only 23/31 (74.1%) of cases. Conclusions The use of Scheimpflug central 2-mm EKR for IOL calculation in irregular astigmatism was beneficial in terms of visual acuity improvement. It had comparable refractive prediction performance to the IOLMaster 500 and better than the anterior corneal sim K . The 2-mm EKR method can be used when IOLMaster cannot provide a reliable reading in abnormal corneas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0721-832X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-702X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00417-022-05729-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acuity ; Astigmatism ; Cataract ; Cataracts ; Cornea ; Eye surgery ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Ophthalmology ; Patients ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology, 2022-12, Vol.260 (12), p.3889-3895</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-54bddd84f17d1657f63d32a70e89014df70b40eeab14078d0fefbf37948e165e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-54bddd84f17d1657f63d32a70e89014df70b40eeab14078d0fefbf37948e165e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6315-6908</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00417-022-05729-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00417-022-05729-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Achiron, Asaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhaddad, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leadbetter, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levinger, Eliya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voytsekhivskyy, Oleksiy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Katy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avadhanam, Venkata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darcy, Kieren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tole, Derek</creatorcontrib><title>Intraocular lens power calculation in patients with irregular astigmatism</title><title>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose Accurate intraocular lens (IOL) calculation in subjects with irregular astigmatism is challenging. This study evaluated the accuracy of using Scheimpflug-derived central 2-mm equivalent keratometry reading (EKR) values for IOL calculation in irregular astigmatism. Methods This retrospective study included subjects (31 eyes of 30 patients) who underwent cataract surgery and IOL calculation using the 2-mm central EKR methods. We compared prediction error (PE) and absolute PE (APE) outcomes using SRK/T and Barrett Universal II formulas for keratometry data obtained from the IOLMaster 500 and Pentacam (anterior corneal sim k ) devices. Results Cataract surgery and IOL calculation using the 2-mm central EKR methods resulted in improved visual acuity (uncorrected: from 1.13 ± 0.38 to 0.65 ± 0.46 logMar, p  &lt; 0.01; best-corrected: from 0.45 ± 0.24 to 0.26 ± 0.20 logMar, p  &lt; 0.01) after surgery. The percentage of subjects with best-corrected visual acuity of 6/6 was 22%, &lt; 6/9 was 58%, and &lt; 6/12 was 71%. For both the SRK/T and the Barrett formulas, the PE was similar to those obtained by IOLMaster (&gt; 0.14) but lower than those obtained by the anterior corneal sim k ( p  &lt; 0.02). IOLMaster provided keratometry reading in only 23/31 (74.1%) of cases. Conclusions The use of Scheimpflug central 2-mm EKR for IOL calculation in irregular astigmatism was beneficial in terms of visual acuity improvement. It had comparable refractive prediction performance to the IOLMaster 500 and better than the anterior corneal sim K . The 2-mm EKR method can be used when IOLMaster cannot provide a reliable reading in abnormal corneas.</description><subject>Acuity</subject><subject>Astigmatism</subject><subject>Cataract</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Eye surgery</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0721-832X</issn><issn>1435-702X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8FL16ik4826VEWPxYWvCjsLaRtsnZp05q0LO6vN7sVBA-eZph5nmF4EbomcEcAxH0A4ERgoBRDKmiO9ydoRjhLsQC6PkUzEJRgyej6HF2EsIXIs5TM0HLpBq-7cmy0TxrjQtJ3O-OTUjeH2VB3Lqld0sfOuCEku3r4SGrvzeZo6DDUmzYuQ3uJzqxugrn6qXP0_vT4tnjBq9fn5eJhhUsq6YBTXlRVJbkloiJZKmzGKka1ACNzILyyAgoOxuiCcBCyAmtsYZnIuTSRN2yObqe7ve8-RxMG1dahNE2jnenGoGgmOeSCZDKiN3_QbTd6F79TVLCMywyIiBSdqNJ3IXhjVe_rVvsvRUAd0lVTuiqmq47pqn2U2CSFCLuN8b-n_7G-AeXffkc</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Achiron, Asaf</creator><creator>Elhaddad, Omar</creator><creator>Leadbetter, Duncan</creator><creator>Levinger, Eliya</creator><creator>Voytsekhivskyy, Oleksiy</creator><creator>Smith, Katy</creator><creator>Avadhanam, Venkata</creator><creator>Darcy, Kieren</creator><creator>Tole, Derek</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6315-6908</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Intraocular lens power calculation in patients with irregular astigmatism</title><author>Achiron, Asaf ; Elhaddad, Omar ; Leadbetter, Duncan ; Levinger, Eliya ; Voytsekhivskyy, Oleksiy ; Smith, Katy ; Avadhanam, Venkata ; Darcy, Kieren ; Tole, Derek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-54bddd84f17d1657f63d32a70e89014df70b40eeab14078d0fefbf37948e165e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acuity</topic><topic>Astigmatism</topic><topic>Cataract</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Eye surgery</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Achiron, Asaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhaddad, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leadbetter, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levinger, Eliya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voytsekhivskyy, Oleksiy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Katy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avadhanam, Venkata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darcy, Kieren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tole, Derek</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Achiron, Asaf</au><au>Elhaddad, Omar</au><au>Leadbetter, Duncan</au><au>Levinger, Eliya</au><au>Voytsekhivskyy, Oleksiy</au><au>Smith, Katy</au><au>Avadhanam, Venkata</au><au>Darcy, Kieren</au><au>Tole, Derek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intraocular lens power calculation in patients with irregular astigmatism</atitle><jtitle>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology</jtitle><stitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</stitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>260</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3889</spage><epage>3895</epage><pages>3889-3895</pages><issn>0721-832X</issn><eissn>1435-702X</eissn><abstract>Purpose Accurate intraocular lens (IOL) calculation in subjects with irregular astigmatism is challenging. This study evaluated the accuracy of using Scheimpflug-derived central 2-mm equivalent keratometry reading (EKR) values for IOL calculation in irregular astigmatism. Methods This retrospective study included subjects (31 eyes of 30 patients) who underwent cataract surgery and IOL calculation using the 2-mm central EKR methods. We compared prediction error (PE) and absolute PE (APE) outcomes using SRK/T and Barrett Universal II formulas for keratometry data obtained from the IOLMaster 500 and Pentacam (anterior corneal sim k ) devices. Results Cataract surgery and IOL calculation using the 2-mm central EKR methods resulted in improved visual acuity (uncorrected: from 1.13 ± 0.38 to 0.65 ± 0.46 logMar, p  &lt; 0.01; best-corrected: from 0.45 ± 0.24 to 0.26 ± 0.20 logMar, p  &lt; 0.01) after surgery. The percentage of subjects with best-corrected visual acuity of 6/6 was 22%, &lt; 6/9 was 58%, and &lt; 6/12 was 71%. For both the SRK/T and the Barrett formulas, the PE was similar to those obtained by IOLMaster (&gt; 0.14) but lower than those obtained by the anterior corneal sim k ( p  &lt; 0.02). IOLMaster provided keratometry reading in only 23/31 (74.1%) of cases. Conclusions The use of Scheimpflug central 2-mm EKR for IOL calculation in irregular astigmatism was beneficial in terms of visual acuity improvement. It had comparable refractive prediction performance to the IOLMaster 500 and better than the anterior corneal sim K . The 2-mm EKR method can be used when IOLMaster cannot provide a reliable reading in abnormal corneas.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00417-022-05729-z</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6315-6908</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0721-832X
ispartof Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology, 2022-12, Vol.260 (12), p.3889-3895
issn 0721-832X
1435-702X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2684097168
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Acuity
Astigmatism
Cataract
Cataracts
Cornea
Eye surgery
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Ophthalmology
Patients
Surgery
title Intraocular lens power calculation in patients with irregular astigmatism
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T02%3A05%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraocular%20lens%20power%20calculation%20in%20patients%20with%20irregular%20astigmatism&rft.jtitle=Graefe's%20archive%20for%20clinical%20and%20experimental%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Achiron,%20Asaf&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=260&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3889&rft.epage=3895&rft.pages=3889-3895&rft.issn=0721-832X&rft.eissn=1435-702X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00417-022-05729-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2736486017%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2736486017&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true