Impact of duration of mechanical support on heart transplantation: Hasty transplantation may not have a good long‐term outcome

Background Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has been widely utilized in critically ill cardiac transplant candidates. Few studies have investigated the impact of duration of MCS before heart transplantation (HTx) on long‐term patient survival. Methods A retrospective HTx database was reviewed be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical transplantation 2022-11, Vol.36 (11), p.e14746-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Sz‐Han, Chou, Heng‐Wen, Wang, Chih‐Hsien, Tsao, Chuan‐I, Fu, Hsun‐Yi, Chen, Kevin Po‐Hsun, Chi, Nai‐Hsin, Huang, Shu‐Chien, Chou, Nai‐Kuan, Hsu, Ron‐Bin, Yu, Hsi‐Yu, Lin, Jou‐Wei, Chen, Yih‐Sharng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 11
container_start_page e14746
container_title Clinical transplantation
container_volume 36
creator Yu, Sz‐Han
Chou, Heng‐Wen
Wang, Chih‐Hsien
Tsao, Chuan‐I
Fu, Hsun‐Yi
Chen, Kevin Po‐Hsun
Chi, Nai‐Hsin
Huang, Shu‐Chien
Chou, Nai‐Kuan
Hsu, Ron‐Bin
Yu, Hsi‐Yu
Lin, Jou‐Wei
Chen, Yih‐Sharng
description Background Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has been widely utilized in critically ill cardiac transplant candidates. Few studies have investigated the impact of duration of MCS before heart transplantation (HTx) on long‐term patient survival. Methods A retrospective HTx database was reviewed between 2009 and 2019. Patients who did not or did undergo MCS before HTx were categorized into two groups: (1) A (did not) and (2) B (did), respectively. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to assess the cutoff level of MCS duration before HTx in evaluating 5‐year survival. Result A total of 270 HTx patients (group A: 120, group B: 150) were analyzed. Group B patients had a higher percentage of blood type O, a higher incidence of resuscitation, a shorter listing duration, and a higher likelihood of having United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) 1A status than group A. The ROC curve revealed 24 days as a good cut‐off level for determining the best MCS before HTx timing. Group B was categorized into two subgroups: (1) B1 (MCS  24 days, n = 85). B2 had a higher incidence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), hemodialysis, longer waiting time after MCS, and better ventricular assist device implantation than B1. However, the survival curves showed that B1 outcomes were significantly worse than in groups A and B2. Groups A and B2 had similar survival curves without an increased incidence of infection. Conclusion The preliminary data demonstrated that a longer duration of MCS may be associated with better outcomes than urgent HTx.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ctr.14746
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2681043871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2681043871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3256-43581a028d365b3634d35933b589ed00c82c45f611f8d489944ec01207af0fbe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AURgdRbK0ufAGZpS7SzmR-mriTorZQEKSuw2QyaSNJJs5MlOz6CD6jT-K0qS4E7-Z-XA4flwPAJUZj7GcinRljOqX8CAwxieMAIRwegyGKUegzJwNwZu2rv3LM2SkYEDZlmDI6BNtF1QjpoM5h1hrhCl3vcqXkRtSFFCW0bdNo44kabpTwwRlR26YUtdvjt3AurOv-nmElOlhrBzfiXUEB11pnsNT1-mv76ZSpoG6d1JU6Bye5KK26OOwReHm4X83mwfLpcTG7WwaShIwHlLAICxRGGeEsJZzQjLCYkJRFscoQklEoKcs5xnmU0SiOKVXSW0BTkaM8VWQErvvexui3VlmXVIWVqvQPK93aJOQRRpREU-zRmx6VRltrVJ40pqiE6RKMkp3wxAtP9sI9e3WobdNKZb_kj2EPTHrgoyhV939TMls995XfR3WMiA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2681043871</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of duration of mechanical support on heart transplantation: Hasty transplantation may not have a good long‐term outcome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Yu, Sz‐Han ; Chou, Heng‐Wen ; Wang, Chih‐Hsien ; Tsao, Chuan‐I ; Fu, Hsun‐Yi ; Chen, Kevin Po‐Hsun ; Chi, Nai‐Hsin ; Huang, Shu‐Chien ; Chou, Nai‐Kuan ; Hsu, Ron‐Bin ; Yu, Hsi‐Yu ; Lin, Jou‐Wei ; Chen, Yih‐Sharng</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Sz‐Han ; Chou, Heng‐Wen ; Wang, Chih‐Hsien ; Tsao, Chuan‐I ; Fu, Hsun‐Yi ; Chen, Kevin Po‐Hsun ; Chi, Nai‐Hsin ; Huang, Shu‐Chien ; Chou, Nai‐Kuan ; Hsu, Ron‐Bin ; Yu, Hsi‐Yu ; Lin, Jou‐Wei ; Chen, Yih‐Sharng</creatorcontrib><description>Background Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has been widely utilized in critically ill cardiac transplant candidates. Few studies have investigated the impact of duration of MCS before heart transplantation (HTx) on long‐term patient survival. Methods A retrospective HTx database was reviewed between 2009 and 2019. Patients who did not or did undergo MCS before HTx were categorized into two groups: (1) A (did not) and (2) B (did), respectively. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to assess the cutoff level of MCS duration before HTx in evaluating 5‐year survival. Result A total of 270 HTx patients (group A: 120, group B: 150) were analyzed. Group B patients had a higher percentage of blood type O, a higher incidence of resuscitation, a shorter listing duration, and a higher likelihood of having United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) 1A status than group A. The ROC curve revealed 24 days as a good cut‐off level for determining the best MCS before HTx timing. Group B was categorized into two subgroups: (1) B1 (MCS &lt; 24 days, n = 65) and (2) B2 (MCS &gt; 24 days, n = 85). B2 had a higher incidence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), hemodialysis, longer waiting time after MCS, and better ventricular assist device implantation than B1. However, the survival curves showed that B1 outcomes were significantly worse than in groups A and B2. Groups A and B2 had similar survival curves without an increased incidence of infection. Conclusion The preliminary data demonstrated that a longer duration of MCS may be associated with better outcomes than urgent HTx.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0902-0063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14746</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35751454</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark</publisher><subject>Heart Failure - surgery ; Heart Transplantation ; Heart-Assist Devices ; Humans ; mechanical circulatory support ; outcome ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors ; timing ; transplantation survival ; Treatment Outcome ; ventricular assist device</subject><ispartof>Clinical transplantation, 2022-11, Vol.36 (11), p.e14746-n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3256-43581a028d365b3634d35933b589ed00c82c45f611f8d489944ec01207af0fbe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3256-43581a028d365b3634d35933b589ed00c82c45f611f8d489944ec01207af0fbe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fctr.14746$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fctr.14746$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35751454$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Sz‐Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Heng‐Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chih‐Hsien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsao, Chuan‐I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Hsun‐Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Kevin Po‐Hsun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chi, Nai‐Hsin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Shu‐Chien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Nai‐Kuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Ron‐Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Hsi‐Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Jou‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yih‐Sharng</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of duration of mechanical support on heart transplantation: Hasty transplantation may not have a good long‐term outcome</title><title>Clinical transplantation</title><addtitle>Clin Transplant</addtitle><description>Background Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has been widely utilized in critically ill cardiac transplant candidates. Few studies have investigated the impact of duration of MCS before heart transplantation (HTx) on long‐term patient survival. Methods A retrospective HTx database was reviewed between 2009 and 2019. Patients who did not or did undergo MCS before HTx were categorized into two groups: (1) A (did not) and (2) B (did), respectively. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to assess the cutoff level of MCS duration before HTx in evaluating 5‐year survival. Result A total of 270 HTx patients (group A: 120, group B: 150) were analyzed. Group B patients had a higher percentage of blood type O, a higher incidence of resuscitation, a shorter listing duration, and a higher likelihood of having United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) 1A status than group A. The ROC curve revealed 24 days as a good cut‐off level for determining the best MCS before HTx timing. Group B was categorized into two subgroups: (1) B1 (MCS &lt; 24 days, n = 65) and (2) B2 (MCS &gt; 24 days, n = 85). B2 had a higher incidence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), hemodialysis, longer waiting time after MCS, and better ventricular assist device implantation than B1. However, the survival curves showed that B1 outcomes were significantly worse than in groups A and B2. Groups A and B2 had similar survival curves without an increased incidence of infection. Conclusion The preliminary data demonstrated that a longer duration of MCS may be associated with better outcomes than urgent HTx.</description><subject>Heart Failure - surgery</subject><subject>Heart Transplantation</subject><subject>Heart-Assist Devices</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>mechanical circulatory support</subject><subject>outcome</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>timing</subject><subject>transplantation survival</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>ventricular assist device</subject><issn>0902-0063</issn><issn>1399-0012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AURgdRbK0ufAGZpS7SzmR-mriTorZQEKSuw2QyaSNJJs5MlOz6CD6jT-K0qS4E7-Z-XA4flwPAJUZj7GcinRljOqX8CAwxieMAIRwegyGKUegzJwNwZu2rv3LM2SkYEDZlmDI6BNtF1QjpoM5h1hrhCl3vcqXkRtSFFCW0bdNo44kabpTwwRlR26YUtdvjt3AurOv-nmElOlhrBzfiXUEB11pnsNT1-mv76ZSpoG6d1JU6Bye5KK26OOwReHm4X83mwfLpcTG7WwaShIwHlLAICxRGGeEsJZzQjLCYkJRFscoQklEoKcs5xnmU0SiOKVXSW0BTkaM8VWQErvvexui3VlmXVIWVqvQPK93aJOQRRpREU-zRmx6VRltrVJ40pqiE6RKMkp3wxAtP9sI9e3WobdNKZb_kj2EPTHrgoyhV939TMls995XfR3WMiA</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Yu, Sz‐Han</creator><creator>Chou, Heng‐Wen</creator><creator>Wang, Chih‐Hsien</creator><creator>Tsao, Chuan‐I</creator><creator>Fu, Hsun‐Yi</creator><creator>Chen, Kevin Po‐Hsun</creator><creator>Chi, Nai‐Hsin</creator><creator>Huang, Shu‐Chien</creator><creator>Chou, Nai‐Kuan</creator><creator>Hsu, Ron‐Bin</creator><creator>Yu, Hsi‐Yu</creator><creator>Lin, Jou‐Wei</creator><creator>Chen, Yih‐Sharng</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Impact of duration of mechanical support on heart transplantation: Hasty transplantation may not have a good long‐term outcome</title><author>Yu, Sz‐Han ; Chou, Heng‐Wen ; Wang, Chih‐Hsien ; Tsao, Chuan‐I ; Fu, Hsun‐Yi ; Chen, Kevin Po‐Hsun ; Chi, Nai‐Hsin ; Huang, Shu‐Chien ; Chou, Nai‐Kuan ; Hsu, Ron‐Bin ; Yu, Hsi‐Yu ; Lin, Jou‐Wei ; Chen, Yih‐Sharng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3256-43581a028d365b3634d35933b589ed00c82c45f611f8d489944ec01207af0fbe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Heart Failure - surgery</topic><topic>Heart Transplantation</topic><topic>Heart-Assist Devices</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>mechanical circulatory support</topic><topic>outcome</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>timing</topic><topic>transplantation survival</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>ventricular assist device</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Sz‐Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Heng‐Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chih‐Hsien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsao, Chuan‐I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Hsun‐Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Kevin Po‐Hsun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chi, Nai‐Hsin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Shu‐Chien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Nai‐Kuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Ron‐Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Hsi‐Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Jou‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yih‐Sharng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Sz‐Han</au><au>Chou, Heng‐Wen</au><au>Wang, Chih‐Hsien</au><au>Tsao, Chuan‐I</au><au>Fu, Hsun‐Yi</au><au>Chen, Kevin Po‐Hsun</au><au>Chi, Nai‐Hsin</au><au>Huang, Shu‐Chien</au><au>Chou, Nai‐Kuan</au><au>Hsu, Ron‐Bin</au><au>Yu, Hsi‐Yu</au><au>Lin, Jou‐Wei</au><au>Chen, Yih‐Sharng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of duration of mechanical support on heart transplantation: Hasty transplantation may not have a good long‐term outcome</atitle><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Transplant</addtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e14746</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14746-n/a</pages><issn>0902-0063</issn><eissn>1399-0012</eissn><abstract>Background Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has been widely utilized in critically ill cardiac transplant candidates. Few studies have investigated the impact of duration of MCS before heart transplantation (HTx) on long‐term patient survival. Methods A retrospective HTx database was reviewed between 2009 and 2019. Patients who did not or did undergo MCS before HTx were categorized into two groups: (1) A (did not) and (2) B (did), respectively. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to assess the cutoff level of MCS duration before HTx in evaluating 5‐year survival. Result A total of 270 HTx patients (group A: 120, group B: 150) were analyzed. Group B patients had a higher percentage of blood type O, a higher incidence of resuscitation, a shorter listing duration, and a higher likelihood of having United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) 1A status than group A. The ROC curve revealed 24 days as a good cut‐off level for determining the best MCS before HTx timing. Group B was categorized into two subgroups: (1) B1 (MCS &lt; 24 days, n = 65) and (2) B2 (MCS &gt; 24 days, n = 85). B2 had a higher incidence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), hemodialysis, longer waiting time after MCS, and better ventricular assist device implantation than B1. However, the survival curves showed that B1 outcomes were significantly worse than in groups A and B2. Groups A and B2 had similar survival curves without an increased incidence of infection. Conclusion The preliminary data demonstrated that a longer duration of MCS may be associated with better outcomes than urgent HTx.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pmid>35751454</pmid><doi>10.1111/ctr.14746</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0902-0063
ispartof Clinical transplantation, 2022-11, Vol.36 (11), p.e14746-n/a
issn 0902-0063
1399-0012
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2681043871
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Heart Failure - surgery
Heart Transplantation
Heart-Assist Devices
Humans
mechanical circulatory support
outcome
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
timing
transplantation survival
Treatment Outcome
ventricular assist device
title Impact of duration of mechanical support on heart transplantation: Hasty transplantation may not have a good long‐term outcome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T12%3A01%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20duration%20of%20mechanical%20support%20on%20heart%20transplantation:%20Hasty%20transplantation%20may%20not%20have%20a%20good%20long%E2%80%90term%20outcome&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20transplantation&rft.au=Yu,%20Sz%E2%80%90Han&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e14746&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14746-n/a&rft.issn=0902-0063&rft.eissn=1399-0012&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ctr.14746&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2681043871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2681043871&rft_id=info:pmid/35751454&rfr_iscdi=true