Impact of duration of mechanical support on heart transplantation: Hasty transplantation may not have a good long‐term outcome
Background Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has been widely utilized in critically ill cardiac transplant candidates. Few studies have investigated the impact of duration of MCS before heart transplantation (HTx) on long‐term patient survival. Methods A retrospective HTx database was reviewed be...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical transplantation 2022-11, Vol.36 (11), p.e14746-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e14746 |
container_title | Clinical transplantation |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Yu, Sz‐Han Chou, Heng‐Wen Wang, Chih‐Hsien Tsao, Chuan‐I Fu, Hsun‐Yi Chen, Kevin Po‐Hsun Chi, Nai‐Hsin Huang, Shu‐Chien Chou, Nai‐Kuan Hsu, Ron‐Bin Yu, Hsi‐Yu Lin, Jou‐Wei Chen, Yih‐Sharng |
description | Background
Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has been widely utilized in critically ill cardiac transplant candidates. Few studies have investigated the impact of duration of MCS before heart transplantation (HTx) on long‐term patient survival.
Methods
A retrospective HTx database was reviewed between 2009 and 2019. Patients who did not or did undergo MCS before HTx were categorized into two groups: (1) A (did not) and (2) B (did), respectively. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to assess the cutoff level of MCS duration before HTx in evaluating 5‐year survival.
Result
A total of 270 HTx patients (group A: 120, group B: 150) were analyzed. Group B patients had a higher percentage of blood type O, a higher incidence of resuscitation, a shorter listing duration, and a higher likelihood of having United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) 1A status than group A. The ROC curve revealed 24 days as a good cut‐off level for determining the best MCS before HTx timing. Group B was categorized into two subgroups: (1) B1 (MCS 24 days, n = 85). B2 had a higher incidence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), hemodialysis, longer waiting time after MCS, and better ventricular assist device implantation than B1. However, the survival curves showed that B1 outcomes were significantly worse than in groups A and B2. Groups A and B2 had similar survival curves without an increased incidence of infection.
Conclusion
The preliminary data demonstrated that a longer duration of MCS may be associated with better outcomes than urgent HTx. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ctr.14746 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2681043871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2681043871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3256-43581a028d365b3634d35933b589ed00c82c45f611f8d489944ec01207af0fbe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AURgdRbK0ufAGZpS7SzmR-mriTorZQEKSuw2QyaSNJJs5MlOz6CD6jT-K0qS4E7-Z-XA4flwPAJUZj7GcinRljOqX8CAwxieMAIRwegyGKUegzJwNwZu2rv3LM2SkYEDZlmDI6BNtF1QjpoM5h1hrhCl3vcqXkRtSFFCW0bdNo44kabpTwwRlR26YUtdvjt3AurOv-nmElOlhrBzfiXUEB11pnsNT1-mv76ZSpoG6d1JU6Bye5KK26OOwReHm4X83mwfLpcTG7WwaShIwHlLAICxRGGeEsJZzQjLCYkJRFscoQklEoKcs5xnmU0SiOKVXSW0BTkaM8VWQErvvexui3VlmXVIWVqvQPK93aJOQRRpREU-zRmx6VRltrVJ40pqiE6RKMkp3wxAtP9sI9e3WobdNKZb_kj2EPTHrgoyhV939TMls995XfR3WMiA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2681043871</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of duration of mechanical support on heart transplantation: Hasty transplantation may not have a good long‐term outcome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Yu, Sz‐Han ; Chou, Heng‐Wen ; Wang, Chih‐Hsien ; Tsao, Chuan‐I ; Fu, Hsun‐Yi ; Chen, Kevin Po‐Hsun ; Chi, Nai‐Hsin ; Huang, Shu‐Chien ; Chou, Nai‐Kuan ; Hsu, Ron‐Bin ; Yu, Hsi‐Yu ; Lin, Jou‐Wei ; Chen, Yih‐Sharng</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Sz‐Han ; Chou, Heng‐Wen ; Wang, Chih‐Hsien ; Tsao, Chuan‐I ; Fu, Hsun‐Yi ; Chen, Kevin Po‐Hsun ; Chi, Nai‐Hsin ; Huang, Shu‐Chien ; Chou, Nai‐Kuan ; Hsu, Ron‐Bin ; Yu, Hsi‐Yu ; Lin, Jou‐Wei ; Chen, Yih‐Sharng</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has been widely utilized in critically ill cardiac transplant candidates. Few studies have investigated the impact of duration of MCS before heart transplantation (HTx) on long‐term patient survival.
Methods
A retrospective HTx database was reviewed between 2009 and 2019. Patients who did not or did undergo MCS before HTx were categorized into two groups: (1) A (did not) and (2) B (did), respectively. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to assess the cutoff level of MCS duration before HTx in evaluating 5‐year survival.
Result
A total of 270 HTx patients (group A: 120, group B: 150) were analyzed. Group B patients had a higher percentage of blood type O, a higher incidence of resuscitation, a shorter listing duration, and a higher likelihood of having United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) 1A status than group A. The ROC curve revealed 24 days as a good cut‐off level for determining the best MCS before HTx timing. Group B was categorized into two subgroups: (1) B1 (MCS < 24 days, n = 65) and (2) B2 (MCS > 24 days, n = 85). B2 had a higher incidence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), hemodialysis, longer waiting time after MCS, and better ventricular assist device implantation than B1. However, the survival curves showed that B1 outcomes were significantly worse than in groups A and B2. Groups A and B2 had similar survival curves without an increased incidence of infection.
Conclusion
The preliminary data demonstrated that a longer duration of MCS may be associated with better outcomes than urgent HTx.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0902-0063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14746</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35751454</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark</publisher><subject>Heart Failure - surgery ; Heart Transplantation ; Heart-Assist Devices ; Humans ; mechanical circulatory support ; outcome ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors ; timing ; transplantation survival ; Treatment Outcome ; ventricular assist device</subject><ispartof>Clinical transplantation, 2022-11, Vol.36 (11), p.e14746-n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3256-43581a028d365b3634d35933b589ed00c82c45f611f8d489944ec01207af0fbe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3256-43581a028d365b3634d35933b589ed00c82c45f611f8d489944ec01207af0fbe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fctr.14746$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fctr.14746$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35751454$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Sz‐Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Heng‐Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chih‐Hsien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsao, Chuan‐I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Hsun‐Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Kevin Po‐Hsun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chi, Nai‐Hsin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Shu‐Chien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Nai‐Kuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Ron‐Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Hsi‐Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Jou‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yih‐Sharng</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of duration of mechanical support on heart transplantation: Hasty transplantation may not have a good long‐term outcome</title><title>Clinical transplantation</title><addtitle>Clin Transplant</addtitle><description>Background
Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has been widely utilized in critically ill cardiac transplant candidates. Few studies have investigated the impact of duration of MCS before heart transplantation (HTx) on long‐term patient survival.
Methods
A retrospective HTx database was reviewed between 2009 and 2019. Patients who did not or did undergo MCS before HTx were categorized into two groups: (1) A (did not) and (2) B (did), respectively. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to assess the cutoff level of MCS duration before HTx in evaluating 5‐year survival.
Result
A total of 270 HTx patients (group A: 120, group B: 150) were analyzed. Group B patients had a higher percentage of blood type O, a higher incidence of resuscitation, a shorter listing duration, and a higher likelihood of having United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) 1A status than group A. The ROC curve revealed 24 days as a good cut‐off level for determining the best MCS before HTx timing. Group B was categorized into two subgroups: (1) B1 (MCS < 24 days, n = 65) and (2) B2 (MCS > 24 days, n = 85). B2 had a higher incidence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), hemodialysis, longer waiting time after MCS, and better ventricular assist device implantation than B1. However, the survival curves showed that B1 outcomes were significantly worse than in groups A and B2. Groups A and B2 had similar survival curves without an increased incidence of infection.
Conclusion
The preliminary data demonstrated that a longer duration of MCS may be associated with better outcomes than urgent HTx.</description><subject>Heart Failure - surgery</subject><subject>Heart Transplantation</subject><subject>Heart-Assist Devices</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>mechanical circulatory support</subject><subject>outcome</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>timing</subject><subject>transplantation survival</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>ventricular assist device</subject><issn>0902-0063</issn><issn>1399-0012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AURgdRbK0ufAGZpS7SzmR-mriTorZQEKSuw2QyaSNJJs5MlOz6CD6jT-K0qS4E7-Z-XA4flwPAJUZj7GcinRljOqX8CAwxieMAIRwegyGKUegzJwNwZu2rv3LM2SkYEDZlmDI6BNtF1QjpoM5h1hrhCl3vcqXkRtSFFCW0bdNo44kabpTwwRlR26YUtdvjt3AurOv-nmElOlhrBzfiXUEB11pnsNT1-mv76ZSpoG6d1JU6Bye5KK26OOwReHm4X83mwfLpcTG7WwaShIwHlLAICxRGGeEsJZzQjLCYkJRFscoQklEoKcs5xnmU0SiOKVXSW0BTkaM8VWQErvvexui3VlmXVIWVqvQPK93aJOQRRpREU-zRmx6VRltrVJ40pqiE6RKMkp3wxAtP9sI9e3WobdNKZb_kj2EPTHrgoyhV939TMls995XfR3WMiA</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Yu, Sz‐Han</creator><creator>Chou, Heng‐Wen</creator><creator>Wang, Chih‐Hsien</creator><creator>Tsao, Chuan‐I</creator><creator>Fu, Hsun‐Yi</creator><creator>Chen, Kevin Po‐Hsun</creator><creator>Chi, Nai‐Hsin</creator><creator>Huang, Shu‐Chien</creator><creator>Chou, Nai‐Kuan</creator><creator>Hsu, Ron‐Bin</creator><creator>Yu, Hsi‐Yu</creator><creator>Lin, Jou‐Wei</creator><creator>Chen, Yih‐Sharng</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Impact of duration of mechanical support on heart transplantation: Hasty transplantation may not have a good long‐term outcome</title><author>Yu, Sz‐Han ; Chou, Heng‐Wen ; Wang, Chih‐Hsien ; Tsao, Chuan‐I ; Fu, Hsun‐Yi ; Chen, Kevin Po‐Hsun ; Chi, Nai‐Hsin ; Huang, Shu‐Chien ; Chou, Nai‐Kuan ; Hsu, Ron‐Bin ; Yu, Hsi‐Yu ; Lin, Jou‐Wei ; Chen, Yih‐Sharng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3256-43581a028d365b3634d35933b589ed00c82c45f611f8d489944ec01207af0fbe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Heart Failure - surgery</topic><topic>Heart Transplantation</topic><topic>Heart-Assist Devices</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>mechanical circulatory support</topic><topic>outcome</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>timing</topic><topic>transplantation survival</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>ventricular assist device</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Sz‐Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Heng‐Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chih‐Hsien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsao, Chuan‐I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Hsun‐Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Kevin Po‐Hsun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chi, Nai‐Hsin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Shu‐Chien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Nai‐Kuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Ron‐Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Hsi‐Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Jou‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yih‐Sharng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Sz‐Han</au><au>Chou, Heng‐Wen</au><au>Wang, Chih‐Hsien</au><au>Tsao, Chuan‐I</au><au>Fu, Hsun‐Yi</au><au>Chen, Kevin Po‐Hsun</au><au>Chi, Nai‐Hsin</au><au>Huang, Shu‐Chien</au><au>Chou, Nai‐Kuan</au><au>Hsu, Ron‐Bin</au><au>Yu, Hsi‐Yu</au><au>Lin, Jou‐Wei</au><au>Chen, Yih‐Sharng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of duration of mechanical support on heart transplantation: Hasty transplantation may not have a good long‐term outcome</atitle><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Transplant</addtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e14746</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14746-n/a</pages><issn>0902-0063</issn><eissn>1399-0012</eissn><abstract>Background
Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has been widely utilized in critically ill cardiac transplant candidates. Few studies have investigated the impact of duration of MCS before heart transplantation (HTx) on long‐term patient survival.
Methods
A retrospective HTx database was reviewed between 2009 and 2019. Patients who did not or did undergo MCS before HTx were categorized into two groups: (1) A (did not) and (2) B (did), respectively. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to assess the cutoff level of MCS duration before HTx in evaluating 5‐year survival.
Result
A total of 270 HTx patients (group A: 120, group B: 150) were analyzed. Group B patients had a higher percentage of blood type O, a higher incidence of resuscitation, a shorter listing duration, and a higher likelihood of having United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) 1A status than group A. The ROC curve revealed 24 days as a good cut‐off level for determining the best MCS before HTx timing. Group B was categorized into two subgroups: (1) B1 (MCS < 24 days, n = 65) and (2) B2 (MCS > 24 days, n = 85). B2 had a higher incidence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), hemodialysis, longer waiting time after MCS, and better ventricular assist device implantation than B1. However, the survival curves showed that B1 outcomes were significantly worse than in groups A and B2. Groups A and B2 had similar survival curves without an increased incidence of infection.
Conclusion
The preliminary data demonstrated that a longer duration of MCS may be associated with better outcomes than urgent HTx.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pmid>35751454</pmid><doi>10.1111/ctr.14746</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0902-0063 |
ispartof | Clinical transplantation, 2022-11, Vol.36 (11), p.e14746-n/a |
issn | 0902-0063 1399-0012 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2681043871 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Heart Failure - surgery Heart Transplantation Heart-Assist Devices Humans mechanical circulatory support outcome Retrospective Studies Time Factors timing transplantation survival Treatment Outcome ventricular assist device |
title | Impact of duration of mechanical support on heart transplantation: Hasty transplantation may not have a good long‐term outcome |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T12%3A01%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20duration%20of%20mechanical%20support%20on%20heart%20transplantation:%20Hasty%20transplantation%20may%20not%20have%20a%20good%20long%E2%80%90term%20outcome&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20transplantation&rft.au=Yu,%20Sz%E2%80%90Han&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e14746&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14746-n/a&rft.issn=0902-0063&rft.eissn=1399-0012&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ctr.14746&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2681043871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2681043871&rft_id=info:pmid/35751454&rfr_iscdi=true |