Does Intraoperative Frozen Section and Revision of Margins Lead to Improved Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Background Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is a rare malignancy that arises at the biliary confluence. Achieving a margin-negative resection (R0) is challenging given the anatomic location of tumors and remains the most important prognostic indicator of long-term survival. The objective of this s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2022-11, Vol.29 (12), p.7592-7602 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7602 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 7592 |
container_title | Annals of surgical oncology |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Lenet, Tori Gilbert, Richard W. D. Smoot, Rory Tzeng, Ching-Wei D. Rocha, Flavio G. Yohanathan, Lavanya Cleary, Sean P. Martel, Guillaume Bertens, Kimberly A. |
description | Background
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is a rare malignancy that arises at the biliary confluence. Achieving a margin-negative resection (R0) is challenging given the anatomic location of tumors and remains the most important prognostic indicator of long-term survival. The objective of this study is to review the impact of intraoperative revision of positive biliary margins in PHC on oncologic outcomes.
Patients and Methods
Electronic databases were searched from inception to October 2021. Studies comparing three types of patients undergoing resection of PHC with intraoperative frozen section of the proximal and/or distal bile ducts were identified: those who were margin-negative (R0), those with an initially positive margin who had revised negative margins (R1R0), and those with a persistently positive margin with or without revision of a positive margin (R1). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included risk of postoperative complication.
Results
A total of 449 studies were screened. Ten retrospective observational studies reporting on 1955 patients were included. Patients undergoing successful revision of a positive proximal and/or distal bile duct margin (R1R0) had similar OS to those with a primary margin-negative resection (R0) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72–1.19,
p
= 0.56,
I
2
= 84%], and significantly better OS than patients with a positive final bile duct margin (R1) (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34–0.79,
p
= 0.002,
I
2
= 0%). There was no increase in the risk of postoperative complications associated with additional resection, although postoperative morbidity was inconsistently reported.
Conclusions
This review supports routine intraoperative biliary margin evaluation during resection of PHC with revision if technically feasible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1245/s10434-022-12041-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2681036712</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2681036712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-854f1d99b6b307679e2f10f19f0a9863011858c23051c45f98725fb3a8c87f6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEEqXwAqwssWGT4t_EWaFqoGWkqag67dryONepq8QebE_o8Gw8HO5MJSQWrPyjcz4f31NV7wk-I5SLT4lgzniNKa0JxZzUjy-qEyLKFW8keVn2uJF1RxvxunqT0gPGpGVYnFS_vwRIaOlz1GELUWc3A7qI4Rd4tAaTXfBI-x7dwOzS0yFYdKXj4HxCK9A9ygEtp20MM_RovYuzm_WInEfXBQU-J3Tne4hDcH4okPSMLJRriO7ejTqixX0YtR9cMDoa58OkP6NztN6nDFOhmMPj8POQ4wqyrrXX4z659LZ6ZfWY4N3zelrdXXy9XXyrV98vl4vzVW2YoLmWglvSd92m2TDcNm0H1BJsSWex7mTDMCFSSEPLQIjhwnaypcJumJZGtrYBdlp9PHLLP3_sIGU1uWRgLKkh7JKiZcaYNS2hRfrhH-lD2MWSt6hayqiknMuiokeViSGlCFZto5t03CuC1VOh6lioKoWqQ6HqsZjY0ZSK2A8Q_6L_4_oDcAKmTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2723282448</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Intraoperative Frozen Section and Revision of Margins Lead to Improved Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Lenet, Tori ; Gilbert, Richard W. D. ; Smoot, Rory ; Tzeng, Ching-Wei D. ; Rocha, Flavio G. ; Yohanathan, Lavanya ; Cleary, Sean P. ; Martel, Guillaume ; Bertens, Kimberly A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lenet, Tori ; Gilbert, Richard W. D. ; Smoot, Rory ; Tzeng, Ching-Wei D. ; Rocha, Flavio G. ; Yohanathan, Lavanya ; Cleary, Sean P. ; Martel, Guillaume ; Bertens, Kimberly A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is a rare malignancy that arises at the biliary confluence. Achieving a margin-negative resection (R0) is challenging given the anatomic location of tumors and remains the most important prognostic indicator of long-term survival. The objective of this study is to review the impact of intraoperative revision of positive biliary margins in PHC on oncologic outcomes.
Patients and Methods
Electronic databases were searched from inception to October 2021. Studies comparing three types of patients undergoing resection of PHC with intraoperative frozen section of the proximal and/or distal bile ducts were identified: those who were margin-negative (R0), those with an initially positive margin who had revised negative margins (R1R0), and those with a persistently positive margin with or without revision of a positive margin (R1). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included risk of postoperative complication.
Results
A total of 449 studies were screened. Ten retrospective observational studies reporting on 1955 patients were included. Patients undergoing successful revision of a positive proximal and/or distal bile duct margin (R1R0) had similar OS to those with a primary margin-negative resection (R0) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72–1.19,
p
= 0.56,
I
2
= 84%], and significantly better OS than patients with a positive final bile duct margin (R1) (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34–0.79,
p
= 0.002,
I
2
= 0%). There was no increase in the risk of postoperative complications associated with additional resection, although postoperative morbidity was inconsistently reported.
Conclusions
This review supports routine intraoperative biliary margin evaluation during resection of PHC with revision if technically feasible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12041-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Bile ducts ; Cholangiocarcinoma ; Complications ; Hepatobiliary Tumors ; Malignancy ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Meta-analysis ; Morbidity ; Oncology ; Postoperative ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Survival ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2022-11, Vol.29 (12), p.7592-7602</ispartof><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2022</rights><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-854f1d99b6b307679e2f10f19f0a9863011858c23051c45f98725fb3a8c87f6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-854f1d99b6b307679e2f10f19f0a9863011858c23051c45f98725fb3a8c87f6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1245/s10434-022-12041-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1245/s10434-022-12041-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lenet, Tori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Richard W. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smoot, Rory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tzeng, Ching-Wei D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Flavio G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yohanathan, Lavanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleary, Sean P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martel, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertens, Kimberly A.</creatorcontrib><title>Does Intraoperative Frozen Section and Revision of Margins Lead to Improved Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is a rare malignancy that arises at the biliary confluence. Achieving a margin-negative resection (R0) is challenging given the anatomic location of tumors and remains the most important prognostic indicator of long-term survival. The objective of this study is to review the impact of intraoperative revision of positive biliary margins in PHC on oncologic outcomes.
Patients and Methods
Electronic databases were searched from inception to October 2021. Studies comparing three types of patients undergoing resection of PHC with intraoperative frozen section of the proximal and/or distal bile ducts were identified: those who were margin-negative (R0), those with an initially positive margin who had revised negative margins (R1R0), and those with a persistently positive margin with or without revision of a positive margin (R1). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included risk of postoperative complication.
Results
A total of 449 studies were screened. Ten retrospective observational studies reporting on 1955 patients were included. Patients undergoing successful revision of a positive proximal and/or distal bile duct margin (R1R0) had similar OS to those with a primary margin-negative resection (R0) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72–1.19,
p
= 0.56,
I
2
= 84%], and significantly better OS than patients with a positive final bile duct margin (R1) (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34–0.79,
p
= 0.002,
I
2
= 0%). There was no increase in the risk of postoperative complications associated with additional resection, although postoperative morbidity was inconsistently reported.
Conclusions
This review supports routine intraoperative biliary margin evaluation during resection of PHC with revision if technically feasible.</description><subject>Bile ducts</subject><subject>Cholangiocarcinoma</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Hepatobiliary Tumors</subject><subject>Malignancy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Postoperative</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEEqXwAqwssWGT4t_EWaFqoGWkqag67dryONepq8QebE_o8Gw8HO5MJSQWrPyjcz4f31NV7wk-I5SLT4lgzniNKa0JxZzUjy-qEyLKFW8keVn2uJF1RxvxunqT0gPGpGVYnFS_vwRIaOlz1GELUWc3A7qI4Rd4tAaTXfBI-x7dwOzS0yFYdKXj4HxCK9A9ygEtp20MM_RovYuzm_WInEfXBQU-J3Tne4hDcH4okPSMLJRriO7ejTqixX0YtR9cMDoa58OkP6NztN6nDFOhmMPj8POQ4wqyrrXX4z659LZ6ZfWY4N3zelrdXXy9XXyrV98vl4vzVW2YoLmWglvSd92m2TDcNm0H1BJsSWex7mTDMCFSSEPLQIjhwnaypcJumJZGtrYBdlp9PHLLP3_sIGU1uWRgLKkh7JKiZcaYNS2hRfrhH-lD2MWSt6hayqiknMuiokeViSGlCFZto5t03CuC1VOh6lioKoWqQ6HqsZjY0ZSK2A8Q_6L_4_oDcAKmTw</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Lenet, Tori</creator><creator>Gilbert, Richard W. D.</creator><creator>Smoot, Rory</creator><creator>Tzeng, Ching-Wei D.</creator><creator>Rocha, Flavio G.</creator><creator>Yohanathan, Lavanya</creator><creator>Cleary, Sean P.</creator><creator>Martel, Guillaume</creator><creator>Bertens, Kimberly A.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>Does Intraoperative Frozen Section and Revision of Margins Lead to Improved Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><author>Lenet, Tori ; Gilbert, Richard W. D. ; Smoot, Rory ; Tzeng, Ching-Wei D. ; Rocha, Flavio G. ; Yohanathan, Lavanya ; Cleary, Sean P. ; Martel, Guillaume ; Bertens, Kimberly A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-854f1d99b6b307679e2f10f19f0a9863011858c23051c45f98725fb3a8c87f6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bile ducts</topic><topic>Cholangiocarcinoma</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Hepatobiliary Tumors</topic><topic>Malignancy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Postoperative</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lenet, Tori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Richard W. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smoot, Rory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tzeng, Ching-Wei D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Flavio G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yohanathan, Lavanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleary, Sean P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martel, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertens, Kimberly A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lenet, Tori</au><au>Gilbert, Richard W. D.</au><au>Smoot, Rory</au><au>Tzeng, Ching-Wei D.</au><au>Rocha, Flavio G.</au><au>Yohanathan, Lavanya</au><au>Cleary, Sean P.</au><au>Martel, Guillaume</au><au>Bertens, Kimberly A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Intraoperative Frozen Section and Revision of Margins Lead to Improved Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Surg Oncol</stitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>7592</spage><epage>7602</epage><pages>7592-7602</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Background
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is a rare malignancy that arises at the biliary confluence. Achieving a margin-negative resection (R0) is challenging given the anatomic location of tumors and remains the most important prognostic indicator of long-term survival. The objective of this study is to review the impact of intraoperative revision of positive biliary margins in PHC on oncologic outcomes.
Patients and Methods
Electronic databases were searched from inception to October 2021. Studies comparing three types of patients undergoing resection of PHC with intraoperative frozen section of the proximal and/or distal bile ducts were identified: those who were margin-negative (R0), those with an initially positive margin who had revised negative margins (R1R0), and those with a persistently positive margin with or without revision of a positive margin (R1). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included risk of postoperative complication.
Results
A total of 449 studies were screened. Ten retrospective observational studies reporting on 1955 patients were included. Patients undergoing successful revision of a positive proximal and/or distal bile duct margin (R1R0) had similar OS to those with a primary margin-negative resection (R0) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72–1.19,
p
= 0.56,
I
2
= 84%], and significantly better OS than patients with a positive final bile duct margin (R1) (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34–0.79,
p
= 0.002,
I
2
= 0%). There was no increase in the risk of postoperative complications associated with additional resection, although postoperative morbidity was inconsistently reported.
Conclusions
This review supports routine intraoperative biliary margin evaluation during resection of PHC with revision if technically feasible.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1245/s10434-022-12041-x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1068-9265 |
ispartof | Annals of surgical oncology, 2022-11, Vol.29 (12), p.7592-7602 |
issn | 1068-9265 1534-4681 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2681036712 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Bile ducts Cholangiocarcinoma Complications Hepatobiliary Tumors Malignancy Medicine Medicine & Public Health Meta-analysis Morbidity Oncology Postoperative Surgery Surgical Oncology Survival Tumors |
title | Does Intraoperative Frozen Section and Revision of Margins Lead to Improved Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T11%3A06%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Intraoperative%20Frozen%20Section%20and%20Revision%20of%20Margins%20Lead%20to%20Improved%20Survival%20in%20Patients%20Undergoing%20Resection%20of%20Perihilar%20Cholangiocarcinoma?%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Lenet,%20Tori&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=7592&rft.epage=7602&rft.pages=7592-7602&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-022-12041-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2681036712%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2723282448&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |