Does Intraoperative Frozen Section and Revision of Margins Lead to Improved Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is a rare malignancy that arises at the biliary confluence. Achieving a margin-negative resection (R0) is challenging given the anatomic location of tumors and remains the most important prognostic indicator of long-term survival. The objective of this s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2022-11, Vol.29 (12), p.7592-7602
Hauptverfasser: Lenet, Tori, Gilbert, Richard W. D., Smoot, Rory, Tzeng, Ching-Wei D., Rocha, Flavio G., Yohanathan, Lavanya, Cleary, Sean P., Martel, Guillaume, Bertens, Kimberly A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7602
container_issue 12
container_start_page 7592
container_title Annals of surgical oncology
container_volume 29
creator Lenet, Tori
Gilbert, Richard W. D.
Smoot, Rory
Tzeng, Ching-Wei D.
Rocha, Flavio G.
Yohanathan, Lavanya
Cleary, Sean P.
Martel, Guillaume
Bertens, Kimberly A.
description Background Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is a rare malignancy that arises at the biliary confluence. Achieving a margin-negative resection (R0) is challenging given the anatomic location of tumors and remains the most important prognostic indicator of long-term survival. The objective of this study is to review the impact of intraoperative revision of positive biliary margins in PHC on oncologic outcomes. Patients and Methods Electronic databases were searched from inception to October 2021. Studies comparing three types of patients undergoing resection of PHC with intraoperative frozen section of the proximal and/or distal bile ducts were identified: those who were margin-negative (R0), those with an initially positive margin who had revised negative margins (R1R0), and those with a persistently positive margin with or without revision of a positive margin (R1). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included risk of postoperative complication. Results A total of 449 studies were screened. Ten retrospective observational studies reporting on 1955 patients were included. Patients undergoing successful revision of a positive proximal and/or distal bile duct margin (R1R0) had similar OS to those with a primary margin-negative resection (R0) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72–1.19, p = 0.56, I 2 = 84%], and significantly better OS than patients with a positive final bile duct margin (R1) (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34–0.79, p = 0.002, I 2 = 0%). There was no increase in the risk of postoperative complications associated with additional resection, although postoperative morbidity was inconsistently reported. Conclusions This review supports routine intraoperative biliary margin evaluation during resection of PHC with revision if technically feasible.
doi_str_mv 10.1245/s10434-022-12041-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2681036712</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2681036712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-854f1d99b6b307679e2f10f19f0a9863011858c23051c45f98725fb3a8c87f6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEEqXwAqwssWGT4t_EWaFqoGWkqag67dryONepq8QebE_o8Gw8HO5MJSQWrPyjcz4f31NV7wk-I5SLT4lgzniNKa0JxZzUjy-qEyLKFW8keVn2uJF1RxvxunqT0gPGpGVYnFS_vwRIaOlz1GELUWc3A7qI4Rd4tAaTXfBI-x7dwOzS0yFYdKXj4HxCK9A9ygEtp20MM_RovYuzm_WInEfXBQU-J3Tne4hDcH4okPSMLJRriO7ejTqixX0YtR9cMDoa58OkP6NztN6nDFOhmMPj8POQ4wqyrrXX4z659LZ6ZfWY4N3zelrdXXy9XXyrV98vl4vzVW2YoLmWglvSd92m2TDcNm0H1BJsSWex7mTDMCFSSEPLQIjhwnaypcJumJZGtrYBdlp9PHLLP3_sIGU1uWRgLKkh7JKiZcaYNS2hRfrhH-lD2MWSt6hayqiknMuiokeViSGlCFZto5t03CuC1VOh6lioKoWqQ6HqsZjY0ZSK2A8Q_6L_4_oDcAKmTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2723282448</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Intraoperative Frozen Section and Revision of Margins Lead to Improved Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Lenet, Tori ; Gilbert, Richard W. D. ; Smoot, Rory ; Tzeng, Ching-Wei D. ; Rocha, Flavio G. ; Yohanathan, Lavanya ; Cleary, Sean P. ; Martel, Guillaume ; Bertens, Kimberly A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lenet, Tori ; Gilbert, Richard W. D. ; Smoot, Rory ; Tzeng, Ching-Wei D. ; Rocha, Flavio G. ; Yohanathan, Lavanya ; Cleary, Sean P. ; Martel, Guillaume ; Bertens, Kimberly A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is a rare malignancy that arises at the biliary confluence. Achieving a margin-negative resection (R0) is challenging given the anatomic location of tumors and remains the most important prognostic indicator of long-term survival. The objective of this study is to review the impact of intraoperative revision of positive biliary margins in PHC on oncologic outcomes. Patients and Methods Electronic databases were searched from inception to October 2021. Studies comparing three types of patients undergoing resection of PHC with intraoperative frozen section of the proximal and/or distal bile ducts were identified: those who were margin-negative (R0), those with an initially positive margin who had revised negative margins (R1R0), and those with a persistently positive margin with or without revision of a positive margin (R1). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included risk of postoperative complication. Results A total of 449 studies were screened. Ten retrospective observational studies reporting on 1955 patients were included. Patients undergoing successful revision of a positive proximal and/or distal bile duct margin (R1R0) had similar OS to those with a primary margin-negative resection (R0) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72–1.19, p = 0.56, I 2 = 84%], and significantly better OS than patients with a positive final bile duct margin (R1) (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34–0.79, p = 0.002, I 2 = 0%). There was no increase in the risk of postoperative complications associated with additional resection, although postoperative morbidity was inconsistently reported. Conclusions This review supports routine intraoperative biliary margin evaluation during resection of PHC with revision if technically feasible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12041-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Bile ducts ; Cholangiocarcinoma ; Complications ; Hepatobiliary Tumors ; Malignancy ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Meta-analysis ; Morbidity ; Oncology ; Postoperative ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Survival ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2022-11, Vol.29 (12), p.7592-7602</ispartof><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2022</rights><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-854f1d99b6b307679e2f10f19f0a9863011858c23051c45f98725fb3a8c87f6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-854f1d99b6b307679e2f10f19f0a9863011858c23051c45f98725fb3a8c87f6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1245/s10434-022-12041-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1245/s10434-022-12041-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lenet, Tori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Richard W. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smoot, Rory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tzeng, Ching-Wei D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Flavio G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yohanathan, Lavanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleary, Sean P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martel, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertens, Kimberly A.</creatorcontrib><title>Does Intraoperative Frozen Section and Revision of Margins Lead to Improved Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is a rare malignancy that arises at the biliary confluence. Achieving a margin-negative resection (R0) is challenging given the anatomic location of tumors and remains the most important prognostic indicator of long-term survival. The objective of this study is to review the impact of intraoperative revision of positive biliary margins in PHC on oncologic outcomes. Patients and Methods Electronic databases were searched from inception to October 2021. Studies comparing three types of patients undergoing resection of PHC with intraoperative frozen section of the proximal and/or distal bile ducts were identified: those who were margin-negative (R0), those with an initially positive margin who had revised negative margins (R1R0), and those with a persistently positive margin with or without revision of a positive margin (R1). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included risk of postoperative complication. Results A total of 449 studies were screened. Ten retrospective observational studies reporting on 1955 patients were included. Patients undergoing successful revision of a positive proximal and/or distal bile duct margin (R1R0) had similar OS to those with a primary margin-negative resection (R0) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72–1.19, p = 0.56, I 2 = 84%], and significantly better OS than patients with a positive final bile duct margin (R1) (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34–0.79, p = 0.002, I 2 = 0%). There was no increase in the risk of postoperative complications associated with additional resection, although postoperative morbidity was inconsistently reported. Conclusions This review supports routine intraoperative biliary margin evaluation during resection of PHC with revision if technically feasible.</description><subject>Bile ducts</subject><subject>Cholangiocarcinoma</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Hepatobiliary Tumors</subject><subject>Malignancy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Postoperative</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEEqXwAqwssWGT4t_EWaFqoGWkqag67dryONepq8QebE_o8Gw8HO5MJSQWrPyjcz4f31NV7wk-I5SLT4lgzniNKa0JxZzUjy-qEyLKFW8keVn2uJF1RxvxunqT0gPGpGVYnFS_vwRIaOlz1GELUWc3A7qI4Rd4tAaTXfBI-x7dwOzS0yFYdKXj4HxCK9A9ygEtp20MM_RovYuzm_WInEfXBQU-J3Tne4hDcH4okPSMLJRriO7ejTqixX0YtR9cMDoa58OkP6NztN6nDFOhmMPj8POQ4wqyrrXX4z659LZ6ZfWY4N3zelrdXXy9XXyrV98vl4vzVW2YoLmWglvSd92m2TDcNm0H1BJsSWex7mTDMCFSSEPLQIjhwnaypcJumJZGtrYBdlp9PHLLP3_sIGU1uWRgLKkh7JKiZcaYNS2hRfrhH-lD2MWSt6hayqiknMuiokeViSGlCFZto5t03CuC1VOh6lioKoWqQ6HqsZjY0ZSK2A8Q_6L_4_oDcAKmTw</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Lenet, Tori</creator><creator>Gilbert, Richard W. D.</creator><creator>Smoot, Rory</creator><creator>Tzeng, Ching-Wei D.</creator><creator>Rocha, Flavio G.</creator><creator>Yohanathan, Lavanya</creator><creator>Cleary, Sean P.</creator><creator>Martel, Guillaume</creator><creator>Bertens, Kimberly A.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>Does Intraoperative Frozen Section and Revision of Margins Lead to Improved Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><author>Lenet, Tori ; Gilbert, Richard W. D. ; Smoot, Rory ; Tzeng, Ching-Wei D. ; Rocha, Flavio G. ; Yohanathan, Lavanya ; Cleary, Sean P. ; Martel, Guillaume ; Bertens, Kimberly A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-854f1d99b6b307679e2f10f19f0a9863011858c23051c45f98725fb3a8c87f6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bile ducts</topic><topic>Cholangiocarcinoma</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Hepatobiliary Tumors</topic><topic>Malignancy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Postoperative</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lenet, Tori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Richard W. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smoot, Rory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tzeng, Ching-Wei D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Flavio G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yohanathan, Lavanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleary, Sean P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martel, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertens, Kimberly A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lenet, Tori</au><au>Gilbert, Richard W. D.</au><au>Smoot, Rory</au><au>Tzeng, Ching-Wei D.</au><au>Rocha, Flavio G.</au><au>Yohanathan, Lavanya</au><au>Cleary, Sean P.</au><au>Martel, Guillaume</au><au>Bertens, Kimberly A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Intraoperative Frozen Section and Revision of Margins Lead to Improved Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Surg Oncol</stitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>7592</spage><epage>7602</epage><pages>7592-7602</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Background Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is a rare malignancy that arises at the biliary confluence. Achieving a margin-negative resection (R0) is challenging given the anatomic location of tumors and remains the most important prognostic indicator of long-term survival. The objective of this study is to review the impact of intraoperative revision of positive biliary margins in PHC on oncologic outcomes. Patients and Methods Electronic databases were searched from inception to October 2021. Studies comparing three types of patients undergoing resection of PHC with intraoperative frozen section of the proximal and/or distal bile ducts were identified: those who were margin-negative (R0), those with an initially positive margin who had revised negative margins (R1R0), and those with a persistently positive margin with or without revision of a positive margin (R1). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included risk of postoperative complication. Results A total of 449 studies were screened. Ten retrospective observational studies reporting on 1955 patients were included. Patients undergoing successful revision of a positive proximal and/or distal bile duct margin (R1R0) had similar OS to those with a primary margin-negative resection (R0) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72–1.19, p = 0.56, I 2 = 84%], and significantly better OS than patients with a positive final bile duct margin (R1) (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34–0.79, p = 0.002, I 2 = 0%). There was no increase in the risk of postoperative complications associated with additional resection, although postoperative morbidity was inconsistently reported. Conclusions This review supports routine intraoperative biliary margin evaluation during resection of PHC with revision if technically feasible.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1245/s10434-022-12041-x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1068-9265
ispartof Annals of surgical oncology, 2022-11, Vol.29 (12), p.7592-7602
issn 1068-9265
1534-4681
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2681036712
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Bile ducts
Cholangiocarcinoma
Complications
Hepatobiliary Tumors
Malignancy
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Meta-analysis
Morbidity
Oncology
Postoperative
Surgery
Surgical Oncology
Survival
Tumors
title Does Intraoperative Frozen Section and Revision of Margins Lead to Improved Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T11%3A06%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Intraoperative%20Frozen%20Section%20and%20Revision%20of%20Margins%20Lead%20to%20Improved%20Survival%20in%20Patients%20Undergoing%20Resection%20of%20Perihilar%20Cholangiocarcinoma?%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Lenet,%20Tori&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=7592&rft.epage=7602&rft.pages=7592-7602&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-022-12041-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2681036712%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2723282448&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true