Predicting Combined Effects of Chemical Stressors: Population‐Level Effects of Organic Chemical Mixtures with a Dynamic Energy Budget Individual‐Based Model

Most regulatory ecological risk‐assessment frameworks largely disregard discrepancies between the laboratory, where effects of single substances are assessed on individual organisms, and the real environment, where organisms live together in populations and are often exposed to multiple simultaneous...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental toxicology and chemistry 2022-09, Vol.41 (9), p.2240-2258
Hauptverfasser: Vlaeminck, Karel, Viaene, Karel P. J., Van Sprang, Patrick, De Schamphelaere, Karel A. C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2258
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2240
container_title Environmental toxicology and chemistry
container_volume 41
creator Vlaeminck, Karel
Viaene, Karel P. J.
Van Sprang, Patrick
De Schamphelaere, Karel A. C.
description Most regulatory ecological risk‐assessment frameworks largely disregard discrepancies between the laboratory, where effects of single substances are assessed on individual organisms, and the real environment, where organisms live together in populations and are often exposed to multiple simultaneously occurring substances. We assessed the capability of individual‐based models (IBMs) with a foundation in the dynamic energy budget (DEB) theory to predict combined effects of chemical mixtures on populations when they are calibrated on toxicity data of single substances at the individual level only. We calibrated a DEB‐IBM for Daphnia magna for four compounds (pyrene, dicofol, α‐hexachlorocyclohexane, and endosulfan), covering different physiological modes of action. We then performed a 17‐week population experiment with D. magna (designed using the DEB‐IBM), in which we tested mixture combinations of these chemicals at relevant concentrations, in a constant exposure phase (7‐week exposure and recovery), followed by a pulsed exposure phase (3‐day pulse exposure and recovery). The DEB‐IBM was validated by comparing blind predictions of mixture toxicity effects with the population data. The DEB‐IBM accurately predicted mixture toxicity effects on population abundance in both phases when assuming independent action at the effect mechanism level. The population recovery after the constant exposure was well predicted, but recovery after the pulse was not. The latter could be related to insufficient consideration of stochasticity in experimental design, model implementation, or both. Importantly, the mechanistic DEB‐IBM performed better than conventional statistical mixture assessment methods. We conclude that the DEB‐IBM, calibrated using only single‐substance individual‐level toxicity data, produces accurate predictions of population‐level mixture effects and can therefore provide meaningful contributions to ecological risk assessment of environmentally realistic mixture exposure scenarios. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:2240–2258. © 2022 SETAC
doi_str_mv 10.1002/etc.5409
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2678739612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2678739612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2909-451dc12c59dbedf11e42c45dc3f82c9dfe4d7cae6f394b50e18f1619e486ab093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd1qFDEYhoNYcG0LXkLAE0-mJpmZzMQzu65a2NKC9jhkky_blGyyJpnWPfMSvASvzStp-gMtgkffwfc8Ly-8CL2h5IgSwt5D0Ud9R8QLNKN9z5qR0_ElmpGhJc3A-PgKvc75ihDKhRAz9Oc8gXG6uLDG87hZuQAGL6wFXTKOFs8vYeO08vhbSZBzTPkDPo_byaviYvj76_cSrsE_N87SWgWnn8xT97NMVcY3rlxihT_tgqofvAiQ1jt8PJk1FHwSjLt2ZlK-hh6rXGucRgP-AO1Z5TMcPt59dPF58X3-tVmefTmZf1w2mgkimq6nRlOme2FWYCyl0DHd9Ua3dmRaGAudGbQCblvRrXoCdLSUUwHdyNWKiHYfvXvI3ab4Y4Jc5MZlDd6rAHHKkvFhHFrBKavo23_QqzilUNtJNhDeMzpw8hSoU8w5gZXb5DYq7SQl8m4qWaeSd1NVtHlAb5yH3X85WZl7_hb9X5jo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2706521760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting Combined Effects of Chemical Stressors: Population‐Level Effects of Organic Chemical Mixtures with a Dynamic Energy Budget Individual‐Based Model</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Vlaeminck, Karel ; Viaene, Karel P. J. ; Van Sprang, Patrick ; De Schamphelaere, Karel A. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vlaeminck, Karel ; Viaene, Karel P. J. ; Van Sprang, Patrick ; De Schamphelaere, Karel A. C.</creatorcontrib><description>Most regulatory ecological risk‐assessment frameworks largely disregard discrepancies between the laboratory, where effects of single substances are assessed on individual organisms, and the real environment, where organisms live together in populations and are often exposed to multiple simultaneously occurring substances. We assessed the capability of individual‐based models (IBMs) with a foundation in the dynamic energy budget (DEB) theory to predict combined effects of chemical mixtures on populations when they are calibrated on toxicity data of single substances at the individual level only. We calibrated a DEB‐IBM for Daphnia magna for four compounds (pyrene, dicofol, α‐hexachlorocyclohexane, and endosulfan), covering different physiological modes of action. We then performed a 17‐week population experiment with D. magna (designed using the DEB‐IBM), in which we tested mixture combinations of these chemicals at relevant concentrations, in a constant exposure phase (7‐week exposure and recovery), followed by a pulsed exposure phase (3‐day pulse exposure and recovery). The DEB‐IBM was validated by comparing blind predictions of mixture toxicity effects with the population data. The DEB‐IBM accurately predicted mixture toxicity effects on population abundance in both phases when assuming independent action at the effect mechanism level. The population recovery after the constant exposure was well predicted, but recovery after the pulse was not. The latter could be related to insufficient consideration of stochasticity in experimental design, model implementation, or both. Importantly, the mechanistic DEB‐IBM performed better than conventional statistical mixture assessment methods. We conclude that the DEB‐IBM, calibrated using only single‐substance individual‐level toxicity data, produces accurate predictions of population‐level mixture effects and can therefore provide meaningful contributions to ecological risk assessment of environmentally realistic mixture exposure scenarios. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:2240–2258. © 2022 SETAC</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-7268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/etc.5409</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Calibration ; Daphnia magna ; Design of experiments ; Dynamic energy budget ; Ecological effects ; Ecological modeling ; Ecological risk assessment ; Effect assessment ; Endosulfan ; Energy budget ; Environmental assessment ; Experimental design ; Exposure ; Hexachlorocyclohexane ; Individual‐based model ; Mechanistic effect modeling ; Mixture toxicity ; Mixtures ; Organic chemicals ; Organic chemistry ; Pesticides ; Population ; Population modeling ; Populations ; Recovery ; Risk assessment ; Stochasticity ; Toxicity</subject><ispartof>Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2022-09, Vol.41 (9), p.2240-2258</ispartof><rights>2022 SETAC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2909-451dc12c59dbedf11e42c45dc3f82c9dfe4d7cae6f394b50e18f1619e486ab093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2909-451dc12c59dbedf11e42c45dc3f82c9dfe4d7cae6f394b50e18f1619e486ab093</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5472-6371 ; 0000-0002-5063-922X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fetc.5409$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fetc.5409$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vlaeminck, Karel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viaene, Karel P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Sprang, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Schamphelaere, Karel A. C.</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting Combined Effects of Chemical Stressors: Population‐Level Effects of Organic Chemical Mixtures with a Dynamic Energy Budget Individual‐Based Model</title><title>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</title><description>Most regulatory ecological risk‐assessment frameworks largely disregard discrepancies between the laboratory, where effects of single substances are assessed on individual organisms, and the real environment, where organisms live together in populations and are often exposed to multiple simultaneously occurring substances. We assessed the capability of individual‐based models (IBMs) with a foundation in the dynamic energy budget (DEB) theory to predict combined effects of chemical mixtures on populations when they are calibrated on toxicity data of single substances at the individual level only. We calibrated a DEB‐IBM for Daphnia magna for four compounds (pyrene, dicofol, α‐hexachlorocyclohexane, and endosulfan), covering different physiological modes of action. We then performed a 17‐week population experiment with D. magna (designed using the DEB‐IBM), in which we tested mixture combinations of these chemicals at relevant concentrations, in a constant exposure phase (7‐week exposure and recovery), followed by a pulsed exposure phase (3‐day pulse exposure and recovery). The DEB‐IBM was validated by comparing blind predictions of mixture toxicity effects with the population data. The DEB‐IBM accurately predicted mixture toxicity effects on population abundance in both phases when assuming independent action at the effect mechanism level. The population recovery after the constant exposure was well predicted, but recovery after the pulse was not. The latter could be related to insufficient consideration of stochasticity in experimental design, model implementation, or both. Importantly, the mechanistic DEB‐IBM performed better than conventional statistical mixture assessment methods. We conclude that the DEB‐IBM, calibrated using only single‐substance individual‐level toxicity data, produces accurate predictions of population‐level mixture effects and can therefore provide meaningful contributions to ecological risk assessment of environmentally realistic mixture exposure scenarios. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:2240–2258. © 2022 SETAC</description><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Daphnia magna</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>Dynamic energy budget</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecological modeling</subject><subject>Ecological risk assessment</subject><subject>Effect assessment</subject><subject>Endosulfan</subject><subject>Energy budget</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Experimental design</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Hexachlorocyclohexane</subject><subject>Individual‐based model</subject><subject>Mechanistic effect modeling</subject><subject>Mixture toxicity</subject><subject>Mixtures</subject><subject>Organic chemicals</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population modeling</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Stochasticity</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><issn>0730-7268</issn><issn>1552-8618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kd1qFDEYhoNYcG0LXkLAE0-mJpmZzMQzu65a2NKC9jhkky_blGyyJpnWPfMSvASvzStp-gMtgkffwfc8Ly-8CL2h5IgSwt5D0Ud9R8QLNKN9z5qR0_ElmpGhJc3A-PgKvc75ihDKhRAz9Oc8gXG6uLDG87hZuQAGL6wFXTKOFs8vYeO08vhbSZBzTPkDPo_byaviYvj76_cSrsE_N87SWgWnn8xT97NMVcY3rlxihT_tgqofvAiQ1jt8PJk1FHwSjLt2ZlK-hh6rXGucRgP-AO1Z5TMcPt59dPF58X3-tVmefTmZf1w2mgkimq6nRlOme2FWYCyl0DHd9Ua3dmRaGAudGbQCblvRrXoCdLSUUwHdyNWKiHYfvXvI3ab4Y4Jc5MZlDd6rAHHKkvFhHFrBKavo23_QqzilUNtJNhDeMzpw8hSoU8w5gZXb5DYq7SQl8m4qWaeSd1NVtHlAb5yH3X85WZl7_hb9X5jo</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Vlaeminck, Karel</creator><creator>Viaene, Karel P. J.</creator><creator>Van Sprang, Patrick</creator><creator>De Schamphelaere, Karel A. C.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5472-6371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5063-922X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Predicting Combined Effects of Chemical Stressors: Population‐Level Effects of Organic Chemical Mixtures with a Dynamic Energy Budget Individual‐Based Model</title><author>Vlaeminck, Karel ; Viaene, Karel P. J. ; Van Sprang, Patrick ; De Schamphelaere, Karel A. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2909-451dc12c59dbedf11e42c45dc3f82c9dfe4d7cae6f394b50e18f1619e486ab093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Daphnia magna</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>Dynamic energy budget</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecological modeling</topic><topic>Ecological risk assessment</topic><topic>Effect assessment</topic><topic>Endosulfan</topic><topic>Energy budget</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Experimental design</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Hexachlorocyclohexane</topic><topic>Individual‐based model</topic><topic>Mechanistic effect modeling</topic><topic>Mixture toxicity</topic><topic>Mixtures</topic><topic>Organic chemicals</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population modeling</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Stochasticity</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vlaeminck, Karel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viaene, Karel P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Sprang, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Schamphelaere, Karel A. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vlaeminck, Karel</au><au>Viaene, Karel P. J.</au><au>Van Sprang, Patrick</au><au>De Schamphelaere, Karel A. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting Combined Effects of Chemical Stressors: Population‐Level Effects of Organic Chemical Mixtures with a Dynamic Energy Budget Individual‐Based Model</atitle><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and chemistry</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2240</spage><epage>2258</epage><pages>2240-2258</pages><issn>0730-7268</issn><eissn>1552-8618</eissn><abstract>Most regulatory ecological risk‐assessment frameworks largely disregard discrepancies between the laboratory, where effects of single substances are assessed on individual organisms, and the real environment, where organisms live together in populations and are often exposed to multiple simultaneously occurring substances. We assessed the capability of individual‐based models (IBMs) with a foundation in the dynamic energy budget (DEB) theory to predict combined effects of chemical mixtures on populations when they are calibrated on toxicity data of single substances at the individual level only. We calibrated a DEB‐IBM for Daphnia magna for four compounds (pyrene, dicofol, α‐hexachlorocyclohexane, and endosulfan), covering different physiological modes of action. We then performed a 17‐week population experiment with D. magna (designed using the DEB‐IBM), in which we tested mixture combinations of these chemicals at relevant concentrations, in a constant exposure phase (7‐week exposure and recovery), followed by a pulsed exposure phase (3‐day pulse exposure and recovery). The DEB‐IBM was validated by comparing blind predictions of mixture toxicity effects with the population data. The DEB‐IBM accurately predicted mixture toxicity effects on population abundance in both phases when assuming independent action at the effect mechanism level. The population recovery after the constant exposure was well predicted, but recovery after the pulse was not. The latter could be related to insufficient consideration of stochasticity in experimental design, model implementation, or both. Importantly, the mechanistic DEB‐IBM performed better than conventional statistical mixture assessment methods. We conclude that the DEB‐IBM, calibrated using only single‐substance individual‐level toxicity data, produces accurate predictions of population‐level mixture effects and can therefore provide meaningful contributions to ecological risk assessment of environmentally realistic mixture exposure scenarios. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:2240–2258. © 2022 SETAC</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/etc.5409</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5472-6371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5063-922X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0730-7268
ispartof Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2022-09, Vol.41 (9), p.2240-2258
issn 0730-7268
1552-8618
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2678739612
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Calibration
Daphnia magna
Design of experiments
Dynamic energy budget
Ecological effects
Ecological modeling
Ecological risk assessment
Effect assessment
Endosulfan
Energy budget
Environmental assessment
Experimental design
Exposure
Hexachlorocyclohexane
Individual‐based model
Mechanistic effect modeling
Mixture toxicity
Mixtures
Organic chemicals
Organic chemistry
Pesticides
Population
Population modeling
Populations
Recovery
Risk assessment
Stochasticity
Toxicity
title Predicting Combined Effects of Chemical Stressors: Population‐Level Effects of Organic Chemical Mixtures with a Dynamic Energy Budget Individual‐Based Model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T21%3A14%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20Combined%20Effects%20of%20Chemical%20Stressors:%20Population%E2%80%90Level%20Effects%20of%20Organic%20Chemical%20Mixtures%20with%20a%20Dynamic%20Energy%20Budget%20Individual%E2%80%90Based%20Model&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20toxicology%20and%20chemistry&rft.au=Vlaeminck,%20Karel&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2240&rft.epage=2258&rft.pages=2240-2258&rft.issn=0730-7268&rft.eissn=1552-8618&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/etc.5409&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2678739612%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2706521760&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true