Prognostic Factors and Primary Healing on Root Perforation Repaired with MTA: A 14-year Longitudinal Study

Few data are available on the long-term efficacy of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) in treating root canal perforations. This prospective cohort study builds on a previously reported trial to determine the outcome for teeth with root perforations treated with orthograde MTA after longer follow-up a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endodontics 2022-09, Vol.48 (9), p.1092-1099
Hauptverfasser: Gorni, Fabio G., Ionescu, Andrei C., Ambrogi, Federico, Brambilla, Eugenio, Gagliani, Massimo M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Few data are available on the long-term efficacy of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) in treating root canal perforations. This prospective cohort study builds on a previously reported trial to determine the outcome for teeth with root perforations treated with orthograde MTA after longer follow-up and identify potential prognostic factors. A prospective cohort study was performed, enrolling (1999–2009) patients with a single dental perforation treated with MTA. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative information was evaluated, and the outcomes were dichotomized as healed or nonhealing. Patients were followed up yearly until 2018 for a maximum of 17 years after treatment, with controls carried out until 14 years. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated using standardized follow-up protocols. Of the 124 entrolled patients (median age = 36.5 years, 53.2% male), 115 were healed at the first (n = 110, 89%) or second (n = 5, 4%) annual posttreatment checkup, while 9 subjects (7%, 4 females, 18–65 years old) did not heal. Characteristics significantly associated with nonhealing were gender, positive probing, size, and perforation site. Perforations recurred in 48 teeth during the follow-up with the estimated probability of reversal at 5, 10, and 14 years of 6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2%–10%), 30% (95% CI, 20%–38%), and 62% (95% CI, 46%–73%), respectively. Positive probing had a higher reversal risk (hazard ratio = 3.3, P ≤ .001), and perforations >3 mm were more likely to have a reversal (hazard ratio = 4.1, P 
ISSN:0099-2399
1878-3554
DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2022.06.005