Laparoscopic revision paraesophageal hernia repair: a 16-year experience at a single institution
Background Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHr) is a safe and effective procedure for relieving foregut symptoms associated with paraesophageal hernias (PEH). Nonetheless, it is estimated that about 30–50% of patients will have symptomatic recurrence requiring additional surgical interve...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2023, Vol.37 (1), p.624-630 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 630 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 624 |
| container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
| container_volume | 37 |
| creator | Addo, Alex Carmichael, Dylan Chan, Kelley Broda, Andrew Dessify, Brian Mekel, Gabriel Gabrielsen, Jon D. Petrick, Anthony T. Parker, David M. |
| description | Background
Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHr) is a safe and effective procedure for relieving foregut symptoms associated with paraesophageal hernias (PEH). Nonetheless, it is estimated that about 30–50% of patients will have symptomatic recurrence requiring additional surgical intervention. Revision surgery is technically demanding and may be associated with a higher rate of morbidity and poor patient-reported outcomes. We present the largest study of perioperative and quality-of-life outcomes among patients who underwent laparoscopic revision PEHr.
Methods
A retrospective review of all patients who underwent laparoscopic revision paraesophageal hernia repair between February 2003 and October 2019, at a single institution was conducted. All revisions of Type I hiatal hernias were excluded. The following validated surveys were used to evaluate quality-of-life outcomes: Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related QOL (GERD-HRQL). Patient demographic, perioperative, and quality-of-life (QOL) data were analyzed using univariate analysis.
Results
One hundred ninety patients were included in the final analysis (63.2% female, 90.5% single revision, 9.5% multiple revisions) with a mean age, BMI, and age-adjusted Charlson score of 56.6 ± 14.7 years, 29.7 ± 5.7 kg/m
2
, and 2.04 ± 1.9, respectively. The study cohort consisted of type II (49.5%), III (46.3%), and IV hiatal hernia (4.2%), respectively. Most patients underwent either a complete (68.7%) or partial (27.7%) fundoplication. A Collis gastroplasty was performed in 14.7% of patients. The median follow-up was 17.6 months. The overall morbidity and mortality rate were 15.8% and 1.1%, respectively. The 30-day readmission rate was 9.5%. Additionally, at latest follow-up 47.9% remained on antireflux medication. At latest follow-up, there was significant improvement in mean RSI score (46.4%,
p
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-022-09359-8 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2678427916</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2678427916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-564e6cd3a6f9f618f84fc67ccf67195645030948234e647aca32a31a9872fca23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtP3DAURi1UBAPlD7BAkbrpxq1f8YNdNWpppZHYwNrcem4Go0wS7KRi_n09DQ-pC1aWvnvu56tDyDlnXzhj5mtmTGlFmRCUOVk7ag_IgispqBDcfiCLkjIqjFPH5CTnB1Z4x-sjcixrw6URfEHuVjBA6nPohxiqhH9ijn1XlQww98M9bBDa6h5TF6GMB4jpsoKKa7pDSBU-DZgidgErGEueY7dpsYpdHuM4jaXqIzlsoM149vyektsf32-WP-nq-urX8tuKBmnqkdZaoQ5rCbpxjea2saoJ2oTQaMNdmdZMMqeskIVTBgJIAZKDs0Y0AYQ8JZ_n3iH1jxPm0W9jDti20GE_ZS-0saq44Lqgn_5DH_opdeU6L4yuBTfO2kKJmQpFT07Y-CHFLaSd58zv_fvZvy_-_T__fr908Vw9_d7i-nXlRXgB5AzkMuo2mN7-fqf2L0Ejj9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2765217988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laparoscopic revision paraesophageal hernia repair: a 16-year experience at a single institution</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Addo, Alex ; Carmichael, Dylan ; Chan, Kelley ; Broda, Andrew ; Dessify, Brian ; Mekel, Gabriel ; Gabrielsen, Jon D. ; Petrick, Anthony T. ; Parker, David M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Addo, Alex ; Carmichael, Dylan ; Chan, Kelley ; Broda, Andrew ; Dessify, Brian ; Mekel, Gabriel ; Gabrielsen, Jon D. ; Petrick, Anthony T. ; Parker, David M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHr) is a safe and effective procedure for relieving foregut symptoms associated with paraesophageal hernias (PEH). Nonetheless, it is estimated that about 30–50% of patients will have symptomatic recurrence requiring additional surgical intervention. Revision surgery is technically demanding and may be associated with a higher rate of morbidity and poor patient-reported outcomes. We present the largest study of perioperative and quality-of-life outcomes among patients who underwent laparoscopic revision PEHr.
Methods
A retrospective review of all patients who underwent laparoscopic revision paraesophageal hernia repair between February 2003 and October 2019, at a single institution was conducted. All revisions of Type I hiatal hernias were excluded. The following validated surveys were used to evaluate quality-of-life outcomes: Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related QOL (GERD-HRQL). Patient demographic, perioperative, and quality-of-life (QOL) data were analyzed using univariate analysis.
Results
One hundred ninety patients were included in the final analysis (63.2% female, 90.5% single revision, 9.5% multiple revisions) with a mean age, BMI, and age-adjusted Charlson score of 56.6 ± 14.7 years, 29.7 ± 5.7 kg/m
2
, and 2.04 ± 1.9, respectively. The study cohort consisted of type II (49.5%), III (46.3%), and IV hiatal hernia (4.2%), respectively. Most patients underwent either a complete (68.7%) or partial (27.7%) fundoplication. A Collis gastroplasty was performed in 14.7% of patients. The median follow-up was 17.6 months. The overall morbidity and mortality rate were 15.8% and 1.1%, respectively. The 30-day readmission rate was 9.5%. Additionally, at latest follow-up 47.9% remained on antireflux medication. At latest follow-up, there was significant improvement in mean RSI score (46.4%,
p
< 0.001) from baseline within the study population. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in QOL between patients who had a history of an initial repair only or history of revision surgery at latest review. The overall recurrence rate was 16.3% with 6.3% requiring a surgical revision.
Conclusion
Laparoscopic revision PEHr is associated with a low rate of morbidity and mortality. Revision surgery may provide improvement in QOL outcomes, despite the high rate of long-term antireflux medication use. The rate of recurrent paraesophageal hernia remains low with few patients requiring a second revision. However, longer follow-up is needed to better characterize the long-term recurrence rate and symptomatic improvements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09359-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35713721</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>2021 SAGES Oral ; Abdominal Surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Fundoplication - methods ; Gastroenterology ; Gastroesophageal reflux ; Gastroesophageal Reflux - complications ; Gastroesophageal Reflux - surgery ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Hernia, Hiatal - complications ; Hernias ; Herniorrhaphy - methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Patients ; Proctology ; Quality of Life ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2023, Vol.37 (1), p.624-630</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-564e6cd3a6f9f618f84fc67ccf67195645030948234e647aca32a31a9872fca23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-564e6cd3a6f9f618f84fc67ccf67195645030948234e647aca32a31a9872fca23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6230-5772</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-022-09359-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-022-09359-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35713721$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Addo, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmichael, Dylan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Kelley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broda, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dessify, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mekel, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabrielsen, Jon D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrick, Anthony T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, David M.</creatorcontrib><title>Laparoscopic revision paraesophageal hernia repair: a 16-year experience at a single institution</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background
Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHr) is a safe and effective procedure for relieving foregut symptoms associated with paraesophageal hernias (PEH). Nonetheless, it is estimated that about 30–50% of patients will have symptomatic recurrence requiring additional surgical intervention. Revision surgery is technically demanding and may be associated with a higher rate of morbidity and poor patient-reported outcomes. We present the largest study of perioperative and quality-of-life outcomes among patients who underwent laparoscopic revision PEHr.
Methods
A retrospective review of all patients who underwent laparoscopic revision paraesophageal hernia repair between February 2003 and October 2019, at a single institution was conducted. All revisions of Type I hiatal hernias were excluded. The following validated surveys were used to evaluate quality-of-life outcomes: Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related QOL (GERD-HRQL). Patient demographic, perioperative, and quality-of-life (QOL) data were analyzed using univariate analysis.
Results
One hundred ninety patients were included in the final analysis (63.2% female, 90.5% single revision, 9.5% multiple revisions) with a mean age, BMI, and age-adjusted Charlson score of 56.6 ± 14.7 years, 29.7 ± 5.7 kg/m
2
, and 2.04 ± 1.9, respectively. The study cohort consisted of type II (49.5%), III (46.3%), and IV hiatal hernia (4.2%), respectively. Most patients underwent either a complete (68.7%) or partial (27.7%) fundoplication. A Collis gastroplasty was performed in 14.7% of patients. The median follow-up was 17.6 months. The overall morbidity and mortality rate were 15.8% and 1.1%, respectively. The 30-day readmission rate was 9.5%. Additionally, at latest follow-up 47.9% remained on antireflux medication. At latest follow-up, there was significant improvement in mean RSI score (46.4%,
p
< 0.001) from baseline within the study population. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in QOL between patients who had a history of an initial repair only or history of revision surgery at latest review. The overall recurrence rate was 16.3% with 6.3% requiring a surgical revision.
Conclusion
Laparoscopic revision PEHr is associated with a low rate of morbidity and mortality. Revision surgery may provide improvement in QOL outcomes, despite the high rate of long-term antireflux medication use. The rate of recurrent paraesophageal hernia remains low with few patients requiring a second revision. However, longer follow-up is needed to better characterize the long-term recurrence rate and symptomatic improvements.</description><subject>2021 SAGES Oral</subject><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundoplication - methods</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal reflux</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal Reflux - complications</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal Reflux - surgery</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Hernia, Hiatal - complications</subject><subject>Hernias</subject><subject>Herniorrhaphy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtP3DAURi1UBAPlD7BAkbrpxq1f8YNdNWpppZHYwNrcem4Go0wS7KRi_n09DQ-pC1aWvnvu56tDyDlnXzhj5mtmTGlFmRCUOVk7ag_IgispqBDcfiCLkjIqjFPH5CTnB1Z4x-sjcixrw6URfEHuVjBA6nPohxiqhH9ijn1XlQww98M9bBDa6h5TF6GMB4jpsoKKa7pDSBU-DZgidgErGEueY7dpsYpdHuM4jaXqIzlsoM149vyektsf32-WP-nq-urX8tuKBmnqkdZaoQ5rCbpxjea2saoJ2oTQaMNdmdZMMqeskIVTBgJIAZKDs0Y0AYQ8JZ_n3iH1jxPm0W9jDti20GE_ZS-0saq44Lqgn_5DH_opdeU6L4yuBTfO2kKJmQpFT07Y-CHFLaSd58zv_fvZvy_-_T__fr908Vw9_d7i-nXlRXgB5AzkMuo2mN7-fqf2L0Ejj9Q</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Addo, Alex</creator><creator>Carmichael, Dylan</creator><creator>Chan, Kelley</creator><creator>Broda, Andrew</creator><creator>Dessify, Brian</creator><creator>Mekel, Gabriel</creator><creator>Gabrielsen, Jon D.</creator><creator>Petrick, Anthony T.</creator><creator>Parker, David M.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6230-5772</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Laparoscopic revision paraesophageal hernia repair: a 16-year experience at a single institution</title><author>Addo, Alex ; Carmichael, Dylan ; Chan, Kelley ; Broda, Andrew ; Dessify, Brian ; Mekel, Gabriel ; Gabrielsen, Jon D. ; Petrick, Anthony T. ; Parker, David M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-564e6cd3a6f9f618f84fc67ccf67195645030948234e647aca32a31a9872fca23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>2021 SAGES Oral</topic><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundoplication - methods</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal reflux</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal Reflux - complications</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal Reflux - surgery</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Hernia, Hiatal - complications</topic><topic>Hernias</topic><topic>Herniorrhaphy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Addo, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmichael, Dylan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Kelley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broda, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dessify, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mekel, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabrielsen, Jon D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrick, Anthony T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, David M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Addo, Alex</au><au>Carmichael, Dylan</au><au>Chan, Kelley</au><au>Broda, Andrew</au><au>Dessify, Brian</au><au>Mekel, Gabriel</au><au>Gabrielsen, Jon D.</au><au>Petrick, Anthony T.</au><au>Parker, David M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laparoscopic revision paraesophageal hernia repair: a 16-year experience at a single institution</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>624</spage><epage>630</epage><pages>624-630</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background
Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHr) is a safe and effective procedure for relieving foregut symptoms associated with paraesophageal hernias (PEH). Nonetheless, it is estimated that about 30–50% of patients will have symptomatic recurrence requiring additional surgical intervention. Revision surgery is technically demanding and may be associated with a higher rate of morbidity and poor patient-reported outcomes. We present the largest study of perioperative and quality-of-life outcomes among patients who underwent laparoscopic revision PEHr.
Methods
A retrospective review of all patients who underwent laparoscopic revision paraesophageal hernia repair between February 2003 and October 2019, at a single institution was conducted. All revisions of Type I hiatal hernias were excluded. The following validated surveys were used to evaluate quality-of-life outcomes: Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related QOL (GERD-HRQL). Patient demographic, perioperative, and quality-of-life (QOL) data were analyzed using univariate analysis.
Results
One hundred ninety patients were included in the final analysis (63.2% female, 90.5% single revision, 9.5% multiple revisions) with a mean age, BMI, and age-adjusted Charlson score of 56.6 ± 14.7 years, 29.7 ± 5.7 kg/m
2
, and 2.04 ± 1.9, respectively. The study cohort consisted of type II (49.5%), III (46.3%), and IV hiatal hernia (4.2%), respectively. Most patients underwent either a complete (68.7%) or partial (27.7%) fundoplication. A Collis gastroplasty was performed in 14.7% of patients. The median follow-up was 17.6 months. The overall morbidity and mortality rate were 15.8% and 1.1%, respectively. The 30-day readmission rate was 9.5%. Additionally, at latest follow-up 47.9% remained on antireflux medication. At latest follow-up, there was significant improvement in mean RSI score (46.4%,
p
< 0.001) from baseline within the study population. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in QOL between patients who had a history of an initial repair only or history of revision surgery at latest review. The overall recurrence rate was 16.3% with 6.3% requiring a surgical revision.
Conclusion
Laparoscopic revision PEHr is associated with a low rate of morbidity and mortality. Revision surgery may provide improvement in QOL outcomes, despite the high rate of long-term antireflux medication use. The rate of recurrent paraesophageal hernia remains low with few patients requiring a second revision. However, longer follow-up is needed to better characterize the long-term recurrence rate and symptomatic improvements.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>35713721</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-022-09359-8</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6230-5772</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
| ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2023, Vol.37 (1), p.624-630 |
| issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2678427916 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | 2021 SAGES Oral Abdominal Surgery Adult Aged Female Fundoplication - methods Gastroenterology Gastroesophageal reflux Gastroesophageal Reflux - complications Gastroesophageal Reflux - surgery Gynecology Hepatology Hernia, Hiatal - complications Hernias Herniorrhaphy - methods Humans Laparoscopy Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Morbidity Mortality Patients Proctology Quality of Life Retrospective Studies Surgery Treatment Outcome |
| title | Laparoscopic revision paraesophageal hernia repair: a 16-year experience at a single institution |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T03%3A37%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic%20revision%20paraesophageal%20hernia%20repair:%20a%2016-year%20experience%20at%20a%20single%20institution&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Addo,%20Alex&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=624&rft.epage=630&rft.pages=624-630&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-022-09359-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2678427916%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2765217988&rft_id=info:pmid/35713721&rfr_iscdi=true |