Model comparison of flow through a municipal solid waste incinerator ash landfill

The drainage discharge of a municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) bottom ash landfill was simulated using various modelling approaches. Two functional models including a neural networks approach and a hydrological linear storage model, and two mechanistic models requiring physical/hydrodynamic pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2001-03, Vol.243 (1), p.55-72
Hauptverfasser: Johnson, C.A., Schaap, M.G., Abbaspour, K.C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 72
container_issue 1
container_start_page 55
container_title Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)
container_volume 243
creator Johnson, C.A.
Schaap, M.G.
Abbaspour, K.C.
description The drainage discharge of a municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) bottom ash landfill was simulated using various modelling approaches. Two functional models including a neural networks approach and a hydrological linear storage model, and two mechanistic models requiring physical/hydrodynamic properties of the waste material, HYDRUS5 and MACRO (Version 4.0) were used. The models were calibrated using an 8-month data set from 1996 and validated on a 3-month data set from winter 1994/1995. The data sets comprised hourly values of rainfall, evaporation (estimated from the Penman–Monteith relationship), drainage discharge and electrical conductivity. Predicted and measured discharges were compared. The discharge predicted by the functional models more exactly followed the discharge patterns of the measured data but, particularly the linear storage model, could not cope with the non-linearity of the system that was caused by seasonal changes in water content of the MSWI bottom ash. The fit of the neural networks model to the data improved with increasing prior information but was less smooth than the measured data. The mechanistic model that included preferential discharge, MACRO, better modelled the discharge characteristics when inversely applied, indicating that preferential flow does occur in this system. However, even the inverse application of HYDRUS5 could not describe the system discharge as well as the linear storage model. All model approaches would have benefited from a more exact knowledge of initial water content.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00404-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26780755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169400004042</els_id><sourcerecordid>14576819</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a451t-ff9df4a62fe34a97b667dff58e3011dfdbdc86168af0596a248fb7d213715f743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1LHEEQxZuQQDYmf4LQEAjxMEl1T3_NSYKYKBhEjOemtj_clt7ptXs24n_v6IrXrUtdfq9e8R4hhwx-MGDq5zUA5x1Tg_gOcAQgQHT8HVkwo4eOa9DvyeIN-Ug-tXYH8_S9WJCrv8WHTF1Zb7CmVkZaIo25PNBpVcv2dkWRrrdjcmmDmbaSk6cP2KZA0-jSGCpOpVJsK5px9DHl_Jl8iJhb-PK6D8jN79N_J2fdxeWf85NfFx0KyaYuxsFHgYrH0Asc9FIp7WOUJvTAmI9-6Z1RTBmMIAeFXJi41J6zXjMZtegPyLfd3U0t99vQJrtOzYU8_xHKtlmutAEt5V6QGVBGKLMfFFIrw4YZlDvQ1dJaDdFualpjfbQM7HMl9qUS-5y3BbAvlVg-676-GmBzmGPFOcP2Jh4Yk0M_U8c7Kszp_U-h2uZSGF3wqQY3WV_SHp8nshifrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14576819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Model comparison of flow through a municipal solid waste incinerator ash landfill</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Johnson, C.A. ; Schaap, M.G. ; Abbaspour, K.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, C.A. ; Schaap, M.G. ; Abbaspour, K.C.</creatorcontrib><description>The drainage discharge of a municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) bottom ash landfill was simulated using various modelling approaches. Two functional models including a neural networks approach and a hydrological linear storage model, and two mechanistic models requiring physical/hydrodynamic properties of the waste material, HYDRUS5 and MACRO (Version 4.0) were used. The models were calibrated using an 8-month data set from 1996 and validated on a 3-month data set from winter 1994/1995. The data sets comprised hourly values of rainfall, evaporation (estimated from the Penman–Monteith relationship), drainage discharge and electrical conductivity. Predicted and measured discharges were compared. The discharge predicted by the functional models more exactly followed the discharge patterns of the measured data but, particularly the linear storage model, could not cope with the non-linearity of the system that was caused by seasonal changes in water content of the MSWI bottom ash. The fit of the neural networks model to the data improved with increasing prior information but was less smooth than the measured data. The mechanistic model that included preferential discharge, MACRO, better modelled the discharge characteristics when inversely applied, indicating that preferential flow does occur in this system. However, even the inverse application of HYDRUS5 could not describe the system discharge as well as the linear storage model. All model approaches would have benefited from a more exact knowledge of initial water content.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00404-2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHYDA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Calibration ; Discharge ; Drainage ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Evaporation ; Exact sciences and technology ; Hydrodynamics ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Incinerators ; Landfill ; Landfills ; Leachate ; Mathematical models ; Moisture content ; Neural network ; Neural networks ; Nonlinearity ; Pollution, environment geology ; Preferential flow ; Rainfall ; Resistivity ; Solid wastes ; Storage ; Wastes</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2001-03, Vol.243 (1), p.55-72</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a451t-ff9df4a62fe34a97b667dff58e3011dfdbdc86168af0596a248fb7d213715f743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a451t-ff9df4a62fe34a97b667dff58e3011dfdbdc86168af0596a248fb7d213715f743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169400004042$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=911593$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, C.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaap, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbaspour, K.C.</creatorcontrib><title>Model comparison of flow through a municipal solid waste incinerator ash landfill</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>The drainage discharge of a municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) bottom ash landfill was simulated using various modelling approaches. Two functional models including a neural networks approach and a hydrological linear storage model, and two mechanistic models requiring physical/hydrodynamic properties of the waste material, HYDRUS5 and MACRO (Version 4.0) were used. The models were calibrated using an 8-month data set from 1996 and validated on a 3-month data set from winter 1994/1995. The data sets comprised hourly values of rainfall, evaporation (estimated from the Penman–Monteith relationship), drainage discharge and electrical conductivity. Predicted and measured discharges were compared. The discharge predicted by the functional models more exactly followed the discharge patterns of the measured data but, particularly the linear storage model, could not cope with the non-linearity of the system that was caused by seasonal changes in water content of the MSWI bottom ash. The fit of the neural networks model to the data improved with increasing prior information but was less smooth than the measured data. The mechanistic model that included preferential discharge, MACRO, better modelled the discharge characteristics when inversely applied, indicating that preferential flow does occur in this system. However, even the inverse application of HYDRUS5 could not describe the system discharge as well as the linear storage model. All model approaches would have benefited from a more exact knowledge of initial water content.</description><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Evaporation</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Incinerators</subject><subject>Landfill</subject><subject>Landfills</subject><subject>Leachate</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Neural network</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>Preferential flow</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Resistivity</subject><subject>Solid wastes</subject><subject>Storage</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1LHEEQxZuQQDYmf4LQEAjxMEl1T3_NSYKYKBhEjOemtj_clt7ptXs24n_v6IrXrUtdfq9e8R4hhwx-MGDq5zUA5x1Tg_gOcAQgQHT8HVkwo4eOa9DvyeIN-Ug-tXYH8_S9WJCrv8WHTF1Zb7CmVkZaIo25PNBpVcv2dkWRrrdjcmmDmbaSk6cP2KZA0-jSGCpOpVJsK5px9DHl_Jl8iJhb-PK6D8jN79N_J2fdxeWf85NfFx0KyaYuxsFHgYrH0Asc9FIp7WOUJvTAmI9-6Z1RTBmMIAeFXJi41J6zXjMZtegPyLfd3U0t99vQJrtOzYU8_xHKtlmutAEt5V6QGVBGKLMfFFIrw4YZlDvQ1dJaDdFualpjfbQM7HMl9qUS-5y3BbAvlVg-676-GmBzmGPFOcP2Jh4Yk0M_U8c7Kszp_U-h2uZSGF3wqQY3WV_SHp8nshifrg</recordid><startdate>20010301</startdate><enddate>20010301</enddate><creator>Johnson, C.A.</creator><creator>Schaap, M.G.</creator><creator>Abbaspour, K.C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010301</creationdate><title>Model comparison of flow through a municipal solid waste incinerator ash landfill</title><author>Johnson, C.A. ; Schaap, M.G. ; Abbaspour, K.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a451t-ff9df4a62fe34a97b667dff58e3011dfdbdc86168af0596a248fb7d213715f743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Evaporation</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Incinerators</topic><topic>Landfill</topic><topic>Landfills</topic><topic>Leachate</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Neural network</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>Preferential flow</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Resistivity</topic><topic>Solid wastes</topic><topic>Storage</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, C.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaap, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbaspour, K.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, C.A.</au><au>Schaap, M.G.</au><au>Abbaspour, K.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Model comparison of flow through a municipal solid waste incinerator ash landfill</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2001-03-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>243</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>55</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>55-72</pages><issn>0022-1694</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><coden>JHYDA7</coden><abstract>The drainage discharge of a municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) bottom ash landfill was simulated using various modelling approaches. Two functional models including a neural networks approach and a hydrological linear storage model, and two mechanistic models requiring physical/hydrodynamic properties of the waste material, HYDRUS5 and MACRO (Version 4.0) were used. The models were calibrated using an 8-month data set from 1996 and validated on a 3-month data set from winter 1994/1995. The data sets comprised hourly values of rainfall, evaporation (estimated from the Penman–Monteith relationship), drainage discharge and electrical conductivity. Predicted and measured discharges were compared. The discharge predicted by the functional models more exactly followed the discharge patterns of the measured data but, particularly the linear storage model, could not cope with the non-linearity of the system that was caused by seasonal changes in water content of the MSWI bottom ash. The fit of the neural networks model to the data improved with increasing prior information but was less smooth than the measured data. The mechanistic model that included preferential discharge, MACRO, better modelled the discharge characteristics when inversely applied, indicating that preferential flow does occur in this system. However, even the inverse application of HYDRUS5 could not describe the system discharge as well as the linear storage model. All model approaches would have benefited from a more exact knowledge of initial water content.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00404-2</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1694
ispartof Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2001-03, Vol.243 (1), p.55-72
issn 0022-1694
1879-2707
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26780755
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Calibration
Discharge
Drainage
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics
Evaporation
Exact sciences and technology
Hydrodynamics
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Incinerators
Landfill
Landfills
Leachate
Mathematical models
Moisture content
Neural network
Neural networks
Nonlinearity
Pollution, environment geology
Preferential flow
Rainfall
Resistivity
Solid wastes
Storage
Wastes
title Model comparison of flow through a municipal solid waste incinerator ash landfill
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T02%3A37%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Model%20comparison%20of%20flow%20through%20a%20municipal%20solid%20waste%20incinerator%20ash%20landfill&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Johnson,%20C.A.&rft.date=2001-03-01&rft.volume=243&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=55-72&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft.coden=JHYDA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00404-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14576819%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14576819&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022169400004042&rfr_iscdi=true