Model comparison of flow through a municipal solid waste incinerator ash landfill
The drainage discharge of a municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) bottom ash landfill was simulated using various modelling approaches. Two functional models including a neural networks approach and a hydrological linear storage model, and two mechanistic models requiring physical/hydrodynamic pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2001-03, Vol.243 (1), p.55-72 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 72 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 55 |
container_title | Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) |
container_volume | 243 |
creator | Johnson, C.A. Schaap, M.G. Abbaspour, K.C. |
description | The drainage discharge of a municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) bottom ash landfill was simulated using various modelling approaches. Two functional models including a neural networks approach and a hydrological linear storage model, and two mechanistic models requiring physical/hydrodynamic properties of the waste material, HYDRUS5 and MACRO (Version 4.0) were used. The models were calibrated using an 8-month data set from 1996 and validated on a 3-month data set from winter 1994/1995. The data sets comprised hourly values of rainfall, evaporation (estimated from the Penman–Monteith relationship), drainage discharge and electrical conductivity. Predicted and measured discharges were compared.
The discharge predicted by the functional models more exactly followed the discharge patterns of the measured data but, particularly the linear storage model, could not cope with the non-linearity of the system that was caused by seasonal changes in water content of the MSWI bottom ash. The fit of the neural networks model to the data improved with increasing prior information but was less smooth than the measured data. The mechanistic model that included preferential discharge, MACRO, better modelled the discharge characteristics when inversely applied, indicating that preferential flow does occur in this system. However, even the inverse application of HYDRUS5 could not describe the system discharge as well as the linear storage model. All model approaches would have benefited from a more exact knowledge of initial water content. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00404-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26780755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169400004042</els_id><sourcerecordid>14576819</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a451t-ff9df4a62fe34a97b667dff58e3011dfdbdc86168af0596a248fb7d213715f743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1LHEEQxZuQQDYmf4LQEAjxMEl1T3_NSYKYKBhEjOemtj_clt7ptXs24n_v6IrXrUtdfq9e8R4hhwx-MGDq5zUA5x1Tg_gOcAQgQHT8HVkwo4eOa9DvyeIN-Ug-tXYH8_S9WJCrv8WHTF1Zb7CmVkZaIo25PNBpVcv2dkWRrrdjcmmDmbaSk6cP2KZA0-jSGCpOpVJsK5px9DHl_Jl8iJhb-PK6D8jN79N_J2fdxeWf85NfFx0KyaYuxsFHgYrH0Asc9FIp7WOUJvTAmI9-6Z1RTBmMIAeFXJi41J6zXjMZtegPyLfd3U0t99vQJrtOzYU8_xHKtlmutAEt5V6QGVBGKLMfFFIrw4YZlDvQ1dJaDdFualpjfbQM7HMl9qUS-5y3BbAvlVg-676-GmBzmGPFOcP2Jh4Yk0M_U8c7Kszp_U-h2uZSGF3wqQY3WV_SHp8nshifrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14576819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Model comparison of flow through a municipal solid waste incinerator ash landfill</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Johnson, C.A. ; Schaap, M.G. ; Abbaspour, K.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, C.A. ; Schaap, M.G. ; Abbaspour, K.C.</creatorcontrib><description>The drainage discharge of a municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) bottom ash landfill was simulated using various modelling approaches. Two functional models including a neural networks approach and a hydrological linear storage model, and two mechanistic models requiring physical/hydrodynamic properties of the waste material, HYDRUS5 and MACRO (Version 4.0) were used. The models were calibrated using an 8-month data set from 1996 and validated on a 3-month data set from winter 1994/1995. The data sets comprised hourly values of rainfall, evaporation (estimated from the Penman–Monteith relationship), drainage discharge and electrical conductivity. Predicted and measured discharges were compared.
The discharge predicted by the functional models more exactly followed the discharge patterns of the measured data but, particularly the linear storage model, could not cope with the non-linearity of the system that was caused by seasonal changes in water content of the MSWI bottom ash. The fit of the neural networks model to the data improved with increasing prior information but was less smooth than the measured data. The mechanistic model that included preferential discharge, MACRO, better modelled the discharge characteristics when inversely applied, indicating that preferential flow does occur in this system. However, even the inverse application of HYDRUS5 could not describe the system discharge as well as the linear storage model. All model approaches would have benefited from a more exact knowledge of initial water content.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00404-2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHYDA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Calibration ; Discharge ; Drainage ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Evaporation ; Exact sciences and technology ; Hydrodynamics ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Incinerators ; Landfill ; Landfills ; Leachate ; Mathematical models ; Moisture content ; Neural network ; Neural networks ; Nonlinearity ; Pollution, environment geology ; Preferential flow ; Rainfall ; Resistivity ; Solid wastes ; Storage ; Wastes</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2001-03, Vol.243 (1), p.55-72</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a451t-ff9df4a62fe34a97b667dff58e3011dfdbdc86168af0596a248fb7d213715f743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a451t-ff9df4a62fe34a97b667dff58e3011dfdbdc86168af0596a248fb7d213715f743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169400004042$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=911593$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, C.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaap, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbaspour, K.C.</creatorcontrib><title>Model comparison of flow through a municipal solid waste incinerator ash landfill</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>The drainage discharge of a municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) bottom ash landfill was simulated using various modelling approaches. Two functional models including a neural networks approach and a hydrological linear storage model, and two mechanistic models requiring physical/hydrodynamic properties of the waste material, HYDRUS5 and MACRO (Version 4.0) were used. The models were calibrated using an 8-month data set from 1996 and validated on a 3-month data set from winter 1994/1995. The data sets comprised hourly values of rainfall, evaporation (estimated from the Penman–Monteith relationship), drainage discharge and electrical conductivity. Predicted and measured discharges were compared.
The discharge predicted by the functional models more exactly followed the discharge patterns of the measured data but, particularly the linear storage model, could not cope with the non-linearity of the system that was caused by seasonal changes in water content of the MSWI bottom ash. The fit of the neural networks model to the data improved with increasing prior information but was less smooth than the measured data. The mechanistic model that included preferential discharge, MACRO, better modelled the discharge characteristics when inversely applied, indicating that preferential flow does occur in this system. However, even the inverse application of HYDRUS5 could not describe the system discharge as well as the linear storage model. All model approaches would have benefited from a more exact knowledge of initial water content.</description><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Evaporation</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Incinerators</subject><subject>Landfill</subject><subject>Landfills</subject><subject>Leachate</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Neural network</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>Preferential flow</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Resistivity</subject><subject>Solid wastes</subject><subject>Storage</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1LHEEQxZuQQDYmf4LQEAjxMEl1T3_NSYKYKBhEjOemtj_clt7ptXs24n_v6IrXrUtdfq9e8R4hhwx-MGDq5zUA5x1Tg_gOcAQgQHT8HVkwo4eOa9DvyeIN-Ug-tXYH8_S9WJCrv8WHTF1Zb7CmVkZaIo25PNBpVcv2dkWRrrdjcmmDmbaSk6cP2KZA0-jSGCpOpVJsK5px9DHl_Jl8iJhb-PK6D8jN79N_J2fdxeWf85NfFx0KyaYuxsFHgYrH0Asc9FIp7WOUJvTAmI9-6Z1RTBmMIAeFXJi41J6zXjMZtegPyLfd3U0t99vQJrtOzYU8_xHKtlmutAEt5V6QGVBGKLMfFFIrw4YZlDvQ1dJaDdFualpjfbQM7HMl9qUS-5y3BbAvlVg-676-GmBzmGPFOcP2Jh4Yk0M_U8c7Kszp_U-h2uZSGF3wqQY3WV_SHp8nshifrg</recordid><startdate>20010301</startdate><enddate>20010301</enddate><creator>Johnson, C.A.</creator><creator>Schaap, M.G.</creator><creator>Abbaspour, K.C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010301</creationdate><title>Model comparison of flow through a municipal solid waste incinerator ash landfill</title><author>Johnson, C.A. ; Schaap, M.G. ; Abbaspour, K.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a451t-ff9df4a62fe34a97b667dff58e3011dfdbdc86168af0596a248fb7d213715f743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Evaporation</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Incinerators</topic><topic>Landfill</topic><topic>Landfills</topic><topic>Leachate</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Neural network</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>Preferential flow</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Resistivity</topic><topic>Solid wastes</topic><topic>Storage</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, C.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaap, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbaspour, K.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, C.A.</au><au>Schaap, M.G.</au><au>Abbaspour, K.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Model comparison of flow through a municipal solid waste incinerator ash landfill</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2001-03-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>243</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>55</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>55-72</pages><issn>0022-1694</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><coden>JHYDA7</coden><abstract>The drainage discharge of a municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) bottom ash landfill was simulated using various modelling approaches. Two functional models including a neural networks approach and a hydrological linear storage model, and two mechanistic models requiring physical/hydrodynamic properties of the waste material, HYDRUS5 and MACRO (Version 4.0) were used. The models were calibrated using an 8-month data set from 1996 and validated on a 3-month data set from winter 1994/1995. The data sets comprised hourly values of rainfall, evaporation (estimated from the Penman–Monteith relationship), drainage discharge and electrical conductivity. Predicted and measured discharges were compared.
The discharge predicted by the functional models more exactly followed the discharge patterns of the measured data but, particularly the linear storage model, could not cope with the non-linearity of the system that was caused by seasonal changes in water content of the MSWI bottom ash. The fit of the neural networks model to the data improved with increasing prior information but was less smooth than the measured data. The mechanistic model that included preferential discharge, MACRO, better modelled the discharge characteristics when inversely applied, indicating that preferential flow does occur in this system. However, even the inverse application of HYDRUS5 could not describe the system discharge as well as the linear storage model. All model approaches would have benefited from a more exact knowledge of initial water content.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00404-2</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1694 |
ispartof | Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2001-03, Vol.243 (1), p.55-72 |
issn | 0022-1694 1879-2707 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26780755 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Calibration Discharge Drainage Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics Evaporation Exact sciences and technology Hydrodynamics Hydrology Hydrology. Hydrogeology Incinerators Landfill Landfills Leachate Mathematical models Moisture content Neural network Neural networks Nonlinearity Pollution, environment geology Preferential flow Rainfall Resistivity Solid wastes Storage Wastes |
title | Model comparison of flow through a municipal solid waste incinerator ash landfill |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T02%3A37%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Model%20comparison%20of%20flow%20through%20a%20municipal%20solid%20waste%20incinerator%20ash%20landfill&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Johnson,%20C.A.&rft.date=2001-03-01&rft.volume=243&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=55-72&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft.coden=JHYDA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00404-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14576819%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14576819&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022169400004042&rfr_iscdi=true |