Mechanism and performance of algal pond assisted constructed wetlands for wastewater polishing and nutrient recovery

The limitation of oxygen and carbon source restricted the TN removal in constructed wetland (CW). Algal pond (AP) could produce oxygen and fix CO2 to improve C/N ratio in water. Therefore, an AP-CW system was established under laboratory conditions to deeply explore the effect of nutrient load distr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2022-09, Vol.840, p.156667-156667, Article 156667
Hauptverfasser: Li, Mengting, Ge, Shuhan, Zhang, Jian, Wu, Shubiao, Wu, Haiming, Zhuang, Lin-Lan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The limitation of oxygen and carbon source restricted the TN removal in constructed wetland (CW). Algal pond (AP) could produce oxygen and fix CO2 to improve C/N ratio in water. Therefore, an AP-CW system was established under laboratory conditions to deeply explore the effect of nutrient load distribution and microalgae addition in CWs on pollutant removal. This study showed that AP-CW could remove 49.7% TN and 90.0% TP with no carbon addition in CWs. The significant removal of NH4-N by AP advanced the location of denitrification in CWs. To enhance TN removal, different dosage of microalgae were intermittently added at 20 and 10 cm respectively below the inlet of the vertical flow CW1 and CW2, where the rest NH4-N has been almost oxidized into nitrate. The addition of microalgae influenced the microflora and effluent quality. Microalgae dosage in denitrification area significantly increased the absolute abundance of Σnir. The best TN removal of AP-CW could reach 91.3% when 8 g (dry weight) microalgae was added. However, unlike previous knowledge, microalgae as an organic carbon source would also release N and P during decomposition, leading to increased nutrients in the effluent. The optimal dosage of microalgae was 1 g/5 d in this study. The position and amount of microalgae addition in CWs should be adjusted based on water property and element flow to achieve the best pollutant removal and biomass harvest. [Display omitted] •AP-CW could achieve 91.3% TN removal by algae-based carbon source addition.•Pollutant loads were allocated based on difference between AP and CWs in N, P removal.•Place and dosage of microalgae addition determined pollutant removal in CWs.•Excessive microalgae dosage would increase nutrients concentration in CWs effluent.
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156667