Radiation environment on the Mir orbital station during solar minimum

The Mir station has been in a 51.65° inclination orbit since March 1986. In March 1995, the first US astronaut flew on the Mir-18 mission and returned on the Space Shuttle in July 1995. Since then three additional US astronauts have stayed on orbit for up to 6 months. Since the return of the first U...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advances in space research 1998-01, Vol.22 (4), p.501-510
Hauptverfasser: Badhwar, G.D, Atwell, W, Cash, B, Petrov, V.M, Akatov, Yu.A, Tchernykh, I.V, Shurshakov, V.A, Arkhangelsky, V.A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 510
container_issue 4
container_start_page 501
container_title Advances in space research
container_volume 22
creator Badhwar, G.D
Atwell, W
Cash, B
Petrov, V.M
Akatov, Yu.A
Tchernykh, I.V
Shurshakov, V.A
Arkhangelsky, V.A
description The Mir station has been in a 51.65° inclination orbit since March 1986. In March 1995, the first US astronaut flew on the Mir-18 mission and returned on the Space Shuttle in July 1995. Since then three additional US astronauts have stayed on orbit for up to 6 months. Since the return of the first US astronaut, both the Spektr and Priroda modules have docked with Mir station, altering the mass shielding distribution. Radiation measurements, including the direct comparison of US and Russian absorbed dose rates in the Base Block of the Mir station, were made during the Mir-18 and -19 missions. There is a significant variation of dose rates across the core module; the six locations sampled showed a variation of a factor of nearly two. A tissue equivalent proportional counter (TEPC) measured a total absorbed dose rate of 300 μ Gy/day, roughly equally divided between the rate due to trapped protons from the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) and galactic cosmic radiation (GCR). This dose rate is about a factor of two lower than the rate measured by the thinly shielded (0.5 g cm −2 of Al) operational ion chamber (R-16), and about 3 2 of the rate of the more heavily shielded (3.5 g cm −2 of Al) ion chamber. This is due to the differences in the mass shielding properties at the location of these detectors. A comparison of integral linear energy transfer (LET) spectra measured by TEPC and plastic nuclear track detectors (PNTDs) deployed side by side are in remarkable agreement in the LET region of 15 –1000 keV/μm, where the PNTDs are fully efficient. The average quality factor, using the ICRP-26 definition, was 2.6, which is higher than normally used. There is excellent agreement between the measured GCR dose rate and model calculations, but this is not true for trapped protons. The measured Mir-18 crew skin dose equivalent rate was 1133 μSv/day. Using the skin dose rate and anatomical models, we have estimated the blood-forming organ (BFO) dose rate and the maximum stay time in orbit for International Space Station crew members.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0273-1177(98)01070-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26773839</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0273117798010709</els_id><sourcerecordid>26773839</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-15ebc91ade68e5c46916a5c2e0e133995845a9fcafa5071237d1d4fdcd965f9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxDAQx4Mo7vr4CEpPoodqpm2a5CSyrA9YEXycQ5pMNdLHmrQLfnu720WPnmYGfv8Z5kfICdBLoJBfvdCEpzEA5-dSXFCgnMZyh0xBcBmDzMQumf4iE3IQwielkHBO98kEgGVDK6Zk_qyt051rmwiblfNtU2PTRcPYfWD06HzU-sJ1uopCN2K29655j0JbaR_VrnF1Xx-RvVJXAY-39ZC83c5fZ_fx4unuYXaziE0meBcDw8JI0BZzgcxkuYRcM5MgRUhTKZnImJal0aVmlEOScgs2K62xMmelLNJDcjbuXfr2q8fQqdoFg1WlG2z7oJKc81SkcgDZCBrfhuCxVEvvau2_FVC19qc2_tRajpJCbfypde50e6AvarR_qa2wAbgeARzeXDn0KhiHjUHrPJpO2db9c-IH8hGAPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>26773839</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiation environment on the Mir orbital station during solar minimum</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Badhwar, G.D ; Atwell, W ; Cash, B ; Petrov, V.M ; Akatov, Yu.A ; Tchernykh, I.V ; Shurshakov, V.A ; Arkhangelsky, V.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Badhwar, G.D ; Atwell, W ; Cash, B ; Petrov, V.M ; Akatov, Yu.A ; Tchernykh, I.V ; Shurshakov, V.A ; Arkhangelsky, V.A</creatorcontrib><description>The Mir station has been in a 51.65° inclination orbit since March 1986. In March 1995, the first US astronaut flew on the Mir-18 mission and returned on the Space Shuttle in July 1995. Since then three additional US astronauts have stayed on orbit for up to 6 months. Since the return of the first US astronaut, both the Spektr and Priroda modules have docked with Mir station, altering the mass shielding distribution. Radiation measurements, including the direct comparison of US and Russian absorbed dose rates in the Base Block of the Mir station, were made during the Mir-18 and -19 missions. There is a significant variation of dose rates across the core module; the six locations sampled showed a variation of a factor of nearly two. A tissue equivalent proportional counter (TEPC) measured a total absorbed dose rate of 300 μ Gy/day, roughly equally divided between the rate due to trapped protons from the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) and galactic cosmic radiation (GCR). This dose rate is about a factor of two lower than the rate measured by the thinly shielded (0.5 g cm −2 of Al) operational ion chamber (R-16), and about 3 2 of the rate of the more heavily shielded (3.5 g cm −2 of Al) ion chamber. This is due to the differences in the mass shielding properties at the location of these detectors. A comparison of integral linear energy transfer (LET) spectra measured by TEPC and plastic nuclear track detectors (PNTDs) deployed side by side are in remarkable agreement in the LET region of 15 –1000 keV/μm, where the PNTDs are fully efficient. The average quality factor, using the ICRP-26 definition, was 2.6, which is higher than normally used. There is excellent agreement between the measured GCR dose rate and model calculations, but this is not true for trapped protons. The measured Mir-18 crew skin dose equivalent rate was 1133 μSv/day. Using the skin dose rate and anatomical models, we have estimated the blood-forming organ (BFO) dose rate and the maximum stay time in orbit for International Space Station crew members.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0273-1177(98)01070-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11542778</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Atlantic Ocean ; Cosmic Radiation ; Hematopoietic System - radiation effects ; Humans ; Linear Energy Transfer ; Protons ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation Monitoring - instrumentation ; Radiation Protection ; Radiometry - instrumentation ; Russia ; Skin - radiation effects ; Solar Activity ; South America ; Space Flight - instrumentation ; Spacecraft - instrumentation ; United States ; United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration ; Weightlessness</subject><ispartof>Advances in space research, 1998-01, Vol.22 (4), p.501-510</ispartof><rights>1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-15ebc91ade68e5c46916a5c2e0e133995845a9fcafa5071237d1d4fdcd965f9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-15ebc91ade68e5c46916a5c2e0e133995845a9fcafa5071237d1d4fdcd965f9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117798010709$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11542778$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Badhwar, G.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atwell, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cash, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrov, V.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akatov, Yu.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tchernykh, I.V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shurshakov, V.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arkhangelsky, V.A</creatorcontrib><title>Radiation environment on the Mir orbital station during solar minimum</title><title>Advances in space research</title><addtitle>Adv Space Res</addtitle><description>The Mir station has been in a 51.65° inclination orbit since March 1986. In March 1995, the first US astronaut flew on the Mir-18 mission and returned on the Space Shuttle in July 1995. Since then three additional US astronauts have stayed on orbit for up to 6 months. Since the return of the first US astronaut, both the Spektr and Priroda modules have docked with Mir station, altering the mass shielding distribution. Radiation measurements, including the direct comparison of US and Russian absorbed dose rates in the Base Block of the Mir station, were made during the Mir-18 and -19 missions. There is a significant variation of dose rates across the core module; the six locations sampled showed a variation of a factor of nearly two. A tissue equivalent proportional counter (TEPC) measured a total absorbed dose rate of 300 μ Gy/day, roughly equally divided between the rate due to trapped protons from the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) and galactic cosmic radiation (GCR). This dose rate is about a factor of two lower than the rate measured by the thinly shielded (0.5 g cm −2 of Al) operational ion chamber (R-16), and about 3 2 of the rate of the more heavily shielded (3.5 g cm −2 of Al) ion chamber. This is due to the differences in the mass shielding properties at the location of these detectors. A comparison of integral linear energy transfer (LET) spectra measured by TEPC and plastic nuclear track detectors (PNTDs) deployed side by side are in remarkable agreement in the LET region of 15 –1000 keV/μm, where the PNTDs are fully efficient. The average quality factor, using the ICRP-26 definition, was 2.6, which is higher than normally used. There is excellent agreement between the measured GCR dose rate and model calculations, but this is not true for trapped protons. The measured Mir-18 crew skin dose equivalent rate was 1133 μSv/day. Using the skin dose rate and anatomical models, we have estimated the blood-forming organ (BFO) dose rate and the maximum stay time in orbit for International Space Station crew members.</description><subject>Atlantic Ocean</subject><subject>Cosmic Radiation</subject><subject>Hematopoietic System - radiation effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linear Energy Transfer</subject><subject>Protons</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation Monitoring - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiation Protection</subject><subject>Radiometry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Russia</subject><subject>Skin - radiation effects</subject><subject>Solar Activity</subject><subject>South America</subject><subject>Space Flight - instrumentation</subject><subject>Spacecraft - instrumentation</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration</subject><subject>Weightlessness</subject><issn>0273-1177</issn><issn>1879-1948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLxDAQx4Mo7vr4CEpPoodqpm2a5CSyrA9YEXycQ5pMNdLHmrQLfnu720WPnmYGfv8Z5kfICdBLoJBfvdCEpzEA5-dSXFCgnMZyh0xBcBmDzMQumf4iE3IQwielkHBO98kEgGVDK6Zk_qyt051rmwiblfNtU2PTRcPYfWD06HzU-sJ1uopCN2K29655j0JbaR_VrnF1Xx-RvVJXAY-39ZC83c5fZ_fx4unuYXaziE0meBcDw8JI0BZzgcxkuYRcM5MgRUhTKZnImJal0aVmlEOScgs2K62xMmelLNJDcjbuXfr2q8fQqdoFg1WlG2z7oJKc81SkcgDZCBrfhuCxVEvvau2_FVC19qc2_tRajpJCbfypde50e6AvarR_qa2wAbgeARzeXDn0KhiHjUHrPJpO2db9c-IH8hGAPw</recordid><startdate>19980101</startdate><enddate>19980101</enddate><creator>Badhwar, G.D</creator><creator>Atwell, W</creator><creator>Cash, B</creator><creator>Petrov, V.M</creator><creator>Akatov, Yu.A</creator><creator>Tchernykh, I.V</creator><creator>Shurshakov, V.A</creator><creator>Arkhangelsky, V.A</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980101</creationdate><title>Radiation environment on the Mir orbital station during solar minimum</title><author>Badhwar, G.D ; Atwell, W ; Cash, B ; Petrov, V.M ; Akatov, Yu.A ; Tchernykh, I.V ; Shurshakov, V.A ; Arkhangelsky, V.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-15ebc91ade68e5c46916a5c2e0e133995845a9fcafa5071237d1d4fdcd965f9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Atlantic Ocean</topic><topic>Cosmic Radiation</topic><topic>Hematopoietic System - radiation effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linear Energy Transfer</topic><topic>Protons</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation Monitoring - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiation Protection</topic><topic>Radiometry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Russia</topic><topic>Skin - radiation effects</topic><topic>Solar Activity</topic><topic>South America</topic><topic>Space Flight - instrumentation</topic><topic>Spacecraft - instrumentation</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration</topic><topic>Weightlessness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Badhwar, G.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atwell, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cash, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrov, V.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akatov, Yu.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tchernykh, I.V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shurshakov, V.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arkhangelsky, V.A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Advances in space research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Badhwar, G.D</au><au>Atwell, W</au><au>Cash, B</au><au>Petrov, V.M</au><au>Akatov, Yu.A</au><au>Tchernykh, I.V</au><au>Shurshakov, V.A</au><au>Arkhangelsky, V.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiation environment on the Mir orbital station during solar minimum</atitle><jtitle>Advances in space research</jtitle><addtitle>Adv Space Res</addtitle><date>1998-01-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>501</spage><epage>510</epage><pages>501-510</pages><issn>0273-1177</issn><eissn>1879-1948</eissn><abstract>The Mir station has been in a 51.65° inclination orbit since March 1986. In March 1995, the first US astronaut flew on the Mir-18 mission and returned on the Space Shuttle in July 1995. Since then three additional US astronauts have stayed on orbit for up to 6 months. Since the return of the first US astronaut, both the Spektr and Priroda modules have docked with Mir station, altering the mass shielding distribution. Radiation measurements, including the direct comparison of US and Russian absorbed dose rates in the Base Block of the Mir station, were made during the Mir-18 and -19 missions. There is a significant variation of dose rates across the core module; the six locations sampled showed a variation of a factor of nearly two. A tissue equivalent proportional counter (TEPC) measured a total absorbed dose rate of 300 μ Gy/day, roughly equally divided between the rate due to trapped protons from the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) and galactic cosmic radiation (GCR). This dose rate is about a factor of two lower than the rate measured by the thinly shielded (0.5 g cm −2 of Al) operational ion chamber (R-16), and about 3 2 of the rate of the more heavily shielded (3.5 g cm −2 of Al) ion chamber. This is due to the differences in the mass shielding properties at the location of these detectors. A comparison of integral linear energy transfer (LET) spectra measured by TEPC and plastic nuclear track detectors (PNTDs) deployed side by side are in remarkable agreement in the LET region of 15 –1000 keV/μm, where the PNTDs are fully efficient. The average quality factor, using the ICRP-26 definition, was 2.6, which is higher than normally used. There is excellent agreement between the measured GCR dose rate and model calculations, but this is not true for trapped protons. The measured Mir-18 crew skin dose equivalent rate was 1133 μSv/day. Using the skin dose rate and anatomical models, we have estimated the blood-forming organ (BFO) dose rate and the maximum stay time in orbit for International Space Station crew members.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11542778</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0273-1177(98)01070-9</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0273-1177
ispartof Advances in space research, 1998-01, Vol.22 (4), p.501-510
issn 0273-1177
1879-1948
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26773839
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Atlantic Ocean
Cosmic Radiation
Hematopoietic System - radiation effects
Humans
Linear Energy Transfer
Protons
Radiation Dosage
Radiation Monitoring - instrumentation
Radiation Protection
Radiometry - instrumentation
Russia
Skin - radiation effects
Solar Activity
South America
Space Flight - instrumentation
Spacecraft - instrumentation
United States
United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Weightlessness
title Radiation environment on the Mir orbital station during solar minimum
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T21%3A31%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiation%20environment%20on%20the%20Mir%20orbital%20station%20during%20solar%20minimum&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20space%20research&rft.au=Badhwar,%20G.D&rft.date=1998-01-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=501&rft.epage=510&rft.pages=501-510&rft.issn=0273-1177&rft.eissn=1879-1948&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0273-1177(98)01070-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E26773839%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=26773839&rft_id=info:pmid/11542778&rft_els_id=S0273117798010709&rfr_iscdi=true