Artificial intelligence versus physicians on interpretation of printed ECG images: Diagnostic performance of ST-elevation myocardial infarction on electrocardiography

Smartphone-based ECG analyzer using camera input can be useful as everyone have it. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether such a system can outperform clinicians in detecting ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) regardless of image acquisition conditions. We retrospectively enrolle...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cardiology 2022-09, Vol.363, p.6-10
Hauptverfasser: Choi, Yoo Jin, Park, Min Ji, Ko, Yura, Soh, Moon-Seung, Kim, Hyue Mee, Kim, Chee Hae, Lee, Eunkyoung, Kim, Joonghee
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 10
container_issue
container_start_page 6
container_title International journal of cardiology
container_volume 363
creator Choi, Yoo Jin
Park, Min Ji
Ko, Yura
Soh, Moon-Seung
Kim, Hyue Mee
Kim, Chee Hae
Lee, Eunkyoung
Kim, Joonghee
description Smartphone-based ECG analyzer using camera input can be useful as everyone have it. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether such a system can outperform clinicians in detecting ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) regardless of image acquisition conditions. We retrospectively enrolled suspected STEMI patients in an emergency department from January to October 2021. A multifaceted cardiovascular assessment system (Quantitative ECG, QCG™) using ECG images to produce a quantitative score (QCG score, ranging from 0 to 100) was compared to human experts of 7 emergency physicians and 3 cardiologists. Voting scores (number of participants answering “yes” for STEMI) were calculated for comparison. The system's robustness was evaluated using an equivalence test where we prove its performance metric (area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC-ROC) changes within a predetermined equivalence range (−0.01 to 0.01) in 6 different environments (A combination of three different smartphones and two image sources including computer screen and paper). 187 patients (96 STEMI, 51.3%) were analyzed. AUC-ROC of QCG score was 0.919 (0.880–0.957). AUC-ROCs of voting scores, 0.856 (0.799–0.913) for all clinicians, 0.843 (0.786–0.900) for emergency physicians, 0.817 (0.756–0.877) for cardiologists, and 0.848 (0.790–0.905) for high-performance group were significantly lower compared to that of QCG score. The change in AUC-ROC by image acquisition condition was negligible with a narrow confidence interval within −0.01 to 0.01 confirming the equivalence. Image-based AI system can outperform clinicians in STEMI diagnosis and its performance was robust to change in image acquisition conditions. •Image-based ECG AI has great potential as it can turn any smartphone into an ECG analyzer.•Our image-based ECG analyzer showed super-human performance in detecting STEMI.•The high performance was robust to change in image acquisition conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.06.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2675986923</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167527322008695</els_id><sourcerecordid>2675986923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-281fe5517e83f8c06a0a89253323f88a39314b7d3dd20e2362cfc49a317ed8813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EotPCGyDkJZukvuTisECqht6kSiwoa8u1jwePkjgcZ0aaF-I5cUhh2ZV1fL7_3H5CPnBWcsaby30Z9tagKwUTomRNybh4RTZctVXB27p6TTYZa4tatPKMnKe0Z4xVXafekjNZNx2vKrYhv69wDj7YYHoaxhn6PuxgtECPgOmQ6PTzlJbsmGgc_xI4IcxmDjmMnk64_Dl6vb2lYTA7SJ_p12B2Y0xzsHQC9BEHs1TM9PfHAno4rurhFJf5187eoF1rjjQjdsY1GXdo8gzvyBtv-gTvn98L8uPm-nF7Vzx8u73fXj0UVjZiLoTiHuqat6CkV5Y1hhnViVpKkWNlZCd59dQ66ZxgILLGelt1RmaFU4rLC_JprTth_HWANOshJJuvYkaIh6RF09adajohM1qtqMWYEoLX-RaDwZPmTC8O6b1eHdKLQ5o1OjuUZR-fOxyeBnD_Rf8sycCXFYC85zEA6mTDYokLmO-iXQwvd_gDBoan2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2675986923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Artificial intelligence versus physicians on interpretation of printed ECG images: Diagnostic performance of ST-elevation myocardial infarction on electrocardiography</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Choi, Yoo Jin ; Park, Min Ji ; Ko, Yura ; Soh, Moon-Seung ; Kim, Hyue Mee ; Kim, Chee Hae ; Lee, Eunkyoung ; Kim, Joonghee</creator><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yoo Jin ; Park, Min Ji ; Ko, Yura ; Soh, Moon-Seung ; Kim, Hyue Mee ; Kim, Chee Hae ; Lee, Eunkyoung ; Kim, Joonghee</creatorcontrib><description>Smartphone-based ECG analyzer using camera input can be useful as everyone have it. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether such a system can outperform clinicians in detecting ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) regardless of image acquisition conditions. We retrospectively enrolled suspected STEMI patients in an emergency department from January to October 2021. A multifaceted cardiovascular assessment system (Quantitative ECG, QCG™) using ECG images to produce a quantitative score (QCG score, ranging from 0 to 100) was compared to human experts of 7 emergency physicians and 3 cardiologists. Voting scores (number of participants answering “yes” for STEMI) were calculated for comparison. The system's robustness was evaluated using an equivalence test where we prove its performance metric (area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC-ROC) changes within a predetermined equivalence range (−0.01 to 0.01) in 6 different environments (A combination of three different smartphones and two image sources including computer screen and paper). 187 patients (96 STEMI, 51.3%) were analyzed. AUC-ROC of QCG score was 0.919 (0.880–0.957). AUC-ROCs of voting scores, 0.856 (0.799–0.913) for all clinicians, 0.843 (0.786–0.900) for emergency physicians, 0.817 (0.756–0.877) for cardiologists, and 0.848 (0.790–0.905) for high-performance group were significantly lower compared to that of QCG score. The change in AUC-ROC by image acquisition condition was negligible with a narrow confidence interval within −0.01 to 0.01 confirming the equivalence. Image-based AI system can outperform clinicians in STEMI diagnosis and its performance was robust to change in image acquisition conditions. •Image-based ECG AI has great potential as it can turn any smartphone into an ECG analyzer.•Our image-based ECG analyzer showed super-human performance in detecting STEMI.•The high performance was robust to change in image acquisition conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-5273</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-1754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.06.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35691440</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Electrocardiography ; Emergency department ; Smartphone ; ST-elevation myocardial infarction</subject><ispartof>International journal of cardiology, 2022-09, Vol.363, p.6-10</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-281fe5517e83f8c06a0a89253323f88a39314b7d3dd20e2362cfc49a317ed8813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-281fe5517e83f8c06a0a89253323f88a39314b7d3dd20e2362cfc49a317ed8813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.06.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35691440$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yoo Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Min Ji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Yura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soh, Moon-Seung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyue Mee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chee Hae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eunkyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Joonghee</creatorcontrib><title>Artificial intelligence versus physicians on interpretation of printed ECG images: Diagnostic performance of ST-elevation myocardial infarction on electrocardiography</title><title>International journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Int J Cardiol</addtitle><description>Smartphone-based ECG analyzer using camera input can be useful as everyone have it. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether such a system can outperform clinicians in detecting ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) regardless of image acquisition conditions. We retrospectively enrolled suspected STEMI patients in an emergency department from January to October 2021. A multifaceted cardiovascular assessment system (Quantitative ECG, QCG™) using ECG images to produce a quantitative score (QCG score, ranging from 0 to 100) was compared to human experts of 7 emergency physicians and 3 cardiologists. Voting scores (number of participants answering “yes” for STEMI) were calculated for comparison. The system's robustness was evaluated using an equivalence test where we prove its performance metric (area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC-ROC) changes within a predetermined equivalence range (−0.01 to 0.01) in 6 different environments (A combination of three different smartphones and two image sources including computer screen and paper). 187 patients (96 STEMI, 51.3%) were analyzed. AUC-ROC of QCG score was 0.919 (0.880–0.957). AUC-ROCs of voting scores, 0.856 (0.799–0.913) for all clinicians, 0.843 (0.786–0.900) for emergency physicians, 0.817 (0.756–0.877) for cardiologists, and 0.848 (0.790–0.905) for high-performance group were significantly lower compared to that of QCG score. The change in AUC-ROC by image acquisition condition was negligible with a narrow confidence interval within −0.01 to 0.01 confirming the equivalence. Image-based AI system can outperform clinicians in STEMI diagnosis and its performance was robust to change in image acquisition conditions. •Image-based ECG AI has great potential as it can turn any smartphone into an ECG analyzer.•Our image-based ECG analyzer showed super-human performance in detecting STEMI.•The high performance was robust to change in image acquisition conditions.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Emergency department</subject><subject>Smartphone</subject><subject>ST-elevation myocardial infarction</subject><issn>0167-5273</issn><issn>1874-1754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EotPCGyDkJZukvuTisECqht6kSiwoa8u1jwePkjgcZ0aaF-I5cUhh2ZV1fL7_3H5CPnBWcsaby30Z9tagKwUTomRNybh4RTZctVXB27p6TTYZa4tatPKMnKe0Z4xVXafekjNZNx2vKrYhv69wDj7YYHoaxhn6PuxgtECPgOmQ6PTzlJbsmGgc_xI4IcxmDjmMnk64_Dl6vb2lYTA7SJ_p12B2Y0xzsHQC9BEHs1TM9PfHAno4rurhFJf5187eoF1rjjQjdsY1GXdo8gzvyBtv-gTvn98L8uPm-nF7Vzx8u73fXj0UVjZiLoTiHuqat6CkV5Y1hhnViVpKkWNlZCd59dQ66ZxgILLGelt1RmaFU4rLC_JprTth_HWANOshJJuvYkaIh6RF09adajohM1qtqMWYEoLX-RaDwZPmTC8O6b1eHdKLQ5o1OjuUZR-fOxyeBnD_Rf8sycCXFYC85zEA6mTDYokLmO-iXQwvd_gDBoan2A</recordid><startdate>20220915</startdate><enddate>20220915</enddate><creator>Choi, Yoo Jin</creator><creator>Park, Min Ji</creator><creator>Ko, Yura</creator><creator>Soh, Moon-Seung</creator><creator>Kim, Hyue Mee</creator><creator>Kim, Chee Hae</creator><creator>Lee, Eunkyoung</creator><creator>Kim, Joonghee</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220915</creationdate><title>Artificial intelligence versus physicians on interpretation of printed ECG images: Diagnostic performance of ST-elevation myocardial infarction on electrocardiography</title><author>Choi, Yoo Jin ; Park, Min Ji ; Ko, Yura ; Soh, Moon-Seung ; Kim, Hyue Mee ; Kim, Chee Hae ; Lee, Eunkyoung ; Kim, Joonghee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-281fe5517e83f8c06a0a89253323f88a39314b7d3dd20e2362cfc49a317ed8813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Emergency department</topic><topic>Smartphone</topic><topic>ST-elevation myocardial infarction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yoo Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Min Ji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Yura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soh, Moon-Seung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyue Mee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chee Hae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Eunkyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Joonghee</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choi, Yoo Jin</au><au>Park, Min Ji</au><au>Ko, Yura</au><au>Soh, Moon-Seung</au><au>Kim, Hyue Mee</au><au>Kim, Chee Hae</au><au>Lee, Eunkyoung</au><au>Kim, Joonghee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Artificial intelligence versus physicians on interpretation of printed ECG images: Diagnostic performance of ST-elevation myocardial infarction on electrocardiography</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2022-09-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>363</volume><spage>6</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>6-10</pages><issn>0167-5273</issn><eissn>1874-1754</eissn><abstract>Smartphone-based ECG analyzer using camera input can be useful as everyone have it. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether such a system can outperform clinicians in detecting ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) regardless of image acquisition conditions. We retrospectively enrolled suspected STEMI patients in an emergency department from January to October 2021. A multifaceted cardiovascular assessment system (Quantitative ECG, QCG™) using ECG images to produce a quantitative score (QCG score, ranging from 0 to 100) was compared to human experts of 7 emergency physicians and 3 cardiologists. Voting scores (number of participants answering “yes” for STEMI) were calculated for comparison. The system's robustness was evaluated using an equivalence test where we prove its performance metric (area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC-ROC) changes within a predetermined equivalence range (−0.01 to 0.01) in 6 different environments (A combination of three different smartphones and two image sources including computer screen and paper). 187 patients (96 STEMI, 51.3%) were analyzed. AUC-ROC of QCG score was 0.919 (0.880–0.957). AUC-ROCs of voting scores, 0.856 (0.799–0.913) for all clinicians, 0.843 (0.786–0.900) for emergency physicians, 0.817 (0.756–0.877) for cardiologists, and 0.848 (0.790–0.905) for high-performance group were significantly lower compared to that of QCG score. The change in AUC-ROC by image acquisition condition was negligible with a narrow confidence interval within −0.01 to 0.01 confirming the equivalence. Image-based AI system can outperform clinicians in STEMI diagnosis and its performance was robust to change in image acquisition conditions. •Image-based ECG AI has great potential as it can turn any smartphone into an ECG analyzer.•Our image-based ECG analyzer showed super-human performance in detecting STEMI.•The high performance was robust to change in image acquisition conditions.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>35691440</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.06.012</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-5273
ispartof International journal of cardiology, 2022-09, Vol.363, p.6-10
issn 0167-5273
1874-1754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2675986923
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Artificial intelligence
Electrocardiography
Emergency department
Smartphone
ST-elevation myocardial infarction
title Artificial intelligence versus physicians on interpretation of printed ECG images: Diagnostic performance of ST-elevation myocardial infarction on electrocardiography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T04%3A00%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Artificial%20intelligence%20versus%20physicians%20on%20interpretation%20of%20printed%20ECG%20images:%20Diagnostic%20performance%20of%20ST-elevation%20myocardial%20infarction%20on%20electrocardiography&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Choi,%20Yoo%20Jin&rft.date=2022-09-15&rft.volume=363&rft.spage=6&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=6-10&rft.issn=0167-5273&rft.eissn=1874-1754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.06.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2675986923%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2675986923&rft_id=info:pmid/35691440&rft_els_id=S0167527322008695&rfr_iscdi=true