Esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis comparing hand‐sewn and stapled anastomosis

This review aims to evaluate the surgical outcomes of hand‐sewn esophageal anastomosis compared to mechanical anastomosis to reconstruct total gastrectomy. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative studies evaluating hand‐sewn and stapled anastomosis were performed. A total of 12 studies...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of surgical oncology 2022-07, Vol.126 (1), p.161-167
Hauptverfasser: Honório, Fernanda Cavalcanti Cabral, Tustumi, Francisco, Pinheiro Filho, João Emílio Lemos, Marques, Stefanie Sophie Buuck, Glina, Felipe Placco Araujo, Henriques, Alexandre Cruz, Dias, André Roncon, Waisberg, Jaques
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 167
container_issue 1
container_start_page 161
container_title Journal of surgical oncology
container_volume 126
creator Honório, Fernanda Cavalcanti Cabral
Tustumi, Francisco
Pinheiro Filho, João Emílio Lemos
Marques, Stefanie Sophie Buuck
Glina, Felipe Placco Araujo
Henriques, Alexandre Cruz
Dias, André Roncon
Waisberg, Jaques
description This review aims to evaluate the surgical outcomes of hand‐sewn esophageal anastomosis compared to mechanical anastomosis to reconstruct total gastrectomy. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative studies evaluating hand‐sewn and stapled anastomosis were performed. A total of 12 studies were selected, comprising 1761 individuals. The results indicate that the hand‐sewn and stapled esophageal anastomosis have similar surgical outcomes. Stapled anastomosis has a shorter operation time.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jso.26909
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2675601453</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2675601453</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-b3ae40a463ae72c7e927280c697fcd3a0f82e5f1b17da55b728ce403ec83aa9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1O3TAQha2qqNzSLvoClaVu2kXAsfPn7hCi_AiJBXQdzXUml0RJnHqcXmVX9Qn6jDwJvgS6QGI1oznfnNHoMPYpFoexEPKoJXsoMy30G7aKhc6i0BZv2SpoMkpyLfbZe6JWCKF1lrxj-yrNCp1qsWJ_T8mOd7CxLbbTYMnbfuZQe3TcWw8d3wB5h2Y3_86POc3ksQffGO7wd4NbDkPFe_Rw_-cfDNDN1BA3th_BNcOG3wU5KITb4ZEkD2OHVehhd8sG-gPbq6Ej_PhUD9jPH6e3J-fR1fXZxcnxVWRUqnS0VoCJgCQLNZcmRy1zWQiT6bw2lQJRFxLTOl7HeQVpug6iCQsKTaEAdKUO2NfFd3T214Tky74hg10HA9qJSpnlaSbiJFUB_fICbe3kwncLFRdSFzvq20IZZ4kc1uXomh7cXMai3AVThmDKx2AC-_nJcVr3WP0nn5MIwNECbJsO59edysub68XyAUQ8nK0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2675182983</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis comparing hand‐sewn and stapled anastomosis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Honório, Fernanda Cavalcanti Cabral ; Tustumi, Francisco ; Pinheiro Filho, João Emílio Lemos ; Marques, Stefanie Sophie Buuck ; Glina, Felipe Placco Araujo ; Henriques, Alexandre Cruz ; Dias, André Roncon ; Waisberg, Jaques</creator><creatorcontrib>Honório, Fernanda Cavalcanti Cabral ; Tustumi, Francisco ; Pinheiro Filho, João Emílio Lemos ; Marques, Stefanie Sophie Buuck ; Glina, Felipe Placco Araujo ; Henriques, Alexandre Cruz ; Dias, André Roncon ; Waisberg, Jaques</creatorcontrib><description>This review aims to evaluate the surgical outcomes of hand‐sewn esophageal anastomosis compared to mechanical anastomosis to reconstruct total gastrectomy. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative studies evaluating hand‐sewn and stapled anastomosis were performed. A total of 12 studies were selected, comprising 1761 individuals. The results indicate that the hand‐sewn and stapled esophageal anastomosis have similar surgical outcomes. Stapled anastomosis has a shorter operation time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9098</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jso.26909</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35689590</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>anastomosis ; Cancer surgery ; Esophageal cancer ; esophageal jejunostomy ; gastrectomy ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Meta-analysis ; Surgical anastomosis ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Journal of surgical oncology, 2022-07, Vol.126 (1), p.161-167</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-b3ae40a463ae72c7e927280c697fcd3a0f82e5f1b17da55b728ce403ec83aa9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-b3ae40a463ae72c7e927280c697fcd3a0f82e5f1b17da55b728ce403ec83aa9d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3378-4916 ; 0000-0002-9329-7362 ; 0000-0001-6695-0496 ; 0000-0002-0420-4604 ; 0000-0003-2775-8068 ; 0000-0002-9076-093X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjso.26909$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjso.26909$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35689590$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Honório, Fernanda Cavalcanti Cabral</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tustumi, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinheiro Filho, João Emílio Lemos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marques, Stefanie Sophie Buuck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glina, Felipe Placco Araujo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henriques, Alexandre Cruz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, André Roncon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waisberg, Jaques</creatorcontrib><title>Esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis comparing hand‐sewn and stapled anastomosis</title><title>Journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>This review aims to evaluate the surgical outcomes of hand‐sewn esophageal anastomosis compared to mechanical anastomosis to reconstruct total gastrectomy. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative studies evaluating hand‐sewn and stapled anastomosis were performed. A total of 12 studies were selected, comprising 1761 individuals. The results indicate that the hand‐sewn and stapled esophageal anastomosis have similar surgical outcomes. Stapled anastomosis has a shorter operation time.</description><subject>anastomosis</subject><subject>Cancer surgery</subject><subject>Esophageal cancer</subject><subject>esophageal jejunostomy</subject><subject>gastrectomy</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Surgical anastomosis</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0022-4790</issn><issn>1096-9098</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1O3TAQha2qqNzSLvoClaVu2kXAsfPn7hCi_AiJBXQdzXUml0RJnHqcXmVX9Qn6jDwJvgS6QGI1oznfnNHoMPYpFoexEPKoJXsoMy30G7aKhc6i0BZv2SpoMkpyLfbZe6JWCKF1lrxj-yrNCp1qsWJ_T8mOd7CxLbbTYMnbfuZQe3TcWw8d3wB5h2Y3_86POc3ksQffGO7wd4NbDkPFe_Rw_-cfDNDN1BA3th_BNcOG3wU5KITb4ZEkD2OHVehhd8sG-gPbq6Ej_PhUD9jPH6e3J-fR1fXZxcnxVWRUqnS0VoCJgCQLNZcmRy1zWQiT6bw2lQJRFxLTOl7HeQVpug6iCQsKTaEAdKUO2NfFd3T214Tky74hg10HA9qJSpnlaSbiJFUB_fICbe3kwncLFRdSFzvq20IZZ4kc1uXomh7cXMai3AVThmDKx2AC-_nJcVr3WP0nn5MIwNECbJsO59edysub68XyAUQ8nK0</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Honório, Fernanda Cavalcanti Cabral</creator><creator>Tustumi, Francisco</creator><creator>Pinheiro Filho, João Emílio Lemos</creator><creator>Marques, Stefanie Sophie Buuck</creator><creator>Glina, Felipe Placco Araujo</creator><creator>Henriques, Alexandre Cruz</creator><creator>Dias, André Roncon</creator><creator>Waisberg, Jaques</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3378-4916</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9329-7362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6695-0496</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0420-4604</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2775-8068</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9076-093X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis comparing hand‐sewn and stapled anastomosis</title><author>Honório, Fernanda Cavalcanti Cabral ; Tustumi, Francisco ; Pinheiro Filho, João Emílio Lemos ; Marques, Stefanie Sophie Buuck ; Glina, Felipe Placco Araujo ; Henriques, Alexandre Cruz ; Dias, André Roncon ; Waisberg, Jaques</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-b3ae40a463ae72c7e927280c697fcd3a0f82e5f1b17da55b728ce403ec83aa9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>anastomosis</topic><topic>Cancer surgery</topic><topic>Esophageal cancer</topic><topic>esophageal jejunostomy</topic><topic>gastrectomy</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Surgical anastomosis</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Honório, Fernanda Cavalcanti Cabral</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tustumi, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinheiro Filho, João Emílio Lemos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marques, Stefanie Sophie Buuck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glina, Felipe Placco Araujo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henriques, Alexandre Cruz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, André Roncon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waisberg, Jaques</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Honório, Fernanda Cavalcanti Cabral</au><au>Tustumi, Francisco</au><au>Pinheiro Filho, João Emílio Lemos</au><au>Marques, Stefanie Sophie Buuck</au><au>Glina, Felipe Placco Araujo</au><au>Henriques, Alexandre Cruz</au><au>Dias, André Roncon</au><au>Waisberg, Jaques</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis comparing hand‐sewn and stapled anastomosis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>167</epage><pages>161-167</pages><issn>0022-4790</issn><eissn>1096-9098</eissn><abstract>This review aims to evaluate the surgical outcomes of hand‐sewn esophageal anastomosis compared to mechanical anastomosis to reconstruct total gastrectomy. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative studies evaluating hand‐sewn and stapled anastomosis were performed. A total of 12 studies were selected, comprising 1761 individuals. The results indicate that the hand‐sewn and stapled esophageal anastomosis have similar surgical outcomes. Stapled anastomosis has a shorter operation time.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35689590</pmid><doi>10.1002/jso.26909</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3378-4916</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9329-7362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6695-0496</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0420-4604</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2775-8068</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9076-093X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4790
ispartof Journal of surgical oncology, 2022-07, Vol.126 (1), p.161-167
issn 0022-4790
1096-9098
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2675601453
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects anastomosis
Cancer surgery
Esophageal cancer
esophageal jejunostomy
gastrectomy
Gastrointestinal surgery
Meta-analysis
Surgical anastomosis
Systematic review
title Esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis comparing hand‐sewn and stapled anastomosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T06%3A12%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Esophagojejunostomy%20after%20total%20gastrectomy:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta%E2%80%90analysis%20comparing%20hand%E2%80%90sewn%20and%20stapled%20anastomosis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Hon%C3%B3rio,%20Fernanda%20Cavalcanti%20Cabral&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=167&rft.pages=161-167&rft.issn=0022-4790&rft.eissn=1096-9098&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jso.26909&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2675601453%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2675182983&rft_id=info:pmid/35689590&rfr_iscdi=true