Attitudes towards mandatory vaccination and sanctions for vaccination refusal
Investigating attitudes towards mandatory vaccination and sanctions for vaccination refusal in an area with insufficient vaccination coverage may help health authorities to assess which strategies for increasing vaccination coverage are appropriate. This study examines attitudes to vaccine mandates...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2022-12, Vol.40 (51), p.7378-7388 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 7388 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 51 |
| container_start_page | 7378 |
| container_title | Vaccine |
| container_volume | 40 |
| creator | Slotte, Pamela Karlsson, Linda C. Soveri, Anna |
| description | Investigating attitudes towards mandatory vaccination and sanctions for vaccination refusal in an area with insufficient vaccination coverage may help health authorities to assess which strategies for increasing vaccination coverage are appropriate. This study examines attitudes to vaccine mandates and asks questions regarding what kinds of sanctions could legitimately result from vaccination refusal. It seeks to find out if people’s attitudes towards mandates and towards sanctions for vaccination refusal are related to their attitudes to vaccines and the degree of trust they feel towards health care professionals and health care authorities. The study also discusses how the observed attitudes towards mandates may be related to perceptions of autonomy, responsibility, and equitability.
Data collection was carried out in Finland through an online survey in a region with suboptimal vaccine uptake. Statistical analysis was conducted on a sample of 1101 respondents, using confirmatory factor analysis and structural regression analysis.
Persons hold different views on mandates and sanctions. Importantly, the persons who support vaccination mandates and sanctions for vaccination refusal are to a great degree the same people who have positive attitudes to vaccines and high trust in health care professionals and health authorities.
Trust is a key factor which has a bearing on people’s attitudes towards mandates and sanctions for noncompliance. A focus on the reasons for lack of trust, and on how to enhance trust, is a more feasible long-term way (than mandates) to promote large- scale compliance with childhood vaccine programmes in the studied country context. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.05.069 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2675600859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X22006971</els_id><sourcerecordid>2675600859</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b1c5daeeea004315fc451c8dc63167206bd31c715545840c7207d5c934376fcf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtrGzEQgEVpaNy0P6FloZdedjN6jFY-lRD6gpRcWuhNyCMtyNirVNIm5N9Hxm6hvfQkNPPN62PsDYeBA9eX2-HeEcU5DAKEGAAH0OtnbMXNKHuB3DxnKxBa9YrDz3P2spQtAKDk6xfsXKI2ZhRmxb5d1Rrr4kPpanpw2Zdu72bvasqP3XGCqzHNXQt2xc10-JRuSvmvbA7TUtzuFTub3K6E16f3gv349PH79Zf-5vbz1-urm56UgtpvOKF3IQQHoCTHiRRyMp605HoUoDdecho5okKjgFpo9EhrqeSoJ5rkBXt_7HuX068llGr3sVDY7dwc0lKs0CNqAIPrhr77B92mJc9tOytGJZUxErFReKQop1LaNfYux73Lj5aDPfi2W3vybQ--LaBtvlvd21P3ZbMP_k_Vb8EN-HAEQtNxH0O2hWKYKfiYA1XrU_zPiCded5O-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2743488355</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attitudes towards mandatory vaccination and sanctions for vaccination refusal</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Slotte, Pamela ; Karlsson, Linda C. ; Soveri, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Slotte, Pamela ; Karlsson, Linda C. ; Soveri, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>Investigating attitudes towards mandatory vaccination and sanctions for vaccination refusal in an area with insufficient vaccination coverage may help health authorities to assess which strategies for increasing vaccination coverage are appropriate. This study examines attitudes to vaccine mandates and asks questions regarding what kinds of sanctions could legitimately result from vaccination refusal. It seeks to find out if people’s attitudes towards mandates and towards sanctions for vaccination refusal are related to their attitudes to vaccines and the degree of trust they feel towards health care professionals and health care authorities. The study also discusses how the observed attitudes towards mandates may be related to perceptions of autonomy, responsibility, and equitability.
Data collection was carried out in Finland through an online survey in a region with suboptimal vaccine uptake. Statistical analysis was conducted on a sample of 1101 respondents, using confirmatory factor analysis and structural regression analysis.
Persons hold different views on mandates and sanctions. Importantly, the persons who support vaccination mandates and sanctions for vaccination refusal are to a great degree the same people who have positive attitudes to vaccines and high trust in health care professionals and health authorities.
Trust is a key factor which has a bearing on people’s attitudes towards mandates and sanctions for noncompliance. A focus on the reasons for lack of trust, and on how to enhance trust, is a more feasible long-term way (than mandates) to promote large- scale compliance with childhood vaccine programmes in the studied country context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.05.069</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35688728</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Child ; Childhood vaccines ; Children ; Compliance ; Data collection ; Ethics ; Factor analysis ; Health care ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Immunization ; Influenza ; Measles ; Public health ; Regression analysis ; Sanctions ; Social exclusion ; Statistical analysis ; Systematic review ; Trust ; Vaccination ; Vaccination Coverage ; Vaccination Refusal ; Vaccine attitudes ; Vaccine mandates ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2022-12, Vol.40 (51), p.7378-7388</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022. The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b1c5daeeea004315fc451c8dc63167206bd31c715545840c7207d5c934376fcf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b1c5daeeea004315fc451c8dc63167206bd31c715545840c7207d5c934376fcf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2743488355?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35688728$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Slotte, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlsson, Linda C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soveri, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Attitudes towards mandatory vaccination and sanctions for vaccination refusal</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Investigating attitudes towards mandatory vaccination and sanctions for vaccination refusal in an area with insufficient vaccination coverage may help health authorities to assess which strategies for increasing vaccination coverage are appropriate. This study examines attitudes to vaccine mandates and asks questions regarding what kinds of sanctions could legitimately result from vaccination refusal. It seeks to find out if people’s attitudes towards mandates and towards sanctions for vaccination refusal are related to their attitudes to vaccines and the degree of trust they feel towards health care professionals and health care authorities. The study also discusses how the observed attitudes towards mandates may be related to perceptions of autonomy, responsibility, and equitability.
Data collection was carried out in Finland through an online survey in a region with suboptimal vaccine uptake. Statistical analysis was conducted on a sample of 1101 respondents, using confirmatory factor analysis and structural regression analysis.
Persons hold different views on mandates and sanctions. Importantly, the persons who support vaccination mandates and sanctions for vaccination refusal are to a great degree the same people who have positive attitudes to vaccines and high trust in health care professionals and health authorities.
Trust is a key factor which has a bearing on people’s attitudes towards mandates and sanctions for noncompliance. A focus on the reasons for lack of trust, and on how to enhance trust, is a more feasible long-term way (than mandates) to promote large- scale compliance with childhood vaccine programmes in the studied country context.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Childhood vaccines</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Measles</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>Social exclusion</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccination Coverage</subject><subject>Vaccination Refusal</subject><subject>Vaccine attitudes</subject><subject>Vaccine mandates</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtrGzEQgEVpaNy0P6FloZdedjN6jFY-lRD6gpRcWuhNyCMtyNirVNIm5N9Hxm6hvfQkNPPN62PsDYeBA9eX2-HeEcU5DAKEGAAH0OtnbMXNKHuB3DxnKxBa9YrDz3P2spQtAKDk6xfsXKI2ZhRmxb5d1Rrr4kPpanpw2Zdu72bvasqP3XGCqzHNXQt2xc10-JRuSvmvbA7TUtzuFTub3K6E16f3gv349PH79Zf-5vbz1-urm56UgtpvOKF3IQQHoCTHiRRyMp605HoUoDdecho5okKjgFpo9EhrqeSoJ5rkBXt_7HuX068llGr3sVDY7dwc0lKs0CNqAIPrhr77B92mJc9tOytGJZUxErFReKQop1LaNfYux73Lj5aDPfi2W3vybQ--LaBtvlvd21P3ZbMP_k_Vb8EN-HAEQtNxH0O2hWKYKfiYA1XrU_zPiCded5O-</recordid><startdate>20221205</startdate><enddate>20221205</enddate><creator>Slotte, Pamela</creator><creator>Karlsson, Linda C.</creator><creator>Soveri, Anna</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221205</creationdate><title>Attitudes towards mandatory vaccination and sanctions for vaccination refusal</title><author>Slotte, Pamela ; Karlsson, Linda C. ; Soveri, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b1c5daeeea004315fc451c8dc63167206bd31c715545840c7207d5c934376fcf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Childhood vaccines</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Measles</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>Social exclusion</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccination Coverage</topic><topic>Vaccination Refusal</topic><topic>Vaccine attitudes</topic><topic>Vaccine mandates</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Slotte, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlsson, Linda C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soveri, Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Slotte, Pamela</au><au>Karlsson, Linda C.</au><au>Soveri, Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attitudes towards mandatory vaccination and sanctions for vaccination refusal</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2022-12-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>51</issue><spage>7378</spage><epage>7388</epage><pages>7378-7388</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>Investigating attitudes towards mandatory vaccination and sanctions for vaccination refusal in an area with insufficient vaccination coverage may help health authorities to assess which strategies for increasing vaccination coverage are appropriate. This study examines attitudes to vaccine mandates and asks questions regarding what kinds of sanctions could legitimately result from vaccination refusal. It seeks to find out if people’s attitudes towards mandates and towards sanctions for vaccination refusal are related to their attitudes to vaccines and the degree of trust they feel towards health care professionals and health care authorities. The study also discusses how the observed attitudes towards mandates may be related to perceptions of autonomy, responsibility, and equitability.
Data collection was carried out in Finland through an online survey in a region with suboptimal vaccine uptake. Statistical analysis was conducted on a sample of 1101 respondents, using confirmatory factor analysis and structural regression analysis.
Persons hold different views on mandates and sanctions. Importantly, the persons who support vaccination mandates and sanctions for vaccination refusal are to a great degree the same people who have positive attitudes to vaccines and high trust in health care professionals and health authorities.
Trust is a key factor which has a bearing on people’s attitudes towards mandates and sanctions for noncompliance. A focus on the reasons for lack of trust, and on how to enhance trust, is a more feasible long-term way (than mandates) to promote large- scale compliance with childhood vaccine programmes in the studied country context.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35688728</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.05.069</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
| ispartof | Vaccine, 2022-12, Vol.40 (51), p.7378-7388 |
| issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2675600859 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
| subjects | Attitudes Child Childhood vaccines Children Compliance Data collection Ethics Factor analysis Health care Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Humans Immunization Influenza Measles Public health Regression analysis Sanctions Social exclusion Statistical analysis Systematic review Trust Vaccination Vaccination Coverage Vaccination Refusal Vaccine attitudes Vaccine mandates Vaccines |
| title | Attitudes towards mandatory vaccination and sanctions for vaccination refusal |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T04%3A08%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attitudes%20towards%20mandatory%20vaccination%20and%20sanctions%20for%20vaccination%20refusal&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Slotte,%20Pamela&rft.date=2022-12-05&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=51&rft.spage=7378&rft.epage=7388&rft.pages=7378-7388&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.05.069&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2675600859%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2743488355&rft_id=info:pmid/35688728&rft_els_id=S0264410X22006971&rfr_iscdi=true |