Revision of the “celia clade” of Pseudodebis Forster, 1964, with Two New Species and Notes on Papilio phorcys Fabricius, 1793 (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae)

The species-level classification of the “ celia clade” of the nymphalid butterfly genus Pseudodebis Forster, 1964, is revised as part of ongoing revisionary work on this genus. The “ celia clade” contains three species, of which two, Pseudodebis darrenthroopi Nakahara & Willmott, n. sp. and P. t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neotropical entomology 2022-08, Vol.51 (4), p.536-556
Hauptverfasser: Nakahara, Shinichi, Janzen, Daniel H., Hallwachs, Winnie, Huertas, Blanca, Das, Gaurab Nandi, Willmott, Keith R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 556
container_issue 4
container_start_page 536
container_title Neotropical entomology
container_volume 51
creator Nakahara, Shinichi
Janzen, Daniel H.
Hallwachs, Winnie
Huertas, Blanca
Das, Gaurab Nandi
Willmott, Keith R.
description The species-level classification of the “ celia clade” of the nymphalid butterfly genus Pseudodebis Forster, 1964, is revised as part of ongoing revisionary work on this genus. The “ celia clade” contains three species, of which two, Pseudodebis darrenthroopi Nakahara & Willmott, n. sp. and P. tigrillo Nakahara & Willmott, n. sp., are described and named herein based on morphology and molecular data. Consequently, we increase the described species diversity of Pseudodebis to 13, with a remarkable six species occurring in the trans-Andean region. We discuss five specific epithets associated with the clade and designate a neotype for Papilio celia Cramer, 1780, and lectotype for Taygetis keneza Butler, 1869, based on the same specimen, thus retaining the status of the former name as a senior objective synonym. We also provide a brief historical review for Papilio phorcys Fabricius, 1793, an enigmatic name currently synonymized under Papilio celia . Nevertheless, we were unable to locate the syntype(s) for this name and the identity of Papilio phorcys remains uncertain, so we retain the current synonymy as a parsimonious approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13744-022-00954-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2674345581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2674345581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-7f8b6da40a8539c6bfef15cfdd64f78d032372ac52f1fd6c73bfaad26d050c573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQhyMEoqXwAhyQj0VqqP876Q1VFJBW24oWiZvl2GPWVTYOdsJ2b30QOPNefRJctnDkNCPNbz5p5quqlwS_IRir40yY4rzGlNYYt4LXN4-qfSJVUzdY0MelF6SthZRf9qpnOV9jTBWT4mm1x4RUvJFiv_r1Cb6HHOKAokfTCtDd7Q8LfTDI9sbB3e3P-8FFhtlFB13I6CymPEE6QqSV_AhtwrRCV5uIlrBBlyPYABmZwaFlnEpXwBdmDH2IaFzFZLcFYLoUbJhzQaiWocMFjMHFsUDNCVpu1-PK9MEZOEGXZtqmMBh4_bx64k2f4cVDPag-n727Ov1QL87ffzx9u6gt42qqlW866QzHphGstbLz4Imw3jnJvWocZpQpaqygnngnrWKdN8ZR6bDAVih2UB3uuGOK32bIk16HXB7SmwHinDUtj2NciIaUKN1FbYo5J_B6TGFt0lYTrO8F6Z0gXQTpP4L0TVl69cCfuzW4fyt_jZQA2wVyGQ1fIenrOKeh3Pw_7G-0eZ8f</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2674345581</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revision of the “celia clade” of Pseudodebis Forster, 1964, with Two New Species and Notes on Papilio phorcys Fabricius, 1793 (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae)</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Nakahara, Shinichi ; Janzen, Daniel H. ; Hallwachs, Winnie ; Huertas, Blanca ; Das, Gaurab Nandi ; Willmott, Keith R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakahara, Shinichi ; Janzen, Daniel H. ; Hallwachs, Winnie ; Huertas, Blanca ; Das, Gaurab Nandi ; Willmott, Keith R.</creatorcontrib><description>The species-level classification of the “ celia clade” of the nymphalid butterfly genus Pseudodebis Forster, 1964, is revised as part of ongoing revisionary work on this genus. The “ celia clade” contains three species, of which two, Pseudodebis darrenthroopi Nakahara &amp; Willmott, n. sp. and P. tigrillo Nakahara &amp; Willmott, n. sp., are described and named herein based on morphology and molecular data. Consequently, we increase the described species diversity of Pseudodebis to 13, with a remarkable six species occurring in the trans-Andean region. We discuss five specific epithets associated with the clade and designate a neotype for Papilio celia Cramer, 1780, and lectotype for Taygetis keneza Butler, 1869, based on the same specimen, thus retaining the status of the former name as a senior objective synonym. We also provide a brief historical review for Papilio phorcys Fabricius, 1793, an enigmatic name currently synonymized under Papilio celia . Nevertheless, we were unable to locate the syntype(s) for this name and the identity of Papilio phorcys remains uncertain, so we retain the current synonymy as a parsimonious approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1519-566X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1678-8052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1678-8052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13744-022-00954-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35674865</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Entomology ; Life Sciences ; Morphology and Physiology ; Systematics</subject><ispartof>Neotropical entomology, 2022-08, Vol.51 (4), p.536-556</ispartof><rights>Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil 2022</rights><rights>2022. Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-7f8b6da40a8539c6bfef15cfdd64f78d032372ac52f1fd6c73bfaad26d050c573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-7f8b6da40a8539c6bfef15cfdd64f78d032372ac52f1fd6c73bfaad26d050c573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13744-022-00954-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13744-022-00954-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35674865$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakahara, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janzen, Daniel H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallwachs, Winnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huertas, Blanca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Gaurab Nandi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willmott, Keith R.</creatorcontrib><title>Revision of the “celia clade” of Pseudodebis Forster, 1964, with Two New Species and Notes on Papilio phorcys Fabricius, 1793 (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae)</title><title>Neotropical entomology</title><addtitle>Neotrop Entomol</addtitle><addtitle>Neotrop Entomol</addtitle><description>The species-level classification of the “ celia clade” of the nymphalid butterfly genus Pseudodebis Forster, 1964, is revised as part of ongoing revisionary work on this genus. The “ celia clade” contains three species, of which two, Pseudodebis darrenthroopi Nakahara &amp; Willmott, n. sp. and P. tigrillo Nakahara &amp; Willmott, n. sp., are described and named herein based on morphology and molecular data. Consequently, we increase the described species diversity of Pseudodebis to 13, with a remarkable six species occurring in the trans-Andean region. We discuss five specific epithets associated with the clade and designate a neotype for Papilio celia Cramer, 1780, and lectotype for Taygetis keneza Butler, 1869, based on the same specimen, thus retaining the status of the former name as a senior objective synonym. We also provide a brief historical review for Papilio phorcys Fabricius, 1793, an enigmatic name currently synonymized under Papilio celia . Nevertheless, we were unable to locate the syntype(s) for this name and the identity of Papilio phorcys remains uncertain, so we retain the current synonymy as a parsimonious approach.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Morphology and Physiology</subject><subject>Systematics</subject><issn>1519-566X</issn><issn>1678-8052</issn><issn>1678-8052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQhyMEoqXwAhyQj0VqqP876Q1VFJBW24oWiZvl2GPWVTYOdsJ2b30QOPNefRJctnDkNCPNbz5p5quqlwS_IRir40yY4rzGlNYYt4LXN4-qfSJVUzdY0MelF6SthZRf9qpnOV9jTBWT4mm1x4RUvJFiv_r1Cb6HHOKAokfTCtDd7Q8LfTDI9sbB3e3P-8FFhtlFB13I6CymPEE6QqSV_AhtwrRCV5uIlrBBlyPYABmZwaFlnEpXwBdmDH2IaFzFZLcFYLoUbJhzQaiWocMFjMHFsUDNCVpu1-PK9MEZOEGXZtqmMBh4_bx64k2f4cVDPag-n727Ov1QL87ffzx9u6gt42qqlW866QzHphGstbLz4Imw3jnJvWocZpQpaqygnngnrWKdN8ZR6bDAVih2UB3uuGOK32bIk16HXB7SmwHinDUtj2NciIaUKN1FbYo5J_B6TGFt0lYTrO8F6Z0gXQTpP4L0TVl69cCfuzW4fyt_jZQA2wVyGQ1fIenrOKeh3Pw_7G-0eZ8f</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Nakahara, Shinichi</creator><creator>Janzen, Daniel H.</creator><creator>Hallwachs, Winnie</creator><creator>Huertas, Blanca</creator><creator>Das, Gaurab Nandi</creator><creator>Willmott, Keith R.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Revision of the “celia clade” of Pseudodebis Forster, 1964, with Two New Species and Notes on Papilio phorcys Fabricius, 1793 (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae)</title><author>Nakahara, Shinichi ; Janzen, Daniel H. ; Hallwachs, Winnie ; Huertas, Blanca ; Das, Gaurab Nandi ; Willmott, Keith R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-7f8b6da40a8539c6bfef15cfdd64f78d032372ac52f1fd6c73bfaad26d050c573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Morphology and Physiology</topic><topic>Systematics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakahara, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janzen, Daniel H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallwachs, Winnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huertas, Blanca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Gaurab Nandi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willmott, Keith R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neotropical entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakahara, Shinichi</au><au>Janzen, Daniel H.</au><au>Hallwachs, Winnie</au><au>Huertas, Blanca</au><au>Das, Gaurab Nandi</au><au>Willmott, Keith R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revision of the “celia clade” of Pseudodebis Forster, 1964, with Two New Species and Notes on Papilio phorcys Fabricius, 1793 (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae)</atitle><jtitle>Neotropical entomology</jtitle><stitle>Neotrop Entomol</stitle><addtitle>Neotrop Entomol</addtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>536</spage><epage>556</epage><pages>536-556</pages><issn>1519-566X</issn><issn>1678-8052</issn><eissn>1678-8052</eissn><abstract>The species-level classification of the “ celia clade” of the nymphalid butterfly genus Pseudodebis Forster, 1964, is revised as part of ongoing revisionary work on this genus. The “ celia clade” contains three species, of which two, Pseudodebis darrenthroopi Nakahara &amp; Willmott, n. sp. and P. tigrillo Nakahara &amp; Willmott, n. sp., are described and named herein based on morphology and molecular data. Consequently, we increase the described species diversity of Pseudodebis to 13, with a remarkable six species occurring in the trans-Andean region. We discuss five specific epithets associated with the clade and designate a neotype for Papilio celia Cramer, 1780, and lectotype for Taygetis keneza Butler, 1869, based on the same specimen, thus retaining the status of the former name as a senior objective synonym. We also provide a brief historical review for Papilio phorcys Fabricius, 1793, an enigmatic name currently synonymized under Papilio celia . Nevertheless, we were unable to locate the syntype(s) for this name and the identity of Papilio phorcys remains uncertain, so we retain the current synonymy as a parsimonious approach.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>35674865</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13744-022-00954-x</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1519-566X
ispartof Neotropical entomology, 2022-08, Vol.51 (4), p.536-556
issn 1519-566X
1678-8052
1678-8052
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2674345581
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Agriculture
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Entomology
Life Sciences
Morphology and Physiology
Systematics
title Revision of the “celia clade” of Pseudodebis Forster, 1964, with Two New Species and Notes on Papilio phorcys Fabricius, 1793 (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T16%3A22%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revision%20of%20the%20%E2%80%9Ccelia%20clade%E2%80%9D%20of%20Pseudodebis%20Forster,%201964,%20with%20Two%20New%20Species%20and%20Notes%20on%20Papilio%20phorcys%20Fabricius,%201793%20(Lepidoptera:%20Nymphalidae:%20Satyrinae)&rft.jtitle=Neotropical%20entomology&rft.au=Nakahara,%20Shinichi&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=536&rft.epage=556&rft.pages=536-556&rft.issn=1519-566X&rft.eissn=1678-8052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13744-022-00954-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2674345581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2674345581&rft_id=info:pmid/35674865&rfr_iscdi=true