Induction Chemotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy Combined to ASA vs. Placebo for High-Risk Rectal Cancer: Results of a Randomized Trial

chemotherapy (IC) followed by chemoradiation (CRT) is an attractive approach in high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer. Additionally, ASA has shown potential to improve outcomes alongside CRT in rectal cancer. The ICAR trial aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IC followed by CRT with or w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical colorectal cancer 2022-09, Vol.21 (3), p.e196-e204
Hauptverfasser: Ominelli, Juliana, Araujo, Rodrigo O. de Castro, Valadão, Marcus, Padoan, Monica L.A., Lopes dos Santos, Victor M., Dutra, Jamille G., Torres, Claudia C., Barbosa, Monique A., Guimarães, Raquel, Carvalho, Juliana C. Carneiro, Ferreira, Maria A., de Oliveira, Ivanir M., Small, Isabele, de Melo, Andréia C., Araujo, Luiz H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e204
container_issue 3
container_start_page e196
container_title Clinical colorectal cancer
container_volume 21
creator Ominelli, Juliana
Araujo, Rodrigo O. de Castro
Valadão, Marcus
Padoan, Monica L.A.
Lopes dos Santos, Victor M.
Dutra, Jamille G.
Torres, Claudia C.
Barbosa, Monique A.
Guimarães, Raquel
Carvalho, Juliana C. Carneiro
Ferreira, Maria A.
de Oliveira, Ivanir M.
Small, Isabele
de Melo, Andréia C.
Araujo, Luiz H.
description chemotherapy (IC) followed by chemoradiation (CRT) is an attractive approach in high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer. Additionally, ASA has shown potential to improve outcomes alongside CRT in rectal cancer. The ICAR trial aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IC followed by CRT with or without ASA on MRI tumor response. Single-center, double-blind, randomized phase II trial to evaluate induction treatment with CAPOX, followed by capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy with ASA (arm 1) or placebo (arm 2) in high-risk stage II-III rectal adenocarcinoma staged by MRI. The primary endpoint was MRI tumor regression grade (mrTRG). Secondary endpoints were pathological response, surgical outcomes, postoperative complications, treatment tolerance, DFS, and OS. Between January 2018 and August 2019, 27 patients were eligible, 25 (92.5%) completed IC, and 23 patients were randomly assigned (12 to ASA group; 11 to placebo group). In the ASA arm, 3 pts (25%) presented distant disease progression at restaging. Seven patients (30.4%) had cCR after neoadjuvant treatment. All 13 patients submitted to surgery after neoadjuvant treatment underwent R0 resections except for 1 patient with positive CRM, and 12 patients (92.3%) had sphincter preservation. After a median follow-up of 34.9 months, the 2-year DFS was 83.1% and 3-year OS was 81.5%. There was good compliance in both treatment arms and encouraging cCR rate. ASA during CRT was safe but failed to improve on MRI tumor response. The study was closed due to the absence of benefits. The ICAR trial aimed to evaluate induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy with or without ASA on MRI tumor response. This single-center, double-blind, randomized phase II trial evaluated induction treatment with CAPOX, followed by capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy with ASA (arm 1) or placebo (arm 2) in 27 patients. ASA during chemoradiotherapy was safe but failed to improve MRI tumor response.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.05.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2674001267</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1533002822000561</els_id><sourcerecordid>2674001267</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-22d497a8e102f8e4cc8358a98b579be9b333f3f9805c564dd124531ce29ff7b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq0KVD7aP9BD5SOXBH_EWQf1sopaQEIqWujZcuxx10sSb-0EiV7543i1wJHTzLx659XMg9A3SkpKaH2-KU1vTMkIYyURJSHsEzqmDZcFqRfVQe4F50WW5RE6SWmTu5pT-hkdcVHXMo_H6Pl6tLOZfBhxu4YhTGuIevuE9Wj3QtTWv6ttGDo_gsVTwMu7JX5MJb7ttYEuYBcivvJ_18XKpwe8AjPpHrd6NBAv8pjmfko4OKzxKoeHwf_POffR6_4LOnS6T_D1tZ6iP79-3rdXxc3vy-t2eVOYfO9UMGarZqElUMKchMoYyYXUjezEoumg6TjnjrtGEmFEXVlLWSU4NcAa5xZdzU_R2T53G8O_GdKkBp8M9L0eIcxJsUyNEJpLtrK91cSQUgSnttEPOj4pStQOvtqoHXy1g6-IUBlmXvr-mj93A9j3lTfa2fBjb4D85aOHqJLxkAlZHzMvZYP_KP8FpFyVYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2674001267</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Induction Chemotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy Combined to ASA vs. Placebo for High-Risk Rectal Cancer: Results of a Randomized Trial</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ominelli, Juliana ; Araujo, Rodrigo O. de Castro ; Valadão, Marcus ; Padoan, Monica L.A. ; Lopes dos Santos, Victor M. ; Dutra, Jamille G. ; Torres, Claudia C. ; Barbosa, Monique A. ; Guimarães, Raquel ; Carvalho, Juliana C. Carneiro ; Ferreira, Maria A. ; de Oliveira, Ivanir M. ; Small, Isabele ; de Melo, Andréia C. ; Araujo, Luiz H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ominelli, Juliana ; Araujo, Rodrigo O. de Castro ; Valadão, Marcus ; Padoan, Monica L.A. ; Lopes dos Santos, Victor M. ; Dutra, Jamille G. ; Torres, Claudia C. ; Barbosa, Monique A. ; Guimarães, Raquel ; Carvalho, Juliana C. Carneiro ; Ferreira, Maria A. ; de Oliveira, Ivanir M. ; Small, Isabele ; de Melo, Andréia C. ; Araujo, Luiz H.</creatorcontrib><description>chemotherapy (IC) followed by chemoradiation (CRT) is an attractive approach in high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer. Additionally, ASA has shown potential to improve outcomes alongside CRT in rectal cancer. The ICAR trial aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IC followed by CRT with or without ASA on MRI tumor response. Single-center, double-blind, randomized phase II trial to evaluate induction treatment with CAPOX, followed by capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy with ASA (arm 1) or placebo (arm 2) in high-risk stage II-III rectal adenocarcinoma staged by MRI. The primary endpoint was MRI tumor regression grade (mrTRG). Secondary endpoints were pathological response, surgical outcomes, postoperative complications, treatment tolerance, DFS, and OS. Between January 2018 and August 2019, 27 patients were eligible, 25 (92.5%) completed IC, and 23 patients were randomly assigned (12 to ASA group; 11 to placebo group). In the ASA arm, 3 pts (25%) presented distant disease progression at restaging. Seven patients (30.4%) had cCR after neoadjuvant treatment. All 13 patients submitted to surgery after neoadjuvant treatment underwent R0 resections except for 1 patient with positive CRM, and 12 patients (92.3%) had sphincter preservation. After a median follow-up of 34.9 months, the 2-year DFS was 83.1% and 3-year OS was 81.5%. There was good compliance in both treatment arms and encouraging cCR rate. ASA during CRT was safe but failed to improve on MRI tumor response. The study was closed due to the absence of benefits. The ICAR trial aimed to evaluate induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy with or without ASA on MRI tumor response. This single-center, double-blind, randomized phase II trial evaluated induction treatment with CAPOX, followed by capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy with ASA (arm 1) or placebo (arm 2) in 27 patients. ASA during chemoradiotherapy was safe but failed to improve MRI tumor response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1533-0028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-0674</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.05.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35668002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acetylsalicylic acid ; Locally advanced rectal cancer ; Neoadjuvant acetylsalicylic acid ; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy ; Total neoadjuvant therapy</subject><ispartof>Clinical colorectal cancer, 2022-09, Vol.21 (3), p.e196-e204</ispartof><rights>2022</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-22d497a8e102f8e4cc8358a98b579be9b333f3f9805c564dd124531ce29ff7b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-22d497a8e102f8e4cc8358a98b579be9b333f3f9805c564dd124531ce29ff7b63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1533002822000561$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35668002$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ominelli, Juliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Rodrigo O. de Castro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valadão, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padoan, Monica L.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes dos Santos, Victor M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutra, Jamille G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Claudia C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Monique A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guimarães, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Juliana C. Carneiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Maria A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Ivanir M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Small, Isabele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Melo, Andréia C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Luiz H.</creatorcontrib><title>Induction Chemotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy Combined to ASA vs. Placebo for High-Risk Rectal Cancer: Results of a Randomized Trial</title><title>Clinical colorectal cancer</title><addtitle>Clin Colorectal Cancer</addtitle><description>chemotherapy (IC) followed by chemoradiation (CRT) is an attractive approach in high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer. Additionally, ASA has shown potential to improve outcomes alongside CRT in rectal cancer. The ICAR trial aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IC followed by CRT with or without ASA on MRI tumor response. Single-center, double-blind, randomized phase II trial to evaluate induction treatment with CAPOX, followed by capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy with ASA (arm 1) or placebo (arm 2) in high-risk stage II-III rectal adenocarcinoma staged by MRI. The primary endpoint was MRI tumor regression grade (mrTRG). Secondary endpoints were pathological response, surgical outcomes, postoperative complications, treatment tolerance, DFS, and OS. Between January 2018 and August 2019, 27 patients were eligible, 25 (92.5%) completed IC, and 23 patients were randomly assigned (12 to ASA group; 11 to placebo group). In the ASA arm, 3 pts (25%) presented distant disease progression at restaging. Seven patients (30.4%) had cCR after neoadjuvant treatment. All 13 patients submitted to surgery after neoadjuvant treatment underwent R0 resections except for 1 patient with positive CRM, and 12 patients (92.3%) had sphincter preservation. After a median follow-up of 34.9 months, the 2-year DFS was 83.1% and 3-year OS was 81.5%. There was good compliance in both treatment arms and encouraging cCR rate. ASA during CRT was safe but failed to improve on MRI tumor response. The study was closed due to the absence of benefits. The ICAR trial aimed to evaluate induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy with or without ASA on MRI tumor response. This single-center, double-blind, randomized phase II trial evaluated induction treatment with CAPOX, followed by capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy with ASA (arm 1) or placebo (arm 2) in 27 patients. ASA during chemoradiotherapy was safe but failed to improve MRI tumor response.</description><subject>Acetylsalicylic acid</subject><subject>Locally advanced rectal cancer</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant acetylsalicylic acid</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy</subject><subject>Total neoadjuvant therapy</subject><issn>1533-0028</issn><issn>1938-0674</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq0KVD7aP9BD5SOXBH_EWQf1sopaQEIqWujZcuxx10sSb-0EiV7543i1wJHTzLx659XMg9A3SkpKaH2-KU1vTMkIYyURJSHsEzqmDZcFqRfVQe4F50WW5RE6SWmTu5pT-hkdcVHXMo_H6Pl6tLOZfBhxu4YhTGuIevuE9Wj3QtTWv6ttGDo_gsVTwMu7JX5MJb7ttYEuYBcivvJ_18XKpwe8AjPpHrd6NBAv8pjmfko4OKzxKoeHwf_POffR6_4LOnS6T_D1tZ6iP79-3rdXxc3vy-t2eVOYfO9UMGarZqElUMKchMoYyYXUjezEoumg6TjnjrtGEmFEXVlLWSU4NcAa5xZdzU_R2T53G8O_GdKkBp8M9L0eIcxJsUyNEJpLtrK91cSQUgSnttEPOj4pStQOvtqoHXy1g6-IUBlmXvr-mj93A9j3lTfa2fBjb4D85aOHqJLxkAlZHzMvZYP_KP8FpFyVYg</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Ominelli, Juliana</creator><creator>Araujo, Rodrigo O. de Castro</creator><creator>Valadão, Marcus</creator><creator>Padoan, Monica L.A.</creator><creator>Lopes dos Santos, Victor M.</creator><creator>Dutra, Jamille G.</creator><creator>Torres, Claudia C.</creator><creator>Barbosa, Monique A.</creator><creator>Guimarães, Raquel</creator><creator>Carvalho, Juliana C. Carneiro</creator><creator>Ferreira, Maria A.</creator><creator>de Oliveira, Ivanir M.</creator><creator>Small, Isabele</creator><creator>de Melo, Andréia C.</creator><creator>Araujo, Luiz H.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Induction Chemotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy Combined to ASA vs. Placebo for High-Risk Rectal Cancer: Results of a Randomized Trial</title><author>Ominelli, Juliana ; Araujo, Rodrigo O. de Castro ; Valadão, Marcus ; Padoan, Monica L.A. ; Lopes dos Santos, Victor M. ; Dutra, Jamille G. ; Torres, Claudia C. ; Barbosa, Monique A. ; Guimarães, Raquel ; Carvalho, Juliana C. Carneiro ; Ferreira, Maria A. ; de Oliveira, Ivanir M. ; Small, Isabele ; de Melo, Andréia C. ; Araujo, Luiz H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-22d497a8e102f8e4cc8358a98b579be9b333f3f9805c564dd124531ce29ff7b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acetylsalicylic acid</topic><topic>Locally advanced rectal cancer</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant acetylsalicylic acid</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy</topic><topic>Total neoadjuvant therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ominelli, Juliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Rodrigo O. de Castro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valadão, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padoan, Monica L.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes dos Santos, Victor M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutra, Jamille G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Claudia C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Monique A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guimarães, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Juliana C. Carneiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Maria A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Ivanir M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Small, Isabele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Melo, Andréia C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Luiz H.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical colorectal cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ominelli, Juliana</au><au>Araujo, Rodrigo O. de Castro</au><au>Valadão, Marcus</au><au>Padoan, Monica L.A.</au><au>Lopes dos Santos, Victor M.</au><au>Dutra, Jamille G.</au><au>Torres, Claudia C.</au><au>Barbosa, Monique A.</au><au>Guimarães, Raquel</au><au>Carvalho, Juliana C. Carneiro</au><au>Ferreira, Maria A.</au><au>de Oliveira, Ivanir M.</au><au>Small, Isabele</au><au>de Melo, Andréia C.</au><au>Araujo, Luiz H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Induction Chemotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy Combined to ASA vs. Placebo for High-Risk Rectal Cancer: Results of a Randomized Trial</atitle><jtitle>Clinical colorectal cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Colorectal Cancer</addtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e196</spage><epage>e204</epage><pages>e196-e204</pages><issn>1533-0028</issn><eissn>1938-0674</eissn><abstract>chemotherapy (IC) followed by chemoradiation (CRT) is an attractive approach in high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer. Additionally, ASA has shown potential to improve outcomes alongside CRT in rectal cancer. The ICAR trial aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IC followed by CRT with or without ASA on MRI tumor response. Single-center, double-blind, randomized phase II trial to evaluate induction treatment with CAPOX, followed by capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy with ASA (arm 1) or placebo (arm 2) in high-risk stage II-III rectal adenocarcinoma staged by MRI. The primary endpoint was MRI tumor regression grade (mrTRG). Secondary endpoints were pathological response, surgical outcomes, postoperative complications, treatment tolerance, DFS, and OS. Between January 2018 and August 2019, 27 patients were eligible, 25 (92.5%) completed IC, and 23 patients were randomly assigned (12 to ASA group; 11 to placebo group). In the ASA arm, 3 pts (25%) presented distant disease progression at restaging. Seven patients (30.4%) had cCR after neoadjuvant treatment. All 13 patients submitted to surgery after neoadjuvant treatment underwent R0 resections except for 1 patient with positive CRM, and 12 patients (92.3%) had sphincter preservation. After a median follow-up of 34.9 months, the 2-year DFS was 83.1% and 3-year OS was 81.5%. There was good compliance in both treatment arms and encouraging cCR rate. ASA during CRT was safe but failed to improve on MRI tumor response. The study was closed due to the absence of benefits. The ICAR trial aimed to evaluate induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy with or without ASA on MRI tumor response. This single-center, double-blind, randomized phase II trial evaluated induction treatment with CAPOX, followed by capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy with ASA (arm 1) or placebo (arm 2) in 27 patients. ASA during chemoradiotherapy was safe but failed to improve MRI tumor response.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35668002</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clcc.2022.05.002</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1533-0028
ispartof Clinical colorectal cancer, 2022-09, Vol.21 (3), p.e196-e204
issn 1533-0028
1938-0674
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2674001267
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Acetylsalicylic acid
Locally advanced rectal cancer
Neoadjuvant acetylsalicylic acid
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Total neoadjuvant therapy
title Induction Chemotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy Combined to ASA vs. Placebo for High-Risk Rectal Cancer: Results of a Randomized Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T17%3A10%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Induction%20Chemotherapy%20and%20Chemoradiotherapy%20Combined%20to%20ASA%20vs.%20Placebo%20for%20High-Risk%20Rectal%20Cancer:%20Results%20of%20a%20Randomized%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20colorectal%20cancer&rft.au=Ominelli,%20Juliana&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e196&rft.epage=e204&rft.pages=e196-e204&rft.issn=1533-0028&rft.eissn=1938-0674&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clcc.2022.05.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2674001267%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2674001267&rft_id=info:pmid/35668002&rft_els_id=S1533002822000561&rfr_iscdi=true