Usefulness and prognostic value of diagnostic tests in patients with possible chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Introduction/Aims Recent guidelines define chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and possible CIDP. The aims of our study were to evaluate the value of diagnostic tests to support the diagnosis of CIDP in patients with possible CIDP and to identify prognostic factors of th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Muscle & nerve 2022-09, Vol.66 (3), p.304-311
Hauptverfasser: Thirouin, Jeanne, Petiot, Philippe, Antoine, Jean‐Christophe, André‐Obadia, Nathalie, Convers, Philippe, Gavoille, Antoine, Bouhour, Françoise, Rheims, Sylvain, Camdessanché, Jean‐Philippe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 311
container_issue 3
container_start_page 304
container_title Muscle & nerve
container_volume 66
creator Thirouin, Jeanne
Petiot, Philippe
Antoine, Jean‐Christophe
André‐Obadia, Nathalie
Convers, Philippe
Gavoille, Antoine
Bouhour, Françoise
Rheims, Sylvain
Camdessanché, Jean‐Philippe
description Introduction/Aims Recent guidelines define chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and possible CIDP. The aims of our study were to evaluate the value of diagnostic tests to support the diagnosis of CIDP in patients with possible CIDP and to identify prognostic factors of therapeutic success. Methods We conducted an observational retrospective two‐center study between 2014 and 2019. We selected patients with a clinical presentation suggesting CIDP, but whose electrodiagnostic (EDX) test results did not meet the EFNS/PNS 2021 criteria. We analyzed epidemiologic and clinical features, axonal loss on EDX, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), plexus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nerve biopsy, and therapeutic response. Results We selected 75 patients, among whom 30 (40%) responded to treatment. The positivity rates of CSF analysis, MRI and SSEPs were not influenced by the clinical presentation or by the delay between symptom onset and medical assessment. A high protein level in CSF, female gender, and a relapsing–remitting course predicted the therapeutic response. Discussion It is important to properly diagnose suspected CIDP not meeting EFNS/PNS 2021 EDX criteria by using supportive criteria. Specific epidemiological factors and a raised CSF protein level predict a response to treatment. Further prospective studies are needed to improve diagnosis and the prognostic value of diagnostic tests in CIDP.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mus.27655
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2673593101</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2673593101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-44721585afda0824f1f9f3a2060869dabb7aabdf086b68aa43929e1eee1f7f803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0EokvhwAsgS1zKIa3_xI59RBUFpFYcYCVukZOMu64ce7FjqjwBr12vtuWAxMn26POnmfkh9JaSc0oIu5hLPmedFOIZ2lCiu6YVWj1HG0Jb1Uiuf56gVznfEUKokt1LdMKFlJQrtkF_thls8QFyxiZMeJ_ibYh5cSP-bXwBHC2enHmqLZCXjF3Ae7M4CPV-75Yd3sec3eABj7sUQ-VcsN7Ms1liWvEE8wrehfol3FbWr8lMbiw-BigpVtVufY1eWOMzvHk8T9H26tOPyy_N9bfPXy8_XjcjF1w0bdsxKpQwdjJEsdZSqy03jEiipJ7MMHTGDJOtr0EqY1qumQYKANR2VhF-is6O3jror1Kn6WeXR_DeBIgl90x2XGhOCa3o-3_Qu1hSqN31rCNcS6mUqNSHIzWmuoQEtt8nN5u09pT0h3T6-aA9pFPZd4_GMsww_SWf4qjAxRG4dx7W_5v6m-33o_IBcqKdrw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2703966885</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Usefulness and prognostic value of diagnostic tests in patients with possible chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Thirouin, Jeanne ; Petiot, Philippe ; Antoine, Jean‐Christophe ; André‐Obadia, Nathalie ; Convers, Philippe ; Gavoille, Antoine ; Bouhour, Françoise ; Rheims, Sylvain ; Camdessanché, Jean‐Philippe</creator><creatorcontrib>Thirouin, Jeanne ; Petiot, Philippe ; Antoine, Jean‐Christophe ; André‐Obadia, Nathalie ; Convers, Philippe ; Gavoille, Antoine ; Bouhour, Françoise ; Rheims, Sylvain ; Camdessanché, Jean‐Philippe</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction/Aims Recent guidelines define chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and possible CIDP. The aims of our study were to evaluate the value of diagnostic tests to support the diagnosis of CIDP in patients with possible CIDP and to identify prognostic factors of therapeutic success. Methods We conducted an observational retrospective two‐center study between 2014 and 2019. We selected patients with a clinical presentation suggesting CIDP, but whose electrodiagnostic (EDX) test results did not meet the EFNS/PNS 2021 criteria. We analyzed epidemiologic and clinical features, axonal loss on EDX, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), plexus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nerve biopsy, and therapeutic response. Results We selected 75 patients, among whom 30 (40%) responded to treatment. The positivity rates of CSF analysis, MRI and SSEPs were not influenced by the clinical presentation or by the delay between symptom onset and medical assessment. A high protein level in CSF, female gender, and a relapsing–remitting course predicted the therapeutic response. Discussion It is important to properly diagnose suspected CIDP not meeting EFNS/PNS 2021 EDX criteria by using supportive criteria. Specific epidemiological factors and a raised CSF protein level predict a response to treatment. Further prospective studies are needed to improve diagnosis and the prognostic value of diagnostic tests in CIDP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-639X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mus.27655</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35661382</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Cerebrospinal fluid ; chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy ; Criteria ; Demyelination ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic systems ; Diagnostic tests ; Epidemiology ; Health services ; Inflammation ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical diagnosis ; nerve biopsy ; Patients ; prognostic factors ; Proteins ; Somatosensory evoked potentials ; supportive criteria</subject><ispartof>Muscle &amp; nerve, 2022-09, Vol.66 (3), p.304-311</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-44721585afda0824f1f9f3a2060869dabb7aabdf086b68aa43929e1eee1f7f803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-44721585afda0824f1f9f3a2060869dabb7aabdf086b68aa43929e1eee1f7f803</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1873-630X ; 0000-0002-8282-9677</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmus.27655$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmus.27655$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35661382$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thirouin, Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petiot, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antoine, Jean‐Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>André‐Obadia, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Convers, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gavoille, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouhour, Françoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rheims, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camdessanché, Jean‐Philippe</creatorcontrib><title>Usefulness and prognostic value of diagnostic tests in patients with possible chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy</title><title>Muscle &amp; nerve</title><addtitle>Muscle Nerve</addtitle><description>Introduction/Aims Recent guidelines define chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and possible CIDP. The aims of our study were to evaluate the value of diagnostic tests to support the diagnosis of CIDP in patients with possible CIDP and to identify prognostic factors of therapeutic success. Methods We conducted an observational retrospective two‐center study between 2014 and 2019. We selected patients with a clinical presentation suggesting CIDP, but whose electrodiagnostic (EDX) test results did not meet the EFNS/PNS 2021 criteria. We analyzed epidemiologic and clinical features, axonal loss on EDX, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), plexus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nerve biopsy, and therapeutic response. Results We selected 75 patients, among whom 30 (40%) responded to treatment. The positivity rates of CSF analysis, MRI and SSEPs were not influenced by the clinical presentation or by the delay between symptom onset and medical assessment. A high protein level in CSF, female gender, and a relapsing–remitting course predicted the therapeutic response. Discussion It is important to properly diagnose suspected CIDP not meeting EFNS/PNS 2021 EDX criteria by using supportive criteria. Specific epidemiological factors and a raised CSF protein level predict a response to treatment. Further prospective studies are needed to improve diagnosis and the prognostic value of diagnostic tests in CIDP.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Demyelination</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>nerve biopsy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>prognostic factors</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Somatosensory evoked potentials</subject><subject>supportive criteria</subject><issn>0148-639X</issn><issn>1097-4598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy0EokvhwAsgS1zKIa3_xI59RBUFpFYcYCVukZOMu64ce7FjqjwBr12vtuWAxMn26POnmfkh9JaSc0oIu5hLPmedFOIZ2lCiu6YVWj1HG0Jb1Uiuf56gVznfEUKokt1LdMKFlJQrtkF_thls8QFyxiZMeJ_ibYh5cSP-bXwBHC2enHmqLZCXjF3Ae7M4CPV-75Yd3sec3eABj7sUQ-VcsN7Ms1liWvEE8wrehfol3FbWr8lMbiw-BigpVtVufY1eWOMzvHk8T9H26tOPyy_N9bfPXy8_XjcjF1w0bdsxKpQwdjJEsdZSqy03jEiipJ7MMHTGDJOtr0EqY1qumQYKANR2VhF-is6O3jror1Kn6WeXR_DeBIgl90x2XGhOCa3o-3_Qu1hSqN31rCNcS6mUqNSHIzWmuoQEtt8nN5u09pT0h3T6-aA9pFPZd4_GMsww_SWf4qjAxRG4dx7W_5v6m-33o_IBcqKdrw</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Thirouin, Jeanne</creator><creator>Petiot, Philippe</creator><creator>Antoine, Jean‐Christophe</creator><creator>André‐Obadia, Nathalie</creator><creator>Convers, Philippe</creator><creator>Gavoille, Antoine</creator><creator>Bouhour, Françoise</creator><creator>Rheims, Sylvain</creator><creator>Camdessanché, Jean‐Philippe</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1873-630X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8282-9677</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Usefulness and prognostic value of diagnostic tests in patients with possible chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy</title><author>Thirouin, Jeanne ; Petiot, Philippe ; Antoine, Jean‐Christophe ; André‐Obadia, Nathalie ; Convers, Philippe ; Gavoille, Antoine ; Bouhour, Françoise ; Rheims, Sylvain ; Camdessanché, Jean‐Philippe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-44721585afda0824f1f9f3a2060869dabb7aabdf086b68aa43929e1eee1f7f803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Demyelination</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>nerve biopsy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>prognostic factors</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Somatosensory evoked potentials</topic><topic>supportive criteria</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thirouin, Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petiot, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antoine, Jean‐Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>André‐Obadia, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Convers, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gavoille, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouhour, Françoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rheims, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camdessanché, Jean‐Philippe</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Muscle &amp; nerve</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thirouin, Jeanne</au><au>Petiot, Philippe</au><au>Antoine, Jean‐Christophe</au><au>André‐Obadia, Nathalie</au><au>Convers, Philippe</au><au>Gavoille, Antoine</au><au>Bouhour, Françoise</au><au>Rheims, Sylvain</au><au>Camdessanché, Jean‐Philippe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Usefulness and prognostic value of diagnostic tests in patients with possible chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy</atitle><jtitle>Muscle &amp; nerve</jtitle><addtitle>Muscle Nerve</addtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>304</spage><epage>311</epage><pages>304-311</pages><issn>0148-639X</issn><eissn>1097-4598</eissn><abstract>Introduction/Aims Recent guidelines define chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and possible CIDP. The aims of our study were to evaluate the value of diagnostic tests to support the diagnosis of CIDP in patients with possible CIDP and to identify prognostic factors of therapeutic success. Methods We conducted an observational retrospective two‐center study between 2014 and 2019. We selected patients with a clinical presentation suggesting CIDP, but whose electrodiagnostic (EDX) test results did not meet the EFNS/PNS 2021 criteria. We analyzed epidemiologic and clinical features, axonal loss on EDX, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), plexus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nerve biopsy, and therapeutic response. Results We selected 75 patients, among whom 30 (40%) responded to treatment. The positivity rates of CSF analysis, MRI and SSEPs were not influenced by the clinical presentation or by the delay between symptom onset and medical assessment. A high protein level in CSF, female gender, and a relapsing–remitting course predicted the therapeutic response. Discussion It is important to properly diagnose suspected CIDP not meeting EFNS/PNS 2021 EDX criteria by using supportive criteria. Specific epidemiological factors and a raised CSF protein level predict a response to treatment. Further prospective studies are needed to improve diagnosis and the prognostic value of diagnostic tests in CIDP.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>35661382</pmid><doi>10.1002/mus.27655</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1873-630X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8282-9677</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-639X
ispartof Muscle & nerve, 2022-09, Vol.66 (3), p.304-311
issn 0148-639X
1097-4598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2673593101
source Wiley Journals
subjects Biopsy
Cerebrospinal fluid
chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy
Criteria
Demyelination
Diagnosis
Diagnostic systems
Diagnostic tests
Epidemiology
Health services
Inflammation
Magnetic resonance imaging
Medical diagnosis
nerve biopsy
Patients
prognostic factors
Proteins
Somatosensory evoked potentials
supportive criteria
title Usefulness and prognostic value of diagnostic tests in patients with possible chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A58%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Usefulness%20and%20prognostic%20value%20of%20diagnostic%20tests%20in%20patients%20with%20possible%20chronic%20inflammatory%20demyelinating%20polyradiculoneuropathy&rft.jtitle=Muscle%20&%20nerve&rft.au=Thirouin,%20Jeanne&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=304&rft.epage=311&rft.pages=304-311&rft.issn=0148-639X&rft.eissn=1097-4598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mus.27655&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2673593101%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2703966885&rft_id=info:pmid/35661382&rfr_iscdi=true