Single-Cell versus Single-Nucleus: Transcriptome differences in murine kidney after ischemia-reperfusion injury

The kidney is a complex organ, which consists of multiple components with highly diverse cell types. A detailed understanding of these cell types in health and disease is crucial for future development of preventive and curative treatment strategies. In recent years, single cell RNA sequencing (scRN...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of physiology. Renal physiology 2022-08, Vol.323 (2), p.F171-F181
Hauptverfasser: Gaedcke, Svenja, Sinning, Julius, Dittrich-Breiholz, Oliver, Haller, Hermann, Soerensen-Zender, Inga, Liao, Chieh Ming, Nordlohne, Alexandra, Sen, Payel, von Vietinghoff, Sibylle, DeLuca, David S, Schmitt, Roland
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page F181
container_issue 2
container_start_page F171
container_title American journal of physiology. Renal physiology
container_volume 323
creator Gaedcke, Svenja
Sinning, Julius
Dittrich-Breiholz, Oliver
Haller, Hermann
Soerensen-Zender, Inga
Liao, Chieh Ming
Nordlohne, Alexandra
Sen, Payel
von Vietinghoff, Sibylle
DeLuca, David S
Schmitt, Roland
description The kidney is a complex organ, which consists of multiple components with highly diverse cell types. A detailed understanding of these cell types in health and disease is crucial for future development of preventive and curative treatment strategies. In recent years, single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) and single nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) technology has opened up completely new possibilities in investigating the variety of renal cell populations in physiological and pathological states. Here, we systematically assess differences between scRNAseq and snRNAseq approaches in transcriptome analysis of murine kidneys after ischemia reperfusion injury. We included tissues from control kidneys and from kidneys harvested one week after mild (17 minutes clamping time) and severe (27 minutes clamping time) transient unilateral ischemia. Our findings reveal important methodological differences in the discovery of inflammatory cells, tubular cells, and other specialized cell types. While the scRNAseq approach is advantageous for investigating immune cells, the snRNAseq approach allows superior insight into healthy and damaged tubular cells. Apart from differences in the quantitative discovery rate, we found important qualitative discrepancies in the captured transcriptomes with crucial consequences for the interpretation of cell states and molecular functions. Together, we provide an overview of method-dependent differences between scRNAseq and snRNAseq results from identical post-ischemic kidney tissues. Our results highlight the importance of choosing the right approach for specific research questions.
doi_str_mv 10.1152/ajprenal.00453.2021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2672000101</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2672000101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-e32d00a1bbe84628ee235574fde387cc1fb3ace70f2a83969857735046f71ec33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwC5BQjlw6krhpO25o4kua4MCQuFVZ6kBGv0gapP17MjY42bJf-7UfQs45m3IuxZVa9w5bVU8ZSyVMBRP8gIxjRyQ8zbLDmM-AJ4XM30bkxPs1Y4xzwY_JCGQGEgSMSfdi2_cakznWNf1G54On-9JT0DUGf02XTrVeO9sPXYO0ssZgNNboqW1pE5xtkX7aqsUNVWZAR63XH9hYlTjs0ZngbddG7Tq4zSk5Mqr2eLaPE_J6d7ucPySL5_vH-c0i0cDkkCCIijHFVyss0kwUiAKkzFNTIRS51tysQGnMmRGqgFk2i1_mIFmamZyjBpiQy93e3nVfAf1QNvGq-KRqsQu-FFkutjwYj1LYSbXrvHdoyt7ZRrlNyVm5JV3-kS5_SZdb0nHqYm8QVg1W_zN_aOEHuwJ95w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2672000101</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single-Cell versus Single-Nucleus: Transcriptome differences in murine kidney after ischemia-reperfusion injury</title><source>American Physiological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gaedcke, Svenja ; Sinning, Julius ; Dittrich-Breiholz, Oliver ; Haller, Hermann ; Soerensen-Zender, Inga ; Liao, Chieh Ming ; Nordlohne, Alexandra ; Sen, Payel ; von Vietinghoff, Sibylle ; DeLuca, David S ; Schmitt, Roland</creator><creatorcontrib>Gaedcke, Svenja ; Sinning, Julius ; Dittrich-Breiholz, Oliver ; Haller, Hermann ; Soerensen-Zender, Inga ; Liao, Chieh Ming ; Nordlohne, Alexandra ; Sen, Payel ; von Vietinghoff, Sibylle ; DeLuca, David S ; Schmitt, Roland</creatorcontrib><description>The kidney is a complex organ, which consists of multiple components with highly diverse cell types. A detailed understanding of these cell types in health and disease is crucial for future development of preventive and curative treatment strategies. In recent years, single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) and single nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) technology has opened up completely new possibilities in investigating the variety of renal cell populations in physiological and pathological states. Here, we systematically assess differences between scRNAseq and snRNAseq approaches in transcriptome analysis of murine kidneys after ischemia reperfusion injury. We included tissues from control kidneys and from kidneys harvested one week after mild (17 minutes clamping time) and severe (27 minutes clamping time) transient unilateral ischemia. Our findings reveal important methodological differences in the discovery of inflammatory cells, tubular cells, and other specialized cell types. While the scRNAseq approach is advantageous for investigating immune cells, the snRNAseq approach allows superior insight into healthy and damaged tubular cells. Apart from differences in the quantitative discovery rate, we found important qualitative discrepancies in the captured transcriptomes with crucial consequences for the interpretation of cell states and molecular functions. Together, we provide an overview of method-dependent differences between scRNAseq and snRNAseq results from identical post-ischemic kidney tissues. Our results highlight the importance of choosing the right approach for specific research questions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-857X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1466</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00453.2021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35635323</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>American journal of physiology. Renal physiology, 2022-08, Vol.323 (2), p.F171-F181</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-e32d00a1bbe84628ee235574fde387cc1fb3ace70f2a83969857735046f71ec33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-e32d00a1bbe84628ee235574fde387cc1fb3ace70f2a83969857735046f71ec33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4415-8355 ; 0000-0001-7336-7354</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3026,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35635323$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gaedcke, Svenja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinning, Julius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dittrich-Breiholz, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haller, Hermann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soerensen-Zender, Inga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Chieh Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordlohne, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sen, Payel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Vietinghoff, Sibylle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLuca, David S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Roland</creatorcontrib><title>Single-Cell versus Single-Nucleus: Transcriptome differences in murine kidney after ischemia-reperfusion injury</title><title>American journal of physiology. Renal physiology</title><addtitle>Am J Physiol Renal Physiol</addtitle><description>The kidney is a complex organ, which consists of multiple components with highly diverse cell types. A detailed understanding of these cell types in health and disease is crucial for future development of preventive and curative treatment strategies. In recent years, single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) and single nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) technology has opened up completely new possibilities in investigating the variety of renal cell populations in physiological and pathological states. Here, we systematically assess differences between scRNAseq and snRNAseq approaches in transcriptome analysis of murine kidneys after ischemia reperfusion injury. We included tissues from control kidneys and from kidneys harvested one week after mild (17 minutes clamping time) and severe (27 minutes clamping time) transient unilateral ischemia. Our findings reveal important methodological differences in the discovery of inflammatory cells, tubular cells, and other specialized cell types. While the scRNAseq approach is advantageous for investigating immune cells, the snRNAseq approach allows superior insight into healthy and damaged tubular cells. Apart from differences in the quantitative discovery rate, we found important qualitative discrepancies in the captured transcriptomes with crucial consequences for the interpretation of cell states and molecular functions. Together, we provide an overview of method-dependent differences between scRNAseq and snRNAseq results from identical post-ischemic kidney tissues. Our results highlight the importance of choosing the right approach for specific research questions.</description><issn>1931-857X</issn><issn>1522-1466</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwC5BQjlw6krhpO25o4kua4MCQuFVZ6kBGv0gapP17MjY42bJf-7UfQs45m3IuxZVa9w5bVU8ZSyVMBRP8gIxjRyQ8zbLDmM-AJ4XM30bkxPs1Y4xzwY_JCGQGEgSMSfdi2_cakznWNf1G54On-9JT0DUGf02XTrVeO9sPXYO0ssZgNNboqW1pE5xtkX7aqsUNVWZAR63XH9hYlTjs0ZngbddG7Tq4zSk5Mqr2eLaPE_J6d7ucPySL5_vH-c0i0cDkkCCIijHFVyss0kwUiAKkzFNTIRS51tysQGnMmRGqgFk2i1_mIFmamZyjBpiQy93e3nVfAf1QNvGq-KRqsQu-FFkutjwYj1LYSbXrvHdoyt7ZRrlNyVm5JV3-kS5_SZdb0nHqYm8QVg1W_zN_aOEHuwJ95w</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Gaedcke, Svenja</creator><creator>Sinning, Julius</creator><creator>Dittrich-Breiholz, Oliver</creator><creator>Haller, Hermann</creator><creator>Soerensen-Zender, Inga</creator><creator>Liao, Chieh Ming</creator><creator>Nordlohne, Alexandra</creator><creator>Sen, Payel</creator><creator>von Vietinghoff, Sibylle</creator><creator>DeLuca, David S</creator><creator>Schmitt, Roland</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4415-8355</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7336-7354</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Single-Cell versus Single-Nucleus: Transcriptome differences in murine kidney after ischemia-reperfusion injury</title><author>Gaedcke, Svenja ; Sinning, Julius ; Dittrich-Breiholz, Oliver ; Haller, Hermann ; Soerensen-Zender, Inga ; Liao, Chieh Ming ; Nordlohne, Alexandra ; Sen, Payel ; von Vietinghoff, Sibylle ; DeLuca, David S ; Schmitt, Roland</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-e32d00a1bbe84628ee235574fde387cc1fb3ace70f2a83969857735046f71ec33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gaedcke, Svenja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinning, Julius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dittrich-Breiholz, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haller, Hermann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soerensen-Zender, Inga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Chieh Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordlohne, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sen, Payel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Vietinghoff, Sibylle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLuca, David S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Roland</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of physiology. Renal physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gaedcke, Svenja</au><au>Sinning, Julius</au><au>Dittrich-Breiholz, Oliver</au><au>Haller, Hermann</au><au>Soerensen-Zender, Inga</au><au>Liao, Chieh Ming</au><au>Nordlohne, Alexandra</au><au>Sen, Payel</au><au>von Vietinghoff, Sibylle</au><au>DeLuca, David S</au><au>Schmitt, Roland</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Single-Cell versus Single-Nucleus: Transcriptome differences in murine kidney after ischemia-reperfusion injury</atitle><jtitle>American journal of physiology. Renal physiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Physiol Renal Physiol</addtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>323</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>F171</spage><epage>F181</epage><pages>F171-F181</pages><issn>1931-857X</issn><eissn>1522-1466</eissn><abstract>The kidney is a complex organ, which consists of multiple components with highly diverse cell types. A detailed understanding of these cell types in health and disease is crucial for future development of preventive and curative treatment strategies. In recent years, single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) and single nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) technology has opened up completely new possibilities in investigating the variety of renal cell populations in physiological and pathological states. Here, we systematically assess differences between scRNAseq and snRNAseq approaches in transcriptome analysis of murine kidneys after ischemia reperfusion injury. We included tissues from control kidneys and from kidneys harvested one week after mild (17 minutes clamping time) and severe (27 minutes clamping time) transient unilateral ischemia. Our findings reveal important methodological differences in the discovery of inflammatory cells, tubular cells, and other specialized cell types. While the scRNAseq approach is advantageous for investigating immune cells, the snRNAseq approach allows superior insight into healthy and damaged tubular cells. Apart from differences in the quantitative discovery rate, we found important qualitative discrepancies in the captured transcriptomes with crucial consequences for the interpretation of cell states and molecular functions. Together, we provide an overview of method-dependent differences between scRNAseq and snRNAseq results from identical post-ischemic kidney tissues. Our results highlight the importance of choosing the right approach for specific research questions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>35635323</pmid><doi>10.1152/ajprenal.00453.2021</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4415-8355</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7336-7354</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1931-857X
ispartof American journal of physiology. Renal physiology, 2022-08, Vol.323 (2), p.F171-F181
issn 1931-857X
1522-1466
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2672000101
source American Physiological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Single-Cell versus Single-Nucleus: Transcriptome differences in murine kidney after ischemia-reperfusion injury
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T02%3A47%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single-Cell%20versus%20Single-Nucleus:%20Transcriptome%20differences%20in%20murine%20kidney%20after%20ischemia-reperfusion%20injury&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20physiology.%20Renal%20physiology&rft.au=Gaedcke,%20Svenja&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=323&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=F171&rft.epage=F181&rft.pages=F171-F181&rft.issn=1931-857X&rft.eissn=1522-1466&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/ajprenal.00453.2021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2672000101%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2672000101&rft_id=info:pmid/35635323&rfr_iscdi=true