Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylaxis use with intravenous contrast exposure to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy

[Display omitted] Iodinated radiographic contrast media has been associated with an acute deterioration in renal function, termed contrast induced nephropathy (CIN). This review aims to establish the efficacy of prophylaxis interventions used in adult patients prior to intravenous exposure to iodina...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of radiology 2022-08, Vol.153, p.110368-110368, Article 110368
Hauptverfasser: Walker, Heather, Guthrie, Greg D., Lambourg, Emilie, Traill, Philippa, Zealley, Ian, Plumb, Andrew, Bell, Samira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110368
container_issue
container_start_page 110368
container_title European journal of radiology
container_volume 153
creator Walker, Heather
Guthrie, Greg D.
Lambourg, Emilie
Traill, Philippa
Zealley, Ian
Plumb, Andrew
Bell, Samira
description [Display omitted] Iodinated radiographic contrast media has been associated with an acute deterioration in renal function, termed contrast induced nephropathy (CIN). This review aims to establish the efficacy of prophylaxis interventions used in adult patients prior to intravenous exposure to iodinated contrast to reduce the risk of CIN. An electronic search for published peer-reviewed articles was performed, supplemented with manual review of references from previous systematic reviews and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias. Random-effect meta-analyses were used to assess CIN incidence, need for kidney replacement therapy (KRT), mortality, fluid overload and persistent kidney dysfunction. 22 studies assessing a range of interventions were included in the qualitative analysis. The incidence of CIN was reduced by the use of N-acetylcysteine compared to a control group of saline (risk difference = -0.07, 95% CI −0.13 to −0.01) but not by sodium bicarbonate compared to control group of saline (risk difference = -0.02, 95% CI −0.04 to 0.01). Published studies give no indication that prophylactic interventions have significant impact on the need for KRT, mortality or persistent renal impairment. Evidence for prophylaxis against CIN in patients receiving intravenous iodinated contrast is limited. There was an association with the use of NAC with reduced incidence of CIN following intravenous contrast but there was no impact on other clinical outcomes assessed. The clinical significance of these findings remains unclear and further research focusing on these clinical outcomes is required.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110368
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2671999381</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0720048X22002182</els_id><sourcerecordid>2671999381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-dc6b7f69cf4e200298ba7da21b742c916d0c091a2a35196e3df94e0cf12268c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1PGzEQxa0KRFLKX1AJ-chl07F3Y68PPVSIfkhIHACpN8uxZxVH-4XtBfbY_xynSTn2NHqa92b0foR8ZrBiwMSX3Qp3wbgVB85XjEEp6g9kyWrJCym5PCFLkBwKqOrfC_Ixxh0ArCvFz8iiXItSAK-W5M_9HBN2JnlLAz57fKGmd7TDZArTm3aOPtKhoWMYxu3cmtcsp4j0xact9X0K5hn7YYrUDnsRE8XXcYhTQJqGnMK8Tu_Lwvdusuhoj-M2XzRpO38ip41pI14c5zl5_H7zcP2zuL378ev6221hK6hS4azYyEYo21TIAbiqN0Y6w9lGVtwqJhxYUMxwU66ZEli6RlUItmGci9rW5Tm5OtzNVZ4mjEl3PlpsW9NjLqC5kEwpVdYsW8uD1YYhxoCNHoPvTJg1A71nr3f6L3u9Z68P7HPq8vhg2nTo3jP_YGfD14MBc82MOuhoPfaZhw9ok3aD_--DNzPbmgs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2671999381</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylaxis use with intravenous contrast exposure to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Walker, Heather ; Guthrie, Greg D. ; Lambourg, Emilie ; Traill, Philippa ; Zealley, Ian ; Plumb, Andrew ; Bell, Samira</creator><creatorcontrib>Walker, Heather ; Guthrie, Greg D. ; Lambourg, Emilie ; Traill, Philippa ; Zealley, Ian ; Plumb, Andrew ; Bell, Samira</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] Iodinated radiographic contrast media has been associated with an acute deterioration in renal function, termed contrast induced nephropathy (CIN). This review aims to establish the efficacy of prophylaxis interventions used in adult patients prior to intravenous exposure to iodinated contrast to reduce the risk of CIN. An electronic search for published peer-reviewed articles was performed, supplemented with manual review of references from previous systematic reviews and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias. Random-effect meta-analyses were used to assess CIN incidence, need for kidney replacement therapy (KRT), mortality, fluid overload and persistent kidney dysfunction. 22 studies assessing a range of interventions were included in the qualitative analysis. The incidence of CIN was reduced by the use of N-acetylcysteine compared to a control group of saline (risk difference = -0.07, 95% CI −0.13 to −0.01) but not by sodium bicarbonate compared to control group of saline (risk difference = -0.02, 95% CI −0.04 to 0.01). Published studies give no indication that prophylactic interventions have significant impact on the need for KRT, mortality or persistent renal impairment. Evidence for prophylaxis against CIN in patients receiving intravenous iodinated contrast is limited. There was an association with the use of NAC with reduced incidence of CIN following intravenous contrast but there was no impact on other clinical outcomes assessed. The clinical significance of these findings remains unclear and further research focusing on these clinical outcomes is required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110368</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35636024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Contrast induced nephropathy ; Iodinated Contrast ; Prophylaxis</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2022-08, Vol.153, p.110368-110368, Article 110368</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-dc6b7f69cf4e200298ba7da21b742c916d0c091a2a35196e3df94e0cf12268c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-dc6b7f69cf4e200298ba7da21b742c916d0c091a2a35196e3df94e0cf12268c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110368$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35636024$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walker, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guthrie, Greg D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambourg, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traill, Philippa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zealley, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plumb, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Samira</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylaxis use with intravenous contrast exposure to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>[Display omitted] Iodinated radiographic contrast media has been associated with an acute deterioration in renal function, termed contrast induced nephropathy (CIN). This review aims to establish the efficacy of prophylaxis interventions used in adult patients prior to intravenous exposure to iodinated contrast to reduce the risk of CIN. An electronic search for published peer-reviewed articles was performed, supplemented with manual review of references from previous systematic reviews and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias. Random-effect meta-analyses were used to assess CIN incidence, need for kidney replacement therapy (KRT), mortality, fluid overload and persistent kidney dysfunction. 22 studies assessing a range of interventions were included in the qualitative analysis. The incidence of CIN was reduced by the use of N-acetylcysteine compared to a control group of saline (risk difference = -0.07, 95% CI −0.13 to −0.01) but not by sodium bicarbonate compared to control group of saline (risk difference = -0.02, 95% CI −0.04 to 0.01). Published studies give no indication that prophylactic interventions have significant impact on the need for KRT, mortality or persistent renal impairment. Evidence for prophylaxis against CIN in patients receiving intravenous iodinated contrast is limited. There was an association with the use of NAC with reduced incidence of CIN following intravenous contrast but there was no impact on other clinical outcomes assessed. The clinical significance of these findings remains unclear and further research focusing on these clinical outcomes is required.</description><subject>Contrast induced nephropathy</subject><subject>Iodinated Contrast</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1PGzEQxa0KRFLKX1AJ-chl07F3Y68PPVSIfkhIHACpN8uxZxVH-4XtBfbY_xynSTn2NHqa92b0foR8ZrBiwMSX3Qp3wbgVB85XjEEp6g9kyWrJCym5PCFLkBwKqOrfC_Ixxh0ArCvFz8iiXItSAK-W5M_9HBN2JnlLAz57fKGmd7TDZArTm3aOPtKhoWMYxu3cmtcsp4j0xact9X0K5hn7YYrUDnsRE8XXcYhTQJqGnMK8Tu_Lwvdusuhoj-M2XzRpO38ip41pI14c5zl5_H7zcP2zuL378ev6221hK6hS4azYyEYo21TIAbiqN0Y6w9lGVtwqJhxYUMxwU66ZEli6RlUItmGci9rW5Tm5OtzNVZ4mjEl3PlpsW9NjLqC5kEwpVdYsW8uD1YYhxoCNHoPvTJg1A71nr3f6L3u9Z68P7HPq8vhg2nTo3jP_YGfD14MBc82MOuhoPfaZhw9ok3aD_--DNzPbmgs</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Walker, Heather</creator><creator>Guthrie, Greg D.</creator><creator>Lambourg, Emilie</creator><creator>Traill, Philippa</creator><creator>Zealley, Ian</creator><creator>Plumb, Andrew</creator><creator>Bell, Samira</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylaxis use with intravenous contrast exposure to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy</title><author>Walker, Heather ; Guthrie, Greg D. ; Lambourg, Emilie ; Traill, Philippa ; Zealley, Ian ; Plumb, Andrew ; Bell, Samira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-dc6b7f69cf4e200298ba7da21b742c916d0c091a2a35196e3df94e0cf12268c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Contrast induced nephropathy</topic><topic>Iodinated Contrast</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walker, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guthrie, Greg D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambourg, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traill, Philippa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zealley, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plumb, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Samira</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walker, Heather</au><au>Guthrie, Greg D.</au><au>Lambourg, Emilie</au><au>Traill, Philippa</au><au>Zealley, Ian</au><au>Plumb, Andrew</au><au>Bell, Samira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylaxis use with intravenous contrast exposure to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>153</volume><spage>110368</spage><epage>110368</epage><pages>110368-110368</pages><artnum>110368</artnum><issn>0720-048X</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] Iodinated radiographic contrast media has been associated with an acute deterioration in renal function, termed contrast induced nephropathy (CIN). This review aims to establish the efficacy of prophylaxis interventions used in adult patients prior to intravenous exposure to iodinated contrast to reduce the risk of CIN. An electronic search for published peer-reviewed articles was performed, supplemented with manual review of references from previous systematic reviews and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias. Random-effect meta-analyses were used to assess CIN incidence, need for kidney replacement therapy (KRT), mortality, fluid overload and persistent kidney dysfunction. 22 studies assessing a range of interventions were included in the qualitative analysis. The incidence of CIN was reduced by the use of N-acetylcysteine compared to a control group of saline (risk difference = -0.07, 95% CI −0.13 to −0.01) but not by sodium bicarbonate compared to control group of saline (risk difference = -0.02, 95% CI −0.04 to 0.01). Published studies give no indication that prophylactic interventions have significant impact on the need for KRT, mortality or persistent renal impairment. Evidence for prophylaxis against CIN in patients receiving intravenous iodinated contrast is limited. There was an association with the use of NAC with reduced incidence of CIN following intravenous contrast but there was no impact on other clinical outcomes assessed. The clinical significance of these findings remains unclear and further research focusing on these clinical outcomes is required.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>35636024</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110368</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0720-048X
ispartof European journal of radiology, 2022-08, Vol.153, p.110368-110368, Article 110368
issn 0720-048X
1872-7727
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2671999381
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Contrast induced nephropathy
Iodinated Contrast
Prophylaxis
title Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylaxis use with intravenous contrast exposure to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A26%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis%20of%20prophylaxis%20use%20with%20intravenous%20contrast%20exposure%20to%20prevent%20contrast-induced%20nephropathy&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Walker,%20Heather&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=153&rft.spage=110368&rft.epage=110368&rft.pages=110368-110368&rft.artnum=110368&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110368&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2671999381%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2671999381&rft_id=info:pmid/35636024&rft_els_id=S0720048X22002182&rfr_iscdi=true