Effects of worksite exercise intervention (PRODET®) on well-being at work and capability in performing work-related sedentary tasks: A pilot study
BACKGROUND: Companies have tried to carry out interventions in order to mitigate the risks associated with losses in productivity and the health of employees. OBJECTIVE: This intervention trial evaluated the effect of a supervised exercise intervention based on aerobic capacity and strength on well-...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Work (Reading, Mass.) Mass.), 2022-01, Vol.72 (3), p.909-920 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 920 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 909 |
container_title | Work (Reading, Mass.) |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Díaz-Benito, Vıctor Jiménez Barriopedro Moro, Marıa Isabel Clemente Remón, Ángel Luis Santacruz Lozano, José Antonio Hervás Pérez, Juan Pablo Vanderhaegen, Frederic |
description | BACKGROUND:
Companies have tried to carry out interventions in order to mitigate the risks associated with losses in productivity and the health of employees.
OBJECTIVE:
This intervention trial evaluated the effect of a supervised exercise intervention based on aerobic capacity and strength on well-being at work and capability in performing work tasks.
METHODOLOGY:
The sample was composed of 67 participants (N = 67, mean age 34.31 years) and investigated a 12-week group physical exercise program in the workplace, two days per week for 50 minutes, which was supervised and based on aerobic endurance and strength. The 67 subjects were working-age office workers, deemed sedentary and randomized into an intervention (N = 40) or control (N = 27) group. Among them, 33 were men (N = 33; 49.25%) and 34 were women (N = 34, 50.75%). Outcomes were assessed pre- and post-test in both groups. The Mann-Whitney U and Chi-Square tests were performed to compare the characteristics of the intervention and control group. η2 = z/(n-1) was calculated as effect size rates.
RESULTS:
The program showed statistically significant effects on strength endurance (P = 0.020, η2 = 0.08), the loss of fat percentage (P = 0.015, η2 = 0.09), lower limb power (P = 0.020, η2 = 0.08) and QoL (P = 0.0001, η2 = 0.39 for the physical health outcome, and P = 0.0001, η2 = 0.35 for the outcome of total scores of mental health).
CONCLUSIONS:
The intervention had an impact on the endurance, fat percentage loss and QoL of the workers whose occupations were based on sedentary tasks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3233/WOR-205340 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2671996620</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.3233_WOR-205340</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2671996620</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-e81b1cff151316e67fc62ce22c728f25b9e86a7930cd03be9f521a05f5208f4e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0d1KHDEUB_AgFbXqjQ9QAr2oLUzNxyYz6Z3otgrCiiheDpnMiURnJ2OSqe5z9D36EH2yZrt-QPHqJPA7Jzn8Edqj5CtnnB9czy4KRgSfkDW0RatSFIqV5F0-E0ELVVGxid7HeEsIYYyoDbTJheSTilZb6NfUWjApYm_xgw930SXA8AjBuAjY9QnCT-iT8z3eP7-YHU8v__z-jPPtAbquaMD1N1inf61Y9y02etCN61xa5GY8QLA-zJdoKYoAnU7Q4ghtHqrDAicd7-I3fIgH1_mEYxrbxQ5at7qLsPtUt9HV9-nl0UlxNvtxenR4VhhWlqmAijbUWEsF5VSCLK2RzABjpmSVZaJRUEldKk5MS3gDygpGNRG5kMpOgG-j_dXcIfj7EWKq5y6avJfuwY-xZrKkSknJSKYf_6O3fgx9_l1WSgpKJ1Jk9WWlTPAxBrD1ENw8r1lTUi-jqnNU9SqqjD88jRybObQv9DmbDD6tQNQ38PreG6P-AmeZnGE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2696511465</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of worksite exercise intervention (PRODET®) on well-being at work and capability in performing work-related sedentary tasks: A pilot study</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Díaz-Benito, Vıctor Jiménez ; Barriopedro Moro, Marıa Isabel ; Clemente Remón, Ángel Luis ; Santacruz Lozano, José Antonio ; Hervás Pérez, Juan Pablo ; Vanderhaegen, Frederic</creator><creatorcontrib>Díaz-Benito, Vıctor Jiménez ; Barriopedro Moro, Marıa Isabel ; Clemente Remón, Ángel Luis ; Santacruz Lozano, José Antonio ; Hervás Pérez, Juan Pablo ; Vanderhaegen, Frederic</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:
Companies have tried to carry out interventions in order to mitigate the risks associated with losses in productivity and the health of employees.
OBJECTIVE:
This intervention trial evaluated the effect of a supervised exercise intervention based on aerobic capacity and strength on well-being at work and capability in performing work tasks.
METHODOLOGY:
The sample was composed of 67 participants (N = 67, mean age 34.31 years) and investigated a 12-week group physical exercise program in the workplace, two days per week for 50 minutes, which was supervised and based on aerobic endurance and strength. The 67 subjects were working-age office workers, deemed sedentary and randomized into an intervention (N = 40) or control (N = 27) group. Among them, 33 were men (N = 33; 49.25%) and 34 were women (N = 34, 50.75%). Outcomes were assessed pre- and post-test in both groups. The Mann-Whitney U and Chi-Square tests were performed to compare the characteristics of the intervention and control group. η2 = z/(n-1) was calculated as effect size rates.
RESULTS:
The program showed statistically significant effects on strength endurance (P = 0.020, η2 = 0.08), the loss of fat percentage (P = 0.015, η2 = 0.09), lower limb power (P = 0.020, η2 = 0.08) and QoL (P = 0.0001, η2 = 0.39 for the physical health outcome, and P = 0.0001, η2 = 0.35 for the outcome of total scores of mental health).
CONCLUSIONS:
The intervention had an impact on the endurance, fat percentage loss and QoL of the workers whose occupations were based on sedentary tasks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-9815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-9270</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3233/WOR-205340</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35634818</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aerobic capacity ; Endurance ; Exercise ; Intervention ; Mental health ; Occupational health ; Physical exercise ; Physical fitness ; Risk reduction ; Sedentary behavior ; Statistical analysis ; Well being</subject><ispartof>Work (Reading, Mass.), 2022-01, Vol.72 (3), p.909-920</ispartof><rights>2022 – IOS Press. All rights reserved</rights><rights>Copyright IOS Press BV 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-e81b1cff151316e67fc62ce22c728f25b9e86a7930cd03be9f521a05f5208f4e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-e81b1cff151316e67fc62ce22c728f25b9e86a7930cd03be9f521a05f5208f4e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35634818$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Díaz-Benito, Vıctor Jiménez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barriopedro Moro, Marıa Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemente Remón, Ángel Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santacruz Lozano, José Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hervás Pérez, Juan Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderhaegen, Frederic</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of worksite exercise intervention (PRODET®) on well-being at work and capability in performing work-related sedentary tasks: A pilot study</title><title>Work (Reading, Mass.)</title><addtitle>Work</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:
Companies have tried to carry out interventions in order to mitigate the risks associated with losses in productivity and the health of employees.
OBJECTIVE:
This intervention trial evaluated the effect of a supervised exercise intervention based on aerobic capacity and strength on well-being at work and capability in performing work tasks.
METHODOLOGY:
The sample was composed of 67 participants (N = 67, mean age 34.31 years) and investigated a 12-week group physical exercise program in the workplace, two days per week for 50 minutes, which was supervised and based on aerobic endurance and strength. The 67 subjects were working-age office workers, deemed sedentary and randomized into an intervention (N = 40) or control (N = 27) group. Among them, 33 were men (N = 33; 49.25%) and 34 were women (N = 34, 50.75%). Outcomes were assessed pre- and post-test in both groups. The Mann-Whitney U and Chi-Square tests were performed to compare the characteristics of the intervention and control group. η2 = z/(n-1) was calculated as effect size rates.
RESULTS:
The program showed statistically significant effects on strength endurance (P = 0.020, η2 = 0.08), the loss of fat percentage (P = 0.015, η2 = 0.09), lower limb power (P = 0.020, η2 = 0.08) and QoL (P = 0.0001, η2 = 0.39 for the physical health outcome, and P = 0.0001, η2 = 0.35 for the outcome of total scores of mental health).
CONCLUSIONS:
The intervention had an impact on the endurance, fat percentage loss and QoL of the workers whose occupations were based on sedentary tasks.</description><subject>Aerobic capacity</subject><subject>Endurance</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Physical exercise</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Sedentary behavior</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>1051-9815</issn><issn>1875-9270</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpt0d1KHDEUB_AgFbXqjQ9QAr2oLUzNxyYz6Z3otgrCiiheDpnMiURnJ2OSqe5z9D36EH2yZrt-QPHqJPA7Jzn8Edqj5CtnnB9czy4KRgSfkDW0RatSFIqV5F0-E0ELVVGxid7HeEsIYYyoDbTJheSTilZb6NfUWjApYm_xgw930SXA8AjBuAjY9QnCT-iT8z3eP7-YHU8v__z-jPPtAbquaMD1N1inf61Y9y02etCN61xa5GY8QLA-zJdoKYoAnU7Q4ghtHqrDAicd7-I3fIgH1_mEYxrbxQ5at7qLsPtUt9HV9-nl0UlxNvtxenR4VhhWlqmAijbUWEsF5VSCLK2RzABjpmSVZaJRUEldKk5MS3gDygpGNRG5kMpOgG-j_dXcIfj7EWKq5y6avJfuwY-xZrKkSknJSKYf_6O3fgx9_l1WSgpKJ1Jk9WWlTPAxBrD1ENw8r1lTUi-jqnNU9SqqjD88jRybObQv9DmbDD6tQNQ38PreG6P-AmeZnGE</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Díaz-Benito, Vıctor Jiménez</creator><creator>Barriopedro Moro, Marıa Isabel</creator><creator>Clemente Remón, Ángel Luis</creator><creator>Santacruz Lozano, José Antonio</creator><creator>Hervás Pérez, Juan Pablo</creator><creator>Vanderhaegen, Frederic</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>IOS Press BV</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Effects of worksite exercise intervention (PRODET®) on well-being at work and capability in performing work-related sedentary tasks: A pilot study</title><author>Díaz-Benito, Vıctor Jiménez ; Barriopedro Moro, Marıa Isabel ; Clemente Remón, Ángel Luis ; Santacruz Lozano, José Antonio ; Hervás Pérez, Juan Pablo ; Vanderhaegen, Frederic</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-e81b1cff151316e67fc62ce22c728f25b9e86a7930cd03be9f521a05f5208f4e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aerobic capacity</topic><topic>Endurance</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Physical exercise</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Sedentary behavior</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Díaz-Benito, Vıctor Jiménez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barriopedro Moro, Marıa Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemente Remón, Ángel Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santacruz Lozano, José Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hervás Pérez, Juan Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderhaegen, Frederic</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Work (Reading, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Díaz-Benito, Vıctor Jiménez</au><au>Barriopedro Moro, Marıa Isabel</au><au>Clemente Remón, Ángel Luis</au><au>Santacruz Lozano, José Antonio</au><au>Hervás Pérez, Juan Pablo</au><au>Vanderhaegen, Frederic</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of worksite exercise intervention (PRODET®) on well-being at work and capability in performing work-related sedentary tasks: A pilot study</atitle><jtitle>Work (Reading, Mass.)</jtitle><addtitle>Work</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>909</spage><epage>920</epage><pages>909-920</pages><issn>1051-9815</issn><eissn>1875-9270</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:
Companies have tried to carry out interventions in order to mitigate the risks associated with losses in productivity and the health of employees.
OBJECTIVE:
This intervention trial evaluated the effect of a supervised exercise intervention based on aerobic capacity and strength on well-being at work and capability in performing work tasks.
METHODOLOGY:
The sample was composed of 67 participants (N = 67, mean age 34.31 years) and investigated a 12-week group physical exercise program in the workplace, two days per week for 50 minutes, which was supervised and based on aerobic endurance and strength. The 67 subjects were working-age office workers, deemed sedentary and randomized into an intervention (N = 40) or control (N = 27) group. Among them, 33 were men (N = 33; 49.25%) and 34 were women (N = 34, 50.75%). Outcomes were assessed pre- and post-test in both groups. The Mann-Whitney U and Chi-Square tests were performed to compare the characteristics of the intervention and control group. η2 = z/(n-1) was calculated as effect size rates.
RESULTS:
The program showed statistically significant effects on strength endurance (P = 0.020, η2 = 0.08), the loss of fat percentage (P = 0.015, η2 = 0.09), lower limb power (P = 0.020, η2 = 0.08) and QoL (P = 0.0001, η2 = 0.39 for the physical health outcome, and P = 0.0001, η2 = 0.35 for the outcome of total scores of mental health).
CONCLUSIONS:
The intervention had an impact on the endurance, fat percentage loss and QoL of the workers whose occupations were based on sedentary tasks.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>35634818</pmid><doi>10.3233/WOR-205340</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1051-9815 |
ispartof | Work (Reading, Mass.), 2022-01, Vol.72 (3), p.909-920 |
issn | 1051-9815 1875-9270 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2671996620 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Aerobic capacity Endurance Exercise Intervention Mental health Occupational health Physical exercise Physical fitness Risk reduction Sedentary behavior Statistical analysis Well being |
title | Effects of worksite exercise intervention (PRODET®) on well-being at work and capability in performing work-related sedentary tasks: A pilot study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T16%3A58%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20worksite%20exercise%20intervention%20(PRODET%C2%AE)%20on%20well-being%20at%20work%20and%20capability%20in%20performing%20work-related%20sedentary%20tasks:%20A%20pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=Work%20(Reading,%20Mass.)&rft.au=D%C3%ADaz-Benito,%20V%C4%B1ctor%20Jim%C3%A9nez&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=909&rft.epage=920&rft.pages=909-920&rft.issn=1051-9815&rft.eissn=1875-9270&rft_id=info:doi/10.3233/WOR-205340&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2671996620%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2696511465&rft_id=info:pmid/35634818&rft_sage_id=10.3233_WOR-205340&rfr_iscdi=true |