Are the recommendation of sodium and fluid restriction in heart failure patients changing over the past years? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Heart failure (HF) is a growing problem for healthcare systems worldwide. Sodium and fluid restriction are non-pharmacological treatments recommended for patients with HF by several guidelines over the years, even without consensus. To evaluate the effects of sodium and fluid restriction in patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical nutrition ESPEN 2022-06, Vol.49, p.129-137
Hauptverfasser: Stein, Cinara, Helal, Lucas, Migliavaca, Celina Borges, Sangalli, Caroline Nicola, Colpani, Verônica, Raupp da Rosa, Priscila, Beck-da-Silva, Luís, Rohde, Luis E., Polanczyk, Carisi Anne, Falavigna, Maicon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 137
container_issue
container_start_page 129
container_title Clinical nutrition ESPEN
container_volume 49
creator Stein, Cinara
Helal, Lucas
Migliavaca, Celina Borges
Sangalli, Caroline Nicola
Colpani, Verônica
Raupp da Rosa, Priscila
Beck-da-Silva, Luís
Rohde, Luis E.
Polanczyk, Carisi Anne
Falavigna, Maicon
description Heart failure (HF) is a growing problem for healthcare systems worldwide. Sodium and fluid restriction are non-pharmacological treatments recommended for patients with HF by several guidelines over the years, even without consensus. To evaluate the effects of sodium and fluid restriction in patients with HF. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases up to June 2020 and screened the reference lists of relevant articles. We included randomized controlled trials evaluating sodium and/or fluid restriction in patients with HF. We assessed three independent comparisons: (a) sodium restriction versus control; (b) fluid restriction versus control; and (c) sodium and fluid restriction versus control. Main outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality and hospitalization. Two independent reviewers selected studies and extracted data. We pooled the results using random-effects meta-analysis. We used the RoB 2.0 and the GRADE framework to assess risk of bias and quality of evidence. We included 16 studies totaling 3545 patients in our meta-analysis. Daily sodium intake was 1.5–2.4 g for the intervention group and >2.7 g for the control group, and daily fluid intake was 0.8–1.5 L for the intervention group and free oral fluid intake for the control group. Sodium restriction increased mortality (relative risk 1.92, 95% confidence interval 1.51 to 2.45, moderate quality of evidence) and hospitalization (relative risk 1.63, 1.11 to 2.40, low quality of evidence). Fluid restriction reduced mortality (relative risk 0.32, 0.13 to 0.82, low quality of evidence) and hospitalization (relative risk 0.46, 0.27 to 0.77, n = 331, low quality of evidence). The combination of sodium and fluid restriction did not significantly affect the risk of mortality (relative risk 0.92, 0.49 to 1.73, low quality of evidence) or the risk of hospitalization (relative risk 0.94, 0.75 to 1.19, low quality of evidence). The combination of sodium and fluid restriction in clinical trials resulted in a null effect although results in the opposite direction were observed for each intervention independently. Combined sodium and fluid restriction are usually recommended for patients with HF. Our findings of sodium restriction harm, risk of mortality and hospitalization are consistent with publications from several clinical trial and physiologic explanations. A well-designed clinical trial nested by an implementation study is urgent for definitive sodium range recommendation, specially con
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.03.032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2671276166</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2405457722002145</els_id><sourcerecordid>2671276166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-48dcb4a193a3e9aea7ef5e3bd26d079f60f964cbb0df015ce972c3f42dec85323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctqHDEQRUVIsI3tPzBBy2x6rFerpzcJg3EeYMjGWQu1VPJo6JY6ktph_sMfHM2ME7IKFEhQp-6l6iJ0Q8mKEipvdyszBsjzihHGVoTXYm_QBROkbUTbdW__-Z-j65x3hNS5vheUnKFz3krG10RcoJdNAly2gBOYOE0QrC4-BhwdztH6ZcI6WOzGxduK5JK8OfZ9wFvQqWCn_bhUjbnOQSgZm60OTz484fgM6Sg961zwvtL5E97gvM8FpkqbKvjs4dfRYYKiGx30uM8-X6F3To8Zrl_fS_Tj8_3j3dfm4fuXb3ebh8awnpVGrK0ZhKY91xx6DboD1wIfLJOWdL2TxPVSmGEg1hHaGug7ZrgTzIJZt5zxS_ThpDun-HOp26nJZwPjqAPEJSsmO8o6SaWsqDihJsWcEzg1Jz_ptFeUqEMkaqdOkahDJIrwWgeH968OyzCB_Tv0J4AKfDwBUPes10gqm3pHA9bXRIqy0f_f4Tf8PqJX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2671276166</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are the recommendation of sodium and fluid restriction in heart failure patients changing over the past years? A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Stein, Cinara ; Helal, Lucas ; Migliavaca, Celina Borges ; Sangalli, Caroline Nicola ; Colpani, Verônica ; Raupp da Rosa, Priscila ; Beck-da-Silva, Luís ; Rohde, Luis E. ; Polanczyk, Carisi Anne ; Falavigna, Maicon</creator><creatorcontrib>Stein, Cinara ; Helal, Lucas ; Migliavaca, Celina Borges ; Sangalli, Caroline Nicola ; Colpani, Verônica ; Raupp da Rosa, Priscila ; Beck-da-Silva, Luís ; Rohde, Luis E. ; Polanczyk, Carisi Anne ; Falavigna, Maicon</creatorcontrib><description>Heart failure (HF) is a growing problem for healthcare systems worldwide. Sodium and fluid restriction are non-pharmacological treatments recommended for patients with HF by several guidelines over the years, even without consensus. To evaluate the effects of sodium and fluid restriction in patients with HF. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases up to June 2020 and screened the reference lists of relevant articles. We included randomized controlled trials evaluating sodium and/or fluid restriction in patients with HF. We assessed three independent comparisons: (a) sodium restriction versus control; (b) fluid restriction versus control; and (c) sodium and fluid restriction versus control. Main outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality and hospitalization. Two independent reviewers selected studies and extracted data. We pooled the results using random-effects meta-analysis. We used the RoB 2.0 and the GRADE framework to assess risk of bias and quality of evidence. We included 16 studies totaling 3545 patients in our meta-analysis. Daily sodium intake was 1.5–2.4 g for the intervention group and &gt;2.7 g for the control group, and daily fluid intake was 0.8–1.5 L for the intervention group and free oral fluid intake for the control group. Sodium restriction increased mortality (relative risk 1.92, 95% confidence interval 1.51 to 2.45, moderate quality of evidence) and hospitalization (relative risk 1.63, 1.11 to 2.40, low quality of evidence). Fluid restriction reduced mortality (relative risk 0.32, 0.13 to 0.82, low quality of evidence) and hospitalization (relative risk 0.46, 0.27 to 0.77, n = 331, low quality of evidence). The combination of sodium and fluid restriction did not significantly affect the risk of mortality (relative risk 0.92, 0.49 to 1.73, low quality of evidence) or the risk of hospitalization (relative risk 0.94, 0.75 to 1.19, low quality of evidence). The combination of sodium and fluid restriction in clinical trials resulted in a null effect although results in the opposite direction were observed for each intervention independently. Combined sodium and fluid restriction are usually recommended for patients with HF. Our findings of sodium restriction harm, risk of mortality and hospitalization are consistent with publications from several clinical trial and physiologic explanations. A well-designed clinical trial nested by an implementation study is urgent for definitive sodium range recommendation, specially considering the change of currently guidelines, pushing up the cut-off of sodium restriction range.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2405-4577</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2405-4577</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.03.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35623804</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Drinking ; Fluid restriction ; Fluid Therapy - methods ; Heart failure ; Heart Failure - therapy ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Meta-analysis ; Sodium ; Sodium restriction ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Clinical nutrition ESPEN, 2022-06, Vol.49, p.129-137</ispartof><rights>2022 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-48dcb4a193a3e9aea7ef5e3bd26d079f60f964cbb0df015ce972c3f42dec85323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-48dcb4a193a3e9aea7ef5e3bd26d079f60f964cbb0df015ce972c3f42dec85323</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5570-1475 ; 0000-0003-1833-8221</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35623804$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stein, Cinara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helal, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Migliavaca, Celina Borges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangalli, Caroline Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colpani, Verônica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raupp da Rosa, Priscila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck-da-Silva, Luís</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohde, Luis E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polanczyk, Carisi Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falavigna, Maicon</creatorcontrib><title>Are the recommendation of sodium and fluid restriction in heart failure patients changing over the past years? A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Clinical nutrition ESPEN</title><addtitle>Clin Nutr ESPEN</addtitle><description>Heart failure (HF) is a growing problem for healthcare systems worldwide. Sodium and fluid restriction are non-pharmacological treatments recommended for patients with HF by several guidelines over the years, even without consensus. To evaluate the effects of sodium and fluid restriction in patients with HF. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases up to June 2020 and screened the reference lists of relevant articles. We included randomized controlled trials evaluating sodium and/or fluid restriction in patients with HF. We assessed three independent comparisons: (a) sodium restriction versus control; (b) fluid restriction versus control; and (c) sodium and fluid restriction versus control. Main outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality and hospitalization. Two independent reviewers selected studies and extracted data. We pooled the results using random-effects meta-analysis. We used the RoB 2.0 and the GRADE framework to assess risk of bias and quality of evidence. We included 16 studies totaling 3545 patients in our meta-analysis. Daily sodium intake was 1.5–2.4 g for the intervention group and &gt;2.7 g for the control group, and daily fluid intake was 0.8–1.5 L for the intervention group and free oral fluid intake for the control group. Sodium restriction increased mortality (relative risk 1.92, 95% confidence interval 1.51 to 2.45, moderate quality of evidence) and hospitalization (relative risk 1.63, 1.11 to 2.40, low quality of evidence). Fluid restriction reduced mortality (relative risk 0.32, 0.13 to 0.82, low quality of evidence) and hospitalization (relative risk 0.46, 0.27 to 0.77, n = 331, low quality of evidence). The combination of sodium and fluid restriction did not significantly affect the risk of mortality (relative risk 0.92, 0.49 to 1.73, low quality of evidence) or the risk of hospitalization (relative risk 0.94, 0.75 to 1.19, low quality of evidence). The combination of sodium and fluid restriction in clinical trials resulted in a null effect although results in the opposite direction were observed for each intervention independently. Combined sodium and fluid restriction are usually recommended for patients with HF. Our findings of sodium restriction harm, risk of mortality and hospitalization are consistent with publications from several clinical trial and physiologic explanations. A well-designed clinical trial nested by an implementation study is urgent for definitive sodium range recommendation, specially considering the change of currently guidelines, pushing up the cut-off of sodium restriction range.</description><subject>Drinking</subject><subject>Fluid restriction</subject><subject>Fluid Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Heart failure</subject><subject>Heart Failure - therapy</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Sodium restriction</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>2405-4577</issn><issn>2405-4577</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctqHDEQRUVIsI3tPzBBy2x6rFerpzcJg3EeYMjGWQu1VPJo6JY6ktph_sMfHM2ME7IKFEhQp-6l6iJ0Q8mKEipvdyszBsjzihHGVoTXYm_QBROkbUTbdW__-Z-j65x3hNS5vheUnKFz3krG10RcoJdNAly2gBOYOE0QrC4-BhwdztH6ZcI6WOzGxduK5JK8OfZ9wFvQqWCn_bhUjbnOQSgZm60OTz484fgM6Sg961zwvtL5E97gvM8FpkqbKvjs4dfRYYKiGx30uM8-X6F3To8Zrl_fS_Tj8_3j3dfm4fuXb3ebh8awnpVGrK0ZhKY91xx6DboD1wIfLJOWdL2TxPVSmGEg1hHaGug7ZrgTzIJZt5zxS_ThpDun-HOp26nJZwPjqAPEJSsmO8o6SaWsqDihJsWcEzg1Jz_ptFeUqEMkaqdOkahDJIrwWgeH968OyzCB_Tv0J4AKfDwBUPes10gqm3pHA9bXRIqy0f_f4Tf8PqJX</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Stein, Cinara</creator><creator>Helal, Lucas</creator><creator>Migliavaca, Celina Borges</creator><creator>Sangalli, Caroline Nicola</creator><creator>Colpani, Verônica</creator><creator>Raupp da Rosa, Priscila</creator><creator>Beck-da-Silva, Luís</creator><creator>Rohde, Luis E.</creator><creator>Polanczyk, Carisi Anne</creator><creator>Falavigna, Maicon</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5570-1475</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1833-8221</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Are the recommendation of sodium and fluid restriction in heart failure patients changing over the past years? A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Stein, Cinara ; Helal, Lucas ; Migliavaca, Celina Borges ; Sangalli, Caroline Nicola ; Colpani, Verônica ; Raupp da Rosa, Priscila ; Beck-da-Silva, Luís ; Rohde, Luis E. ; Polanczyk, Carisi Anne ; Falavigna, Maicon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-48dcb4a193a3e9aea7ef5e3bd26d079f60f964cbb0df015ce972c3f42dec85323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Drinking</topic><topic>Fluid restriction</topic><topic>Fluid Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Heart failure</topic><topic>Heart Failure - therapy</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Sodium restriction</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stein, Cinara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helal, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Migliavaca, Celina Borges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangalli, Caroline Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colpani, Verônica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raupp da Rosa, Priscila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck-da-Silva, Luís</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohde, Luis E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polanczyk, Carisi Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falavigna, Maicon</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical nutrition ESPEN</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stein, Cinara</au><au>Helal, Lucas</au><au>Migliavaca, Celina Borges</au><au>Sangalli, Caroline Nicola</au><au>Colpani, Verônica</au><au>Raupp da Rosa, Priscila</au><au>Beck-da-Silva, Luís</au><au>Rohde, Luis E.</au><au>Polanczyk, Carisi Anne</au><au>Falavigna, Maicon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are the recommendation of sodium and fluid restriction in heart failure patients changing over the past years? A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical nutrition ESPEN</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Nutr ESPEN</addtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>49</volume><spage>129</spage><epage>137</epage><pages>129-137</pages><issn>2405-4577</issn><eissn>2405-4577</eissn><abstract>Heart failure (HF) is a growing problem for healthcare systems worldwide. Sodium and fluid restriction are non-pharmacological treatments recommended for patients with HF by several guidelines over the years, even without consensus. To evaluate the effects of sodium and fluid restriction in patients with HF. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases up to June 2020 and screened the reference lists of relevant articles. We included randomized controlled trials evaluating sodium and/or fluid restriction in patients with HF. We assessed three independent comparisons: (a) sodium restriction versus control; (b) fluid restriction versus control; and (c) sodium and fluid restriction versus control. Main outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality and hospitalization. Two independent reviewers selected studies and extracted data. We pooled the results using random-effects meta-analysis. We used the RoB 2.0 and the GRADE framework to assess risk of bias and quality of evidence. We included 16 studies totaling 3545 patients in our meta-analysis. Daily sodium intake was 1.5–2.4 g for the intervention group and &gt;2.7 g for the control group, and daily fluid intake was 0.8–1.5 L for the intervention group and free oral fluid intake for the control group. Sodium restriction increased mortality (relative risk 1.92, 95% confidence interval 1.51 to 2.45, moderate quality of evidence) and hospitalization (relative risk 1.63, 1.11 to 2.40, low quality of evidence). Fluid restriction reduced mortality (relative risk 0.32, 0.13 to 0.82, low quality of evidence) and hospitalization (relative risk 0.46, 0.27 to 0.77, n = 331, low quality of evidence). The combination of sodium and fluid restriction did not significantly affect the risk of mortality (relative risk 0.92, 0.49 to 1.73, low quality of evidence) or the risk of hospitalization (relative risk 0.94, 0.75 to 1.19, low quality of evidence). The combination of sodium and fluid restriction in clinical trials resulted in a null effect although results in the opposite direction were observed for each intervention independently. Combined sodium and fluid restriction are usually recommended for patients with HF. Our findings of sodium restriction harm, risk of mortality and hospitalization are consistent with publications from several clinical trial and physiologic explanations. A well-designed clinical trial nested by an implementation study is urgent for definitive sodium range recommendation, specially considering the change of currently guidelines, pushing up the cut-off of sodium restriction range.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35623804</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.03.032</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5570-1475</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1833-8221</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2405-4577
ispartof Clinical nutrition ESPEN, 2022-06, Vol.49, p.129-137
issn 2405-4577
2405-4577
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2671276166
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Drinking
Fluid restriction
Fluid Therapy - methods
Heart failure
Heart Failure - therapy
Hospitalization
Humans
Meta-analysis
Sodium
Sodium restriction
Systematic review
title Are the recommendation of sodium and fluid restriction in heart failure patients changing over the past years? A systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A44%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20the%20recommendation%20of%20sodium%20and%20fluid%20restriction%20in%20heart%20failure%20patients%20changing%20over%20the%20past%20years?%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20nutrition%20ESPEN&rft.au=Stein,%20Cinara&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=49&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=137&rft.pages=129-137&rft.issn=2405-4577&rft.eissn=2405-4577&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.03.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2671276166%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2671276166&rft_id=info:pmid/35623804&rft_els_id=S2405457722002145&rfr_iscdi=true