Feasibility and utility of amygdala neurofeedback
Amygdala NeuroFeedback (NF) have the potential of being a valuable non-invasive intervention tool in many psychiatric disporders. However, the feasibility and best practices of this method have not been systematically examined. The current article presents a review of amygdala-NF studies, an analyti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews 2022-07, Vol.138, p.104694-104694, Article 104694 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 104694 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 104694 |
container_title | Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews |
container_volume | 138 |
creator | Goldway, Noam Jalon, Itamar Keynan, Jackob N. Hellrung, Lydia Horstmann, Annette Paret, Christian Hendler, Talma |
description | Amygdala NeuroFeedback (NF) have the potential of being a valuable non-invasive intervention tool in many psychiatric disporders. However, the feasibility and best practices of this method have not been systematically examined. The current article presents a review of amygdala-NF studies, an analytic summary of study design parameters, and examination of brain mechanisms related to successful amygdala-NF performance. A meta-analysis of 33 publications showed that real amygdala-NF facilitates learned modulation compared to control conditions. In addition, while variability in study dsign parameters is high, these design choices are implicitly organized by the targeted valence domain (positive or negative). However, in most cases the neuro-behavioral effects of targeting such domains were not directly assessed. Lastly, re-analyzing six data sets of amygdala-fMRI-NF revealed that successful amygdala down-modulation is coupled with deactivation of the posterior insula and nodes in the Default-Mode-Network. Our findings suggest that amygdala self-modulation can be acquired using NF. Yet, additional controlled studies, relevant behavioral tasks before and after NF intervention, and neural 'target engagement' measures are critically needed to establish efficacy and specificity. In addition, the fMRI analysis presented here suggest that common accounts regarding the brain network involved in amygdala NF might reflect unsuccessful modulation attempts rather than successful modulation.
•NF facilitates learned amygdala self-modulation more than placebo.•As for clinical outcomes, placebo-controlled evidence are yet scarce.•Variability in design choices could be explained by the targeted neurobehavioral domain.•Successful Amygdala down-modulation is coupled with deactivation of posterior insula and Default-Mode-Network nodes.•Studies should explicitly target neurobehavioral processes, and include 'target engagement' measures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104694 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2671276122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S014976342200183X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2671276122</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-ac19e55cbbec179104a7c64a25ad34c8aef604a21a82fbbe34852d418d01f10e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwC5AlmwS_YifLqqKAVIkNrC3HniCXPIqdVOrf4yqlW1Zjjc7MHR-EHgjOCCbiaZt1MFau97DPKKY0drko-QWak0KyVOa0uERzTHiZSsH4DN2EsMUYU8zyazRjuaCMczlHZA06uMo1bjgkurPJOEzvvk50e_iyutFJzPJ9DWArbb5v0VWtmwB3p7pAn-vnj9Vrunl_eVstN6nhmA-pNqSEPDdVBYbIMt6npRFc01xbxk2hoRaxR4kuaB0hxoucWk4Ki0lNMLAFepz27nz_M0IYVOuCgabRHfRjUFRIQqUglEZUTqjxfQgearXzrtX-oAhWR19qq86-1NGXmnzFyftTyFi1YM9zf4IisJwAiF_dO_AqGAedAes8mEHZ3v0b8gvr-X_7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2671276122</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility and utility of amygdala neurofeedback</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Goldway, Noam ; Jalon, Itamar ; Keynan, Jackob N. ; Hellrung, Lydia ; Horstmann, Annette ; Paret, Christian ; Hendler, Talma</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldway, Noam ; Jalon, Itamar ; Keynan, Jackob N. ; Hellrung, Lydia ; Horstmann, Annette ; Paret, Christian ; Hendler, Talma</creatorcontrib><description>Amygdala NeuroFeedback (NF) have the potential of being a valuable non-invasive intervention tool in many psychiatric disporders. However, the feasibility and best practices of this method have not been systematically examined. The current article presents a review of amygdala-NF studies, an analytic summary of study design parameters, and examination of brain mechanisms related to successful amygdala-NF performance. A meta-analysis of 33 publications showed that real amygdala-NF facilitates learned modulation compared to control conditions. In addition, while variability in study dsign parameters is high, these design choices are implicitly organized by the targeted valence domain (positive or negative). However, in most cases the neuro-behavioral effects of targeting such domains were not directly assessed. Lastly, re-analyzing six data sets of amygdala-fMRI-NF revealed that successful amygdala down-modulation is coupled with deactivation of the posterior insula and nodes in the Default-Mode-Network. Our findings suggest that amygdala self-modulation can be acquired using NF. Yet, additional controlled studies, relevant behavioral tasks before and after NF intervention, and neural 'target engagement' measures are critically needed to establish efficacy and specificity. In addition, the fMRI analysis presented here suggest that common accounts regarding the brain network involved in amygdala NF might reflect unsuccessful modulation attempts rather than successful modulation.
•NF facilitates learned amygdala self-modulation more than placebo.•As for clinical outcomes, placebo-controlled evidence are yet scarce.•Variability in design choices could be explained by the targeted neurobehavioral domain.•Successful Amygdala down-modulation is coupled with deactivation of posterior insula and Default-Mode-Network nodes.•Studies should explicitly target neurobehavioral processes, and include 'target engagement' measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-7634</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104694</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35623447</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Amygdala ; Brain Computer Interface ; Meta-analysis ; Neurofeedback ; RDoC ; Real-time fMRI</subject><ispartof>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2022-07, Vol.138, p.104694-104694, Article 104694</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-ac19e55cbbec179104a7c64a25ad34c8aef604a21a82fbbe34852d418d01f10e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-ac19e55cbbec179104a7c64a25ad34c8aef604a21a82fbbe34852d418d01f10e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014976342200183X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35623447$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldway, Noam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalon, Itamar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keynan, Jackob N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hellrung, Lydia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horstmann, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paret, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendler, Talma</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility and utility of amygdala neurofeedback</title><title>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</title><addtitle>Neurosci Biobehav Rev</addtitle><description>Amygdala NeuroFeedback (NF) have the potential of being a valuable non-invasive intervention tool in many psychiatric disporders. However, the feasibility and best practices of this method have not been systematically examined. The current article presents a review of amygdala-NF studies, an analytic summary of study design parameters, and examination of brain mechanisms related to successful amygdala-NF performance. A meta-analysis of 33 publications showed that real amygdala-NF facilitates learned modulation compared to control conditions. In addition, while variability in study dsign parameters is high, these design choices are implicitly organized by the targeted valence domain (positive or negative). However, in most cases the neuro-behavioral effects of targeting such domains were not directly assessed. Lastly, re-analyzing six data sets of amygdala-fMRI-NF revealed that successful amygdala down-modulation is coupled with deactivation of the posterior insula and nodes in the Default-Mode-Network. Our findings suggest that amygdala self-modulation can be acquired using NF. Yet, additional controlled studies, relevant behavioral tasks before and after NF intervention, and neural 'target engagement' measures are critically needed to establish efficacy and specificity. In addition, the fMRI analysis presented here suggest that common accounts regarding the brain network involved in amygdala NF might reflect unsuccessful modulation attempts rather than successful modulation.
•NF facilitates learned amygdala self-modulation more than placebo.•As for clinical outcomes, placebo-controlled evidence are yet scarce.•Variability in design choices could be explained by the targeted neurobehavioral domain.•Successful Amygdala down-modulation is coupled with deactivation of posterior insula and Default-Mode-Network nodes.•Studies should explicitly target neurobehavioral processes, and include 'target engagement' measures.</description><subject>Amygdala</subject><subject>Brain Computer Interface</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Neurofeedback</subject><subject>RDoC</subject><subject>Real-time fMRI</subject><issn>0149-7634</issn><issn>1873-7528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwC5AlmwS_YifLqqKAVIkNrC3HniCXPIqdVOrf4yqlW1Zjjc7MHR-EHgjOCCbiaZt1MFau97DPKKY0drko-QWak0KyVOa0uERzTHiZSsH4DN2EsMUYU8zyazRjuaCMczlHZA06uMo1bjgkurPJOEzvvk50e_iyutFJzPJ9DWArbb5v0VWtmwB3p7pAn-vnj9Vrunl_eVstN6nhmA-pNqSEPDdVBYbIMt6npRFc01xbxk2hoRaxR4kuaB0hxoucWk4Ki0lNMLAFepz27nz_M0IYVOuCgabRHfRjUFRIQqUglEZUTqjxfQgearXzrtX-oAhWR19qq86-1NGXmnzFyftTyFi1YM9zf4IisJwAiF_dO_AqGAedAes8mEHZ3v0b8gvr-X_7</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Goldway, Noam</creator><creator>Jalon, Itamar</creator><creator>Keynan, Jackob N.</creator><creator>Hellrung, Lydia</creator><creator>Horstmann, Annette</creator><creator>Paret, Christian</creator><creator>Hendler, Talma</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Feasibility and utility of amygdala neurofeedback</title><author>Goldway, Noam ; Jalon, Itamar ; Keynan, Jackob N. ; Hellrung, Lydia ; Horstmann, Annette ; Paret, Christian ; Hendler, Talma</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-ac19e55cbbec179104a7c64a25ad34c8aef604a21a82fbbe34852d418d01f10e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Amygdala</topic><topic>Brain Computer Interface</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Neurofeedback</topic><topic>RDoC</topic><topic>Real-time fMRI</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldway, Noam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalon, Itamar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keynan, Jackob N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hellrung, Lydia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horstmann, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paret, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendler, Talma</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldway, Noam</au><au>Jalon, Itamar</au><au>Keynan, Jackob N.</au><au>Hellrung, Lydia</au><au>Horstmann, Annette</au><au>Paret, Christian</au><au>Hendler, Talma</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility and utility of amygdala neurofeedback</atitle><jtitle>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Neurosci Biobehav Rev</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>138</volume><spage>104694</spage><epage>104694</epage><pages>104694-104694</pages><artnum>104694</artnum><issn>0149-7634</issn><eissn>1873-7528</eissn><abstract>Amygdala NeuroFeedback (NF) have the potential of being a valuable non-invasive intervention tool in many psychiatric disporders. However, the feasibility and best practices of this method have not been systematically examined. The current article presents a review of amygdala-NF studies, an analytic summary of study design parameters, and examination of brain mechanisms related to successful amygdala-NF performance. A meta-analysis of 33 publications showed that real amygdala-NF facilitates learned modulation compared to control conditions. In addition, while variability in study dsign parameters is high, these design choices are implicitly organized by the targeted valence domain (positive or negative). However, in most cases the neuro-behavioral effects of targeting such domains were not directly assessed. Lastly, re-analyzing six data sets of amygdala-fMRI-NF revealed that successful amygdala down-modulation is coupled with deactivation of the posterior insula and nodes in the Default-Mode-Network. Our findings suggest that amygdala self-modulation can be acquired using NF. Yet, additional controlled studies, relevant behavioral tasks before and after NF intervention, and neural 'target engagement' measures are critically needed to establish efficacy and specificity. In addition, the fMRI analysis presented here suggest that common accounts regarding the brain network involved in amygdala NF might reflect unsuccessful modulation attempts rather than successful modulation.
•NF facilitates learned amygdala self-modulation more than placebo.•As for clinical outcomes, placebo-controlled evidence are yet scarce.•Variability in design choices could be explained by the targeted neurobehavioral domain.•Successful Amygdala down-modulation is coupled with deactivation of posterior insula and Default-Mode-Network nodes.•Studies should explicitly target neurobehavioral processes, and include 'target engagement' measures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35623447</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104694</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0149-7634 |
ispartof | Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2022-07, Vol.138, p.104694-104694, Article 104694 |
issn | 0149-7634 1873-7528 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2671276122 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Amygdala Brain Computer Interface Meta-analysis Neurofeedback RDoC Real-time fMRI |
title | Feasibility and utility of amygdala neurofeedback |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T21%3A49%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20and%20utility%20of%20amygdala%20neurofeedback&rft.jtitle=Neuroscience%20and%20biobehavioral%20reviews&rft.au=Goldway,%20Noam&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=138&rft.spage=104694&rft.epage=104694&rft.pages=104694-104694&rft.artnum=104694&rft.issn=0149-7634&rft.eissn=1873-7528&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104694&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2671276122%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2671276122&rft_id=info:pmid/35623447&rft_els_id=S014976342200183X&rfr_iscdi=true |