Comparison of state-of-the-art machine and deep learning algorithms to classify proximal humeral fractures using radiology text
•Proximal humeral fractures account for a significant proportion of all fractures.•Accurate classification of the type and severity of this fracture is important.•X-ray, CT scan radiology text can be used for classification.•Machine and Deep learning (ML/DL) algorithms for classification may be appl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of radiology 2022-08, Vol.153, p.110366-110366, Article 110366 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 110366 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 110366 |
container_title | European journal of radiology |
container_volume | 153 |
creator | Dipnall, Joanna F. Lu, Jueqing Gabbe, Belinda J. Cosic, Filip Edwards, Elton Page, Richard Du, Lan |
description | •Proximal humeral fractures account for a significant proportion of all fractures.•Accurate classification of the type and severity of this fracture is important.•X-ray, CT scan radiology text can be used for classification.•Machine and Deep learning (ML/DL) algorithms for classification may be applied.•Class imbalance for these types of fractures should be addressed to improve results.•ML/DL with radiology text aids classification tasks for radiologists/researchers.
Proximal humeral fractures account for a significant proportion of all fractures. Detailed accurate classification of the type and severity of the fracture is a key component of clinical decision making, treatment and plays an important role in orthopaedic trauma research. This research aimed to assess the performance of Machine Learning (ML) multiclass classification algorithms to classify proximal humeral fractures using radiology text data.
Data from adult (16 + years) patients admitted to a major trauma centre for management of their proximal humerus fracture from January 2010 to January 2019 were used (1,324). Six input text datasets were used for classification: X-ray and/or CT scan reports (primary) and concatenation of patient age and/or patient sex. One of seven Neer class labels were classified. Models were evaluated using accuracy, recall, precision, F1, and One-versus-rest scores.
A number of statistical ML algorithms performed acceptably and one of the BERT models, exhibiting good accuracy of 61% and an excellent one-versus-rest score above 0.8. The highest precision, recall and F1 scores were 50%, 39% and 39% respectively, being considered reasonable scores with the sparse text data used and in the context of machine learning.
ML and BERT algorithms based on routine unstructured X-ray and CT text reports, combined with the demographics of the patient, show promise in Neer classification of proximal humeral fractures to aid research. Use of these algorithms shows potential to speed up the classification task and assist radiologist, surgeons and researchers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110366 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2671276109</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0720048X22002169</els_id><sourcerecordid>2671276109</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-334e0fe215c25d4a453b344f626ebce475b6c3237261d7e54ebbe24a5a63de293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtvGzEQhIkgQSw_fkGAgGWaU8jlyypcGEIeBgykSYB0BI_ckyjcHWWSZ1hV_npOke0y1TQzO7MfIR84W3LG9efdEnfZhSUwgCXnTGj9hiz4tYHGGDBvyYIZYA2T17_PyHkpO8aYkit4T86E0iAEFwvyZ52GvcuxpJGmjpbqKjapa-oWG5crHZzfxhGpGwMNiHvao8tjHDfU9ZuUY90OhdZEfe9Kid2B7nN6ioPr6XYaMM_aZefrlLHQqRxz8-SY-rQ50IpP9ZK861xf8OpZL8ivr19-rr839z--3a1v7xsv1Ko2QkhkHQJXHlSQTirRCik7DRpbj9KoVnsBwoDmwaCS2LYI0imnRUBYiQvy6XR33vcwYal2iMVj37sR01QsaMPBaM6OVnGy-pxKydjZfZ4_ygfLmT2Stzv7j7w9krcn8nPq43PB1A4YXjMvqGfDzcmA85uPEbMtPuLoMcSMvtqQ4n8L_gKzRJfY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2671276109</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of state-of-the-art machine and deep learning algorithms to classify proximal humeral fractures using radiology text</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Dipnall, Joanna F. ; Lu, Jueqing ; Gabbe, Belinda J. ; Cosic, Filip ; Edwards, Elton ; Page, Richard ; Du, Lan</creator><creatorcontrib>Dipnall, Joanna F. ; Lu, Jueqing ; Gabbe, Belinda J. ; Cosic, Filip ; Edwards, Elton ; Page, Richard ; Du, Lan</creatorcontrib><description>•Proximal humeral fractures account for a significant proportion of all fractures.•Accurate classification of the type and severity of this fracture is important.•X-ray, CT scan radiology text can be used for classification.•Machine and Deep learning (ML/DL) algorithms for classification may be applied.•Class imbalance for these types of fractures should be addressed to improve results.•ML/DL with radiology text aids classification tasks for radiologists/researchers.
Proximal humeral fractures account for a significant proportion of all fractures. Detailed accurate classification of the type and severity of the fracture is a key component of clinical decision making, treatment and plays an important role in orthopaedic trauma research. This research aimed to assess the performance of Machine Learning (ML) multiclass classification algorithms to classify proximal humeral fractures using radiology text data.
Data from adult (16 + years) patients admitted to a major trauma centre for management of their proximal humerus fracture from January 2010 to January 2019 were used (1,324). Six input text datasets were used for classification: X-ray and/or CT scan reports (primary) and concatenation of patient age and/or patient sex. One of seven Neer class labels were classified. Models were evaluated using accuracy, recall, precision, F1, and One-versus-rest scores.
A number of statistical ML algorithms performed acceptably and one of the BERT models, exhibiting good accuracy of 61% and an excellent one-versus-rest score above 0.8. The highest precision, recall and F1 scores were 50%, 39% and 39% respectively, being considered reasonable scores with the sparse text data used and in the context of machine learning.
ML and BERT algorithms based on routine unstructured X-ray and CT text reports, combined with the demographics of the patient, show promise in Neer classification of proximal humeral fractures to aid research. Use of these algorithms shows potential to speed up the classification task and assist radiologist, surgeons and researchers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110366</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35623313</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>BERT ; Classification ; Deep learning ; Machine learning ; Natural language processing ; Neer ; Proximal humeral fracture ; Radiology</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2022-08, Vol.153, p.110366-110366, Article 110366</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-334e0fe215c25d4a453b344f626ebce475b6c3237261d7e54ebbe24a5a63de293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-334e0fe215c25d4a453b344f626ebce475b6c3237261d7e54ebbe24a5a63de293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X22002169$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35623313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dipnall, Joanna F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Jueqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabbe, Belinda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosic, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Elton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Lan</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of state-of-the-art machine and deep learning algorithms to classify proximal humeral fractures using radiology text</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>•Proximal humeral fractures account for a significant proportion of all fractures.•Accurate classification of the type and severity of this fracture is important.•X-ray, CT scan radiology text can be used for classification.•Machine and Deep learning (ML/DL) algorithms for classification may be applied.•Class imbalance for these types of fractures should be addressed to improve results.•ML/DL with radiology text aids classification tasks for radiologists/researchers.
Proximal humeral fractures account for a significant proportion of all fractures. Detailed accurate classification of the type and severity of the fracture is a key component of clinical decision making, treatment and plays an important role in orthopaedic trauma research. This research aimed to assess the performance of Machine Learning (ML) multiclass classification algorithms to classify proximal humeral fractures using radiology text data.
Data from adult (16 + years) patients admitted to a major trauma centre for management of their proximal humerus fracture from January 2010 to January 2019 were used (1,324). Six input text datasets were used for classification: X-ray and/or CT scan reports (primary) and concatenation of patient age and/or patient sex. One of seven Neer class labels were classified. Models were evaluated using accuracy, recall, precision, F1, and One-versus-rest scores.
A number of statistical ML algorithms performed acceptably and one of the BERT models, exhibiting good accuracy of 61% and an excellent one-versus-rest score above 0.8. The highest precision, recall and F1 scores were 50%, 39% and 39% respectively, being considered reasonable scores with the sparse text data used and in the context of machine learning.
ML and BERT algorithms based on routine unstructured X-ray and CT text reports, combined with the demographics of the patient, show promise in Neer classification of proximal humeral fractures to aid research. Use of these algorithms shows potential to speed up the classification task and assist radiologist, surgeons and researchers.</description><subject>BERT</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Natural language processing</subject><subject>Neer</subject><subject>Proximal humeral fracture</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDtvGzEQhIkgQSw_fkGAgGWaU8jlyypcGEIeBgykSYB0BI_ckyjcHWWSZ1hV_npOke0y1TQzO7MfIR84W3LG9efdEnfZhSUwgCXnTGj9hiz4tYHGGDBvyYIZYA2T17_PyHkpO8aYkit4T86E0iAEFwvyZ52GvcuxpJGmjpbqKjapa-oWG5crHZzfxhGpGwMNiHvao8tjHDfU9ZuUY90OhdZEfe9Kid2B7nN6ioPr6XYaMM_aZefrlLHQqRxz8-SY-rQ50IpP9ZK861xf8OpZL8ivr19-rr839z--3a1v7xsv1Ko2QkhkHQJXHlSQTirRCik7DRpbj9KoVnsBwoDmwaCS2LYI0imnRUBYiQvy6XR33vcwYal2iMVj37sR01QsaMPBaM6OVnGy-pxKydjZfZ4_ygfLmT2Stzv7j7w9krcn8nPq43PB1A4YXjMvqGfDzcmA85uPEbMtPuLoMcSMvtqQ4n8L_gKzRJfY</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Dipnall, Joanna F.</creator><creator>Lu, Jueqing</creator><creator>Gabbe, Belinda J.</creator><creator>Cosic, Filip</creator><creator>Edwards, Elton</creator><creator>Page, Richard</creator><creator>Du, Lan</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Comparison of state-of-the-art machine and deep learning algorithms to classify proximal humeral fractures using radiology text</title><author>Dipnall, Joanna F. ; Lu, Jueqing ; Gabbe, Belinda J. ; Cosic, Filip ; Edwards, Elton ; Page, Richard ; Du, Lan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-334e0fe215c25d4a453b344f626ebce475b6c3237261d7e54ebbe24a5a63de293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>BERT</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Natural language processing</topic><topic>Neer</topic><topic>Proximal humeral fracture</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dipnall, Joanna F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Jueqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabbe, Belinda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosic, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Elton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Lan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dipnall, Joanna F.</au><au>Lu, Jueqing</au><au>Gabbe, Belinda J.</au><au>Cosic, Filip</au><au>Edwards, Elton</au><au>Page, Richard</au><au>Du, Lan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of state-of-the-art machine and deep learning algorithms to classify proximal humeral fractures using radiology text</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>153</volume><spage>110366</spage><epage>110366</epage><pages>110366-110366</pages><artnum>110366</artnum><issn>0720-048X</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><abstract>•Proximal humeral fractures account for a significant proportion of all fractures.•Accurate classification of the type and severity of this fracture is important.•X-ray, CT scan radiology text can be used for classification.•Machine and Deep learning (ML/DL) algorithms for classification may be applied.•Class imbalance for these types of fractures should be addressed to improve results.•ML/DL with radiology text aids classification tasks for radiologists/researchers.
Proximal humeral fractures account for a significant proportion of all fractures. Detailed accurate classification of the type and severity of the fracture is a key component of clinical decision making, treatment and plays an important role in orthopaedic trauma research. This research aimed to assess the performance of Machine Learning (ML) multiclass classification algorithms to classify proximal humeral fractures using radiology text data.
Data from adult (16 + years) patients admitted to a major trauma centre for management of their proximal humerus fracture from January 2010 to January 2019 were used (1,324). Six input text datasets were used for classification: X-ray and/or CT scan reports (primary) and concatenation of patient age and/or patient sex. One of seven Neer class labels were classified. Models were evaluated using accuracy, recall, precision, F1, and One-versus-rest scores.
A number of statistical ML algorithms performed acceptably and one of the BERT models, exhibiting good accuracy of 61% and an excellent one-versus-rest score above 0.8. The highest precision, recall and F1 scores were 50%, 39% and 39% respectively, being considered reasonable scores with the sparse text data used and in the context of machine learning.
ML and BERT algorithms based on routine unstructured X-ray and CT text reports, combined with the demographics of the patient, show promise in Neer classification of proximal humeral fractures to aid research. Use of these algorithms shows potential to speed up the classification task and assist radiologist, surgeons and researchers.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>35623313</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110366</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0720-048X |
ispartof | European journal of radiology, 2022-08, Vol.153, p.110366-110366, Article 110366 |
issn | 0720-048X 1872-7727 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2671276109 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | BERT Classification Deep learning Machine learning Natural language processing Neer Proximal humeral fracture Radiology |
title | Comparison of state-of-the-art machine and deep learning algorithms to classify proximal humeral fractures using radiology text |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T23%3A52%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20state-of-the-art%20machine%20and%20deep%20learning%20algorithms%20to%20classify%20proximal%20humeral%20fractures%20using%20radiology%20text&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Dipnall,%20Joanna%20F.&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=153&rft.spage=110366&rft.epage=110366&rft.pages=110366-110366&rft.artnum=110366&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110366&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2671276109%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2671276109&rft_id=info:pmid/35623313&rft_els_id=S0720048X22002169&rfr_iscdi=true |