Clinical validation and implementation of droplet digital PCR for the detection of BRAF mutations from cell-free DNA

Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has been demonstrated in many research studies to be a sensitive method in the analysis of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) for identifying mutations and tracking disease. The transition of ddPCR into the diagnostic setting requires a number of critical steps including the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pathology 2022-10, Vol.54 (6), p.772-778
Hauptverfasser: Arnolda, Rainier, Howlett, Kerryn, Chan, Timmy, Raleigh, Jeanette, Hatzimihalis, Athena, Bell, Anthony, Fellowes, Andrew, Sandhu, Shahneen, McArthur, Grant A., Fox, Stephen B., Dawson, Sarah-Jane, Hewitt, Chelsee, Jones, Kate, Wong, Stephen Q.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 778
container_issue 6
container_start_page 772
container_title Pathology
container_volume 54
creator Arnolda, Rainier
Howlett, Kerryn
Chan, Timmy
Raleigh, Jeanette
Hatzimihalis, Athena
Bell, Anthony
Fellowes, Andrew
Sandhu, Shahneen
McArthur, Grant A.
Fox, Stephen B.
Dawson, Sarah-Jane
Hewitt, Chelsee
Jones, Kate
Wong, Stephen Q.
description Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has been demonstrated in many research studies to be a sensitive method in the analysis of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) for identifying mutations and tracking disease. The transition of ddPCR into the diagnostic setting requires a number of critical steps including the assessment of accuracy and precision and ultimately implementation into clinical use. Here we present the clinical validation of ddPCR for the detection of BRAF mutations (V600E and V600K) from plasma. We describe the performance characteristics assessed including the limit of blank, limit of detection, ruggedness, accuracy, precision and the effect of the matrix. Overall, each assay could achieve a limit of detection of 0.5% variant allele fraction and was highly accurate, with 100% concordance of results obtained from routine diagnostic testing of formalin fixed tumour samples or reference controls (n=36 for BRAF V600E and n=30 for BRAF V600K). Inter-laboratory reproducibility across 12 plasma samples for each assay was also assessed and results were 100% concordant. Overall, we report the successful validation and translation of a ddPCR assay into clinical routine practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pathol.2022.02.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2671265135</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0031302522001350</els_id><sourcerecordid>2671265135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-7f8e982b9fc05fffb12a911fe890985bddfe78524e51252c8d9a168d5144eea33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFqGzEQhkVIady0bxCKjrmsq5FWa-2l4DhJWwhtCe1ZyNKokdlduZIc6NtHZpMcCwMDw_fPSB8hF8CWwKD7tFvuTXmIw5IzzpesFrATsoC2k43oBZySBWMCGsG4PCPvct4xxlql1FtyJmQHSrJ-QcpmCFOwZqCPZgjOlBAnaiZHw7gfcMSpzKPoqUuxjgp14U8oNfBzc099TLQ8IHVY0L6AV_frWzoe5mSmPsWRWhyGxidEev19_Z688WbI-OG5n5Pftze_Nl-bux9fvm3Wd40VHS_NyivsFd_23jLpvd8CNz2AR9WzXsmtcx5XSvIWJXDJrXK9gU45CW2LaIQ4J5fz3n2Kfw-Yix5DPr7ETBgPWfNuBbyTIGRF2xm1Keac0Ot9CqNJ_zQwffStd3r2rY--NasFrMY-Pl84bEd0r6EXwRX4PANY__kYMOlsA04WXUjVmHYx_P_CEx3Ek6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2671265135</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical validation and implementation of droplet digital PCR for the detection of BRAF mutations from cell-free DNA</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Arnolda, Rainier ; Howlett, Kerryn ; Chan, Timmy ; Raleigh, Jeanette ; Hatzimihalis, Athena ; Bell, Anthony ; Fellowes, Andrew ; Sandhu, Shahneen ; McArthur, Grant A. ; Fox, Stephen B. ; Dawson, Sarah-Jane ; Hewitt, Chelsee ; Jones, Kate ; Wong, Stephen Q.</creator><creatorcontrib>Arnolda, Rainier ; Howlett, Kerryn ; Chan, Timmy ; Raleigh, Jeanette ; Hatzimihalis, Athena ; Bell, Anthony ; Fellowes, Andrew ; Sandhu, Shahneen ; McArthur, Grant A. ; Fox, Stephen B. ; Dawson, Sarah-Jane ; Hewitt, Chelsee ; Jones, Kate ; Wong, Stephen Q.</creatorcontrib><description>Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has been demonstrated in many research studies to be a sensitive method in the analysis of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) for identifying mutations and tracking disease. The transition of ddPCR into the diagnostic setting requires a number of critical steps including the assessment of accuracy and precision and ultimately implementation into clinical use. Here we present the clinical validation of ddPCR for the detection of BRAF mutations (V600E and V600K) from plasma. We describe the performance characteristics assessed including the limit of blank, limit of detection, ruggedness, accuracy, precision and the effect of the matrix. Overall, each assay could achieve a limit of detection of 0.5% variant allele fraction and was highly accurate, with 100% concordance of results obtained from routine diagnostic testing of formalin fixed tumour samples or reference controls (n=36 for BRAF V600E and n=30 for BRAF V600K). Inter-laboratory reproducibility across 12 plasma samples for each assay was also assessed and results were 100% concordant. Overall, we report the successful validation and translation of a ddPCR assay into clinical routine practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-3025</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3931</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2022.02.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35618509</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>BRAF ; Cell-free DNA ; droplet digital PCR ; melanoma</subject><ispartof>Pathology, 2022-10, Vol.54 (6), p.772-778</ispartof><rights>2022 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-7f8e982b9fc05fffb12a911fe890985bddfe78524e51252c8d9a168d5144eea33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-7f8e982b9fc05fffb12a911fe890985bddfe78524e51252c8d9a168d5144eea33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2154-2813 ; 0000-0001-9336-5735 ; 0000-0003-1972-6381 ; 0000-0002-7335-2168 ; 0000-0001-7472-6128 ; 0000-0001-6228-8706 ; 0000-0002-8276-0374 ; 0000-0002-7648-8896 ; 0000-0001-5084-7662</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35618509$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arnolda, Rainier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howlett, Kerryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Timmy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raleigh, Jeanette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatzimihalis, Athena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fellowes, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandhu, Shahneen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McArthur, Grant A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Stephen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Sarah-Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hewitt, Chelsee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Stephen Q.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical validation and implementation of droplet digital PCR for the detection of BRAF mutations from cell-free DNA</title><title>Pathology</title><addtitle>Pathology</addtitle><description>Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has been demonstrated in many research studies to be a sensitive method in the analysis of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) for identifying mutations and tracking disease. The transition of ddPCR into the diagnostic setting requires a number of critical steps including the assessment of accuracy and precision and ultimately implementation into clinical use. Here we present the clinical validation of ddPCR for the detection of BRAF mutations (V600E and V600K) from plasma. We describe the performance characteristics assessed including the limit of blank, limit of detection, ruggedness, accuracy, precision and the effect of the matrix. Overall, each assay could achieve a limit of detection of 0.5% variant allele fraction and was highly accurate, with 100% concordance of results obtained from routine diagnostic testing of formalin fixed tumour samples or reference controls (n=36 for BRAF V600E and n=30 for BRAF V600K). Inter-laboratory reproducibility across 12 plasma samples for each assay was also assessed and results were 100% concordant. Overall, we report the successful validation and translation of a ddPCR assay into clinical routine practice.</description><subject>BRAF</subject><subject>Cell-free DNA</subject><subject>droplet digital PCR</subject><subject>melanoma</subject><issn>0031-3025</issn><issn>1465-3931</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFqGzEQhkVIady0bxCKjrmsq5FWa-2l4DhJWwhtCe1ZyNKokdlduZIc6NtHZpMcCwMDw_fPSB8hF8CWwKD7tFvuTXmIw5IzzpesFrATsoC2k43oBZySBWMCGsG4PCPvct4xxlql1FtyJmQHSrJ-QcpmCFOwZqCPZgjOlBAnaiZHw7gfcMSpzKPoqUuxjgp14U8oNfBzc099TLQ8IHVY0L6AV_frWzoe5mSmPsWRWhyGxidEev19_Z688WbI-OG5n5Pftze_Nl-bux9fvm3Wd40VHS_NyivsFd_23jLpvd8CNz2AR9WzXsmtcx5XSvIWJXDJrXK9gU45CW2LaIQ4J5fz3n2Kfw-Yix5DPr7ETBgPWfNuBbyTIGRF2xm1Keac0Ot9CqNJ_zQwffStd3r2rY--NasFrMY-Pl84bEd0r6EXwRX4PANY__kYMOlsA04WXUjVmHYx_P_CEx3Ek6g</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Arnolda, Rainier</creator><creator>Howlett, Kerryn</creator><creator>Chan, Timmy</creator><creator>Raleigh, Jeanette</creator><creator>Hatzimihalis, Athena</creator><creator>Bell, Anthony</creator><creator>Fellowes, Andrew</creator><creator>Sandhu, Shahneen</creator><creator>McArthur, Grant A.</creator><creator>Fox, Stephen B.</creator><creator>Dawson, Sarah-Jane</creator><creator>Hewitt, Chelsee</creator><creator>Jones, Kate</creator><creator>Wong, Stephen Q.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2154-2813</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9336-5735</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1972-6381</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7335-2168</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7472-6128</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6228-8706</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8276-0374</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7648-8896</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5084-7662</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Clinical validation and implementation of droplet digital PCR for the detection of BRAF mutations from cell-free DNA</title><author>Arnolda, Rainier ; Howlett, Kerryn ; Chan, Timmy ; Raleigh, Jeanette ; Hatzimihalis, Athena ; Bell, Anthony ; Fellowes, Andrew ; Sandhu, Shahneen ; McArthur, Grant A. ; Fox, Stephen B. ; Dawson, Sarah-Jane ; Hewitt, Chelsee ; Jones, Kate ; Wong, Stephen Q.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-7f8e982b9fc05fffb12a911fe890985bddfe78524e51252c8d9a168d5144eea33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>BRAF</topic><topic>Cell-free DNA</topic><topic>droplet digital PCR</topic><topic>melanoma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arnolda, Rainier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howlett, Kerryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Timmy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raleigh, Jeanette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatzimihalis, Athena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fellowes, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandhu, Shahneen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McArthur, Grant A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Stephen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Sarah-Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hewitt, Chelsee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Stephen Q.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arnolda, Rainier</au><au>Howlett, Kerryn</au><au>Chan, Timmy</au><au>Raleigh, Jeanette</au><au>Hatzimihalis, Athena</au><au>Bell, Anthony</au><au>Fellowes, Andrew</au><au>Sandhu, Shahneen</au><au>McArthur, Grant A.</au><au>Fox, Stephen B.</au><au>Dawson, Sarah-Jane</au><au>Hewitt, Chelsee</au><au>Jones, Kate</au><au>Wong, Stephen Q.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical validation and implementation of droplet digital PCR for the detection of BRAF mutations from cell-free DNA</atitle><jtitle>Pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Pathology</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>772</spage><epage>778</epage><pages>772-778</pages><issn>0031-3025</issn><eissn>1465-3931</eissn><abstract>Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has been demonstrated in many research studies to be a sensitive method in the analysis of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) for identifying mutations and tracking disease. The transition of ddPCR into the diagnostic setting requires a number of critical steps including the assessment of accuracy and precision and ultimately implementation into clinical use. Here we present the clinical validation of ddPCR for the detection of BRAF mutations (V600E and V600K) from plasma. We describe the performance characteristics assessed including the limit of blank, limit of detection, ruggedness, accuracy, precision and the effect of the matrix. Overall, each assay could achieve a limit of detection of 0.5% variant allele fraction and was highly accurate, with 100% concordance of results obtained from routine diagnostic testing of formalin fixed tumour samples or reference controls (n=36 for BRAF V600E and n=30 for BRAF V600K). Inter-laboratory reproducibility across 12 plasma samples for each assay was also assessed and results were 100% concordant. Overall, we report the successful validation and translation of a ddPCR assay into clinical routine practice.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>35618509</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pathol.2022.02.010</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2154-2813</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9336-5735</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1972-6381</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7335-2168</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7472-6128</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6228-8706</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8276-0374</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7648-8896</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5084-7662</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-3025
ispartof Pathology, 2022-10, Vol.54 (6), p.772-778
issn 0031-3025
1465-3931
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2671265135
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects BRAF
Cell-free DNA
droplet digital PCR
melanoma
title Clinical validation and implementation of droplet digital PCR for the detection of BRAF mutations from cell-free DNA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A50%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20validation%20and%20implementation%20of%20droplet%20digital%20PCR%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20BRAF%20mutations%20from%20cell-free%20DNA&rft.jtitle=Pathology&rft.au=Arnolda,%20Rainier&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=772&rft.epage=778&rft.pages=772-778&rft.issn=0031-3025&rft.eissn=1465-3931&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pathol.2022.02.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2671265135%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2671265135&rft_id=info:pmid/35618509&rft_els_id=S0031302522001350&rfr_iscdi=true