EUnetHTA relative effectiveness assessments: efforts to increase usability, transparency and inclusiveness
The objective of the European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) Joint Action 3 (JA3) was to develop a sustainable European model for future collaboration on HTA, by reducing duplication in HTA production and increasing patient access to health technologies. Compared to the previous...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of technology assessment in health care 2022-05, Vol.38 (1), p.e41-e41, Article e41 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e41 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e41 |
container_title | International journal of technology assessment in health care |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Willemsen, Anne Ettinger, Sabine Helmink, Catharina Erdos, Judit Hviding, Krystyna Ormstad, Sari Susanna |
description | The objective of the European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) Joint Action 3 (JA3) was to develop a sustainable European model for future collaboration on HTA, by reducing duplication in HTA production and increasing patient access to health technologies. Compared to the previous JA2, several procedural changes were made aiming to increase usability, transparency, and inclusiveness of relative effectiveness assessments (REAs). This article presents and highlights these changes, explains their rationale as well as their influence on HTA production.
Feedback from REA teams and project managers was collected. At the end of JA3, all lessons learned were mapped, resulting in a set of recommendations for a future REA production process.
In JA3, forty-three EUnetHTA REAs have been produced. Efforts to increase the usability of the REAs were made by focussing on the needs of REA producers and users (HTA agencies) and by increasing stakeholder involvement. Huge steps were taken with regard to transparency, which was achieved through publication of guidances, templates, and up-to-date information on the EUnetHTA website. In an attempt to improve inclusiveness, (stakeholder) interaction and involvement as well as feedback procedures were enhanced and streamlined. The fine-tuned project management brought all aspects together and facilitated a consistent and reliable workflow.
Despite that HTA agencies have different national requirements, the procedural changes made in JA3 proved to counteract some of these challenges. Nevertheless, it is of utmost importance that further perceived methodological differences are being resolved to ensure a strong base for future European collaboration on REA production. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0266462322000058 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2670061286</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0266462322000058</cupid><sourcerecordid>2670061286</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-38e976691f4188281da28268916533ae90c57af63478381c401b338118906fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1LxDAQhoMoun78AC9S8OLBaiZp09TbIn7BggfXc8m2U-nSpmsmFfbfm7KrguJcZuB95p1khrFT4FfAIbt-4UKpRAkpBA-R6h02gSSDWMlE77LJKMejfsAOiZacg-Q532cHMlWQagUTtrx7tegf59PIYWt884ER1jWWY2WRKDJEIXVoPd2MUu88Rb6PGls6NITRQGbRtI1fX0beGUsr49CW68jYaoTagbZWx2yvNi3hyTYfsfn93fz2MZ49PzzdTmdxmYDysdSYZ0rlUCegtdBQGaGF0jmoVEqDOS_TzNThi5mWGsqEw0KGAnTOVV3JI3axsV25_n1A8kXXUIltayz2AxVCZZwrEFoF9PwXuuwHZ8PjAqVyKVLBRwo2VOl6Iod1sXJNZ9y6AF6Mdyj-3CH0nG2dh0WH1XfH1-IDILemplu4pnrDn9n_234CAVmRBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2669325206</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EUnetHTA relative effectiveness assessments: efforts to increase usability, transparency and inclusiveness</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Willemsen, Anne ; Ettinger, Sabine ; Helmink, Catharina ; Erdos, Judit ; Hviding, Krystyna ; Ormstad, Sari Susanna</creator><creatorcontrib>Willemsen, Anne ; Ettinger, Sabine ; Helmink, Catharina ; Erdos, Judit ; Hviding, Krystyna ; Ormstad, Sari Susanna</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of the European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) Joint Action 3 (JA3) was to develop a sustainable European model for future collaboration on HTA, by reducing duplication in HTA production and increasing patient access to health technologies. Compared to the previous JA2, several procedural changes were made aiming to increase usability, transparency, and inclusiveness of relative effectiveness assessments (REAs). This article presents and highlights these changes, explains their rationale as well as their influence on HTA production.
Feedback from REA teams and project managers was collected. At the end of JA3, all lessons learned were mapped, resulting in a set of recommendations for a future REA production process.
In JA3, forty-three EUnetHTA REAs have been produced. Efforts to increase the usability of the REAs were made by focussing on the needs of REA producers and users (HTA agencies) and by increasing stakeholder involvement. Huge steps were taken with regard to transparency, which was achieved through publication of guidances, templates, and up-to-date information on the EUnetHTA website. In an attempt to improve inclusiveness, (stakeholder) interaction and involvement as well as feedback procedures were enhanced and streamlined. The fine-tuned project management brought all aspects together and facilitated a consistent and reliable workflow.
Despite that HTA agencies have different national requirements, the procedural changes made in JA3 proved to counteract some of these challenges. Nevertheless, it is of utmost importance that further perceived methodological differences are being resolved to ensure a strong base for future European collaboration on REA production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0266462322000058</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35615861</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Decision making ; Feedback ; Health technology assessment ; Medical technology ; Pharmaceuticals ; Production methods ; Project management ; Technology ; Technology assessment ; Transparency ; Usability ; Websites ; Workflow</subject><ispartof>International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2022-05, Vol.38 (1), p.e41-e41, Article e41</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-38e976691f4188281da28268916533ae90c57af63478381c401b338118906fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-38e976691f4188281da28268916533ae90c57af63478381c401b338118906fd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4591-6106</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266462322000058/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35615861$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Willemsen, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ettinger, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helmink, Catharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdos, Judit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hviding, Krystyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ormstad, Sari Susanna</creatorcontrib><title>EUnetHTA relative effectiveness assessments: efforts to increase usability, transparency and inclusiveness</title><title>International journal of technology assessment in health care</title><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><description>The objective of the European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) Joint Action 3 (JA3) was to develop a sustainable European model for future collaboration on HTA, by reducing duplication in HTA production and increasing patient access to health technologies. Compared to the previous JA2, several procedural changes were made aiming to increase usability, transparency, and inclusiveness of relative effectiveness assessments (REAs). This article presents and highlights these changes, explains their rationale as well as their influence on HTA production.
Feedback from REA teams and project managers was collected. At the end of JA3, all lessons learned were mapped, resulting in a set of recommendations for a future REA production process.
In JA3, forty-three EUnetHTA REAs have been produced. Efforts to increase the usability of the REAs were made by focussing on the needs of REA producers and users (HTA agencies) and by increasing stakeholder involvement. Huge steps were taken with regard to transparency, which was achieved through publication of guidances, templates, and up-to-date information on the EUnetHTA website. In an attempt to improve inclusiveness, (stakeholder) interaction and involvement as well as feedback procedures were enhanced and streamlined. The fine-tuned project management brought all aspects together and facilitated a consistent and reliable workflow.
Despite that HTA agencies have different national requirements, the procedural changes made in JA3 proved to counteract some of these challenges. Nevertheless, it is of utmost importance that further perceived methodological differences are being resolved to ensure a strong base for future European collaboration on REA production.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Medical technology</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Production methods</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Technology assessment</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><subject>Usability</subject><subject>Websites</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><issn>0266-4623</issn><issn>1471-6348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1LxDAQhoMoun78AC9S8OLBaiZp09TbIn7BggfXc8m2U-nSpmsmFfbfm7KrguJcZuB95p1khrFT4FfAIbt-4UKpRAkpBA-R6h02gSSDWMlE77LJKMejfsAOiZacg-Q532cHMlWQagUTtrx7tegf59PIYWt884ER1jWWY2WRKDJEIXVoPd2MUu88Rb6PGls6NITRQGbRtI1fX0beGUsr49CW68jYaoTagbZWx2yvNi3hyTYfsfn93fz2MZ49PzzdTmdxmYDysdSYZ0rlUCegtdBQGaGF0jmoVEqDOS_TzNThi5mWGsqEw0KGAnTOVV3JI3axsV25_n1A8kXXUIltayz2AxVCZZwrEFoF9PwXuuwHZ8PjAqVyKVLBRwo2VOl6Iod1sXJNZ9y6AF6Mdyj-3CH0nG2dh0WH1XfH1-IDILemplu4pnrDn9n_234CAVmRBQ</recordid><startdate>20220526</startdate><enddate>20220526</enddate><creator>Willemsen, Anne</creator><creator>Ettinger, Sabine</creator><creator>Helmink, Catharina</creator><creator>Erdos, Judit</creator><creator>Hviding, Krystyna</creator><creator>Ormstad, Sari Susanna</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4591-6106</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220526</creationdate><title>EUnetHTA relative effectiveness assessments: efforts to increase usability, transparency and inclusiveness</title><author>Willemsen, Anne ; Ettinger, Sabine ; Helmink, Catharina ; Erdos, Judit ; Hviding, Krystyna ; Ormstad, Sari Susanna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-38e976691f4188281da28268916533ae90c57af63478381c401b338118906fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Medical technology</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Production methods</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Technology assessment</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><topic>Usability</topic><topic>Websites</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Willemsen, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ettinger, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helmink, Catharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdos, Judit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hviding, Krystyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ormstad, Sari Susanna</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Journals Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Willemsen, Anne</au><au>Ettinger, Sabine</au><au>Helmink, Catharina</au><au>Erdos, Judit</au><au>Hviding, Krystyna</au><au>Ormstad, Sari Susanna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EUnetHTA relative effectiveness assessments: efforts to increase usability, transparency and inclusiveness</atitle><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><date>2022-05-26</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e41</spage><epage>e41</epage><pages>e41-e41</pages><artnum>e41</artnum><issn>0266-4623</issn><eissn>1471-6348</eissn><abstract>The objective of the European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) Joint Action 3 (JA3) was to develop a sustainable European model for future collaboration on HTA, by reducing duplication in HTA production and increasing patient access to health technologies. Compared to the previous JA2, several procedural changes were made aiming to increase usability, transparency, and inclusiveness of relative effectiveness assessments (REAs). This article presents and highlights these changes, explains their rationale as well as their influence on HTA production.
Feedback from REA teams and project managers was collected. At the end of JA3, all lessons learned were mapped, resulting in a set of recommendations for a future REA production process.
In JA3, forty-three EUnetHTA REAs have been produced. Efforts to increase the usability of the REAs were made by focussing on the needs of REA producers and users (HTA agencies) and by increasing stakeholder involvement. Huge steps were taken with regard to transparency, which was achieved through publication of guidances, templates, and up-to-date information on the EUnetHTA website. In an attempt to improve inclusiveness, (stakeholder) interaction and involvement as well as feedback procedures were enhanced and streamlined. The fine-tuned project management brought all aspects together and facilitated a consistent and reliable workflow.
Despite that HTA agencies have different national requirements, the procedural changes made in JA3 proved to counteract some of these challenges. Nevertheless, it is of utmost importance that further perceived methodological differences are being resolved to ensure a strong base for future European collaboration on REA production.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>35615861</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0266462322000058</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4591-6106</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-4623 |
ispartof | International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2022-05, Vol.38 (1), p.e41-e41, Article e41 |
issn | 0266-4623 1471-6348 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2670061286 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Collaboration Decision making Feedback Health technology assessment Medical technology Pharmaceuticals Production methods Project management Technology Technology assessment Transparency Usability Websites Workflow |
title | EUnetHTA relative effectiveness assessments: efforts to increase usability, transparency and inclusiveness |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A38%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EUnetHTA%20relative%20effectiveness%20assessments:%20efforts%20to%20increase%20usability,%20transparency%20and%20inclusiveness&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20technology%20assessment%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Willemsen,%20Anne&rft.date=2022-05-26&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e41&rft.epage=e41&rft.pages=e41-e41&rft.artnum=e41&rft.issn=0266-4623&rft.eissn=1471-6348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0266462322000058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2670061286%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2669325206&rft_id=info:pmid/35615861&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0266462322000058&rfr_iscdi=true |