Comparison of the short-term effects of tooth–bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion in older adolescents
Purpose To compare the short-term effects of tooth–bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion (RME) devices on dentofacial structures in older adolescents. Methods The retrospective study reviewed pre- and posttreatment lateral and posteroanterior cephalometric images and orthodontic model...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of orofacial orthopedics 2024, Vol.85 (1), p.43-55 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 55 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 43 |
| container_title | Journal of orofacial orthopedics |
| container_volume | 85 |
| creator | Gokturk, Mustafa Yavan, Mehmet Ali |
| description | Purpose
To compare the short-term effects of tooth–bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion (RME) devices on dentofacial structures in older adolescents.
Methods
The retrospective study reviewed pre- and posttreatment lateral and posteroanterior cephalometric images and orthodontic model records of patients who underwent maxillary expansion. Two groups were formed, in which the same upper jaw expansion protocol was applied with two different maxillary expansion devices: the first group consisted of 15 individuals treated with tooth–bone-borne (hybrid) RME (HRME; 9 girls and 6 boys; mean age, 16.9 ± 0.42 years) and the second group consisted of 15 individuals treated with tooth-borne (conventional) RME (CRME; 8 girls and 7 boys; mean age, 16.74 ± 0.54 years). Cephalometric and orthodontic model measurements were conducted on the records taken before and after treatment.
Results
Significant skeletal and dental expansions were observed in both groups (
p
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00056-022-00401-x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2669503480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2669503480</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a1950efdb0654e3fe32f39f006d720f4dfe84b1002aaddab86ca07b02a5b901c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtO7DAMhiME4v4CLFCXZxNwLk2nSzQ6B5CQ2MA6ShuHKWqTknSkYcc78IY8yQl0YMnKdvz7j_0RcsbgggFUlwkASkWBcwoggdHNDjlkipVUVUzu5lwKSUteiwNylNLzp1yC2icHolSMl7U8JK_LMIwmdin4IrhiWmGRViFOdMI4FOgctlP66oQwrT7e3pvgkTYheiyMt_Pzto5m7GwxmE3X9ya-FrgZjU9ddu6yeW8xFsaGHlOLfkonZM-ZPuHpNh6Tx39_H5Y39O7--nZ5dUdbIauJGlaXgM42oEqJwqHgTtQOQNmKg5PW4UI2mQc3xlrTLFRroGpyWTY1sFYckz-z7xjDyxrTpIcub5BX9BjWSXOl8g9CLiBL-SxtY0gpotNj7IZ8imagP5HrGbnOyPUXcr3JQ-db_3UzoP0Z-WacBWIWpNzyTxj1c1hHn2_-zfY_aSqQbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2669503480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the short-term effects of tooth–bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion in older adolescents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Gokturk, Mustafa ; Yavan, Mehmet Ali</creator><creatorcontrib>Gokturk, Mustafa ; Yavan, Mehmet Ali</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To compare the short-term effects of tooth–bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion (RME) devices on dentofacial structures in older adolescents.
Methods
The retrospective study reviewed pre- and posttreatment lateral and posteroanterior cephalometric images and orthodontic model records of patients who underwent maxillary expansion. Two groups were formed, in which the same upper jaw expansion protocol was applied with two different maxillary expansion devices: the first group consisted of 15 individuals treated with tooth–bone-borne (hybrid) RME (HRME; 9 girls and 6 boys; mean age, 16.9 ± 0.42 years) and the second group consisted of 15 individuals treated with tooth-borne (conventional) RME (CRME; 8 girls and 7 boys; mean age, 16.74 ± 0.54 years). Cephalometric and orthodontic model measurements were conducted on the records taken before and after treatment.
Results
Significant skeletal and dental expansions were observed in both groups (
p
< 0.05). However, the increase in nasal width measurements in the HRME group (2.24 ± 0.61 mm) was significantly higher than the increase in the CRME group (1.12 ± 0.25 mm;
p
< 0.01). Buccal tipping of the premolars was significantly less in the HRME group (0.46 ± 0.35°) than in the CRME group (2.46 ± 0.63°;
p
< 0.01). The amount of tipping of the molars was higher in the HRME group (4.76 ± 0.88°) compared to the CRME group (2.9 ± 1.03°;
p
< 0.01).
Conclusion
Although the HRME device increase the nasal width in older adolescents to a greater extent, more dental side effects were seen at the maxillary first molars.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1434-5293</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-6714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00056-022-00401-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35612594</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer Medizin</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Bicuspid ; Dentistry ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Maxilla - diagnostic imaging ; Medicine ; Molar ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ; Original Article ; Palatal Expansion Technique ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of orofacial orthopedics, 2024, Vol.85 (1), p.43-55</ispartof><rights>Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>2022. Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a1950efdb0654e3fe32f39f006d720f4dfe84b1002aaddab86ca07b02a5b901c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a1950efdb0654e3fe32f39f006d720f4dfe84b1002aaddab86ca07b02a5b901c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00056-022-00401-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00056-022-00401-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35612594$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gokturk, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yavan, Mehmet Ali</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the short-term effects of tooth–bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion in older adolescents</title><title>Journal of orofacial orthopedics</title><addtitle>J Orofac Orthop</addtitle><addtitle>J Orofac Orthop</addtitle><description>Purpose
To compare the short-term effects of tooth–bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion (RME) devices on dentofacial structures in older adolescents.
Methods
The retrospective study reviewed pre- and posttreatment lateral and posteroanterior cephalometric images and orthodontic model records of patients who underwent maxillary expansion. Two groups were formed, in which the same upper jaw expansion protocol was applied with two different maxillary expansion devices: the first group consisted of 15 individuals treated with tooth–bone-borne (hybrid) RME (HRME; 9 girls and 6 boys; mean age, 16.9 ± 0.42 years) and the second group consisted of 15 individuals treated with tooth-borne (conventional) RME (CRME; 8 girls and 7 boys; mean age, 16.74 ± 0.54 years). Cephalometric and orthodontic model measurements were conducted on the records taken before and after treatment.
Results
Significant skeletal and dental expansions were observed in both groups (
p
< 0.05). However, the increase in nasal width measurements in the HRME group (2.24 ± 0.61 mm) was significantly higher than the increase in the CRME group (1.12 ± 0.25 mm;
p
< 0.01). Buccal tipping of the premolars was significantly less in the HRME group (0.46 ± 0.35°) than in the CRME group (2.46 ± 0.63°;
p
< 0.01). The amount of tipping of the molars was higher in the HRME group (4.76 ± 0.88°) compared to the CRME group (2.9 ± 1.03°;
p
< 0.01).
Conclusion
Although the HRME device increase the nasal width in older adolescents to a greater extent, more dental side effects were seen at the maxillary first molars.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Bicuspid</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Molar</subject><subject>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Palatal Expansion Technique</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>1434-5293</issn><issn>1615-6714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtO7DAMhiME4v4CLFCXZxNwLk2nSzQ6B5CQ2MA6ShuHKWqTknSkYcc78IY8yQl0YMnKdvz7j_0RcsbgggFUlwkASkWBcwoggdHNDjlkipVUVUzu5lwKSUteiwNylNLzp1yC2icHolSMl7U8JK_LMIwmdin4IrhiWmGRViFOdMI4FOgctlP66oQwrT7e3pvgkTYheiyMt_Pzto5m7GwxmE3X9ya-FrgZjU9ddu6yeW8xFsaGHlOLfkonZM-ZPuHpNh6Tx39_H5Y39O7--nZ5dUdbIauJGlaXgM42oEqJwqHgTtQOQNmKg5PW4UI2mQc3xlrTLFRroGpyWTY1sFYckz-z7xjDyxrTpIcub5BX9BjWSXOl8g9CLiBL-SxtY0gpotNj7IZ8imagP5HrGbnOyPUXcr3JQ-db_3UzoP0Z-WacBWIWpNzyTxj1c1hHn2_-zfY_aSqQbg</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Gokturk, Mustafa</creator><creator>Yavan, Mehmet Ali</creator><general>Springer Medizin</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Comparison of the short-term effects of tooth–bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion in older adolescents</title><author>Gokturk, Mustafa ; Yavan, Mehmet Ali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a1950efdb0654e3fe32f39f006d720f4dfe84b1002aaddab86ca07b02a5b901c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Bicuspid</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Molar</topic><topic>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Palatal Expansion Technique</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gokturk, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yavan, Mehmet Ali</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gokturk, Mustafa</au><au>Yavan, Mehmet Ali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the short-term effects of tooth–bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion in older adolescents</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orofacial orthopedics</jtitle><stitle>J Orofac Orthop</stitle><addtitle>J Orofac Orthop</addtitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>55</epage><pages>43-55</pages><issn>1434-5293</issn><eissn>1615-6714</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To compare the short-term effects of tooth–bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion (RME) devices on dentofacial structures in older adolescents.
Methods
The retrospective study reviewed pre- and posttreatment lateral and posteroanterior cephalometric images and orthodontic model records of patients who underwent maxillary expansion. Two groups were formed, in which the same upper jaw expansion protocol was applied with two different maxillary expansion devices: the first group consisted of 15 individuals treated with tooth–bone-borne (hybrid) RME (HRME; 9 girls and 6 boys; mean age, 16.9 ± 0.42 years) and the second group consisted of 15 individuals treated with tooth-borne (conventional) RME (CRME; 8 girls and 7 boys; mean age, 16.74 ± 0.54 years). Cephalometric and orthodontic model measurements were conducted on the records taken before and after treatment.
Results
Significant skeletal and dental expansions were observed in both groups (
p
< 0.05). However, the increase in nasal width measurements in the HRME group (2.24 ± 0.61 mm) was significantly higher than the increase in the CRME group (1.12 ± 0.25 mm;
p
< 0.01). Buccal tipping of the premolars was significantly less in the HRME group (0.46 ± 0.35°) than in the CRME group (2.46 ± 0.63°;
p
< 0.01). The amount of tipping of the molars was higher in the HRME group (4.76 ± 0.88°) compared to the CRME group (2.9 ± 1.03°;
p
< 0.01).
Conclusion
Although the HRME device increase the nasal width in older adolescents to a greater extent, more dental side effects were seen at the maxillary first molars.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Medizin</pub><pmid>35612594</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00056-022-00401-x</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1434-5293 |
| ispartof | Journal of orofacial orthopedics, 2024, Vol.85 (1), p.43-55 |
| issn | 1434-5293 1615-6714 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2669503480 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Adolescent Bicuspid Dentistry Female Humans Male Maxilla - diagnostic imaging Medicine Molar Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Original Article Palatal Expansion Technique Retrospective Studies |
| title | Comparison of the short-term effects of tooth–bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion in older adolescents |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T20%3A04%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20short-term%20effects%20of%20tooth%E2%80%93bone-borne%20and%20tooth-borne%20rapid%20maxillary%20expansion%20in%20older%20adolescents&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=Gokturk,%20Mustafa&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=55&rft.pages=43-55&rft.issn=1434-5293&rft.eissn=1615-6714&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00056-022-00401-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2669503480%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2669503480&rft_id=info:pmid/35612594&rfr_iscdi=true |