Evaluation of an individual feedback report on patient-reported outcomes in the Prospective Dutch ColoRectal Cancer cohort
Purpose Returning patient-reported outcomes to patients might aid patients in detecting symptoms and might facilitate early intervention. This descriptive study evaluates the use of an individual feedback report on patient-reported outcomes for colorectal cancer patients and aims to assess differenc...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Supportive care in cancer 2022-09, Vol.30 (9), p.7303-7312 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 7312 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 7303 |
| container_title | Supportive care in cancer |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Vissers, Pauline A. J. Vink, Geraldine R. Koelink, Maaike R. Koopman, Miriam Arts, Lindy P. J. Oerlemans, Simone May, Anne M. van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V. van Erning, Felice N. |
| description | Purpose
Returning patient-reported outcomes to patients might aid patients in detecting symptoms and might facilitate early intervention. This descriptive study evaluates the use of an individual feedback report on patient-reported outcomes for colorectal cancer patients and aims to assess differences in patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics and cohort retention between patients who opt and do not opt for the feedback report.
Methods
Patients with colorectal cancer participating in the nationwide Prospective Dutch ColoRectal Cancer Cohort, who filled in questionnaires digitally between June 2018 and January 2019, were included. Participants were given the option to receive a feedback report at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. The usefulness, content, and layout of the feedback report were evaluated. Differences in patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, patient-reported outcomes, and cohort retention at subsequent questionnaires between participants who did and did not opt for feedback were assessed.
Results
A total of 484 participants were included of whom 293 (61%) opted for feedback. The feedback report was considered useful by 92%. No differences in patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes were found between participants who did and did not opt for feedback. The response rate was higher among patients who opted for feedback compared to patients who did not opt for feedback at T3 (84 vs 74%), but not at T6 and T12.
Conclusion
The feedback report was used by 6 out of 10 patients. The feedback report was considered valuable and associated with a higher subsequent response rate. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00520-022-07165-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2668909395</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A714262733</galeid><sourcerecordid>A714262733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-9c560e7ecc14dd206fae4a2054cabdc655e55441c557032e7797019ec59e9bc83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYModlv9Aj5IwBdfpubvZPNY1lqFgiL6HLKZO93U2WRMZhb003vXqRZFJA-Be3_ncJJDyDPOzjlj5lVlTAvWMCEaZnirG_2ArLiSsjFS2odkxazijZJan5DTWm8Z48Zo8ZicSN2yVhmzIt8vD36Y_RRzormnPtGYuniI3ewH2gN0Wx--0AJjLhNFZkQU0tQsE-honqeQ91BRR6cd0A8l1xHCFA9AX-NuRzd5yB9xgoYbnwIUGvIOxU_Io94PFZ7e3Wfk85vLT5u3zfX7q3ebi-smSCGnxgYMCwZC4KrrBGt7D8oLplXw2y60WoPWSvGgtWFSgDHWMG4haAt2G9byjLxcfMeSv85QJ7ePNcAw-AR5rk607doyK61G9MVf6G2eS8J0TqA5Xxsl-D114wdwMfV5Kj4cTd2F4Uq0Av8fqfN_UHg62MeQE_QR538IxCII-IW1QO_GEve-fHOcuWPhbincYeHuZ-HumPj5XeJ5u4fut-RXwwjIBai4SjdQ7p_0H9sfy0e1Qw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2703187421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of an individual feedback report on patient-reported outcomes in the Prospective Dutch ColoRectal Cancer cohort</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Vissers, Pauline A. J. ; Vink, Geraldine R. ; Koelink, Maaike R. ; Koopman, Miriam ; Arts, Lindy P. J. ; Oerlemans, Simone ; May, Anne M. ; van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V. ; van Erning, Felice N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vissers, Pauline A. J. ; Vink, Geraldine R. ; Koelink, Maaike R. ; Koopman, Miriam ; Arts, Lindy P. J. ; Oerlemans, Simone ; May, Anne M. ; van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V. ; van Erning, Felice N.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Returning patient-reported outcomes to patients might aid patients in detecting symptoms and might facilitate early intervention. This descriptive study evaluates the use of an individual feedback report on patient-reported outcomes for colorectal cancer patients and aims to assess differences in patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics and cohort retention between patients who opt and do not opt for the feedback report.
Methods
Patients with colorectal cancer participating in the nationwide Prospective Dutch ColoRectal Cancer Cohort, who filled in questionnaires digitally between June 2018 and January 2019, were included. Participants were given the option to receive a feedback report at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. The usefulness, content, and layout of the feedback report were evaluated. Differences in patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, patient-reported outcomes, and cohort retention at subsequent questionnaires between participants who did and did not opt for feedback were assessed.
Results
A total of 484 participants were included of whom 293 (61%) opted for feedback. The feedback report was considered useful by 92%. No differences in patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes were found between participants who did and did not opt for feedback. The response rate was higher among patients who opted for feedback compared to patients who did not opt for feedback at T3 (84 vs 74%), but not at T6 and T12.
Conclusion
The feedback report was used by 6 out of 10 patients. The feedback report was considered valuable and associated with a higher subsequent response rate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-4355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07165-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35606477</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Cancer patients ; Cancer therapies ; Care and treatment ; Clinical outcomes ; Colorectal cancer ; Data collection ; Feedback ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Medicine, Experimental ; Nursing ; Nursing Research ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Pain Medicine ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; Questionnaires ; Rehabilitation Medicine ; Response rates</subject><ispartof>Supportive care in cancer, 2022-09, Vol.30 (9), p.7303-7312</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-9c560e7ecc14dd206fae4a2054cabdc655e55441c557032e7797019ec59e9bc83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00520-022-07165-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00520-022-07165-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35606477$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vissers, Pauline A. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vink, Geraldine R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koelink, Maaike R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koopman, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arts, Lindy P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oerlemans, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Erning, Felice N.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of an individual feedback report on patient-reported outcomes in the Prospective Dutch ColoRectal Cancer cohort</title><title>Supportive care in cancer</title><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><description>Purpose
Returning patient-reported outcomes to patients might aid patients in detecting symptoms and might facilitate early intervention. This descriptive study evaluates the use of an individual feedback report on patient-reported outcomes for colorectal cancer patients and aims to assess differences in patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics and cohort retention between patients who opt and do not opt for the feedback report.
Methods
Patients with colorectal cancer participating in the nationwide Prospective Dutch ColoRectal Cancer Cohort, who filled in questionnaires digitally between June 2018 and January 2019, were included. Participants were given the option to receive a feedback report at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. The usefulness, content, and layout of the feedback report were evaluated. Differences in patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, patient-reported outcomes, and cohort retention at subsequent questionnaires between participants who did and did not opt for feedback were assessed.
Results
A total of 484 participants were included of whom 293 (61%) opted for feedback. The feedback report was considered useful by 92%. No differences in patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes were found between participants who did and did not opt for feedback. The response rate was higher among patients who opted for feedback compared to patients who did not opt for feedback at T3 (84 vs 74%), but not at T6 and T12.
Conclusion
The feedback report was used by 6 out of 10 patients. The feedback report was considered valuable and associated with a higher subsequent response rate.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Research</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><issn>0941-4355</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYModlv9Aj5IwBdfpubvZPNY1lqFgiL6HLKZO93U2WRMZhb003vXqRZFJA-Be3_ncJJDyDPOzjlj5lVlTAvWMCEaZnirG_2ArLiSsjFS2odkxazijZJan5DTWm8Z48Zo8ZicSN2yVhmzIt8vD36Y_RRzormnPtGYuniI3ewH2gN0Wx--0AJjLhNFZkQU0tQsE-honqeQ91BRR6cd0A8l1xHCFA9AX-NuRzd5yB9xgoYbnwIUGvIOxU_Io94PFZ7e3Wfk85vLT5u3zfX7q3ebi-smSCGnxgYMCwZC4KrrBGt7D8oLplXw2y60WoPWSvGgtWFSgDHWMG4haAt2G9byjLxcfMeSv85QJ7ePNcAw-AR5rk607doyK61G9MVf6G2eS8J0TqA5Xxsl-D114wdwMfV5Kj4cTd2F4Uq0Av8fqfN_UHg62MeQE_QR538IxCII-IW1QO_GEve-fHOcuWPhbincYeHuZ-HumPj5XeJ5u4fut-RXwwjIBai4SjdQ7p_0H9sfy0e1Qw</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Vissers, Pauline A. J.</creator><creator>Vink, Geraldine R.</creator><creator>Koelink, Maaike R.</creator><creator>Koopman, Miriam</creator><creator>Arts, Lindy P. J.</creator><creator>Oerlemans, Simone</creator><creator>May, Anne M.</creator><creator>van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V.</creator><creator>van Erning, Felice N.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Evaluation of an individual feedback report on patient-reported outcomes in the Prospective Dutch ColoRectal Cancer cohort</title><author>Vissers, Pauline A. J. ; Vink, Geraldine R. ; Koelink, Maaike R. ; Koopman, Miriam ; Arts, Lindy P. J. ; Oerlemans, Simone ; May, Anne M. ; van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V. ; van Erning, Felice N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-9c560e7ecc14dd206fae4a2054cabdc655e55441c557032e7797019ec59e9bc83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Research</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Medicine</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vissers, Pauline A. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vink, Geraldine R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koelink, Maaike R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koopman, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arts, Lindy P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oerlemans, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Erning, Felice N.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vissers, Pauline A. J.</au><au>Vink, Geraldine R.</au><au>Koelink, Maaike R.</au><au>Koopman, Miriam</au><au>Arts, Lindy P. J.</au><au>Oerlemans, Simone</au><au>May, Anne M.</au><au>van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V.</au><au>van Erning, Felice N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of an individual feedback report on patient-reported outcomes in the Prospective Dutch ColoRectal Cancer cohort</atitle><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle><stitle>Support Care Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>7303</spage><epage>7312</epage><pages>7303-7312</pages><issn>0941-4355</issn><eissn>1433-7339</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Returning patient-reported outcomes to patients might aid patients in detecting symptoms and might facilitate early intervention. This descriptive study evaluates the use of an individual feedback report on patient-reported outcomes for colorectal cancer patients and aims to assess differences in patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics and cohort retention between patients who opt and do not opt for the feedback report.
Methods
Patients with colorectal cancer participating in the nationwide Prospective Dutch ColoRectal Cancer Cohort, who filled in questionnaires digitally between June 2018 and January 2019, were included. Participants were given the option to receive a feedback report at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. The usefulness, content, and layout of the feedback report were evaluated. Differences in patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, patient-reported outcomes, and cohort retention at subsequent questionnaires between participants who did and did not opt for feedback were assessed.
Results
A total of 484 participants were included of whom 293 (61%) opted for feedback. The feedback report was considered useful by 92%. No differences in patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes were found between participants who did and did not opt for feedback. The response rate was higher among patients who opted for feedback compared to patients who did not opt for feedback at T3 (84 vs 74%), but not at T6 and T12.
Conclusion
The feedback report was used by 6 out of 10 patients. The feedback report was considered valuable and associated with a higher subsequent response rate.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>35606477</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00520-022-07165-5</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0941-4355 |
| ispartof | Supportive care in cancer, 2022-09, Vol.30 (9), p.7303-7312 |
| issn | 0941-4355 1433-7339 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2668909395 |
| source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Analysis Cancer patients Cancer therapies Care and treatment Clinical outcomes Colorectal cancer Data collection Feedback Medical research Medicine Medicine & Public Health Medicine, Experimental Nursing Nursing Research Oncology Original Article Pain Medicine Patient outcomes Patients Questionnaires Rehabilitation Medicine Response rates |
| title | Evaluation of an individual feedback report on patient-reported outcomes in the Prospective Dutch ColoRectal Cancer cohort |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T09%3A25%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20an%20individual%20feedback%20report%20on%20patient-reported%20outcomes%20in%20the%20Prospective%20Dutch%20ColoRectal%20Cancer%20cohort&rft.jtitle=Supportive%20care%20in%20cancer&rft.au=Vissers,%20Pauline%20A.%20J.&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=7303&rft.epage=7312&rft.pages=7303-7312&rft.issn=0941-4355&rft.eissn=1433-7339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00520-022-07165-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA714262733%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2703187421&rft_id=info:pmid/35606477&rft_galeid=A714262733&rfr_iscdi=true |