Lack of association of CYP2B6 pharmacogenetics with cyclophosphamide toxicity in patients with cancer

Purpose Cyclophosphamide is a commonly used cancer agent that is metabolically activated by polymorphic enzymes. This study aims to investigate the association between predicted activity of candidate pharmacogenes with severe toxicity during cyclophosphamide treatment. Methods Genome-wide genetic da...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supportive care in cancer 2022-09, Vol.30 (9), p.7355-7363
Hauptverfasser: Hwang, Mary, Medley, Sarah, Shakeel, Faisal, Vanderwerff, Brett, Zawistowski, Matthew, Kidwell, Kelley M., Hertz, Daniel L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7363
container_issue 9
container_start_page 7355
container_title Supportive care in cancer
container_volume 30
creator Hwang, Mary
Medley, Sarah
Shakeel, Faisal
Vanderwerff, Brett
Zawistowski, Matthew
Kidwell, Kelley M.
Hertz, Daniel L.
description Purpose Cyclophosphamide is a commonly used cancer agent that is metabolically activated by polymorphic enzymes. This study aims to investigate the association between predicted activity of candidate pharmacogenes with severe toxicity during cyclophosphamide treatment. Methods Genome-wide genetic data was collected from an institutional genetic data repository for CYP2B6 , CYP3A4 , CYP2C9 , CYP2C19 , GSTA1 , GSTP1 , ALDH1A1 , ALDH3A1 , ABCC1 , ABCB1 , and ERCC1 . Treatment and toxicity data were retrospectively collected from the patient’s medical record. The a priori selected primary hypothesis was that patients who have CYP2B6 reduced metabolizer activity (poor or intermediate (PM/IM) vs. normal (NM) metabolizer) have lower risk of severe toxicity or cyclophosphamide treatment modification due to toxicity. Results In the primary analysis of 510 cyclophosphamide-treated patients with available genetic data, there was no difference in the odds of severe toxicity or treatment modification due to toxicity in CYP2B6 PM/IM vs. NM (odds ratio = 0.97, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.62–1.50, p  = 0.88). In an exploratory, statistically uncorrected secondary analysis, carriers of the ALDH1A1 rs8187996 variant had a lower risk of the primary toxicity endpoint compared with wild-type homozygous patients (odds ratio = 0.31, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.09–0.78, p  = 0.028). None of the other tested phenotypes or genotypes was associated with the primary or secondary endpoints in unadjusted analysis (all p  > 0.05). Conclusion The finding that patients who carry ALDH1A1 rs8187996 may have a lower risk of cyclophosphamide toxicity than wild-type patients contradicts a prior finding for this variant and should be viewed with skepticism. We found weak evidence that any of these candidate pharmacogenetic predictors of cyclophosphamide toxicity may be useful to personalize cyclophosphamide dosing to optimize therapeutic outcomes in patients with cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00520-022-07118-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2668909386</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A714262735</galeid><sourcerecordid>A714262735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4603f4f57fccf980cdc87208bca0cd2764859fb2eddac8a626d9abcd6c3c98fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuPFCEUhYnROD2jf8CFqcSNmxp5VAG1HDs6mnSiC124IvQFuhmroAQ6Wv9e2p7xFWNYXLj3OyeXHISeEHxJMBYvMsY9xS2mtMWCENku99CKdIy1grHhPlrhoSNtx_r-DJ3nfIMxEaKnD9EZ6znmnZArZDcaPjfRNTrnCF4XH8Pxuf70nr7kzbzXadIQdzbY4iE3X33ZN7DAGOd9zHU8eWObEr958GVpfGjm6mFDuUN1AJseoQdOj9k-vq0X6OPrVx_Wb9rNu-u366tNC0zQ0nYcM9e5XjgAN0gMBqSgWG5B1zsVvJP94LbUGqNBak65GfQWDAcGg3SGXaDnJ985xS8Hm4uafAY7jjrYeMiKci4HPDDJK_rsL_QmHlKo2ykqMCOS0v43aqdHq3xwsSQNR1N1JUhHORWsr9TlP6h6jJ08xGCdr_0_BPQkgBRzTtapOflJp0URrI7ZqlO2qmarfmSrlip6ervxYTtZ81NyF2YF2AnIdRR2Nv360n9svwNel69d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2703182256</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lack of association of CYP2B6 pharmacogenetics with cyclophosphamide toxicity in patients with cancer</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Hwang, Mary ; Medley, Sarah ; Shakeel, Faisal ; Vanderwerff, Brett ; Zawistowski, Matthew ; Kidwell, Kelley M. ; Hertz, Daniel L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Mary ; Medley, Sarah ; Shakeel, Faisal ; Vanderwerff, Brett ; Zawistowski, Matthew ; Kidwell, Kelley M. ; Hertz, Daniel L.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Cyclophosphamide is a commonly used cancer agent that is metabolically activated by polymorphic enzymes. This study aims to investigate the association between predicted activity of candidate pharmacogenes with severe toxicity during cyclophosphamide treatment. Methods Genome-wide genetic data was collected from an institutional genetic data repository for CYP2B6 , CYP3A4 , CYP2C9 , CYP2C19 , GSTA1 , GSTP1 , ALDH1A1 , ALDH3A1 , ABCC1 , ABCB1 , and ERCC1 . Treatment and toxicity data were retrospectively collected from the patient’s medical record. The a priori selected primary hypothesis was that patients who have CYP2B6 reduced metabolizer activity (poor or intermediate (PM/IM) vs. normal (NM) metabolizer) have lower risk of severe toxicity or cyclophosphamide treatment modification due to toxicity. Results In the primary analysis of 510 cyclophosphamide-treated patients with available genetic data, there was no difference in the odds of severe toxicity or treatment modification due to toxicity in CYP2B6 PM/IM vs. NM (odds ratio = 0.97, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.62–1.50, p  = 0.88). In an exploratory, statistically uncorrected secondary analysis, carriers of the ALDH1A1 rs8187996 variant had a lower risk of the primary toxicity endpoint compared with wild-type homozygous patients (odds ratio = 0.31, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.09–0.78, p  = 0.028). None of the other tested phenotypes or genotypes was associated with the primary or secondary endpoints in unadjusted analysis (all p  &gt; 0.05). Conclusion The finding that patients who carry ALDH1A1 rs8187996 may have a lower risk of cyclophosphamide toxicity than wild-type patients contradicts a prior finding for this variant and should be viewed with skepticism. We found weak evidence that any of these candidate pharmacogenetic predictors of cyclophosphamide toxicity may be useful to personalize cyclophosphamide dosing to optimize therapeutic outcomes in patients with cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-4355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07118-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35606478</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Cancer ; Cancer patients ; Care and treatment ; Chemotherapy ; Clopidogrel ; Confidence intervals ; Cyclophosphamide ; Cytochrome P-450 ; Cytotoxicity ; Genomes ; Medical records ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Nursing ; Nursing Research ; Oncology ; Oncology, Experimental ; Original Article ; Pain Medicine ; Pharmacogenetics ; Precision Oncology &amp; Supportive Care ; Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><ispartof>Supportive care in cancer, 2022-09, Vol.30 (9), p.7355-7363</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4603f4f57fccf980cdc87208bca0cd2764859fb2eddac8a626d9abcd6c3c98fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4603f4f57fccf980cdc87208bca0cd2764859fb2eddac8a626d9abcd6c3c98fd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0501-1035</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00520-022-07118-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00520-022-07118-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35606478$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medley, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shakeel, Faisal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderwerff, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zawistowski, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kidwell, Kelley M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hertz, Daniel L.</creatorcontrib><title>Lack of association of CYP2B6 pharmacogenetics with cyclophosphamide toxicity in patients with cancer</title><title>Supportive care in cancer</title><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><description>Purpose Cyclophosphamide is a commonly used cancer agent that is metabolically activated by polymorphic enzymes. This study aims to investigate the association between predicted activity of candidate pharmacogenes with severe toxicity during cyclophosphamide treatment. Methods Genome-wide genetic data was collected from an institutional genetic data repository for CYP2B6 , CYP3A4 , CYP2C9 , CYP2C19 , GSTA1 , GSTP1 , ALDH1A1 , ALDH3A1 , ABCC1 , ABCB1 , and ERCC1 . Treatment and toxicity data were retrospectively collected from the patient’s medical record. The a priori selected primary hypothesis was that patients who have CYP2B6 reduced metabolizer activity (poor or intermediate (PM/IM) vs. normal (NM) metabolizer) have lower risk of severe toxicity or cyclophosphamide treatment modification due to toxicity. Results In the primary analysis of 510 cyclophosphamide-treated patients with available genetic data, there was no difference in the odds of severe toxicity or treatment modification due to toxicity in CYP2B6 PM/IM vs. NM (odds ratio = 0.97, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.62–1.50, p  = 0.88). In an exploratory, statistically uncorrected secondary analysis, carriers of the ALDH1A1 rs8187996 variant had a lower risk of the primary toxicity endpoint compared with wild-type homozygous patients (odds ratio = 0.31, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.09–0.78, p  = 0.028). None of the other tested phenotypes or genotypes was associated with the primary or secondary endpoints in unadjusted analysis (all p  &gt; 0.05). Conclusion The finding that patients who carry ALDH1A1 rs8187996 may have a lower risk of cyclophosphamide toxicity than wild-type patients contradicts a prior finding for this variant and should be viewed with skepticism. We found weak evidence that any of these candidate pharmacogenetic predictors of cyclophosphamide toxicity may be useful to personalize cyclophosphamide dosing to optimize therapeutic outcomes in patients with cancer.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Clopidogrel</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Cyclophosphamide</subject><subject>Cytochrome P-450</subject><subject>Cytotoxicity</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Research</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Oncology, Experimental</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Pharmacogenetics</subject><subject>Precision Oncology &amp; Supportive Care</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><issn>0941-4355</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUuPFCEUhYnROD2jf8CFqcSNmxp5VAG1HDs6mnSiC124IvQFuhmroAQ6Wv9e2p7xFWNYXLj3OyeXHISeEHxJMBYvMsY9xS2mtMWCENku99CKdIy1grHhPlrhoSNtx_r-DJ3nfIMxEaKnD9EZ6znmnZArZDcaPjfRNTrnCF4XH8Pxuf70nr7kzbzXadIQdzbY4iE3X33ZN7DAGOd9zHU8eWObEr958GVpfGjm6mFDuUN1AJseoQdOj9k-vq0X6OPrVx_Wb9rNu-u366tNC0zQ0nYcM9e5XjgAN0gMBqSgWG5B1zsVvJP94LbUGqNBak65GfQWDAcGg3SGXaDnJ985xS8Hm4uafAY7jjrYeMiKci4HPDDJK_rsL_QmHlKo2ykqMCOS0v43aqdHq3xwsSQNR1N1JUhHORWsr9TlP6h6jJ08xGCdr_0_BPQkgBRzTtapOflJp0URrI7ZqlO2qmarfmSrlip6ervxYTtZ81NyF2YF2AnIdRR2Nv360n9svwNel69d</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Hwang, Mary</creator><creator>Medley, Sarah</creator><creator>Shakeel, Faisal</creator><creator>Vanderwerff, Brett</creator><creator>Zawistowski, Matthew</creator><creator>Kidwell, Kelley M.</creator><creator>Hertz, Daniel L.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0501-1035</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Lack of association of CYP2B6 pharmacogenetics with cyclophosphamide toxicity in patients with cancer</title><author>Hwang, Mary ; Medley, Sarah ; Shakeel, Faisal ; Vanderwerff, Brett ; Zawistowski, Matthew ; Kidwell, Kelley M. ; Hertz, Daniel L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-4603f4f57fccf980cdc87208bca0cd2764859fb2eddac8a626d9abcd6c3c98fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Clopidogrel</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Cyclophosphamide</topic><topic>Cytochrome P-450</topic><topic>Cytotoxicity</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Research</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Oncology, Experimental</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Pharmacogenetics</topic><topic>Precision Oncology &amp; Supportive Care</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medley, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shakeel, Faisal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderwerff, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zawistowski, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kidwell, Kelley M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hertz, Daniel L.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hwang, Mary</au><au>Medley, Sarah</au><au>Shakeel, Faisal</au><au>Vanderwerff, Brett</au><au>Zawistowski, Matthew</au><au>Kidwell, Kelley M.</au><au>Hertz, Daniel L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lack of association of CYP2B6 pharmacogenetics with cyclophosphamide toxicity in patients with cancer</atitle><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle><stitle>Support Care Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>7355</spage><epage>7363</epage><pages>7355-7363</pages><issn>0941-4355</issn><eissn>1433-7339</eissn><abstract>Purpose Cyclophosphamide is a commonly used cancer agent that is metabolically activated by polymorphic enzymes. This study aims to investigate the association between predicted activity of candidate pharmacogenes with severe toxicity during cyclophosphamide treatment. Methods Genome-wide genetic data was collected from an institutional genetic data repository for CYP2B6 , CYP3A4 , CYP2C9 , CYP2C19 , GSTA1 , GSTP1 , ALDH1A1 , ALDH3A1 , ABCC1 , ABCB1 , and ERCC1 . Treatment and toxicity data were retrospectively collected from the patient’s medical record. The a priori selected primary hypothesis was that patients who have CYP2B6 reduced metabolizer activity (poor or intermediate (PM/IM) vs. normal (NM) metabolizer) have lower risk of severe toxicity or cyclophosphamide treatment modification due to toxicity. Results In the primary analysis of 510 cyclophosphamide-treated patients with available genetic data, there was no difference in the odds of severe toxicity or treatment modification due to toxicity in CYP2B6 PM/IM vs. NM (odds ratio = 0.97, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.62–1.50, p  = 0.88). In an exploratory, statistically uncorrected secondary analysis, carriers of the ALDH1A1 rs8187996 variant had a lower risk of the primary toxicity endpoint compared with wild-type homozygous patients (odds ratio = 0.31, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.09–0.78, p  = 0.028). None of the other tested phenotypes or genotypes was associated with the primary or secondary endpoints in unadjusted analysis (all p  &gt; 0.05). Conclusion The finding that patients who carry ALDH1A1 rs8187996 may have a lower risk of cyclophosphamide toxicity than wild-type patients contradicts a prior finding for this variant and should be viewed with skepticism. We found weak evidence that any of these candidate pharmacogenetic predictors of cyclophosphamide toxicity may be useful to personalize cyclophosphamide dosing to optimize therapeutic outcomes in patients with cancer.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>35606478</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00520-022-07118-y</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0501-1035</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0941-4355
ispartof Supportive care in cancer, 2022-09, Vol.30 (9), p.7355-7363
issn 0941-4355
1433-7339
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2668909386
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Analysis
Cancer
Cancer patients
Care and treatment
Chemotherapy
Clopidogrel
Confidence intervals
Cyclophosphamide
Cytochrome P-450
Cytotoxicity
Genomes
Medical records
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Nursing
Nursing Research
Oncology
Oncology, Experimental
Original Article
Pain Medicine
Pharmacogenetics
Precision Oncology & Supportive Care
Rehabilitation Medicine
title Lack of association of CYP2B6 pharmacogenetics with cyclophosphamide toxicity in patients with cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T11%3A56%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lack%20of%20association%20of%20CYP2B6%20pharmacogenetics%20with%20cyclophosphamide%20toxicity%20in%20patients%20with%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Supportive%20care%20in%20cancer&rft.au=Hwang,%20Mary&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=7355&rft.epage=7363&rft.pages=7355-7363&rft.issn=0941-4355&rft.eissn=1433-7339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00520-022-07118-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA714262735%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2703182256&rft_id=info:pmid/35606478&rft_galeid=A714262735&rfr_iscdi=true