China's cultivation of master nursing specialist: A qualitative content analysis of the stakeholders
To assess the Master of Nursing Specialist (MNS) in China from the perspectives of relevant stakeholders to assist the sustained development of the MNS program. With the growing demand for quality nursing care, the cultivation of higher-level specialized nursing professionals continues to be challen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nurse education in practice 2022-08, Vol.63, p.103359-103359, Article 103359 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 103359 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 103359 |
container_title | Nurse education in practice |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Shi, Xiuxiu Yao, Xiuyu Liang, Jie Gan, Shan Li, Zheng |
description | To assess the Master of Nursing Specialist (MNS) in China from the perspectives of relevant stakeholders to assist the sustained development of the MNS program.
With the growing demand for quality nursing care, the cultivation of higher-level specialized nursing professionals continues to be challenging.
A descriptive qualitative study.
The study used a convenience sampling method. Stakeholders of MNS education in the interviews included graduates of the MNS program, hospital administrators and healthcare policymakers. The individual semi-structured interviews were conducted via telephone, online interview, or face-to-face between April and December 2020. All interview materials were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim and were analyzed using the qualitative content analysis approach.
A total of 27 stakeholders completed the interviews, including 11 MNS graduates, 11 hospital administrators and 5 healthcare policymakers. Attitudes about and confirmation of the MNS program were collected as well as suggestions about further optimization. Three themes or categories were identified: the paradox of MNS prospects, current conditions of MNS education and strategic actions for further optimization.
Our findings were based on the relevant stakeholders’ views toward MNS education, providing a multidimensional view when combined. The results reflected the current state and future direction of MNS education in China, which will help sustain the development of MNS programs. The practice and experience in China will enlighten other developing countries with similar backgrounds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103359 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2667792127</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1471595322000737</els_id><sourcerecordid>2705386239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d36219aac8e6deb187d257302797a3676c8da683e304a59bbcd719c073da67773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtrWzEQhUVpaR7tH-iiCLpoNtfRw3qVboJJHxDoJl0LWRrXcq8lR9I15N9HF6dddNHVDMN3Dsw5CL2jZEEJlde7RYJDWTDCWD9wLswLdE614oNgjL_s-1LRQRjBz9BFrTvSRUTJ1-iMC6G11OYchdU2JvexYj-NLR5diznhvMF7VxsUnKZSY_qF6wF8dGOs7RO-wQ9TX1tnj4B9Tg1Swy658bHGOovbFnBt7jds8xig1Dfo1caNFd4-z0v088vt_erbcPfj6_fVzd3guV62IXDJqHHOa5AB1v2TwITihCmjHJdKeh2c1Bw4WTph1msfFDWeKN7PSil-ia5OvoeSHyaoze5j9TCOLkGeqmWyY4ZRNqMf_kF3eSr9h04pIriWjJtOsRPlS661wMYeSty78mgpsXMHdmfnDuzcgT110EXvn62n9R7CX8mf0Dvw-QRAz-IYodjqIyQPIRbwzYYc_-f_BFcqmCM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2705386239</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>China's cultivation of master nursing specialist: A qualitative content analysis of the stakeholders</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Shi, Xiuxiu ; Yao, Xiuyu ; Liang, Jie ; Gan, Shan ; Li, Zheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Shi, Xiuxiu ; Yao, Xiuyu ; Liang, Jie ; Gan, Shan ; Li, Zheng</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the Master of Nursing Specialist (MNS) in China from the perspectives of relevant stakeholders to assist the sustained development of the MNS program.
With the growing demand for quality nursing care, the cultivation of higher-level specialized nursing professionals continues to be challenging.
A descriptive qualitative study.
The study used a convenience sampling method. Stakeholders of MNS education in the interviews included graduates of the MNS program, hospital administrators and healthcare policymakers. The individual semi-structured interviews were conducted via telephone, online interview, or face-to-face between April and December 2020. All interview materials were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim and were analyzed using the qualitative content analysis approach.
A total of 27 stakeholders completed the interviews, including 11 MNS graduates, 11 hospital administrators and 5 healthcare policymakers. Attitudes about and confirmation of the MNS program were collected as well as suggestions about further optimization. Three themes or categories were identified: the paradox of MNS prospects, current conditions of MNS education and strategic actions for further optimization.
Our findings were based on the relevant stakeholders’ views toward MNS education, providing a multidimensional view when combined. The results reflected the current state and future direction of MNS education in China, which will help sustain the development of MNS programs. The practice and experience in China will enlighten other developing countries with similar backgrounds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-5953</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103359</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35588689</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Clinical medicine ; Clinical nursing ; Content analysis ; Cultivating pattern ; Cultivation ; Data analysis ; Data collection ; Developing countries ; Doctoral Programs ; Educational Change ; Health care ; Health care policy ; Hospitals ; Interviews ; LDCs ; Leadership ; Master of nursing specialist ; Medical research ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing education ; Optimization ; Policy making ; Professional Education ; Professional training ; Prospects ; Psychiatric-mental health nursing ; Qualitative research ; Qualitative study ; Quality of care ; Researchers ; Stakeholders ; Teachers</subject><ispartof>Nurse education in practice, 2022-08, Vol.63, p.103359-103359, Article 103359</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d36219aac8e6deb187d257302797a3676c8da683e304a59bbcd719c073da67773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d36219aac8e6deb187d257302797a3676c8da683e304a59bbcd719c073da67773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2705386239?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,12846,27924,27925,30999,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35588689$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shi, Xiuxiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Xiuyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zheng</creatorcontrib><title>China's cultivation of master nursing specialist: A qualitative content analysis of the stakeholders</title><title>Nurse education in practice</title><addtitle>Nurse Educ Pract</addtitle><description>To assess the Master of Nursing Specialist (MNS) in China from the perspectives of relevant stakeholders to assist the sustained development of the MNS program.
With the growing demand for quality nursing care, the cultivation of higher-level specialized nursing professionals continues to be challenging.
A descriptive qualitative study.
The study used a convenience sampling method. Stakeholders of MNS education in the interviews included graduates of the MNS program, hospital administrators and healthcare policymakers. The individual semi-structured interviews were conducted via telephone, online interview, or face-to-face between April and December 2020. All interview materials were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim and were analyzed using the qualitative content analysis approach.
A total of 27 stakeholders completed the interviews, including 11 MNS graduates, 11 hospital administrators and 5 healthcare policymakers. Attitudes about and confirmation of the MNS program were collected as well as suggestions about further optimization. Three themes or categories were identified: the paradox of MNS prospects, current conditions of MNS education and strategic actions for further optimization.
Our findings were based on the relevant stakeholders’ views toward MNS education, providing a multidimensional view when combined. The results reflected the current state and future direction of MNS education in China, which will help sustain the development of MNS programs. The practice and experience in China will enlighten other developing countries with similar backgrounds.</description><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical nursing</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Cultivating pattern</subject><subject>Cultivation</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Doctoral Programs</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Master of nursing specialist</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing education</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Professional Education</subject><subject>Professional training</subject><subject>Prospects</subject><subject>Psychiatric-mental health nursing</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Qualitative study</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><issn>1471-5953</issn><issn>1873-5223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtrWzEQhUVpaR7tH-iiCLpoNtfRw3qVboJJHxDoJl0LWRrXcq8lR9I15N9HF6dddNHVDMN3Dsw5CL2jZEEJlde7RYJDWTDCWD9wLswLdE614oNgjL_s-1LRQRjBz9BFrTvSRUTJ1-iMC6G11OYchdU2JvexYj-NLR5diznhvMF7VxsUnKZSY_qF6wF8dGOs7RO-wQ9TX1tnj4B9Tg1Swy658bHGOovbFnBt7jds8xig1Dfo1caNFd4-z0v088vt_erbcPfj6_fVzd3guV62IXDJqHHOa5AB1v2TwITihCmjHJdKeh2c1Bw4WTph1msfFDWeKN7PSil-ia5OvoeSHyaoze5j9TCOLkGeqmWyY4ZRNqMf_kF3eSr9h04pIriWjJtOsRPlS661wMYeSty78mgpsXMHdmfnDuzcgT110EXvn62n9R7CX8mf0Dvw-QRAz-IYodjqIyQPIRbwzYYc_-f_BFcqmCM</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Shi, Xiuxiu</creator><creator>Yao, Xiuyu</creator><creator>Liang, Jie</creator><creator>Gan, Shan</creator><creator>Li, Zheng</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>China's cultivation of master nursing specialist: A qualitative content analysis of the stakeholders</title><author>Shi, Xiuxiu ; Yao, Xiuyu ; Liang, Jie ; Gan, Shan ; Li, Zheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d36219aac8e6deb187d257302797a3676c8da683e304a59bbcd719c073da67773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical nursing</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Cultivating pattern</topic><topic>Cultivation</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Doctoral Programs</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Master of nursing specialist</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing education</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Professional Education</topic><topic>Professional training</topic><topic>Prospects</topic><topic>Psychiatric-mental health nursing</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Qualitative study</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shi, Xiuxiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Xiuyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zheng</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nurse education in practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shi, Xiuxiu</au><au>Yao, Xiuyu</au><au>Liang, Jie</au><au>Gan, Shan</au><au>Li, Zheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>China's cultivation of master nursing specialist: A qualitative content analysis of the stakeholders</atitle><jtitle>Nurse education in practice</jtitle><addtitle>Nurse Educ Pract</addtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>63</volume><spage>103359</spage><epage>103359</epage><pages>103359-103359</pages><artnum>103359</artnum><issn>1471-5953</issn><eissn>1873-5223</eissn><abstract>To assess the Master of Nursing Specialist (MNS) in China from the perspectives of relevant stakeholders to assist the sustained development of the MNS program.
With the growing demand for quality nursing care, the cultivation of higher-level specialized nursing professionals continues to be challenging.
A descriptive qualitative study.
The study used a convenience sampling method. Stakeholders of MNS education in the interviews included graduates of the MNS program, hospital administrators and healthcare policymakers. The individual semi-structured interviews were conducted via telephone, online interview, or face-to-face between April and December 2020. All interview materials were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim and were analyzed using the qualitative content analysis approach.
A total of 27 stakeholders completed the interviews, including 11 MNS graduates, 11 hospital administrators and 5 healthcare policymakers. Attitudes about and confirmation of the MNS program were collected as well as suggestions about further optimization. Three themes or categories were identified: the paradox of MNS prospects, current conditions of MNS education and strategic actions for further optimization.
Our findings were based on the relevant stakeholders’ views toward MNS education, providing a multidimensional view when combined. The results reflected the current state and future direction of MNS education in China, which will help sustain the development of MNS programs. The practice and experience in China will enlighten other developing countries with similar backgrounds.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35588689</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103359</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-5953 |
ispartof | Nurse education in practice, 2022-08, Vol.63, p.103359-103359, Article 103359 |
issn | 1471-5953 1873-5223 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2667792127 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Clinical medicine Clinical nursing Content analysis Cultivating pattern Cultivation Data analysis Data collection Developing countries Doctoral Programs Educational Change Health care Health care policy Hospitals Interviews LDCs Leadership Master of nursing specialist Medical research Nurses Nursing Nursing education Optimization Policy making Professional Education Professional training Prospects Psychiatric-mental health nursing Qualitative research Qualitative study Quality of care Researchers Stakeholders Teachers |
title | China's cultivation of master nursing specialist: A qualitative content analysis of the stakeholders |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T01%3A34%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=China's%20cultivation%20of%20master%20nursing%20specialist:%20A%20qualitative%20content%20analysis%20of%20the%20stakeholders&rft.jtitle=Nurse%20education%20in%20practice&rft.au=Shi,%20Xiuxiu&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=63&rft.spage=103359&rft.epage=103359&rft.pages=103359-103359&rft.artnum=103359&rft.issn=1471-5953&rft.eissn=1873-5223&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103359&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2705386239%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2705386239&rft_id=info:pmid/35588689&rft_els_id=S1471595322000737&rfr_iscdi=true |