Efficacy of cement restrictors: Experimental study and development of a classification

Cement restrictors (CRs) are devices that allow occlusion of the femoral canal in order to obtain greater interdigitation of the cement between the bone and a better pressurization, which generates an increase in the survival of cemented stems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología 2022-05, Vol.66 (3), p.208-214
Hauptverfasser: Rincón H, J A, de la Pava, C, Rozo, D J, Restrepo, A, Manrique, J E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; spa
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 214
container_issue 3
container_start_page 208
container_title Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología
container_volume 66
creator Rincón H, J A
de la Pava, C
Rozo, D J
Restrepo, A
Manrique, J E
description Cement restrictors (CRs) are devices that allow occlusion of the femoral canal in order to obtain greater interdigitation of the cement between the bone and a better pressurization, which generates an increase in the survival of cemented stems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the different CRs used and propose a classification of this device. An experimental study was carried out, where 7 CR references of different designs and manufacturers were taken. Later, tests were carried out on 9 chlorinated polyvinyl chloride tubes for each reference, to achieve a total of 63 tests. In our study, 34.9% of the CRs in ultra high molecular weight polyethylene failed, presenting migration and allowing cement to leak while none of the gelatin RC failed. The RC with an umbrella design proved to be the less effective, presented a higher incidence of migration and cement leakage, while the gelatin CRs were the best performers. Based on the results of this study, an analysis of the CR design was carried out and a classification was proposed that divides these devices into 2 types.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.recot.2021.09.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2667790802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2667790802</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p126t-f5d24c396c602ef6a67410a07bb4995a28087a33351e220eb8125891a289300e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kM1LxDAQxYMg7rr6FwiSo5fWSdKkiTdZ1g9Y8KJeS5pOoUu3qUkq7n9v14_TwJvfe8w8Qq4Y5AyYut3lAZ1POQfOcjA5gDghS2a0zrSWakHOY9wBqIIZdkYWQkoDhdBL8r5p285Zd6C-pQ73OCQaMKbQueRDvKObrxFDd9RtT2OamgO1Q0Mb_MTejz_87LTU9TbG7piVOj9ckNPW9hEv_-aKvD1sXtdP2fbl8Xl9v81GxlXKWtnwwgmjnAKOrbKqLBhYKOu6MEZarkGXVgghGXIOWGvGpTZsXhgBgGJFbn5zx-A_pvnuat9Fh31vB_RTrLhSZWlAA5_R6z90qvfYVOP8lQ2H6r8L8Q06ZmAG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2667790802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of cement restrictors: Experimental study and development of a classification</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Rincón H, J A ; de la Pava, C ; Rozo, D J ; Restrepo, A ; Manrique, J E</creator><creatorcontrib>Rincón H, J A ; de la Pava, C ; Rozo, D J ; Restrepo, A ; Manrique, J E</creatorcontrib><description>Cement restrictors (CRs) are devices that allow occlusion of the femoral canal in order to obtain greater interdigitation of the cement between the bone and a better pressurization, which generates an increase in the survival of cemented stems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the different CRs used and propose a classification of this device. An experimental study was carried out, where 7 CR references of different designs and manufacturers were taken. Later, tests were carried out on 9 chlorinated polyvinyl chloride tubes for each reference, to achieve a total of 63 tests. In our study, 34.9% of the CRs in ultra high molecular weight polyethylene failed, presenting migration and allowing cement to leak while none of the gelatin RC failed. The RC with an umbrella design proved to be the less effective, presented a higher incidence of migration and cement leakage, while the gelatin CRs were the best performers. Based on the results of this study, an analysis of the CR design was carried out and a classification was proposed that divides these devices into 2 types.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1988-8856</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.recot.2021.09.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35590438</identifier><language>eng ; spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><ispartof>Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología, 2022-05, Vol.66 (3), p.208-214</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 SECOT. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,862,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35590438$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rincón H, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Pava, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozo, D J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Restrepo, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manrique, J E</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of cement restrictors: Experimental study and development of a classification</title><title>Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología</title><addtitle>Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol</addtitle><description>Cement restrictors (CRs) are devices that allow occlusion of the femoral canal in order to obtain greater interdigitation of the cement between the bone and a better pressurization, which generates an increase in the survival of cemented stems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the different CRs used and propose a classification of this device. An experimental study was carried out, where 7 CR references of different designs and manufacturers were taken. Later, tests were carried out on 9 chlorinated polyvinyl chloride tubes for each reference, to achieve a total of 63 tests. In our study, 34.9% of the CRs in ultra high molecular weight polyethylene failed, presenting migration and allowing cement to leak while none of the gelatin RC failed. The RC with an umbrella design proved to be the less effective, presented a higher incidence of migration and cement leakage, while the gelatin CRs were the best performers. Based on the results of this study, an analysis of the CR design was carried out and a classification was proposed that divides these devices into 2 types.</description><issn>1988-8856</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kM1LxDAQxYMg7rr6FwiSo5fWSdKkiTdZ1g9Y8KJeS5pOoUu3qUkq7n9v14_TwJvfe8w8Qq4Y5AyYut3lAZ1POQfOcjA5gDghS2a0zrSWakHOY9wBqIIZdkYWQkoDhdBL8r5p285Zd6C-pQ73OCQaMKbQueRDvKObrxFDd9RtT2OamgO1Q0Mb_MTejz_87LTU9TbG7piVOj9ckNPW9hEv_-aKvD1sXtdP2fbl8Xl9v81GxlXKWtnwwgmjnAKOrbKqLBhYKOu6MEZarkGXVgghGXIOWGvGpTZsXhgBgGJFbn5zx-A_pvnuat9Fh31vB_RTrLhSZWlAA5_R6z90qvfYVOP8lQ2H6r8L8Q06ZmAG</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Rincón H, J A</creator><creator>de la Pava, C</creator><creator>Rozo, D J</creator><creator>Restrepo, A</creator><creator>Manrique, J E</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Efficacy of cement restrictors: Experimental study and development of a classification</title><author>Rincón H, J A ; de la Pava, C ; Rozo, D J ; Restrepo, A ; Manrique, J E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p126t-f5d24c396c602ef6a67410a07bb4995a28087a33351e220eb8125891a289300e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; spa</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rincón H, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Pava, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozo, D J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Restrepo, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manrique, J E</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rincón H, J A</au><au>de la Pava, C</au><au>Rozo, D J</au><au>Restrepo, A</au><au>Manrique, J E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of cement restrictors: Experimental study and development of a classification</atitle><jtitle>Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol</addtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>208</spage><epage>214</epage><pages>208-214</pages><eissn>1988-8856</eissn><abstract>Cement restrictors (CRs) are devices that allow occlusion of the femoral canal in order to obtain greater interdigitation of the cement between the bone and a better pressurization, which generates an increase in the survival of cemented stems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the different CRs used and propose a classification of this device. An experimental study was carried out, where 7 CR references of different designs and manufacturers were taken. Later, tests were carried out on 9 chlorinated polyvinyl chloride tubes for each reference, to achieve a total of 63 tests. In our study, 34.9% of the CRs in ultra high molecular weight polyethylene failed, presenting migration and allowing cement to leak while none of the gelatin RC failed. The RC with an umbrella design proved to be the less effective, presented a higher incidence of migration and cement leakage, while the gelatin CRs were the best performers. Based on the results of this study, an analysis of the CR design was carried out and a classification was proposed that divides these devices into 2 types.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>35590438</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.recot.2021.09.003</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1988-8856
ispartof Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología, 2022-05, Vol.66 (3), p.208-214
issn 1988-8856
language eng ; spa
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2667790802
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
title Efficacy of cement restrictors: Experimental study and development of a classification
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T19%3A16%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20cement%20restrictors:%20Experimental%20study%20and%20development%20of%20a%20classification&rft.jtitle=Revista%20espa%C3%B1ola%20de%20cirug%C3%ADa%20ortop%C3%A9dica%20y%20traumatolog%C3%ADa&rft.au=Rinc%C3%B3n%20H,%20J%20A&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=208&rft.epage=214&rft.pages=208-214&rft.eissn=1988-8856&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.recot.2021.09.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2667790802%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2667790802&rft_id=info:pmid/35590438&rfr_iscdi=true