No‐take marine protected areas enhance the benefits of kelp‐forest restoration for fish but not fisheries

Kelp habitat restoration is gaining traction as a management action to support recovery in areas affected by severe disturbances, thereby ensuring the sustainability of ecosystem services. Knowing when and where to restore is a major question. Using a single‐species population model, we consider how restoring inside marine protected areas (MPAs) might benefit coastal fish populations and fisheries. We found that MPAs can greatly enhance the population benefits of restoration but at a small cost to fishery yields. Generally, restoring inside MPAs had a better overall gains‐loss outcome, especially if the system is under high fishing pressure or severe habitat loss. However, restoring outside became preferable when predatory fish indirectly benefit kelp habitats. In either case, successful restoration actions may be difficult to detect in time‐series data due to complex transient dynamics. We provide context for setting management goals and social expectations for the ecosystem service implications of restoration in MPAs. Kelp habitat restoration is increasingly popular as a response to habitat loss and degradation. Using a fish population model that includes the effect of kelp habitat loss as an external driver of recruit survival, we show that marine protected areas can greatly enhance the benefits of kelp habitat restoration for fish populations. This, however, is likely to come at a small cost to fishery yields.