Identification of tumor biomarkers for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced breast cancer
Background Therapeutic response predictors like age, nodal status, and tumor grade and markers, like ER/PR, HER2, and Ki67, are not reliable in predicting the response to a specific form of chemotherapy. The current study aims to identify and validate reliable markers that can predict pathological c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Breast cancer research and treatment 2022-07, Vol.194 (2), p.207-220 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 220 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 207 |
container_title | Breast cancer research and treatment |
container_volume | 194 |
creator | Gopinath, Prarthana Veluswami, Sridevi Gopisetty, Gopal Sundersingh, Shirley Rajaraman, Swaminathan Thangarajan, Rajkumar |
description | Background
Therapeutic response predictors like age, nodal status, and tumor grade and markers, like ER/PR, HER2, and Ki67, are not reliable in predicting the response to a specific form of chemotherapy. The current study aims to identify and validate reliable markers that can predict pathological complete response (pCR) in fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC)-based neoadjuvant therapy with (NACT/RT) and without concurrent radiation (NACT).
Materials and methods
Tandem mass tag (TMT) quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) was used to identify differentially expressed proteins from core needle breast biopsy between pCR (
n
= 4) and no-pCR (
n
= 4). Immunoblotting of shortlisted proteins with the tissue lysates confirmed the differential expression of the markers. Further, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of treatment-naive core needle biopsies. In the NACT, 29 pCR and 130 no-pCR and in NACT/RT, 32 pCR and 71 no-pCR were used.
Results
733 and 807 proteins were identified in NACT and NACT/RT groups, respectively. Ten proteins were shortlisted for validation as potential pCR-predictive markers. THBS1, TNC, and DCN were significantly overexpressed in no-pCR in both the groups. In NACT, CPA3 was significantly upregulated in the no-pCR. In NACT/RT, HnRNPAB was significantly upregulated and HMGB1 significantly downregulated in the no-pCR. HMGB1 was the only marker to show prognostic significance.
Conclusion
Quantitative proteomics followed by IHC identified and validated potential biomarkers for predicting patient response to therapy. These markers can be used, following larger-scale validation, in combination with routine histological analysis providing vital indications of treatment response. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10549-022-06617-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2667787805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A708580622</galeid><sourcerecordid>A708580622</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-8020714f9615fce40bcdc19adb85e6f6dad3003ac96b2139ad61623959a00b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksFu1DAQhiMEokvhBTggS0iIS8rYie3kWFUUKlXi0rvl2OPdLE4cbAepNx4db7dQihDywRrP949mPH9VvaZwRgHkh0SBt30NjNUgBJU1PKk2lMumlozKp9UGqJC16ECcVC9S2gNAL6F_Xp00nPeya2FT_biyOOfRjUbnMcwkOJLXKUQyjGHS8SvGRFwJF513wYdt4TwxYVo8ZiQR0xLmhCQHMmPQdr9-13MmOaLOUylMxpn4UDT-lmhbcgYtGUo2ZWIOUXxZPXPaJ3x1f59WN5cfby4-19dfPl1dnF_XpmVtrjtgIGnrekG5M9jCYKyhvbZDx1E4YbVtABptejEw2pSEoII1Pe81wCCa0-r9sewSw7cVU1bTmAx6r0vfa1JMCCk72QEv6Nu_0H1Y41yaK1RHRcNFLx-orfaoxtmFHLU5FFXnEjpefp2xQp39gyrH4jSaMKMby_sjwbs_BDvUPu9S8OthOekxyI6giSGliE4tcSwbu1UU1MEe6mgPVeyh7uyhoIje3I-2DhPa35JffihAcwRSSc1bjA-z_6fsTx70xSI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2681635697</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identification of tumor biomarkers for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced breast cancer</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Gopinath, Prarthana ; Veluswami, Sridevi ; Gopisetty, Gopal ; Sundersingh, Shirley ; Rajaraman, Swaminathan ; Thangarajan, Rajkumar</creator><creatorcontrib>Gopinath, Prarthana ; Veluswami, Sridevi ; Gopisetty, Gopal ; Sundersingh, Shirley ; Rajaraman, Swaminathan ; Thangarajan, Rajkumar</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Therapeutic response predictors like age, nodal status, and tumor grade and markers, like ER/PR, HER2, and Ki67, are not reliable in predicting the response to a specific form of chemotherapy. The current study aims to identify and validate reliable markers that can predict pathological complete response (pCR) in fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC)-based neoadjuvant therapy with (NACT/RT) and without concurrent radiation (NACT).
Materials and methods
Tandem mass tag (TMT) quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) was used to identify differentially expressed proteins from core needle breast biopsy between pCR (
n
= 4) and no-pCR (
n
= 4). Immunoblotting of shortlisted proteins with the tissue lysates confirmed the differential expression of the markers. Further, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of treatment-naive core needle biopsies. In the NACT, 29 pCR and 130 no-pCR and in NACT/RT, 32 pCR and 71 no-pCR were used.
Results
733 and 807 proteins were identified in NACT and NACT/RT groups, respectively. Ten proteins were shortlisted for validation as potential pCR-predictive markers. THBS1, TNC, and DCN were significantly overexpressed in no-pCR in both the groups. In NACT, CPA3 was significantly upregulated in the no-pCR. In NACT/RT, HnRNPAB was significantly upregulated and HMGB1 significantly downregulated in the no-pCR. HMGB1 was the only marker to show prognostic significance.
Conclusion
Quantitative proteomics followed by IHC identified and validated potential biomarkers for predicting patient response to therapy. These markers can be used, following larger-scale validation, in combination with routine histological analysis providing vital indications of treatment response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7217</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06617-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35597840</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>5-Fluorouracil ; Adjuvant treatment ; Analysis ; Biological markers ; Biomarkers ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Cancer ; Cancer research ; Cancer therapies ; Chemotherapy ; Chromosomal proteins ; Cyclophosphamide ; Epirubicin ; ErbB-2 protein ; Formaldehyde ; HMGB1 protein ; Immunoblotting ; Immunohistochemistry ; Liquid chromatography ; Lysates ; Mass spectrometry ; Mass spectroscopy ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Medicine, Experimental ; Oncology ; Paraffin ; Pertuzumab ; Preclinical Study ; Proteins ; Proteomics ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Breast cancer research and treatment, 2022-07, Vol.194 (2), p.207-220</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-8020714f9615fce40bcdc19adb85e6f6dad3003ac96b2139ad61623959a00b63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7869-4343</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10549-022-06617-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10549-022-06617-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35597840$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gopinath, Prarthana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veluswami, Sridevi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gopisetty, Gopal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundersingh, Shirley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajaraman, Swaminathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thangarajan, Rajkumar</creatorcontrib><title>Identification of tumor biomarkers for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced breast cancer</title><title>Breast cancer research and treatment</title><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><description>Background
Therapeutic response predictors like age, nodal status, and tumor grade and markers, like ER/PR, HER2, and Ki67, are not reliable in predicting the response to a specific form of chemotherapy. The current study aims to identify and validate reliable markers that can predict pathological complete response (pCR) in fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC)-based neoadjuvant therapy with (NACT/RT) and without concurrent radiation (NACT).
Materials and methods
Tandem mass tag (TMT) quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) was used to identify differentially expressed proteins from core needle breast biopsy between pCR (
n
= 4) and no-pCR (
n
= 4). Immunoblotting of shortlisted proteins with the tissue lysates confirmed the differential expression of the markers. Further, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of treatment-naive core needle biopsies. In the NACT, 29 pCR and 130 no-pCR and in NACT/RT, 32 pCR and 71 no-pCR were used.
Results
733 and 807 proteins were identified in NACT and NACT/RT groups, respectively. Ten proteins were shortlisted for validation as potential pCR-predictive markers. THBS1, TNC, and DCN were significantly overexpressed in no-pCR in both the groups. In NACT, CPA3 was significantly upregulated in the no-pCR. In NACT/RT, HnRNPAB was significantly upregulated and HMGB1 significantly downregulated in the no-pCR. HMGB1 was the only marker to show prognostic significance.
Conclusion
Quantitative proteomics followed by IHC identified and validated potential biomarkers for predicting patient response to therapy. These markers can be used, following larger-scale validation, in combination with routine histological analysis providing vital indications of treatment response.</description><subject>5-Fluorouracil</subject><subject>Adjuvant treatment</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biological markers</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Chromosomal proteins</subject><subject>Cyclophosphamide</subject><subject>Epirubicin</subject><subject>ErbB-2 protein</subject><subject>Formaldehyde</subject><subject>HMGB1 protein</subject><subject>Immunoblotting</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Lysates</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Mass spectroscopy</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Paraffin</subject><subject>Pertuzumab</subject><subject>Preclinical Study</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Proteomics</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0167-6806</issn><issn>1573-7217</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksFu1DAQhiMEokvhBTggS0iIS8rYie3kWFUUKlXi0rvl2OPdLE4cbAepNx4db7dQihDywRrP949mPH9VvaZwRgHkh0SBt30NjNUgBJU1PKk2lMumlozKp9UGqJC16ECcVC9S2gNAL6F_Xp00nPeya2FT_biyOOfRjUbnMcwkOJLXKUQyjGHS8SvGRFwJF513wYdt4TwxYVo8ZiQR0xLmhCQHMmPQdr9-13MmOaLOUylMxpn4UDT-lmhbcgYtGUo2ZWIOUXxZPXPaJ3x1f59WN5cfby4-19dfPl1dnF_XpmVtrjtgIGnrekG5M9jCYKyhvbZDx1E4YbVtABptejEw2pSEoII1Pe81wCCa0-r9sewSw7cVU1bTmAx6r0vfa1JMCCk72QEv6Nu_0H1Y41yaK1RHRcNFLx-orfaoxtmFHLU5FFXnEjpefp2xQp39gyrH4jSaMKMby_sjwbs_BDvUPu9S8OthOekxyI6giSGliE4tcSwbu1UU1MEe6mgPVeyh7uyhoIje3I-2DhPa35JffihAcwRSSc1bjA-z_6fsTx70xSI</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Gopinath, Prarthana</creator><creator>Veluswami, Sridevi</creator><creator>Gopisetty, Gopal</creator><creator>Sundersingh, Shirley</creator><creator>Rajaraman, Swaminathan</creator><creator>Thangarajan, Rajkumar</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7869-4343</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Identification of tumor biomarkers for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced breast cancer</title><author>Gopinath, Prarthana ; Veluswami, Sridevi ; Gopisetty, Gopal ; Sundersingh, Shirley ; Rajaraman, Swaminathan ; Thangarajan, Rajkumar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-8020714f9615fce40bcdc19adb85e6f6dad3003ac96b2139ad61623959a00b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>5-Fluorouracil</topic><topic>Adjuvant treatment</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biological markers</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Chromosomal proteins</topic><topic>Cyclophosphamide</topic><topic>Epirubicin</topic><topic>ErbB-2 protein</topic><topic>Formaldehyde</topic><topic>HMGB1 protein</topic><topic>Immunoblotting</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Lysates</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Mass spectroscopy</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Paraffin</topic><topic>Pertuzumab</topic><topic>Preclinical Study</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Proteomics</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gopinath, Prarthana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veluswami, Sridevi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gopisetty, Gopal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundersingh, Shirley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajaraman, Swaminathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thangarajan, Rajkumar</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gopinath, Prarthana</au><au>Veluswami, Sridevi</au><au>Gopisetty, Gopal</au><au>Sundersingh, Shirley</au><au>Rajaraman, Swaminathan</au><au>Thangarajan, Rajkumar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identification of tumor biomarkers for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle><stitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</stitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>194</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>220</epage><pages>207-220</pages><issn>0167-6806</issn><eissn>1573-7217</eissn><abstract>Background
Therapeutic response predictors like age, nodal status, and tumor grade and markers, like ER/PR, HER2, and Ki67, are not reliable in predicting the response to a specific form of chemotherapy. The current study aims to identify and validate reliable markers that can predict pathological complete response (pCR) in fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC)-based neoadjuvant therapy with (NACT/RT) and without concurrent radiation (NACT).
Materials and methods
Tandem mass tag (TMT) quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) was used to identify differentially expressed proteins from core needle breast biopsy between pCR (
n
= 4) and no-pCR (
n
= 4). Immunoblotting of shortlisted proteins with the tissue lysates confirmed the differential expression of the markers. Further, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of treatment-naive core needle biopsies. In the NACT, 29 pCR and 130 no-pCR and in NACT/RT, 32 pCR and 71 no-pCR were used.
Results
733 and 807 proteins were identified in NACT and NACT/RT groups, respectively. Ten proteins were shortlisted for validation as potential pCR-predictive markers. THBS1, TNC, and DCN were significantly overexpressed in no-pCR in both the groups. In NACT, CPA3 was significantly upregulated in the no-pCR. In NACT/RT, HnRNPAB was significantly upregulated and HMGB1 significantly downregulated in the no-pCR. HMGB1 was the only marker to show prognostic significance.
Conclusion
Quantitative proteomics followed by IHC identified and validated potential biomarkers for predicting patient response to therapy. These markers can be used, following larger-scale validation, in combination with routine histological analysis providing vital indications of treatment response.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>35597840</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10549-022-06617-0</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7869-4343</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-6806 |
ispartof | Breast cancer research and treatment, 2022-07, Vol.194 (2), p.207-220 |
issn | 0167-6806 1573-7217 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2667787805 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | 5-Fluorouracil Adjuvant treatment Analysis Biological markers Biomarkers Biopsy Breast cancer Cancer Cancer research Cancer therapies Chemotherapy Chromosomal proteins Cyclophosphamide Epirubicin ErbB-2 protein Formaldehyde HMGB1 protein Immunoblotting Immunohistochemistry Liquid chromatography Lysates Mass spectrometry Mass spectroscopy Medical research Medicine Medicine & Public Health Medicine, Experimental Oncology Paraffin Pertuzumab Preclinical Study Proteins Proteomics Tumors |
title | Identification of tumor biomarkers for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced breast cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T05%3A34%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identification%20of%20tumor%20biomarkers%20for%20pathological%20complete%20response%20to%20neoadjuvant%20treatment%20in%20locally%20advanced%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Breast%20cancer%20research%20and%20treatment&rft.au=Gopinath,%20Prarthana&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=194&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=220&rft.pages=207-220&rft.issn=0167-6806&rft.eissn=1573-7217&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10549-022-06617-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA708580622%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2681635697&rft_id=info:pmid/35597840&rft_galeid=A708580622&rfr_iscdi=true |