Should we stop prescribing IM progesterone to women with a history of preterm labor?
YES, we should stop the routine prescribing of IM progesterone to prevent preterm delivery. A 2003 randomized controlled trial (RCT) found that weekly intramuscular (IM) 17 hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) for women with a singleton pregnancy and a history of spontaneous preterm delivery decreased the p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of Family Practice 2022-01, Vol.71 (1), p.E15-E17 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | E17 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | E15 |
container_title | The Journal of Family Practice |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Dresang, Lee Vellardita, Lia |
description | YES, we should stop the routine prescribing of IM progesterone to prevent preterm delivery. A 2003 randomized controlled trial (RCT) found that weekly intramuscular (IM) 17 hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) for women with a singleton pregnancy and a history of spontaneous preterm delivery decreased the preterm delivery rate by 34% (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, single RCT). However, the follow-up 2020 PROLONG RCT did not find that 17-OHP prevents preterm birth or improves neonatal outcomes. This held true for subgroup analyses (SOR: B, single larger RCT). (Notably, though, the PROLONG study had very few Black participants when compared with the 2003 study.)The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recommended withdrawing 17-OHP from the market. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) have released statements supporting shared decision-making with women regarding the prescribing of 17-OHP for preterm delivery prevention (SOR: C, expert opinion). |
doi_str_mv | 10.12788/jfp.0334 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2666908540</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2666908540</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1954-b6df1d2277ac448a7879315f143031f6028c492d9b6ecca88b1a05a2a613c14e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMgbk4v_AOSS73ozHfSK5Hhx2DihfO6pGm6dbRNTVrK_r2Zm169vPCcw-EB4AajOSZSqYdd2c0RpewMTDGnNJEkZRNwGcIOIUwlZhdgQjlXknE5BevPrRvqAo4Wht51sPM2GF_lVbuBy_f4uo0NvfWutbB3cHSNbeFY9Vuo4baKEb-HrjzEItTAWufOP16B81LXwV6f7gx8vTyvF2_J6uN1uXhaJQannCW5KEpcECKlNowpLZVMKeYlZhRRXApElGEpKdJcWGO0UjnWiGuiBaYGM0tn4O7YG2d-D3Fn1lTB2LrWrXVDyIgQIkWKMxTR-yNqvAvB2zLrfNVov88wyn7FZVFcdhAX2dtT7ZA3tvgn_6zRH-77anc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2666908540</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Should we stop prescribing IM progesterone to women with a history of preterm labor?</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dresang, Lee ; Vellardita, Lia</creator><creatorcontrib>Dresang, Lee ; Vellardita, Lia</creatorcontrib><description>YES, we should stop the routine prescribing of IM progesterone to prevent preterm delivery. A 2003 randomized controlled trial (RCT) found that weekly intramuscular (IM) 17 hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) for women with a singleton pregnancy and a history of spontaneous preterm delivery decreased the preterm delivery rate by 34% (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, single RCT). However, the follow-up 2020 PROLONG RCT did not find that 17-OHP prevents preterm birth or improves neonatal outcomes. This held true for subgroup analyses (SOR: B, single larger RCT). (Notably, though, the PROLONG study had very few Black participants when compared with the 2003 study.)The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recommended withdrawing 17-OHP from the market. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) have released statements supporting shared decision-making with women regarding the prescribing of 17-OHP for preterm delivery prevention (SOR: C, expert opinion).</description><identifier>EISSN: 1533-7294</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12788/jfp.0334</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35587457</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>The Journal of Family Practice, 2022-01, Vol.71 (1), p.E15-E17</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35587457$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dresang, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vellardita, Lia</creatorcontrib><title>Should we stop prescribing IM progesterone to women with a history of preterm labor?</title><title>The Journal of Family Practice</title><addtitle>J Fam Pract</addtitle><description>YES, we should stop the routine prescribing of IM progesterone to prevent preterm delivery. A 2003 randomized controlled trial (RCT) found that weekly intramuscular (IM) 17 hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) for women with a singleton pregnancy and a history of spontaneous preterm delivery decreased the preterm delivery rate by 34% (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, single RCT). However, the follow-up 2020 PROLONG RCT did not find that 17-OHP prevents preterm birth or improves neonatal outcomes. This held true for subgroup analyses (SOR: B, single larger RCT). (Notably, though, the PROLONG study had very few Black participants when compared with the 2003 study.)The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recommended withdrawing 17-OHP from the market. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) have released statements supporting shared decision-making with women regarding the prescribing of 17-OHP for preterm delivery prevention (SOR: C, expert opinion).</description><issn>1533-7294</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMgbk4v_AOSS73ozHfSK5Hhx2DihfO6pGm6dbRNTVrK_r2Zm169vPCcw-EB4AajOSZSqYdd2c0RpewMTDGnNJEkZRNwGcIOIUwlZhdgQjlXknE5BevPrRvqAo4Wht51sPM2GF_lVbuBy_f4uo0NvfWutbB3cHSNbeFY9Vuo4baKEb-HrjzEItTAWufOP16B81LXwV6f7gx8vTyvF2_J6uN1uXhaJQannCW5KEpcECKlNowpLZVMKeYlZhRRXApElGEpKdJcWGO0UjnWiGuiBaYGM0tn4O7YG2d-D3Fn1lTB2LrWrXVDyIgQIkWKMxTR-yNqvAvB2zLrfNVov88wyn7FZVFcdhAX2dtT7ZA3tvgn_6zRH-77anc</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Dresang, Lee</creator><creator>Vellardita, Lia</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Should we stop prescribing IM progesterone to women with a history of preterm labor?</title><author>Dresang, Lee ; Vellardita, Lia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1954-b6df1d2277ac448a7879315f143031f6028c492d9b6ecca88b1a05a2a613c14e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dresang, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vellardita, Lia</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of Family Practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dresang, Lee</au><au>Vellardita, Lia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Should we stop prescribing IM progesterone to women with a history of preterm labor?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of Family Practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Fam Pract</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>E15</spage><epage>E17</epage><pages>E15-E17</pages><eissn>1533-7294</eissn><abstract>YES, we should stop the routine prescribing of IM progesterone to prevent preterm delivery. A 2003 randomized controlled trial (RCT) found that weekly intramuscular (IM) 17 hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) for women with a singleton pregnancy and a history of spontaneous preterm delivery decreased the preterm delivery rate by 34% (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, single RCT). However, the follow-up 2020 PROLONG RCT did not find that 17-OHP prevents preterm birth or improves neonatal outcomes. This held true for subgroup analyses (SOR: B, single larger RCT). (Notably, though, the PROLONG study had very few Black participants when compared with the 2003 study.)The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recommended withdrawing 17-OHP from the market. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) have released statements supporting shared decision-making with women regarding the prescribing of 17-OHP for preterm delivery prevention (SOR: C, expert opinion).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>35587457</pmid><doi>10.12788/jfp.0334</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1533-7294 |
ispartof | The Journal of Family Practice, 2022-01, Vol.71 (1), p.E15-E17 |
issn | 1533-7294 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2666908540 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Should we stop prescribing IM progesterone to women with a history of preterm labor? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T09%3A30%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Should%20we%20stop%20prescribing%20IM%20progesterone%20to%20women%20with%20a%20history%20of%20preterm%20labor?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20Family%20Practice&rft.au=Dresang,%20Lee&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=E15&rft.epage=E17&rft.pages=E15-E17&rft.eissn=1533-7294&rft_id=info:doi/10.12788/jfp.0334&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2666908540%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2666908540&rft_id=info:pmid/35587457&rfr_iscdi=true |