Calibration of Meteosat water vapor channel observations with independent satellite observations
The objective of this study is to identify potential problems of and increase confidence in the operational calibration of the water vapor channel of the Meteosat Visible and Infrared Radiation Imager (MVIRI). First, the operational vicarious calibration method of the MVIRI water vapor channel is an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Geophysical Research 2001-03, Vol.106 (D6), p.5199-5209 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5209 |
---|---|
container_issue | D6 |
container_start_page | 5199 |
container_title | Journal of Geophysical Research |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Tjemkes, Stephen A. König, Marianne Lutz, Hans‐Joachim Berg, Leo Schmetz, Johannes |
description | The objective of this study is to identify potential problems of and increase confidence in the operational calibration of the water vapor channel of the Meteosat Visible and Infrared Radiation Imager (MVIRI). First, the operational vicarious calibration method of the MVIRI water vapor channel is analyzed. This is done through a comparison of the operational calibration coefficient with a calibration coefficient derived from collocated satellite observations taken by water‐vapor‐sensitive channel 12 of the High Resolution Infrared Sounder (HIRS) on NOAA 14. The analysis suggests a relatively large difference between the two calibration coefficients, the operational calibration coefficient being 10–15% larger than the one from the intersatellite calibration. Second, no such difference is found to exist between the MVIRI operational calibration coefficient and an intersatellite calibration coefficient derived from collocated GOES 8 water‐vapor‐sensitive channel 3 observations. Third, it is shown that the operational calibration coefficient for the MVIRI water vapor channel on Meteosat 7 is consistent with its blackbody calibration. At the present stage of the research no definite conclusions can be made. The results support the previously documented accuracy of 5% for the operational calibration coefficient of the MVIRI water vapor channel. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2000JD900738 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26661355</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>26661355</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3765-175d94b7d27e471ae544e76feb42cd7582a32e992d2ff580fde28d7c2fcb381b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UtPwzAMB_AIgcQE3PgAOXGikLhJkx7RgPEYDyEex5C2rgiUdiRhY9-ewhCCC1zsy-9vWTYhm5ztcAb5LjDGTvZzxlSql8gAuMwSAAbLZMC40AkDUKtkI4THHjIhM8H4gNwPbeMKb6PrWtrV9AwjdsFGOrMRPZ3aSedp-WDbFhvaFQH99NMGOnPxgbq2wgn2pY20T2HTuIi_3DpZqW0TcOOrr5Gbw4Pr4VEyvhgdD_fGSZmqTCZcySoXhapAoVDcohQCVVZjIaCslNRgU8A8hwrqWmpWVwi6UiXUZZFqXqRrZGsxd-K7l1cM0Ty7UPYL2Ra712AgyzKeSvkv5FrkSmjWw-0FLH0XgsfaTLx7tn5uODMfJzc_T95zWPCZa3D-pzUno6t93X-oDyWLkAsR375D1j-ZTKVKmrvzkbm9vTu_FNen5jB9BzW2kw0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18497480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Calibration of Meteosat water vapor channel observations with independent satellite observations</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tjemkes, Stephen A. ; König, Marianne ; Lutz, Hans‐Joachim ; Berg, Leo ; Schmetz, Johannes</creator><creatorcontrib>Tjemkes, Stephen A. ; König, Marianne ; Lutz, Hans‐Joachim ; Berg, Leo ; Schmetz, Johannes</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study is to identify potential problems of and increase confidence in the operational calibration of the water vapor channel of the Meteosat Visible and Infrared Radiation Imager (MVIRI). First, the operational vicarious calibration method of the MVIRI water vapor channel is analyzed. This is done through a comparison of the operational calibration coefficient with a calibration coefficient derived from collocated satellite observations taken by water‐vapor‐sensitive channel 12 of the High Resolution Infrared Sounder (HIRS) on NOAA 14. The analysis suggests a relatively large difference between the two calibration coefficients, the operational calibration coefficient being 10–15% larger than the one from the intersatellite calibration. Second, no such difference is found to exist between the MVIRI operational calibration coefficient and an intersatellite calibration coefficient derived from collocated GOES 8 water‐vapor‐sensitive channel 3 observations. Third, it is shown that the operational calibration coefficient for the MVIRI water vapor channel on Meteosat 7 is consistent with its blackbody calibration. At the present stage of the research no definite conclusions can be made. The results support the previously documented accuracy of 5% for the operational calibration coefficient of the MVIRI water vapor channel.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2000JD900738</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research, 2001-03, Vol.106 (D6), p.5199-5209</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3765-175d94b7d27e471ae544e76feb42cd7582a32e992d2ff580fde28d7c2fcb381b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3765-175d94b7d27e471ae544e76feb42cd7582a32e992d2ff580fde28d7c2fcb381b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2000JD900738$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2000JD900738$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46443,46808,46867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tjemkes, Stephen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>König, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, Hans‐Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Leo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmetz, Johannes</creatorcontrib><title>Calibration of Meteosat water vapor channel observations with independent satellite observations</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>The objective of this study is to identify potential problems of and increase confidence in the operational calibration of the water vapor channel of the Meteosat Visible and Infrared Radiation Imager (MVIRI). First, the operational vicarious calibration method of the MVIRI water vapor channel is analyzed. This is done through a comparison of the operational calibration coefficient with a calibration coefficient derived from collocated satellite observations taken by water‐vapor‐sensitive channel 12 of the High Resolution Infrared Sounder (HIRS) on NOAA 14. The analysis suggests a relatively large difference between the two calibration coefficients, the operational calibration coefficient being 10–15% larger than the one from the intersatellite calibration. Second, no such difference is found to exist between the MVIRI operational calibration coefficient and an intersatellite calibration coefficient derived from collocated GOES 8 water‐vapor‐sensitive channel 3 observations. Third, it is shown that the operational calibration coefficient for the MVIRI water vapor channel on Meteosat 7 is consistent with its blackbody calibration. At the present stage of the research no definite conclusions can be made. The results support the previously documented accuracy of 5% for the operational calibration coefficient of the MVIRI water vapor channel.</description><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0UtPwzAMB_AIgcQE3PgAOXGikLhJkx7RgPEYDyEex5C2rgiUdiRhY9-ewhCCC1zsy-9vWTYhm5ztcAb5LjDGTvZzxlSql8gAuMwSAAbLZMC40AkDUKtkI4THHjIhM8H4gNwPbeMKb6PrWtrV9AwjdsFGOrMRPZ3aSedp-WDbFhvaFQH99NMGOnPxgbq2wgn2pY20T2HTuIi_3DpZqW0TcOOrr5Gbw4Pr4VEyvhgdD_fGSZmqTCZcySoXhapAoVDcohQCVVZjIaCslNRgU8A8hwrqWmpWVwi6UiXUZZFqXqRrZGsxd-K7l1cM0Ty7UPYL2Ra712AgyzKeSvkv5FrkSmjWw-0FLH0XgsfaTLx7tn5uODMfJzc_T95zWPCZa3D-pzUno6t93X-oDyWLkAsR375D1j-ZTKVKmrvzkbm9vTu_FNen5jB9BzW2kw0</recordid><startdate>20010327</startdate><enddate>20010327</enddate><creator>Tjemkes, Stephen A.</creator><creator>König, Marianne</creator><creator>Lutz, Hans‐Joachim</creator><creator>Berg, Leo</creator><creator>Schmetz, Johannes</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010327</creationdate><title>Calibration of Meteosat water vapor channel observations with independent satellite observations</title><author>Tjemkes, Stephen A. ; König, Marianne ; Lutz, Hans‐Joachim ; Berg, Leo ; Schmetz, Johannes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3765-175d94b7d27e471ae544e76feb42cd7582a32e992d2ff580fde28d7c2fcb381b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tjemkes, Stephen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>König, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, Hans‐Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Leo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmetz, Johannes</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tjemkes, Stephen A.</au><au>König, Marianne</au><au>Lutz, Hans‐Joachim</au><au>Berg, Leo</au><au>Schmetz, Johannes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Calibration of Meteosat water vapor channel observations with independent satellite observations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2001-03-27</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>D6</issue><spage>5199</spage><epage>5209</epage><pages>5199-5209</pages><issn>0148-0227</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study is to identify potential problems of and increase confidence in the operational calibration of the water vapor channel of the Meteosat Visible and Infrared Radiation Imager (MVIRI). First, the operational vicarious calibration method of the MVIRI water vapor channel is analyzed. This is done through a comparison of the operational calibration coefficient with a calibration coefficient derived from collocated satellite observations taken by water‐vapor‐sensitive channel 12 of the High Resolution Infrared Sounder (HIRS) on NOAA 14. The analysis suggests a relatively large difference between the two calibration coefficients, the operational calibration coefficient being 10–15% larger than the one from the intersatellite calibration. Second, no such difference is found to exist between the MVIRI operational calibration coefficient and an intersatellite calibration coefficient derived from collocated GOES 8 water‐vapor‐sensitive channel 3 observations. Third, it is shown that the operational calibration coefficient for the MVIRI water vapor channel on Meteosat 7 is consistent with its blackbody calibration. At the present stage of the research no definite conclusions can be made. The results support the previously documented accuracy of 5% for the operational calibration coefficient of the MVIRI water vapor channel.</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2000JD900738</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-0227 |
ispartof | Journal of Geophysical Research, 2001-03, Vol.106 (D6), p.5199-5209 |
issn | 0148-0227 2156-2202 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26661355 |
source | Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Calibration of Meteosat water vapor channel observations with independent satellite observations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T21%3A18%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Calibration%20of%20Meteosat%20water%20vapor%20channel%20observations%20with%20independent%20satellite%20observations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research&rft.au=Tjemkes,%20Stephen%20A.&rft.date=2001-03-27&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=D6&rft.spage=5199&rft.epage=5209&rft.pages=5199-5209&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2000JD900738&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E26661355%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18497480&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |