Colloidal iron oxide slime coatings and galena particle flotation

Microflotation was used to investigate the influence of colloidal iron oxide “slimes” on galena (PbS) particle flotation. Complementary particle adsorption (heteroaggregation) studies were undertaken to investigate the formation of iron oxide slime coatings and to develop methods for their removal....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Minerals engineering 2001-05, Vol.14 (5), p.487-497
Hauptverfasser: Bandini, P., Prestidge, C.A., Ralston, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 497
container_issue 5
container_start_page 487
container_title Minerals engineering
container_volume 14
creator Bandini, P.
Prestidge, C.A.
Ralston, J.
description Microflotation was used to investigate the influence of colloidal iron oxide “slimes” on galena (PbS) particle flotation. Complementary particle adsorption (heteroaggregation) studies were undertaken to investigate the formation of iron oxide slime coatings and to develop methods for their removal. Trace quantities of hematite (Fe 2O 3) colloids have a significant depressant action on both the collector-induced and collectorless flotation of galena particles. For example, slime particle surface coverage as low as 10% of an equivalent close-packed particle monolayer decreased the flotation rate constant of galena by an order of magnitude. In the pH range 4 to 7, high affinity Fe 2O 3 particle adsorption was observed on PbS and the surface coverage approached that of an equivalent particle monolayer. In contrast, in mildly alkaline solutions, particle adsorption isotherms were of low affinity, with plateau surface coverages significantly less than an equivalent particle monolayer. These observations are discussed in terms of the surface chemistry of galena and slime coating mechanisms. The use of shear, sonication, pH control and chemical reagent addition to quantitatively remove iron oxide slime coatings is also reported. A combination of physical and chemical methods is most effective at iron oxide particle removal and synergistic effects have been observed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0892-6875(01)00036-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26651236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S089268750100036X</els_id><sourcerecordid>26651236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-c672edf40a5848a56f4af5bf7969e9fd24ebe585945293f1522472d8dc51fb6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QVgQRA-rSTbJJieR4hcUPKjQW0iTSYmkm5qsov_ebSu9eprDPO-8zIPQKcFXBBNx_YKlorWQLb_A5BJj3Ih6todGRLa0VoyxfTTaIYfoqJT3AeKtVCN0O0kxpuBMrEJOXZW-g4OqxLCEyibTh25RKtO5amEidKZamdwHG6HyMfXDOnXH6MCbWODkb47R2_3d6-Sxnj4_PE1up7VthOhrK1oKzjNsuGTScOGZ8XzuWyUUKO8ogzlwyRXjVDWecEpZS510lhM_F7YZo_Pt3VVOH59Qer0MxUKMpoP0WTQVghPaiAHkW9DmVEoGr1c5LE3-0QTrtTC9EabXNjQmeiNMz4bc2V-BKdZEn01nQ9mFlRRMkoG62VIw_PoVIOtiA3QWXMhge-1S-KfnFyIVf3M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>26651236</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Colloidal iron oxide slime coatings and galena particle flotation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Bandini, P. ; Prestidge, C.A. ; Ralston, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bandini, P. ; Prestidge, C.A. ; Ralston, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Microflotation was used to investigate the influence of colloidal iron oxide “slimes” on galena (PbS) particle flotation. Complementary particle adsorption (heteroaggregation) studies were undertaken to investigate the formation of iron oxide slime coatings and to develop methods for their removal. Trace quantities of hematite (Fe 2O 3) colloids have a significant depressant action on both the collector-induced and collectorless flotation of galena particles. For example, slime particle surface coverage as low as 10% of an equivalent close-packed particle monolayer decreased the flotation rate constant of galena by an order of magnitude. In the pH range 4 to 7, high affinity Fe 2O 3 particle adsorption was observed on PbS and the surface coverage approached that of an equivalent particle monolayer. In contrast, in mildly alkaline solutions, particle adsorption isotherms were of low affinity, with plateau surface coverages significantly less than an equivalent particle monolayer. These observations are discussed in terms of the surface chemistry of galena and slime coating mechanisms. The use of shear, sonication, pH control and chemical reagent addition to quantitatively remove iron oxide slime coatings is also reported. A combination of physical and chemical methods is most effective at iron oxide particle removal and synergistic effects have been observed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-6875</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9444</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0892-6875(01)00036-X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MENGEB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Exact sciences and technology ; fine particle processing ; flotation kinetics ; Hydrometallurgy ; Metals. Metallurgy ; Production of metals ; Production of non ferrous metals. Process materials ; shear forces ; Sulphide ores ; surface modification</subject><ispartof>Minerals engineering, 2001-05, Vol.14 (5), p.487-497</ispartof><rights>2001</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-c672edf40a5848a56f4af5bf7969e9fd24ebe585945293f1522472d8dc51fb6c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-c672edf40a5848a56f4af5bf7969e9fd24ebe585945293f1522472d8dc51fb6c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0892-6875(01)00036-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=986481$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bandini, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prestidge, C.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ralston, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Colloidal iron oxide slime coatings and galena particle flotation</title><title>Minerals engineering</title><description>Microflotation was used to investigate the influence of colloidal iron oxide “slimes” on galena (PbS) particle flotation. Complementary particle adsorption (heteroaggregation) studies were undertaken to investigate the formation of iron oxide slime coatings and to develop methods for their removal. Trace quantities of hematite (Fe 2O 3) colloids have a significant depressant action on both the collector-induced and collectorless flotation of galena particles. For example, slime particle surface coverage as low as 10% of an equivalent close-packed particle monolayer decreased the flotation rate constant of galena by an order of magnitude. In the pH range 4 to 7, high affinity Fe 2O 3 particle adsorption was observed on PbS and the surface coverage approached that of an equivalent particle monolayer. In contrast, in mildly alkaline solutions, particle adsorption isotherms were of low affinity, with plateau surface coverages significantly less than an equivalent particle monolayer. These observations are discussed in terms of the surface chemistry of galena and slime coating mechanisms. The use of shear, sonication, pH control and chemical reagent addition to quantitatively remove iron oxide slime coatings is also reported. A combination of physical and chemical methods is most effective at iron oxide particle removal and synergistic effects have been observed.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>fine particle processing</subject><subject>flotation kinetics</subject><subject>Hydrometallurgy</subject><subject>Metals. Metallurgy</subject><subject>Production of metals</subject><subject>Production of non ferrous metals. Process materials</subject><subject>shear forces</subject><subject>Sulphide ores</subject><subject>surface modification</subject><issn>0892-6875</issn><issn>1872-9444</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QVgQRA-rSTbJJieR4hcUPKjQW0iTSYmkm5qsov_ebSu9eprDPO-8zIPQKcFXBBNx_YKlorWQLb_A5BJj3Ih6todGRLa0VoyxfTTaIYfoqJT3AeKtVCN0O0kxpuBMrEJOXZW-g4OqxLCEyibTh25RKtO5amEidKZamdwHG6HyMfXDOnXH6MCbWODkb47R2_3d6-Sxnj4_PE1up7VthOhrK1oKzjNsuGTScOGZ8XzuWyUUKO8ogzlwyRXjVDWecEpZS510lhM_F7YZo_Pt3VVOH59Qer0MxUKMpoP0WTQVghPaiAHkW9DmVEoGr1c5LE3-0QTrtTC9EabXNjQmeiNMz4bc2V-BKdZEn01nQ9mFlRRMkoG62VIw_PoVIOtiA3QWXMhge-1S-KfnFyIVf3M</recordid><startdate>20010501</startdate><enddate>20010501</enddate><creator>Bandini, P.</creator><creator>Prestidge, C.A.</creator><creator>Ralston, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010501</creationdate><title>Colloidal iron oxide slime coatings and galena particle flotation</title><author>Bandini, P. ; Prestidge, C.A. ; Ralston, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-c672edf40a5848a56f4af5bf7969e9fd24ebe585945293f1522472d8dc51fb6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>fine particle processing</topic><topic>flotation kinetics</topic><topic>Hydrometallurgy</topic><topic>Metals. Metallurgy</topic><topic>Production of metals</topic><topic>Production of non ferrous metals. Process materials</topic><topic>shear forces</topic><topic>Sulphide ores</topic><topic>surface modification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bandini, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prestidge, C.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ralston, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Minerals engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bandini, P.</au><au>Prestidge, C.A.</au><au>Ralston, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Colloidal iron oxide slime coatings and galena particle flotation</atitle><jtitle>Minerals engineering</jtitle><date>2001-05-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>487</spage><epage>497</epage><pages>487-497</pages><issn>0892-6875</issn><eissn>1872-9444</eissn><coden>MENGEB</coden><abstract>Microflotation was used to investigate the influence of colloidal iron oxide “slimes” on galena (PbS) particle flotation. Complementary particle adsorption (heteroaggregation) studies were undertaken to investigate the formation of iron oxide slime coatings and to develop methods for their removal. Trace quantities of hematite (Fe 2O 3) colloids have a significant depressant action on both the collector-induced and collectorless flotation of galena particles. For example, slime particle surface coverage as low as 10% of an equivalent close-packed particle monolayer decreased the flotation rate constant of galena by an order of magnitude. In the pH range 4 to 7, high affinity Fe 2O 3 particle adsorption was observed on PbS and the surface coverage approached that of an equivalent particle monolayer. In contrast, in mildly alkaline solutions, particle adsorption isotherms were of low affinity, with plateau surface coverages significantly less than an equivalent particle monolayer. These observations are discussed in terms of the surface chemistry of galena and slime coating mechanisms. The use of shear, sonication, pH control and chemical reagent addition to quantitatively remove iron oxide slime coatings is also reported. A combination of physical and chemical methods is most effective at iron oxide particle removal and synergistic effects have been observed.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0892-6875(01)00036-X</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0892-6875
ispartof Minerals engineering, 2001-05, Vol.14 (5), p.487-497
issn 0892-6875
1872-9444
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26651236
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Applied sciences
Exact sciences and technology
fine particle processing
flotation kinetics
Hydrometallurgy
Metals. Metallurgy
Production of metals
Production of non ferrous metals. Process materials
shear forces
Sulphide ores
surface modification
title Colloidal iron oxide slime coatings and galena particle flotation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A05%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Colloidal%20iron%20oxide%20slime%20coatings%20and%20galena%20particle%20flotation&rft.jtitle=Minerals%20engineering&rft.au=Bandini,%20P.&rft.date=2001-05-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=487&rft.epage=497&rft.pages=487-497&rft.issn=0892-6875&rft.eissn=1872-9444&rft.coden=MENGEB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0892-6875(01)00036-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E26651236%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=26651236&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S089268750100036X&rfr_iscdi=true