Colloidal iron oxide slime coatings and galena particle flotation
Microflotation was used to investigate the influence of colloidal iron oxide “slimes” on galena (PbS) particle flotation. Complementary particle adsorption (heteroaggregation) studies were undertaken to investigate the formation of iron oxide slime coatings and to develop methods for their removal....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Minerals engineering 2001-05, Vol.14 (5), p.487-497 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 497 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 487 |
container_title | Minerals engineering |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Bandini, P. Prestidge, C.A. Ralston, J. |
description | Microflotation was used to investigate the influence of colloidal iron oxide “slimes” on galena (PbS) particle flotation. Complementary particle adsorption (heteroaggregation) studies were undertaken to investigate the formation of iron oxide slime coatings and to develop methods for their removal. Trace quantities of hematite (Fe
2O
3) colloids have a significant depressant action on both the collector-induced and collectorless flotation of galena particles. For example, slime particle surface coverage as low as 10% of an equivalent close-packed particle monolayer decreased the flotation rate constant of galena by an order of magnitude. In the pH range 4 to 7, high affinity Fe
2O
3 particle adsorption was observed on PbS and the surface coverage approached that of an equivalent particle monolayer. In contrast, in mildly alkaline solutions, particle adsorption isotherms were of low affinity, with plateau surface coverages significantly less than an equivalent particle monolayer. These observations are discussed in terms of the surface chemistry of galena and slime coating mechanisms. The use of shear, sonication, pH control and chemical reagent addition to quantitatively remove iron oxide slime coatings is also reported. A combination of physical and chemical methods is most effective at iron oxide particle removal and synergistic effects have been observed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0892-6875(01)00036-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26651236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S089268750100036X</els_id><sourcerecordid>26651236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-c672edf40a5848a56f4af5bf7969e9fd24ebe585945293f1522472d8dc51fb6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QVgQRA-rSTbJJieR4hcUPKjQW0iTSYmkm5qsov_ebSu9eprDPO-8zIPQKcFXBBNx_YKlorWQLb_A5BJj3Ih6todGRLa0VoyxfTTaIYfoqJT3AeKtVCN0O0kxpuBMrEJOXZW-g4OqxLCEyibTh25RKtO5amEidKZamdwHG6HyMfXDOnXH6MCbWODkb47R2_3d6-Sxnj4_PE1up7VthOhrK1oKzjNsuGTScOGZ8XzuWyUUKO8ogzlwyRXjVDWecEpZS510lhM_F7YZo_Pt3VVOH59Qer0MxUKMpoP0WTQVghPaiAHkW9DmVEoGr1c5LE3-0QTrtTC9EabXNjQmeiNMz4bc2V-BKdZEn01nQ9mFlRRMkoG62VIw_PoVIOtiA3QWXMhge-1S-KfnFyIVf3M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>26651236</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Colloidal iron oxide slime coatings and galena particle flotation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Bandini, P. ; Prestidge, C.A. ; Ralston, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bandini, P. ; Prestidge, C.A. ; Ralston, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Microflotation was used to investigate the influence of colloidal iron oxide “slimes” on galena (PbS) particle flotation. Complementary particle adsorption (heteroaggregation) studies were undertaken to investigate the formation of iron oxide slime coatings and to develop methods for their removal. Trace quantities of hematite (Fe
2O
3) colloids have a significant depressant action on both the collector-induced and collectorless flotation of galena particles. For example, slime particle surface coverage as low as 10% of an equivalent close-packed particle monolayer decreased the flotation rate constant of galena by an order of magnitude. In the pH range 4 to 7, high affinity Fe
2O
3 particle adsorption was observed on PbS and the surface coverage approached that of an equivalent particle monolayer. In contrast, in mildly alkaline solutions, particle adsorption isotherms were of low affinity, with plateau surface coverages significantly less than an equivalent particle monolayer. These observations are discussed in terms of the surface chemistry of galena and slime coating mechanisms. The use of shear, sonication, pH control and chemical reagent addition to quantitatively remove iron oxide slime coatings is also reported. A combination of physical and chemical methods is most effective at iron oxide particle removal and synergistic effects have been observed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-6875</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9444</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0892-6875(01)00036-X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MENGEB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Exact sciences and technology ; fine particle processing ; flotation kinetics ; Hydrometallurgy ; Metals. Metallurgy ; Production of metals ; Production of non ferrous metals. Process materials ; shear forces ; Sulphide ores ; surface modification</subject><ispartof>Minerals engineering, 2001-05, Vol.14 (5), p.487-497</ispartof><rights>2001</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-c672edf40a5848a56f4af5bf7969e9fd24ebe585945293f1522472d8dc51fb6c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-c672edf40a5848a56f4af5bf7969e9fd24ebe585945293f1522472d8dc51fb6c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0892-6875(01)00036-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=986481$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bandini, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prestidge, C.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ralston, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Colloidal iron oxide slime coatings and galena particle flotation</title><title>Minerals engineering</title><description>Microflotation was used to investigate the influence of colloidal iron oxide “slimes” on galena (PbS) particle flotation. Complementary particle adsorption (heteroaggregation) studies were undertaken to investigate the formation of iron oxide slime coatings and to develop methods for their removal. Trace quantities of hematite (Fe
2O
3) colloids have a significant depressant action on both the collector-induced and collectorless flotation of galena particles. For example, slime particle surface coverage as low as 10% of an equivalent close-packed particle monolayer decreased the flotation rate constant of galena by an order of magnitude. In the pH range 4 to 7, high affinity Fe
2O
3 particle adsorption was observed on PbS and the surface coverage approached that of an equivalent particle monolayer. In contrast, in mildly alkaline solutions, particle adsorption isotherms were of low affinity, with plateau surface coverages significantly less than an equivalent particle monolayer. These observations are discussed in terms of the surface chemistry of galena and slime coating mechanisms. The use of shear, sonication, pH control and chemical reagent addition to quantitatively remove iron oxide slime coatings is also reported. A combination of physical and chemical methods is most effective at iron oxide particle removal and synergistic effects have been observed.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>fine particle processing</subject><subject>flotation kinetics</subject><subject>Hydrometallurgy</subject><subject>Metals. Metallurgy</subject><subject>Production of metals</subject><subject>Production of non ferrous metals. Process materials</subject><subject>shear forces</subject><subject>Sulphide ores</subject><subject>surface modification</subject><issn>0892-6875</issn><issn>1872-9444</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QVgQRA-rSTbJJieR4hcUPKjQW0iTSYmkm5qsov_ebSu9eprDPO-8zIPQKcFXBBNx_YKlorWQLb_A5BJj3Ih6todGRLa0VoyxfTTaIYfoqJT3AeKtVCN0O0kxpuBMrEJOXZW-g4OqxLCEyibTh25RKtO5amEidKZamdwHG6HyMfXDOnXH6MCbWODkb47R2_3d6-Sxnj4_PE1up7VthOhrK1oKzjNsuGTScOGZ8XzuWyUUKO8ogzlwyRXjVDWecEpZS510lhM_F7YZo_Pt3VVOH59Qer0MxUKMpoP0WTQVghPaiAHkW9DmVEoGr1c5LE3-0QTrtTC9EabXNjQmeiNMz4bc2V-BKdZEn01nQ9mFlRRMkoG62VIw_PoVIOtiA3QWXMhge-1S-KfnFyIVf3M</recordid><startdate>20010501</startdate><enddate>20010501</enddate><creator>Bandini, P.</creator><creator>Prestidge, C.A.</creator><creator>Ralston, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010501</creationdate><title>Colloidal iron oxide slime coatings and galena particle flotation</title><author>Bandini, P. ; Prestidge, C.A. ; Ralston, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-c672edf40a5848a56f4af5bf7969e9fd24ebe585945293f1522472d8dc51fb6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>fine particle processing</topic><topic>flotation kinetics</topic><topic>Hydrometallurgy</topic><topic>Metals. Metallurgy</topic><topic>Production of metals</topic><topic>Production of non ferrous metals. Process materials</topic><topic>shear forces</topic><topic>Sulphide ores</topic><topic>surface modification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bandini, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prestidge, C.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ralston, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Minerals engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bandini, P.</au><au>Prestidge, C.A.</au><au>Ralston, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Colloidal iron oxide slime coatings and galena particle flotation</atitle><jtitle>Minerals engineering</jtitle><date>2001-05-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>487</spage><epage>497</epage><pages>487-497</pages><issn>0892-6875</issn><eissn>1872-9444</eissn><coden>MENGEB</coden><abstract>Microflotation was used to investigate the influence of colloidal iron oxide “slimes” on galena (PbS) particle flotation. Complementary particle adsorption (heteroaggregation) studies were undertaken to investigate the formation of iron oxide slime coatings and to develop methods for their removal. Trace quantities of hematite (Fe
2O
3) colloids have a significant depressant action on both the collector-induced and collectorless flotation of galena particles. For example, slime particle surface coverage as low as 10% of an equivalent close-packed particle monolayer decreased the flotation rate constant of galena by an order of magnitude. In the pH range 4 to 7, high affinity Fe
2O
3 particle adsorption was observed on PbS and the surface coverage approached that of an equivalent particle monolayer. In contrast, in mildly alkaline solutions, particle adsorption isotherms were of low affinity, with plateau surface coverages significantly less than an equivalent particle monolayer. These observations are discussed in terms of the surface chemistry of galena and slime coating mechanisms. The use of shear, sonication, pH control and chemical reagent addition to quantitatively remove iron oxide slime coatings is also reported. A combination of physical and chemical methods is most effective at iron oxide particle removal and synergistic effects have been observed.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0892-6875(01)00036-X</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0892-6875 |
ispartof | Minerals engineering, 2001-05, Vol.14 (5), p.487-497 |
issn | 0892-6875 1872-9444 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26651236 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Applied sciences Exact sciences and technology fine particle processing flotation kinetics Hydrometallurgy Metals. Metallurgy Production of metals Production of non ferrous metals. Process materials shear forces Sulphide ores surface modification |
title | Colloidal iron oxide slime coatings and galena particle flotation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A05%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Colloidal%20iron%20oxide%20slime%20coatings%20and%20galena%20particle%20flotation&rft.jtitle=Minerals%20engineering&rft.au=Bandini,%20P.&rft.date=2001-05-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=487&rft.epage=497&rft.pages=487-497&rft.issn=0892-6875&rft.eissn=1872-9444&rft.coden=MENGEB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0892-6875(01)00036-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E26651236%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=26651236&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S089268750100036X&rfr_iscdi=true |