Measuring PROMIS® Global Health in Early Childhood
Abstract Objective Assessing general (“global”) health is important to clinicians caring for patients, researchers studying patient subgroups, and epidemiologists tracking population trends. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) introduced an adult self-report Globa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pediatric psychology 2022-05, Vol.47 (5), p.523-533 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 533 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 523 |
container_title | Journal of pediatric psychology |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Kallen, Michael A Lai, Jin-Shei Blackwell, Courtney K Schuchard, Julia R Forrest, Christopher B Wakschlag, Lauren S Cella, David |
description | Abstract
Objective
Assessing general (“global”) health is important to clinicians caring for patients, researchers studying patient subgroups, and epidemiologists tracking population trends. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) introduced an adult self-report Global Health measure (ages 18+) in 2009 and pediatric versions (ages 5–17 years) in 2014. Our aim was to extend global health assessment to 1–5-year olds.
Methods
We used the PROMIS mixed-methods approach to develop PROMIS Early Childhood (EC) Global Health, emphasizing qualitative measure development guidance utilizing input from experts and parents. Quantitatively, we conducted two data collection waves with parents of 1–5-year olds and applied state-of-the-science measure development methods, including exploratory, confirmatory, and bi-factor analytics, particularly regarding potentially multi-dimensional Global Health item content. We conducted a series of hypothesis-based across-domain association analyses, which were more exploratory in nature, and known-groups validity analyses.
Results
Experts emphasized the physical, mental, and social facets of global health, and parents described the broader, overarching construct. Using Waves 1 (N = 1,400) and 2 (N = 1,057) data, we retained six items directly sourced from the age 5–17 version and two new items. The resulting 8-item PROMIS EC Global Health was sufficiently unidimensional, so we fit item responses to the graded response model for parameter estimation. This produced an 8-item scale with one total score. Across-domain associations and known-groups validity analyses largely supported our hypotheses.
Conclusions
We achieved our aim to extend global health assessment to 1–5-year olds and to thereby expand the range of PROMIS life course global health assessment from children aged 1–17 years, to adults of all ages. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jpepsy/jsac026 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2664798201</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jpepsy/jsac026</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2664798201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2146-bef144be46278b004522d73dad19bcfdff9670b71bb7e1ba873caf1ea0f325bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLtOwzAYhS0EoqWwMqKMMKT1LXYyoqq0lYqKuEhslh3bNJVbB7sZ-lI8BE9GqhRWpl-_9J1zpA-AawSHCBZktK5NHfejdZQlxOwE9BFlWcpJ9n4K-rB90pwVpAcuYlxDCCkl7Bz0SEZJzjntA_JoZGxCtf1Inp6Xj_OX769k6rySLpkZ6XarpNomExncPhmvKqdX3utLcGali-bqeAfg7WHyOp6li-V0Pr5fpCU-DCtjEaXKUIZ5rtrtDGPNiZYaFaq02tqCcag4UoobpGTOSSktMhJagjNlyQDcdr118J-NiTuxqWJpnJNb45soMGOUFzmGqEWHHVoGH2MwVtSh2siwFwiKgyjRiRJHUW3g5tjdqI3Rf_ivmRa46wDf1P-V_QD4uXSK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2664798201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring PROMIS® Global Health in Early Childhood</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kallen, Michael A ; Lai, Jin-Shei ; Blackwell, Courtney K ; Schuchard, Julia R ; Forrest, Christopher B ; Wakschlag, Lauren S ; Cella, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Kallen, Michael A ; Lai, Jin-Shei ; Blackwell, Courtney K ; Schuchard, Julia R ; Forrest, Christopher B ; Wakschlag, Lauren S ; Cella, David</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Objective
Assessing general (“global”) health is important to clinicians caring for patients, researchers studying patient subgroups, and epidemiologists tracking population trends. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) introduced an adult self-report Global Health measure (ages 18+) in 2009 and pediatric versions (ages 5–17 years) in 2014. Our aim was to extend global health assessment to 1–5-year olds.
Methods
We used the PROMIS mixed-methods approach to develop PROMIS Early Childhood (EC) Global Health, emphasizing qualitative measure development guidance utilizing input from experts and parents. Quantitatively, we conducted two data collection waves with parents of 1–5-year olds and applied state-of-the-science measure development methods, including exploratory, confirmatory, and bi-factor analytics, particularly regarding potentially multi-dimensional Global Health item content. We conducted a series of hypothesis-based across-domain association analyses, which were more exploratory in nature, and known-groups validity analyses.
Results
Experts emphasized the physical, mental, and social facets of global health, and parents described the broader, overarching construct. Using Waves 1 (N = 1,400) and 2 (N = 1,057) data, we retained six items directly sourced from the age 5–17 version and two new items. The resulting 8-item PROMIS EC Global Health was sufficiently unidimensional, so we fit item responses to the graded response model for parameter estimation. This produced an 8-item scale with one total score. Across-domain associations and known-groups validity analyses largely supported our hypotheses.
Conclusions
We achieved our aim to extend global health assessment to 1–5-year olds and to thereby expand the range of PROMIS life course global health assessment from children aged 1–17 years, to adults of all ages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-8693</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-735X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsac026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35438774</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Journal of pediatric psychology, 2022-05, Vol.47 (5), p.523-533</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2146-bef144be46278b004522d73dad19bcfdff9670b71bb7e1ba873caf1ea0f325bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2146-bef144be46278b004522d73dad19bcfdff9670b71bb7e1ba873caf1ea0f325bf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0934-0207 ; 0000-0003-1252-068X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35438774$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kallen, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Jin-Shei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackwell, Courtney K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuchard, Julia R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrest, Christopher B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wakschlag, Lauren S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cella, David</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring PROMIS® Global Health in Early Childhood</title><title>Journal of pediatric psychology</title><addtitle>J Pediatr Psychol</addtitle><description>Abstract
Objective
Assessing general (“global”) health is important to clinicians caring for patients, researchers studying patient subgroups, and epidemiologists tracking population trends. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) introduced an adult self-report Global Health measure (ages 18+) in 2009 and pediatric versions (ages 5–17 years) in 2014. Our aim was to extend global health assessment to 1–5-year olds.
Methods
We used the PROMIS mixed-methods approach to develop PROMIS Early Childhood (EC) Global Health, emphasizing qualitative measure development guidance utilizing input from experts and parents. Quantitatively, we conducted two data collection waves with parents of 1–5-year olds and applied state-of-the-science measure development methods, including exploratory, confirmatory, and bi-factor analytics, particularly regarding potentially multi-dimensional Global Health item content. We conducted a series of hypothesis-based across-domain association analyses, which were more exploratory in nature, and known-groups validity analyses.
Results
Experts emphasized the physical, mental, and social facets of global health, and parents described the broader, overarching construct. Using Waves 1 (N = 1,400) and 2 (N = 1,057) data, we retained six items directly sourced from the age 5–17 version and two new items. The resulting 8-item PROMIS EC Global Health was sufficiently unidimensional, so we fit item responses to the graded response model for parameter estimation. This produced an 8-item scale with one total score. Across-domain associations and known-groups validity analyses largely supported our hypotheses.
Conclusions
We achieved our aim to extend global health assessment to 1–5-year olds and to thereby expand the range of PROMIS life course global health assessment from children aged 1–17 years, to adults of all ages.</description><issn>0146-8693</issn><issn>1465-735X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkLtOwzAYhS0EoqWwMqKMMKT1LXYyoqq0lYqKuEhslh3bNJVbB7sZ-lI8BE9GqhRWpl-_9J1zpA-AawSHCBZktK5NHfejdZQlxOwE9BFlWcpJ9n4K-rB90pwVpAcuYlxDCCkl7Bz0SEZJzjntA_JoZGxCtf1Inp6Xj_OX769k6rySLpkZ6XarpNomExncPhmvKqdX3utLcGali-bqeAfg7WHyOp6li-V0Pr5fpCU-DCtjEaXKUIZ5rtrtDGPNiZYaFaq02tqCcag4UoobpGTOSSktMhJagjNlyQDcdr118J-NiTuxqWJpnJNb45soMGOUFzmGqEWHHVoGH2MwVtSh2siwFwiKgyjRiRJHUW3g5tjdqI3Rf_ivmRa46wDf1P-V_QD4uXSK</recordid><startdate>20220513</startdate><enddate>20220513</enddate><creator>Kallen, Michael A</creator><creator>Lai, Jin-Shei</creator><creator>Blackwell, Courtney K</creator><creator>Schuchard, Julia R</creator><creator>Forrest, Christopher B</creator><creator>Wakschlag, Lauren S</creator><creator>Cella, David</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0934-0207</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1252-068X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220513</creationdate><title>Measuring PROMIS® Global Health in Early Childhood</title><author>Kallen, Michael A ; Lai, Jin-Shei ; Blackwell, Courtney K ; Schuchard, Julia R ; Forrest, Christopher B ; Wakschlag, Lauren S ; Cella, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2146-bef144be46278b004522d73dad19bcfdff9670b71bb7e1ba873caf1ea0f325bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kallen, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Jin-Shei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackwell, Courtney K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuchard, Julia R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrest, Christopher B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wakschlag, Lauren S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cella, David</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pediatric psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kallen, Michael A</au><au>Lai, Jin-Shei</au><au>Blackwell, Courtney K</au><au>Schuchard, Julia R</au><au>Forrest, Christopher B</au><au>Wakschlag, Lauren S</au><au>Cella, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring PROMIS® Global Health in Early Childhood</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pediatric psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr Psychol</addtitle><date>2022-05-13</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>523</spage><epage>533</epage><pages>523-533</pages><issn>0146-8693</issn><eissn>1465-735X</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Objective
Assessing general (“global”) health is important to clinicians caring for patients, researchers studying patient subgroups, and epidemiologists tracking population trends. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) introduced an adult self-report Global Health measure (ages 18+) in 2009 and pediatric versions (ages 5–17 years) in 2014. Our aim was to extend global health assessment to 1–5-year olds.
Methods
We used the PROMIS mixed-methods approach to develop PROMIS Early Childhood (EC) Global Health, emphasizing qualitative measure development guidance utilizing input from experts and parents. Quantitatively, we conducted two data collection waves with parents of 1–5-year olds and applied state-of-the-science measure development methods, including exploratory, confirmatory, and bi-factor analytics, particularly regarding potentially multi-dimensional Global Health item content. We conducted a series of hypothesis-based across-domain association analyses, which were more exploratory in nature, and known-groups validity analyses.
Results
Experts emphasized the physical, mental, and social facets of global health, and parents described the broader, overarching construct. Using Waves 1 (N = 1,400) and 2 (N = 1,057) data, we retained six items directly sourced from the age 5–17 version and two new items. The resulting 8-item PROMIS EC Global Health was sufficiently unidimensional, so we fit item responses to the graded response model for parameter estimation. This produced an 8-item scale with one total score. Across-domain associations and known-groups validity analyses largely supported our hypotheses.
Conclusions
We achieved our aim to extend global health assessment to 1–5-year olds and to thereby expand the range of PROMIS life course global health assessment from children aged 1–17 years, to adults of all ages.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>35438774</pmid><doi>10.1093/jpepsy/jsac026</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0934-0207</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1252-068X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0146-8693 |
ispartof | Journal of pediatric psychology, 2022-05, Vol.47 (5), p.523-533 |
issn | 0146-8693 1465-735X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2664798201 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Education Source; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Measuring PROMIS® Global Health in Early Childhood |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A47%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20PROMIS%C2%AE%20Global%20Health%20in%20Early%20Childhood&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pediatric%20psychology&rft.au=Kallen,%20Michael%20A&rft.date=2022-05-13&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=523&rft.epage=533&rft.pages=523-533&rft.issn=0146-8693&rft.eissn=1465-735X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jpepsy/jsac026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2664798201%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2664798201&rft_id=info:pmid/35438774&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jpepsy/jsac026&rfr_iscdi=true |