A randomised crossover trial: Exploring the dose–response effect of carbohydrate restriction on glycaemia in people with well‐controlled type 2 diabetes
Background Trials investigating the role of carbohydrate restriction in the management of glycaemia in type 2 diabetes (T2D) have been confounded by multiple factors, including degree of calorie restriction and dietary protein content, as well as by no clear definition of a low‐carbohydrate diet. Th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of human nutrition and dietetics 2023-02, Vol.36 (1), p.51-61 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 61 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 51 |
container_title | Journal of human nutrition and dietetics |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Al‐Ozairi, Ebaa Reem, Al Awadi El Samad, Abeer Taghadom, Etab Al‐Kandari, Jumana Abdul‐Ghani, Muhammad Oliver, Nick Whitcher, Brandon Guess, Nicola |
description | Background
Trials investigating the role of carbohydrate restriction in the management of glycaemia in type 2 diabetes (T2D) have been confounded by multiple factors, including degree of calorie restriction and dietary protein content, as well as by no clear definition of a low‐carbohydrate diet. The present study aimed to provide insight into the relationship between carbohydrate restriction and glycaemia by testing the effect of varying doses of carbohydrate on continuous glucose concentrations within a range of intakes defined as low‐carbohydrate at the same time as controlling for confounding factors.
Methods
This was a randomised crossover trial in participants with T2D (HbA1c: 6.6 ± 0.6%, 49 ± 0.9 mmol mol–1) testing five different 6‐day eucaloric dietary treatments with varying carbohydrate content (10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30% kcal). Diets exchanged %kcal from carbohydrate with fat, keeping protein constant at 15% kcal. Daily self‐weighing was employed to ensure weight stability throughout each treatment arm. Between dietary treatments, participants underwent a washout period of at least 7 days and were advised to maintain their habitual diet. Glycaemic control was assessed using a continuous glucose monitoring device.
Results
Twelve participants completed the study. There were no differences in 24‐h and post‐prandial sensor glucose concentrations between the 30 and 10%kcal doses (7.4 ± 1.1 mmol L–1 vs. 7.6 ± 1.3 mmol L–1 [p = 0.28] and 8.1 ± 1.5 mmol L–1 vs. 8.5 ± 1.4 mmol L–1 [p = 0.28], respectively). In our exploratory analyses, we did not find any dose–response relationship between carbohydrate intake and glycaemia. A small amount of weight loss occurred in each treatment arm (range: 0.4–1.1 kg over the 6 days) but adjusting for these differences did not influence the primary or secondary outcomes.
Conclusions
Modest changes in dietary carbohydrate content in the absence of weight loss at the same time as keeping dietary protein intake constant do not appear to influence glucose concentrations in people with well‐controlled T2D.
Summary
This study randomised people with T2D to receive five different doses of carbohydrate from 10% to 30% of calories in random order to see what effect it had on their blood glucose.
Key points
Decreasing the carbohydrate content of the diet from 30 to 10%kcal had no detectable effect on blood glucose concentration.
There was no observed relationship between the dose of carbohydrate as a %kcal and glucose concentra |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jhn.13030 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2664796586</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2664796586</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-296a82fd1ffc72cc0c5954f12de725160fb3ea5000096165e296f01c5420beb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kbFuFDEQhi0EIkeg4AWQJRooNhl7z95duigKBBRBAxKd5fWOcz757MXey7FdHgGJlqfLk-DkAgUSI0tT-Jvfv-cn5DmDI1bqeL0KR6yGGh6QBaulqHjTfH1IFtAJXtVtww7Ik5zXACAZwGNyUAshoRWwIL9OaNJhiBuXcaAmxZzjFSY6Jaf9G3r2ffQxuXBJpxXSIWa8uf6ZMI8xZKRoLZqJRkuNTn1czUPSE9JyX8bN5GKg5Vz62WjcOE1doCPG0SPduWlFd-j9zfUPE8OUovfl_WkekXI6ON3jhPkpeWS1z_jsvh-SL2_PPp-eVxef3r0_PbmoTN22UPFO6pbbgVlrGm4MGNGJpWV8wIYLJsH2NWpRvg-dZFJgGbDAjFhy6LHv6kPyaq87pvhtW9yrsg5T3OmAcZsVl3LZdFK0sqAv_0HXcZtCcad4I0XHWxC3gq_31N1CE1o1JrfRaVYM1G1kqkSm7iIr7It7xW2_weEv-SejAhzvgZ3zOP9fSX04_7iX_A3SvqQr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2765928059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomised crossover trial: Exploring the dose–response effect of carbohydrate restriction on glycaemia in people with well‐controlled type 2 diabetes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Al‐Ozairi, Ebaa ; Reem, Al Awadi ; El Samad, Abeer ; Taghadom, Etab ; Al‐Kandari, Jumana ; Abdul‐Ghani, Muhammad ; Oliver, Nick ; Whitcher, Brandon ; Guess, Nicola</creator><creatorcontrib>Al‐Ozairi, Ebaa ; Reem, Al Awadi ; El Samad, Abeer ; Taghadom, Etab ; Al‐Kandari, Jumana ; Abdul‐Ghani, Muhammad ; Oliver, Nick ; Whitcher, Brandon ; Guess, Nicola</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Trials investigating the role of carbohydrate restriction in the management of glycaemia in type 2 diabetes (T2D) have been confounded by multiple factors, including degree of calorie restriction and dietary protein content, as well as by no clear definition of a low‐carbohydrate diet. The present study aimed to provide insight into the relationship between carbohydrate restriction and glycaemia by testing the effect of varying doses of carbohydrate on continuous glucose concentrations within a range of intakes defined as low‐carbohydrate at the same time as controlling for confounding factors.
Methods
This was a randomised crossover trial in participants with T2D (HbA1c: 6.6 ± 0.6%, 49 ± 0.9 mmol mol–1) testing five different 6‐day eucaloric dietary treatments with varying carbohydrate content (10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30% kcal). Diets exchanged %kcal from carbohydrate with fat, keeping protein constant at 15% kcal. Daily self‐weighing was employed to ensure weight stability throughout each treatment arm. Between dietary treatments, participants underwent a washout period of at least 7 days and were advised to maintain their habitual diet. Glycaemic control was assessed using a continuous glucose monitoring device.
Results
Twelve participants completed the study. There were no differences in 24‐h and post‐prandial sensor glucose concentrations between the 30 and 10%kcal doses (7.4 ± 1.1 mmol L–1 vs. 7.6 ± 1.3 mmol L–1 [p = 0.28] and 8.1 ± 1.5 mmol L–1 vs. 8.5 ± 1.4 mmol L–1 [p = 0.28], respectively). In our exploratory analyses, we did not find any dose–response relationship between carbohydrate intake and glycaemia. A small amount of weight loss occurred in each treatment arm (range: 0.4–1.1 kg over the 6 days) but adjusting for these differences did not influence the primary or secondary outcomes.
Conclusions
Modest changes in dietary carbohydrate content in the absence of weight loss at the same time as keeping dietary protein intake constant do not appear to influence glucose concentrations in people with well‐controlled T2D.
Summary
This study randomised people with T2D to receive five different doses of carbohydrate from 10% to 30% of calories in random order to see what effect it had on their blood glucose.
Key points
Decreasing the carbohydrate content of the diet from 30 to 10%kcal had no detectable effect on blood glucose concentration.
There was no observed relationship between the dose of carbohydrate as a %kcal and glucose concentration.
It is possible that a low carbohydrate diet needs to be combined with high protein to lower glucose in type 2 diabetes.
This study was specifically designed to prevent weight loss and therefore our results do not mean that a low carbohydrate which causes weight loss would not be beneficial for type 2 diabetes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-3871</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-277X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jhn.13030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35560850</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Blood ; Blood glucose ; Blood Glucose - metabolism ; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring ; Blood levels ; Body weight loss ; Calories ; Carbohydrates ; Cross-Over Studies ; diabetes mellitus ; Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent) ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Diet ; Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted ; Dietary Carbohydrates ; Dietary Proteins ; Glucose ; Humans ; Low carbohydrate diet ; Nutrient deficiency ; post‐prandial period ; Weight loss ; Weight Loss - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of human nutrition and dietetics, 2023-02, Vol.36 (1), p.51-61</ispartof><rights>2022 The British Dietetic Association Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 The British Dietetic Association Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-296a82fd1ffc72cc0c5954f12de725160fb3ea5000096165e296f01c5420beb93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-296a82fd1ffc72cc0c5954f12de725160fb3ea5000096165e296f01c5420beb93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6829-0671</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjhn.13030$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjhn.13030$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35560850$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al‐Ozairi, Ebaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reem, Al Awadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Samad, Abeer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taghadom, Etab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al‐Kandari, Jumana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdul‐Ghani, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitcher, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guess, Nicola</creatorcontrib><title>A randomised crossover trial: Exploring the dose–response effect of carbohydrate restriction on glycaemia in people with well‐controlled type 2 diabetes</title><title>Journal of human nutrition and dietetics</title><addtitle>J Hum Nutr Diet</addtitle><description>Background
Trials investigating the role of carbohydrate restriction in the management of glycaemia in type 2 diabetes (T2D) have been confounded by multiple factors, including degree of calorie restriction and dietary protein content, as well as by no clear definition of a low‐carbohydrate diet. The present study aimed to provide insight into the relationship between carbohydrate restriction and glycaemia by testing the effect of varying doses of carbohydrate on continuous glucose concentrations within a range of intakes defined as low‐carbohydrate at the same time as controlling for confounding factors.
Methods
This was a randomised crossover trial in participants with T2D (HbA1c: 6.6 ± 0.6%, 49 ± 0.9 mmol mol–1) testing five different 6‐day eucaloric dietary treatments with varying carbohydrate content (10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30% kcal). Diets exchanged %kcal from carbohydrate with fat, keeping protein constant at 15% kcal. Daily self‐weighing was employed to ensure weight stability throughout each treatment arm. Between dietary treatments, participants underwent a washout period of at least 7 days and were advised to maintain their habitual diet. Glycaemic control was assessed using a continuous glucose monitoring device.
Results
Twelve participants completed the study. There were no differences in 24‐h and post‐prandial sensor glucose concentrations between the 30 and 10%kcal doses (7.4 ± 1.1 mmol L–1 vs. 7.6 ± 1.3 mmol L–1 [p = 0.28] and 8.1 ± 1.5 mmol L–1 vs. 8.5 ± 1.4 mmol L–1 [p = 0.28], respectively). In our exploratory analyses, we did not find any dose–response relationship between carbohydrate intake and glycaemia. A small amount of weight loss occurred in each treatment arm (range: 0.4–1.1 kg over the 6 days) but adjusting for these differences did not influence the primary or secondary outcomes.
Conclusions
Modest changes in dietary carbohydrate content in the absence of weight loss at the same time as keeping dietary protein intake constant do not appear to influence glucose concentrations in people with well‐controlled T2D.
Summary
This study randomised people with T2D to receive five different doses of carbohydrate from 10% to 30% of calories in random order to see what effect it had on their blood glucose.
Key points
Decreasing the carbohydrate content of the diet from 30 to 10%kcal had no detectable effect on blood glucose concentration.
There was no observed relationship between the dose of carbohydrate as a %kcal and glucose concentration.
It is possible that a low carbohydrate diet needs to be combined with high protein to lower glucose in type 2 diabetes.
This study was specifically designed to prevent weight loss and therefore our results do not mean that a low carbohydrate which causes weight loss would not be beneficial for type 2 diabetes.</description><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood glucose</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - metabolism</subject><subject>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring</subject><subject>Blood levels</subject><subject>Body weight loss</subject><subject>Calories</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted</subject><subject>Dietary Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Dietary Proteins</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low carbohydrate diet</subject><subject>Nutrient deficiency</subject><subject>post‐prandial period</subject><subject>Weight loss</subject><subject>Weight Loss - physiology</subject><issn>0952-3871</issn><issn>1365-277X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kbFuFDEQhi0EIkeg4AWQJRooNhl7z95duigKBBRBAxKd5fWOcz757MXey7FdHgGJlqfLk-DkAgUSI0tT-Jvfv-cn5DmDI1bqeL0KR6yGGh6QBaulqHjTfH1IFtAJXtVtww7Ik5zXACAZwGNyUAshoRWwIL9OaNJhiBuXcaAmxZzjFSY6Jaf9G3r2ffQxuXBJpxXSIWa8uf6ZMI8xZKRoLZqJRkuNTn1czUPSE9JyX8bN5GKg5Vz62WjcOE1doCPG0SPduWlFd-j9zfUPE8OUovfl_WkekXI6ON3jhPkpeWS1z_jsvh-SL2_PPp-eVxef3r0_PbmoTN22UPFO6pbbgVlrGm4MGNGJpWV8wIYLJsH2NWpRvg-dZFJgGbDAjFhy6LHv6kPyaq87pvhtW9yrsg5T3OmAcZsVl3LZdFK0sqAv_0HXcZtCcad4I0XHWxC3gq_31N1CE1o1JrfRaVYM1G1kqkSm7iIr7It7xW2_weEv-SejAhzvgZ3zOP9fSX04_7iX_A3SvqQr</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Al‐Ozairi, Ebaa</creator><creator>Reem, Al Awadi</creator><creator>El Samad, Abeer</creator><creator>Taghadom, Etab</creator><creator>Al‐Kandari, Jumana</creator><creator>Abdul‐Ghani, Muhammad</creator><creator>Oliver, Nick</creator><creator>Whitcher, Brandon</creator><creator>Guess, Nicola</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6829-0671</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>A randomised crossover trial: Exploring the dose–response effect of carbohydrate restriction on glycaemia in people with well‐controlled type 2 diabetes</title><author>Al‐Ozairi, Ebaa ; Reem, Al Awadi ; El Samad, Abeer ; Taghadom, Etab ; Al‐Kandari, Jumana ; Abdul‐Ghani, Muhammad ; Oliver, Nick ; Whitcher, Brandon ; Guess, Nicola</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-296a82fd1ffc72cc0c5954f12de725160fb3ea5000096165e296f01c5420beb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood glucose</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - metabolism</topic><topic>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring</topic><topic>Blood levels</topic><topic>Body weight loss</topic><topic>Calories</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted</topic><topic>Dietary Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Dietary Proteins</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low carbohydrate diet</topic><topic>Nutrient deficiency</topic><topic>post‐prandial period</topic><topic>Weight loss</topic><topic>Weight Loss - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al‐Ozairi, Ebaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reem, Al Awadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Samad, Abeer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taghadom, Etab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al‐Kandari, Jumana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdul‐Ghani, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitcher, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guess, Nicola</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of human nutrition and dietetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al‐Ozairi, Ebaa</au><au>Reem, Al Awadi</au><au>El Samad, Abeer</au><au>Taghadom, Etab</au><au>Al‐Kandari, Jumana</au><au>Abdul‐Ghani, Muhammad</au><au>Oliver, Nick</au><au>Whitcher, Brandon</au><au>Guess, Nicola</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomised crossover trial: Exploring the dose–response effect of carbohydrate restriction on glycaemia in people with well‐controlled type 2 diabetes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of human nutrition and dietetics</jtitle><addtitle>J Hum Nutr Diet</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>51-61</pages><issn>0952-3871</issn><eissn>1365-277X</eissn><abstract>Background
Trials investigating the role of carbohydrate restriction in the management of glycaemia in type 2 diabetes (T2D) have been confounded by multiple factors, including degree of calorie restriction and dietary protein content, as well as by no clear definition of a low‐carbohydrate diet. The present study aimed to provide insight into the relationship between carbohydrate restriction and glycaemia by testing the effect of varying doses of carbohydrate on continuous glucose concentrations within a range of intakes defined as low‐carbohydrate at the same time as controlling for confounding factors.
Methods
This was a randomised crossover trial in participants with T2D (HbA1c: 6.6 ± 0.6%, 49 ± 0.9 mmol mol–1) testing five different 6‐day eucaloric dietary treatments with varying carbohydrate content (10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30% kcal). Diets exchanged %kcal from carbohydrate with fat, keeping protein constant at 15% kcal. Daily self‐weighing was employed to ensure weight stability throughout each treatment arm. Between dietary treatments, participants underwent a washout period of at least 7 days and were advised to maintain their habitual diet. Glycaemic control was assessed using a continuous glucose monitoring device.
Results
Twelve participants completed the study. There were no differences in 24‐h and post‐prandial sensor glucose concentrations between the 30 and 10%kcal doses (7.4 ± 1.1 mmol L–1 vs. 7.6 ± 1.3 mmol L–1 [p = 0.28] and 8.1 ± 1.5 mmol L–1 vs. 8.5 ± 1.4 mmol L–1 [p = 0.28], respectively). In our exploratory analyses, we did not find any dose–response relationship between carbohydrate intake and glycaemia. A small amount of weight loss occurred in each treatment arm (range: 0.4–1.1 kg over the 6 days) but adjusting for these differences did not influence the primary or secondary outcomes.
Conclusions
Modest changes in dietary carbohydrate content in the absence of weight loss at the same time as keeping dietary protein intake constant do not appear to influence glucose concentrations in people with well‐controlled T2D.
Summary
This study randomised people with T2D to receive five different doses of carbohydrate from 10% to 30% of calories in random order to see what effect it had on their blood glucose.
Key points
Decreasing the carbohydrate content of the diet from 30 to 10%kcal had no detectable effect on blood glucose concentration.
There was no observed relationship between the dose of carbohydrate as a %kcal and glucose concentration.
It is possible that a low carbohydrate diet needs to be combined with high protein to lower glucose in type 2 diabetes.
This study was specifically designed to prevent weight loss and therefore our results do not mean that a low carbohydrate which causes weight loss would not be beneficial for type 2 diabetes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>35560850</pmid><doi>10.1111/jhn.13030</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6829-0671</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0952-3871 |
ispartof | Journal of human nutrition and dietetics, 2023-02, Vol.36 (1), p.51-61 |
issn | 0952-3871 1365-277X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2664796586 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | Blood Blood glucose Blood Glucose - metabolism Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring Blood levels Body weight loss Calories Carbohydrates Cross-Over Studies diabetes mellitus Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent) Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Diet Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted Dietary Carbohydrates Dietary Proteins Glucose Humans Low carbohydrate diet Nutrient deficiency post‐prandial period Weight loss Weight Loss - physiology |
title | A randomised crossover trial: Exploring the dose–response effect of carbohydrate restriction on glycaemia in people with well‐controlled type 2 diabetes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T01%3A25%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomised%20crossover%20trial:%20Exploring%20the%20dose%E2%80%93response%20effect%20of%20carbohydrate%20restriction%20on%20glycaemia%20in%20people%20with%20well%E2%80%90controlled%20type%202%20diabetes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20human%20nutrition%20and%20dietetics&rft.au=Al%E2%80%90Ozairi,%20Ebaa&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=51-61&rft.issn=0952-3871&rft.eissn=1365-277X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jhn.13030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2664796586%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2765928059&rft_id=info:pmid/35560850&rfr_iscdi=true |