A randomised crossover trial: Exploring the dose–response effect of carbohydrate restriction on glycaemia in people with well‐controlled type 2 diabetes

Background Trials investigating the role of carbohydrate restriction in the management of glycaemia in type 2 diabetes (T2D) have been confounded by multiple factors, including degree of calorie restriction and dietary protein content, as well as by no clear definition of a low‐carbohydrate diet. Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of human nutrition and dietetics 2023-02, Vol.36 (1), p.51-61
Hauptverfasser: Al‐Ozairi, Ebaa, Reem, Al Awadi, El Samad, Abeer, Taghadom, Etab, Al‐Kandari, Jumana, Abdul‐Ghani, Muhammad, Oliver, Nick, Whitcher, Brandon, Guess, Nicola
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 61
container_issue 1
container_start_page 51
container_title Journal of human nutrition and dietetics
container_volume 36
creator Al‐Ozairi, Ebaa
Reem, Al Awadi
El Samad, Abeer
Taghadom, Etab
Al‐Kandari, Jumana
Abdul‐Ghani, Muhammad
Oliver, Nick
Whitcher, Brandon
Guess, Nicola
description Background Trials investigating the role of carbohydrate restriction in the management of glycaemia in type 2 diabetes (T2D) have been confounded by multiple factors, including degree of calorie restriction and dietary protein content, as well as by no clear definition of a low‐carbohydrate diet. The present study aimed to provide insight into the relationship between carbohydrate restriction and glycaemia by testing the effect of varying doses of carbohydrate on continuous glucose concentrations within a range of intakes defined as low‐carbohydrate at the same time as controlling for confounding factors. Methods This was a randomised crossover trial in participants with T2D (HbA1c: 6.6 ± 0.6%, 49 ± 0.9 mmol mol–1) testing five different 6‐day eucaloric dietary treatments with varying carbohydrate content (10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30% kcal). Diets exchanged %kcal from carbohydrate with fat, keeping protein constant at 15% kcal. Daily self‐weighing was employed to ensure weight stability throughout each treatment arm. Between dietary treatments, participants underwent a washout period of at least 7 days and were advised to maintain their habitual diet. Glycaemic control was assessed using a continuous glucose monitoring device. Results Twelve participants completed the study. There were no differences in 24‐h and post‐prandial sensor glucose concentrations between the 30 and 10%kcal doses (7.4 ± 1.1 mmol L–1 vs. 7.6 ± 1.3 mmol L–1 [p = 0.28] and 8.1 ± 1.5 mmol L–1 vs. 8.5 ± 1.4 mmol L–1 [p = 0.28], respectively). In our exploratory analyses, we did not find any dose–response relationship between carbohydrate intake and glycaemia. A small amount of weight loss occurred in each treatment arm (range: 0.4–1.1 kg over the 6 days) but adjusting for these differences did not influence the primary or secondary outcomes. Conclusions Modest changes in dietary carbohydrate content in the absence of weight loss at the same time as keeping dietary protein intake constant do not appear to influence glucose concentrations in people with well‐controlled T2D. Summary This study randomised people with T2D to receive five different doses of carbohydrate from 10% to 30% of calories in random order to see what effect it had on their blood glucose. Key points Decreasing the carbohydrate content of the diet from 30 to 10%kcal had no detectable effect on blood glucose concentration. There was no observed relationship between the dose of carbohydrate as a %kcal and glucose concentra
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jhn.13030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2664796586</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2664796586</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-296a82fd1ffc72cc0c5954f12de725160fb3ea5000096165e296f01c5420beb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kbFuFDEQhi0EIkeg4AWQJRooNhl7z95duigKBBRBAxKd5fWOcz757MXey7FdHgGJlqfLk-DkAgUSI0tT-Jvfv-cn5DmDI1bqeL0KR6yGGh6QBaulqHjTfH1IFtAJXtVtww7Ik5zXACAZwGNyUAshoRWwIL9OaNJhiBuXcaAmxZzjFSY6Jaf9G3r2ffQxuXBJpxXSIWa8uf6ZMI8xZKRoLZqJRkuNTn1czUPSE9JyX8bN5GKg5Vz62WjcOE1doCPG0SPduWlFd-j9zfUPE8OUovfl_WkekXI6ON3jhPkpeWS1z_jsvh-SL2_PPp-eVxef3r0_PbmoTN22UPFO6pbbgVlrGm4MGNGJpWV8wIYLJsH2NWpRvg-dZFJgGbDAjFhy6LHv6kPyaq87pvhtW9yrsg5T3OmAcZsVl3LZdFK0sqAv_0HXcZtCcad4I0XHWxC3gq_31N1CE1o1JrfRaVYM1G1kqkSm7iIr7It7xW2_weEv-SejAhzvgZ3zOP9fSX04_7iX_A3SvqQr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2765928059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomised crossover trial: Exploring the dose–response effect of carbohydrate restriction on glycaemia in people with well‐controlled type 2 diabetes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Al‐Ozairi, Ebaa ; Reem, Al Awadi ; El Samad, Abeer ; Taghadom, Etab ; Al‐Kandari, Jumana ; Abdul‐Ghani, Muhammad ; Oliver, Nick ; Whitcher, Brandon ; Guess, Nicola</creator><creatorcontrib>Al‐Ozairi, Ebaa ; Reem, Al Awadi ; El Samad, Abeer ; Taghadom, Etab ; Al‐Kandari, Jumana ; Abdul‐Ghani, Muhammad ; Oliver, Nick ; Whitcher, Brandon ; Guess, Nicola</creatorcontrib><description>Background Trials investigating the role of carbohydrate restriction in the management of glycaemia in type 2 diabetes (T2D) have been confounded by multiple factors, including degree of calorie restriction and dietary protein content, as well as by no clear definition of a low‐carbohydrate diet. The present study aimed to provide insight into the relationship between carbohydrate restriction and glycaemia by testing the effect of varying doses of carbohydrate on continuous glucose concentrations within a range of intakes defined as low‐carbohydrate at the same time as controlling for confounding factors. Methods This was a randomised crossover trial in participants with T2D (HbA1c: 6.6 ± 0.6%, 49 ± 0.9 mmol mol–1) testing five different 6‐day eucaloric dietary treatments with varying carbohydrate content (10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30% kcal). Diets exchanged %kcal from carbohydrate with fat, keeping protein constant at 15% kcal. Daily self‐weighing was employed to ensure weight stability throughout each treatment arm. Between dietary treatments, participants underwent a washout period of at least 7 days and were advised to maintain their habitual diet. Glycaemic control was assessed using a continuous glucose monitoring device. Results Twelve participants completed the study. There were no differences in 24‐h and post‐prandial sensor glucose concentrations between the 30 and 10%kcal doses (7.4 ± 1.1 mmol L–1 vs. 7.6 ± 1.3 mmol L–1 [p = 0.28] and 8.1 ± 1.5 mmol L–1 vs. 8.5 ± 1.4 mmol L–1 [p = 0.28], respectively). In our exploratory analyses, we did not find any dose–response relationship between carbohydrate intake and glycaemia. A small amount of weight loss occurred in each treatment arm (range: 0.4–1.1 kg over the 6 days) but adjusting for these differences did not influence the primary or secondary outcomes. Conclusions Modest changes in dietary carbohydrate content in the absence of weight loss at the same time as keeping dietary protein intake constant do not appear to influence glucose concentrations in people with well‐controlled T2D. Summary This study randomised people with T2D to receive five different doses of carbohydrate from 10% to 30% of calories in random order to see what effect it had on their blood glucose. Key points Decreasing the carbohydrate content of the diet from 30 to 10%kcal had no detectable effect on blood glucose concentration. There was no observed relationship between the dose of carbohydrate as a %kcal and glucose concentration. It is possible that a low carbohydrate diet needs to be combined with high protein to lower glucose in type 2 diabetes. This study was specifically designed to prevent weight loss and therefore our results do not mean that a low carbohydrate which causes weight loss would not be beneficial for type 2 diabetes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-3871</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-277X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jhn.13030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35560850</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Blood ; Blood glucose ; Blood Glucose - metabolism ; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring ; Blood levels ; Body weight loss ; Calories ; Carbohydrates ; Cross-Over Studies ; diabetes mellitus ; Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent) ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Diet ; Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted ; Dietary Carbohydrates ; Dietary Proteins ; Glucose ; Humans ; Low carbohydrate diet ; Nutrient deficiency ; post‐prandial period ; Weight loss ; Weight Loss - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of human nutrition and dietetics, 2023-02, Vol.36 (1), p.51-61</ispartof><rights>2022 The British Dietetic Association Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 The British Dietetic Association Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-296a82fd1ffc72cc0c5954f12de725160fb3ea5000096165e296f01c5420beb93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-296a82fd1ffc72cc0c5954f12de725160fb3ea5000096165e296f01c5420beb93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6829-0671</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjhn.13030$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjhn.13030$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35560850$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al‐Ozairi, Ebaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reem, Al Awadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Samad, Abeer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taghadom, Etab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al‐Kandari, Jumana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdul‐Ghani, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitcher, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guess, Nicola</creatorcontrib><title>A randomised crossover trial: Exploring the dose–response effect of carbohydrate restriction on glycaemia in people with well‐controlled type 2 diabetes</title><title>Journal of human nutrition and dietetics</title><addtitle>J Hum Nutr Diet</addtitle><description>Background Trials investigating the role of carbohydrate restriction in the management of glycaemia in type 2 diabetes (T2D) have been confounded by multiple factors, including degree of calorie restriction and dietary protein content, as well as by no clear definition of a low‐carbohydrate diet. The present study aimed to provide insight into the relationship between carbohydrate restriction and glycaemia by testing the effect of varying doses of carbohydrate on continuous glucose concentrations within a range of intakes defined as low‐carbohydrate at the same time as controlling for confounding factors. Methods This was a randomised crossover trial in participants with T2D (HbA1c: 6.6 ± 0.6%, 49 ± 0.9 mmol mol–1) testing five different 6‐day eucaloric dietary treatments with varying carbohydrate content (10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30% kcal). Diets exchanged %kcal from carbohydrate with fat, keeping protein constant at 15% kcal. Daily self‐weighing was employed to ensure weight stability throughout each treatment arm. Between dietary treatments, participants underwent a washout period of at least 7 days and were advised to maintain their habitual diet. Glycaemic control was assessed using a continuous glucose monitoring device. Results Twelve participants completed the study. There were no differences in 24‐h and post‐prandial sensor glucose concentrations between the 30 and 10%kcal doses (7.4 ± 1.1 mmol L–1 vs. 7.6 ± 1.3 mmol L–1 [p = 0.28] and 8.1 ± 1.5 mmol L–1 vs. 8.5 ± 1.4 mmol L–1 [p = 0.28], respectively). In our exploratory analyses, we did not find any dose–response relationship between carbohydrate intake and glycaemia. A small amount of weight loss occurred in each treatment arm (range: 0.4–1.1 kg over the 6 days) but adjusting for these differences did not influence the primary or secondary outcomes. Conclusions Modest changes in dietary carbohydrate content in the absence of weight loss at the same time as keeping dietary protein intake constant do not appear to influence glucose concentrations in people with well‐controlled T2D. Summary This study randomised people with T2D to receive five different doses of carbohydrate from 10% to 30% of calories in random order to see what effect it had on their blood glucose. Key points Decreasing the carbohydrate content of the diet from 30 to 10%kcal had no detectable effect on blood glucose concentration. There was no observed relationship between the dose of carbohydrate as a %kcal and glucose concentration. It is possible that a low carbohydrate diet needs to be combined with high protein to lower glucose in type 2 diabetes. This study was specifically designed to prevent weight loss and therefore our results do not mean that a low carbohydrate which causes weight loss would not be beneficial for type 2 diabetes.</description><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood glucose</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - metabolism</subject><subject>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring</subject><subject>Blood levels</subject><subject>Body weight loss</subject><subject>Calories</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted</subject><subject>Dietary Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Dietary Proteins</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low carbohydrate diet</subject><subject>Nutrient deficiency</subject><subject>post‐prandial period</subject><subject>Weight loss</subject><subject>Weight Loss - physiology</subject><issn>0952-3871</issn><issn>1365-277X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kbFuFDEQhi0EIkeg4AWQJRooNhl7z95duigKBBRBAxKd5fWOcz757MXey7FdHgGJlqfLk-DkAgUSI0tT-Jvfv-cn5DmDI1bqeL0KR6yGGh6QBaulqHjTfH1IFtAJXtVtww7Ik5zXACAZwGNyUAshoRWwIL9OaNJhiBuXcaAmxZzjFSY6Jaf9G3r2ffQxuXBJpxXSIWa8uf6ZMI8xZKRoLZqJRkuNTn1czUPSE9JyX8bN5GKg5Vz62WjcOE1doCPG0SPduWlFd-j9zfUPE8OUovfl_WkekXI6ON3jhPkpeWS1z_jsvh-SL2_PPp-eVxef3r0_PbmoTN22UPFO6pbbgVlrGm4MGNGJpWV8wIYLJsH2NWpRvg-dZFJgGbDAjFhy6LHv6kPyaq87pvhtW9yrsg5T3OmAcZsVl3LZdFK0sqAv_0HXcZtCcad4I0XHWxC3gq_31N1CE1o1JrfRaVYM1G1kqkSm7iIr7It7xW2_weEv-SejAhzvgZ3zOP9fSX04_7iX_A3SvqQr</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Al‐Ozairi, Ebaa</creator><creator>Reem, Al Awadi</creator><creator>El Samad, Abeer</creator><creator>Taghadom, Etab</creator><creator>Al‐Kandari, Jumana</creator><creator>Abdul‐Ghani, Muhammad</creator><creator>Oliver, Nick</creator><creator>Whitcher, Brandon</creator><creator>Guess, Nicola</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6829-0671</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>A randomised crossover trial: Exploring the dose–response effect of carbohydrate restriction on glycaemia in people with well‐controlled type 2 diabetes</title><author>Al‐Ozairi, Ebaa ; Reem, Al Awadi ; El Samad, Abeer ; Taghadom, Etab ; Al‐Kandari, Jumana ; Abdul‐Ghani, Muhammad ; Oliver, Nick ; Whitcher, Brandon ; Guess, Nicola</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-296a82fd1ffc72cc0c5954f12de725160fb3ea5000096165e296f01c5420beb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood glucose</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - metabolism</topic><topic>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring</topic><topic>Blood levels</topic><topic>Body weight loss</topic><topic>Calories</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted</topic><topic>Dietary Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Dietary Proteins</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low carbohydrate diet</topic><topic>Nutrient deficiency</topic><topic>post‐prandial period</topic><topic>Weight loss</topic><topic>Weight Loss - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al‐Ozairi, Ebaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reem, Al Awadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Samad, Abeer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taghadom, Etab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al‐Kandari, Jumana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdul‐Ghani, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitcher, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guess, Nicola</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of human nutrition and dietetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al‐Ozairi, Ebaa</au><au>Reem, Al Awadi</au><au>El Samad, Abeer</au><au>Taghadom, Etab</au><au>Al‐Kandari, Jumana</au><au>Abdul‐Ghani, Muhammad</au><au>Oliver, Nick</au><au>Whitcher, Brandon</au><au>Guess, Nicola</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomised crossover trial: Exploring the dose–response effect of carbohydrate restriction on glycaemia in people with well‐controlled type 2 diabetes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of human nutrition and dietetics</jtitle><addtitle>J Hum Nutr Diet</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>51-61</pages><issn>0952-3871</issn><eissn>1365-277X</eissn><abstract>Background Trials investigating the role of carbohydrate restriction in the management of glycaemia in type 2 diabetes (T2D) have been confounded by multiple factors, including degree of calorie restriction and dietary protein content, as well as by no clear definition of a low‐carbohydrate diet. The present study aimed to provide insight into the relationship between carbohydrate restriction and glycaemia by testing the effect of varying doses of carbohydrate on continuous glucose concentrations within a range of intakes defined as low‐carbohydrate at the same time as controlling for confounding factors. Methods This was a randomised crossover trial in participants with T2D (HbA1c: 6.6 ± 0.6%, 49 ± 0.9 mmol mol–1) testing five different 6‐day eucaloric dietary treatments with varying carbohydrate content (10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30% kcal). Diets exchanged %kcal from carbohydrate with fat, keeping protein constant at 15% kcal. Daily self‐weighing was employed to ensure weight stability throughout each treatment arm. Between dietary treatments, participants underwent a washout period of at least 7 days and were advised to maintain their habitual diet. Glycaemic control was assessed using a continuous glucose monitoring device. Results Twelve participants completed the study. There were no differences in 24‐h and post‐prandial sensor glucose concentrations between the 30 and 10%kcal doses (7.4 ± 1.1 mmol L–1 vs. 7.6 ± 1.3 mmol L–1 [p = 0.28] and 8.1 ± 1.5 mmol L–1 vs. 8.5 ± 1.4 mmol L–1 [p = 0.28], respectively). In our exploratory analyses, we did not find any dose–response relationship between carbohydrate intake and glycaemia. A small amount of weight loss occurred in each treatment arm (range: 0.4–1.1 kg over the 6 days) but adjusting for these differences did not influence the primary or secondary outcomes. Conclusions Modest changes in dietary carbohydrate content in the absence of weight loss at the same time as keeping dietary protein intake constant do not appear to influence glucose concentrations in people with well‐controlled T2D. Summary This study randomised people with T2D to receive five different doses of carbohydrate from 10% to 30% of calories in random order to see what effect it had on their blood glucose. Key points Decreasing the carbohydrate content of the diet from 30 to 10%kcal had no detectable effect on blood glucose concentration. There was no observed relationship between the dose of carbohydrate as a %kcal and glucose concentration. It is possible that a low carbohydrate diet needs to be combined with high protein to lower glucose in type 2 diabetes. This study was specifically designed to prevent weight loss and therefore our results do not mean that a low carbohydrate which causes weight loss would not be beneficial for type 2 diabetes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>35560850</pmid><doi>10.1111/jhn.13030</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6829-0671</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0952-3871
ispartof Journal of human nutrition and dietetics, 2023-02, Vol.36 (1), p.51-61
issn 0952-3871
1365-277X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2664796586
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects Blood
Blood glucose
Blood Glucose - metabolism
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
Blood levels
Body weight loss
Calories
Carbohydrates
Cross-Over Studies
diabetes mellitus
Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Diet
Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted
Dietary Carbohydrates
Dietary Proteins
Glucose
Humans
Low carbohydrate diet
Nutrient deficiency
post‐prandial period
Weight loss
Weight Loss - physiology
title A randomised crossover trial: Exploring the dose–response effect of carbohydrate restriction on glycaemia in people with well‐controlled type 2 diabetes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T01%3A25%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomised%20crossover%20trial:%20Exploring%20the%20dose%E2%80%93response%20effect%20of%20carbohydrate%20restriction%20on%20glycaemia%20in%20people%20with%20well%E2%80%90controlled%20type%202%20diabetes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20human%20nutrition%20and%20dietetics&rft.au=Al%E2%80%90Ozairi,%20Ebaa&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=51-61&rft.issn=0952-3871&rft.eissn=1365-277X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jhn.13030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2664796586%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2765928059&rft_id=info:pmid/35560850&rfr_iscdi=true