Effect of Increasing Obstacle Distances Task on Postural Stability Variables During Gait Initiation in Older Nonfallers and Fallers
•Older fallers conservatively vary anterior-posterior (AP) center of mass (CoM)-center of pressure (CoP) separation before toe-off of the gait initiation (GI).•Older fallers lean trunk more forward than nonfallers during swing phase of the GI.•AP CoM-CoP separation before toe-off of the GI distingui...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2022-12, Vol.103 (12), p.2303-2310 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2310 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2303 |
container_title | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Rathore, Roshita Tucker, Carole A. Jeka, John J. Wright, W. Geoffrey Hurt, Christopher P. |
description | •Older fallers conservatively vary anterior-posterior (AP) center of mass (CoM)-center of pressure (CoP) separation before toe-off of the gait initiation (GI).•Older fallers lean trunk more forward than nonfallers during swing phase of the GI.•AP CoM-CoP separation before toe-off of the GI distinguishes fallers vs non-fallers•GI during scaled obstacle distances can assess postural stability in older adults.•If task success affects AP CoM-CoP separation during the swing phase is unknown.
To compare the scaling of the postural stability variables between older nonfallers and fallers during gait initiation (GI) while stepping over increasing obstacle distances.
Cross-sectional study.
University research laboratory.
A sample of participants (N=24) divided into 2 groups: older nonfallers (n=12) and older fallers (n=12). Participants had no known neurologic, musculoskeletal, or cardiovascular conditions that could have affected their walking, and all were independent walkers. All the participants had an adequate cognitive function to participate as indicated by a score of more than 24 on the Mini-Mental State Examination.
Not applicable.
The primary dependent variables were peak anterior-posterior (AP) center of mass (CoM)-center of pressure (CoP) separation during anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs), AP CoM-CoP separation at the toe-off, and peak AP CoM-CoP separation during the swing. Secondary dependent variables were AP trunk angle during GI. Within- and between-repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare means between groups across different task conditions for all the dependent variables.
There was a main effect of group for peak AP CoM-CoP separation during APA (P=.018), an interaction effect between group and condition for AP CoM-CoP separation at toe-off (P=.009), and a main effect of condition for peak AP CoM-CoP separation during the swing (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.04.006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2664791559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003999322003653</els_id><sourcerecordid>2664791559</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a0f72c4f3ffcc03bc3420db9e373e03409d2b4de42b12693227e4bc6f7f3f3523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkb1uFDEUhS0EIkvCC1AglzQz-HdmLdGg_BEpyiIlIDrL9lwjL96ZxfYgpebF8WhDyqS691rfOYU_hN5R0lJCu4_b1ux3qWWEsZaIlpDuBVpRyVmzZvTHS7QihPBGKcWP0Juct_XsJKev0RGXUhLK1Qr9PfceXMGTx1ejS2ByGH_ijc3FuAj4LNRldJDxncm_8DTir1MuczIR3xZjQwzlHn83KRgbK3Q2pyV-aUKpdaEEU0LNhBFv4gAJ30yjNzFCytiMA7447CfoVX3N8PZhHqNvF-d3p1-a683l1enn68bxtSqNIb5nTnjuvXOEW8cFI4NVwHsOhAuiBmbFAIJZyjrFGetBWNf5vka4ZPwYfTj07tP0e4Zc9C5kBzGaEaY5a7aWSrJ-LdTzaNeJXlEpF5QdUJemnBN4vU9hZ9K9pkQvnvRWL5704kkToauFGnr_0D_bHQyPkf9iKvDpAED9kD8Bks4uQDUxhFR96WEKT_X_A4YepQs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2664791559</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Increasing Obstacle Distances Task on Postural Stability Variables During Gait Initiation in Older Nonfallers and Fallers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Rathore, Roshita ; Tucker, Carole A. ; Jeka, John J. ; Wright, W. Geoffrey ; Hurt, Christopher P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rathore, Roshita ; Tucker, Carole A. ; Jeka, John J. ; Wright, W. Geoffrey ; Hurt, Christopher P.</creatorcontrib><description>•Older fallers conservatively vary anterior-posterior (AP) center of mass (CoM)-center of pressure (CoP) separation before toe-off of the gait initiation (GI).•Older fallers lean trunk more forward than nonfallers during swing phase of the GI.•AP CoM-CoP separation before toe-off of the GI distinguishes fallers vs non-fallers•GI during scaled obstacle distances can assess postural stability in older adults.•If task success affects AP CoM-CoP separation during the swing phase is unknown.
To compare the scaling of the postural stability variables between older nonfallers and fallers during gait initiation (GI) while stepping over increasing obstacle distances.
Cross-sectional study.
University research laboratory.
A sample of participants (N=24) divided into 2 groups: older nonfallers (n=12) and older fallers (n=12). Participants had no known neurologic, musculoskeletal, or cardiovascular conditions that could have affected their walking, and all were independent walkers. All the participants had an adequate cognitive function to participate as indicated by a score of more than 24 on the Mini-Mental State Examination.
Not applicable.
The primary dependent variables were peak anterior-posterior (AP) center of mass (CoM)-center of pressure (CoP) separation during anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs), AP CoM-CoP separation at the toe-off, and peak AP CoM-CoP separation during the swing. Secondary dependent variables were AP trunk angle during GI. Within- and between-repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare means between groups across different task conditions for all the dependent variables.
There was a main effect of group for peak AP CoM-CoP separation during APA (P=.018), an interaction effect between group and condition for AP CoM-CoP separation at toe-off (P=.009), and a main effect of condition for peak AP CoM-CoP separation during the swing (P<.001). We also found a main effect of group for peak AP trunk angle during the swing (P=.028).
For GI while stepping over increasing obstacle distances, older fallers adopt a more conservative strategy of AP CoM-CoP separation than nonfallers prior to toe-off and demonstrate increased peak AP trunk lean during the swing. AP CoM-CoP separation prior to toe-off during the GI task may be a critical marker to identify fallers and warrants additional investigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.04.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35550139</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Center of mass ; Center of pressure ; Cognition ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Gait ; Gait initiation ; Humans ; Obstacle ; Postural Balance ; Rehabilitation ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2022-12, Vol.103 (12), p.2303-2310</ispartof><rights>2022 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a0f72c4f3ffcc03bc3420db9e373e03409d2b4de42b12693227e4bc6f7f3f3523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a0f72c4f3ffcc03bc3420db9e373e03409d2b4de42b12693227e4bc6f7f3f3523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999322003653$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35550139$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rathore, Roshita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Carole A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeka, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, W. Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurt, Christopher P.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Increasing Obstacle Distances Task on Postural Stability Variables During Gait Initiation in Older Nonfallers and Fallers</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>•Older fallers conservatively vary anterior-posterior (AP) center of mass (CoM)-center of pressure (CoP) separation before toe-off of the gait initiation (GI).•Older fallers lean trunk more forward than nonfallers during swing phase of the GI.•AP CoM-CoP separation before toe-off of the GI distinguishes fallers vs non-fallers•GI during scaled obstacle distances can assess postural stability in older adults.•If task success affects AP CoM-CoP separation during the swing phase is unknown.
To compare the scaling of the postural stability variables between older nonfallers and fallers during gait initiation (GI) while stepping over increasing obstacle distances.
Cross-sectional study.
University research laboratory.
A sample of participants (N=24) divided into 2 groups: older nonfallers (n=12) and older fallers (n=12). Participants had no known neurologic, musculoskeletal, or cardiovascular conditions that could have affected their walking, and all were independent walkers. All the participants had an adequate cognitive function to participate as indicated by a score of more than 24 on the Mini-Mental State Examination.
Not applicable.
The primary dependent variables were peak anterior-posterior (AP) center of mass (CoM)-center of pressure (CoP) separation during anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs), AP CoM-CoP separation at the toe-off, and peak AP CoM-CoP separation during the swing. Secondary dependent variables were AP trunk angle during GI. Within- and between-repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare means between groups across different task conditions for all the dependent variables.
There was a main effect of group for peak AP CoM-CoP separation during APA (P=.018), an interaction effect between group and condition for AP CoM-CoP separation at toe-off (P=.009), and a main effect of condition for peak AP CoM-CoP separation during the swing (P<.001). We also found a main effect of group for peak AP trunk angle during the swing (P=.028).
For GI while stepping over increasing obstacle distances, older fallers adopt a more conservative strategy of AP CoM-CoP separation than nonfallers prior to toe-off and demonstrate increased peak AP trunk lean during the swing. AP CoM-CoP separation prior to toe-off during the GI task may be a critical marker to identify fallers and warrants additional investigation.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Center of mass</subject><subject>Center of pressure</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Gait initiation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Obstacle</subject><subject>Postural Balance</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkb1uFDEUhS0EIkvCC1AglzQz-HdmLdGg_BEpyiIlIDrL9lwjL96ZxfYgpebF8WhDyqS691rfOYU_hN5R0lJCu4_b1ux3qWWEsZaIlpDuBVpRyVmzZvTHS7QihPBGKcWP0Juct_XsJKev0RGXUhLK1Qr9PfceXMGTx1ejS2ByGH_ijc3FuAj4LNRldJDxncm_8DTir1MuczIR3xZjQwzlHn83KRgbK3Q2pyV-aUKpdaEEU0LNhBFv4gAJ30yjNzFCytiMA7447CfoVX3N8PZhHqNvF-d3p1-a683l1enn68bxtSqNIb5nTnjuvXOEW8cFI4NVwHsOhAuiBmbFAIJZyjrFGetBWNf5vka4ZPwYfTj07tP0e4Zc9C5kBzGaEaY5a7aWSrJ-LdTzaNeJXlEpF5QdUJemnBN4vU9hZ9K9pkQvnvRWL5704kkToauFGnr_0D_bHQyPkf9iKvDpAED9kD8Bks4uQDUxhFR96WEKT_X_A4YepQs</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Rathore, Roshita</creator><creator>Tucker, Carole A.</creator><creator>Jeka, John J.</creator><creator>Wright, W. Geoffrey</creator><creator>Hurt, Christopher P.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Effect of Increasing Obstacle Distances Task on Postural Stability Variables During Gait Initiation in Older Nonfallers and Fallers</title><author>Rathore, Roshita ; Tucker, Carole A. ; Jeka, John J. ; Wright, W. Geoffrey ; Hurt, Christopher P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a0f72c4f3ffcc03bc3420db9e373e03409d2b4de42b12693227e4bc6f7f3f3523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Center of mass</topic><topic>Center of pressure</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Gait initiation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Obstacle</topic><topic>Postural Balance</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rathore, Roshita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Carole A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeka, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, W. Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurt, Christopher P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rathore, Roshita</au><au>Tucker, Carole A.</au><au>Jeka, John J.</au><au>Wright, W. Geoffrey</au><au>Hurt, Christopher P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Increasing Obstacle Distances Task on Postural Stability Variables During Gait Initiation in Older Nonfallers and Fallers</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2303</spage><epage>2310</epage><pages>2303-2310</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><abstract>•Older fallers conservatively vary anterior-posterior (AP) center of mass (CoM)-center of pressure (CoP) separation before toe-off of the gait initiation (GI).•Older fallers lean trunk more forward than nonfallers during swing phase of the GI.•AP CoM-CoP separation before toe-off of the GI distinguishes fallers vs non-fallers•GI during scaled obstacle distances can assess postural stability in older adults.•If task success affects AP CoM-CoP separation during the swing phase is unknown.
To compare the scaling of the postural stability variables between older nonfallers and fallers during gait initiation (GI) while stepping over increasing obstacle distances.
Cross-sectional study.
University research laboratory.
A sample of participants (N=24) divided into 2 groups: older nonfallers (n=12) and older fallers (n=12). Participants had no known neurologic, musculoskeletal, or cardiovascular conditions that could have affected their walking, and all were independent walkers. All the participants had an adequate cognitive function to participate as indicated by a score of more than 24 on the Mini-Mental State Examination.
Not applicable.
The primary dependent variables were peak anterior-posterior (AP) center of mass (CoM)-center of pressure (CoP) separation during anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs), AP CoM-CoP separation at the toe-off, and peak AP CoM-CoP separation during the swing. Secondary dependent variables were AP trunk angle during GI. Within- and between-repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare means between groups across different task conditions for all the dependent variables.
There was a main effect of group for peak AP CoM-CoP separation during APA (P=.018), an interaction effect between group and condition for AP CoM-CoP separation at toe-off (P=.009), and a main effect of condition for peak AP CoM-CoP separation during the swing (P<.001). We also found a main effect of group for peak AP trunk angle during the swing (P=.028).
For GI while stepping over increasing obstacle distances, older fallers adopt a more conservative strategy of AP CoM-CoP separation than nonfallers prior to toe-off and demonstrate increased peak AP trunk lean during the swing. AP CoM-CoP separation prior to toe-off during the GI task may be a critical marker to identify fallers and warrants additional investigation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35550139</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apmr.2022.04.006</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9993 |
ispartof | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2022-12, Vol.103 (12), p.2303-2310 |
issn | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2664791559 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Aged Center of mass Center of pressure Cognition Cross-Sectional Studies Gait Gait initiation Humans Obstacle Postural Balance Rehabilitation Walking |
title | Effect of Increasing Obstacle Distances Task on Postural Stability Variables During Gait Initiation in Older Nonfallers and Fallers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T20%3A09%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Increasing%20Obstacle%20Distances%20Task%20on%20Postural%20Stability%20Variables%20During%20Gait%20Initiation%20in%20Older%20Nonfallers%20and%20Fallers&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Rathore,%20Roshita&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2303&rft.epage=2310&rft.pages=2303-2310&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.04.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2664791559%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2664791559&rft_id=info:pmid/35550139&rft_els_id=S0003999322003653&rfr_iscdi=true |