When punishment goals moderate and mediate the effect of clinical reports on the recidivism risk on prison sentences
This research examined whether an individual's endorsement of punishment goals moderates and mediates the effect of a clinical assessment of recidivism risk on the length of prison sentences. We measured participants' endorsement of punishment goals, both before they read a criminal case (...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psychiatry, psychology, and law psychology, and law, 2021-08, Vol.28 (4), p.531-545 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 545 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 531 |
| container_title | Psychiatry, psychology, and law |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Niang, Anta Leclerc, Chloé Testé, Benoît |
| description | This research examined whether an individual's endorsement of punishment goals moderates and mediates the effect of a clinical assessment of recidivism risk on the length of prison sentences. We measured participants' endorsement of punishment goals, both before they read a criminal case (i.e. a priori endorsement), and after they had read it (i.e. case-specific endorsement). As expected, the effect of the clinical report's conclusion on participants' sentencing decisions was moderated by a priori endorsement of incapacitation as a punishment goal. Participants who expressed strong (versus weak) a priori endorsement of this punishment goal were influenced by the report's conclusion on the risk of recidivism. In addition, when the clinical report concluded that the offender had a high risk of recidivating, participants expressed greater case-specific motivation to incapacitate him. Finally, the clinical report's conclusion had an indirect effect on the severity of the sentence through case-specific endorsement of the incapacitation punishment goal. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13218719.2020.1805811 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2664788476</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agis.20220511066670</informt_id><sourcerecordid>2664788476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c733t-aae0ee7299f5012d48987d10f649222fc11dc4f606d3bc9ea73323c23c175d5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-BCXgjb3Ymq_5yI1YSnWFhd4oXoY0HztZZ5I1ya7033umsy21ggiBHE6e874nyamq1wSfEdzh94RR0rVEnFFMIdXhuiPkSXVMBOML0nTtU4iBWUzQUfUi5w3GRAD4vDpidQ04b4-r8r23AW13wed-tKGgdVRDRmM0NqlikQoGjdb4KS69RdY5qwuKDunBB6_VgJLdxlQyiuGWSFZ74_c-jyj5_GNKbyGALYO-Ddrml9UzBy721WE_qb59uvx6sVysrj5_uThfLXTLWFkoZbG1LRXC1ZhQwzvRtYZg13BBKXWaEKO5a3Bj2LUWVkEVZRoWaWtTK3ZSfZh1t7truIQG_6QGCe2MKt3IqLz88yT4Xq7jXgosMMccBE5ngf5R2fJ8JaccMJxTzPcE2HcHsxR_7mwucvRZ22FQwcZdlrRpeNt1vG0AffsI3cRdCvAUQNWiY4LgiapnSqeYc7LuvgOC5TQD8m4G5DQD8jADUPfm4a3vq-4-HYCrGUijL1LHYYAv9THkjSpZZquS7qUPLt6ex7SWJvrJlDHSSLX2eTKkuCbQZtO0GBSXDxQnYlv-Swiwv6Q-zlJznfoV02BkUTdDTC6poMGd_fsBfgM7JPV_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2659839106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When punishment goals moderate and mediate the effect of clinical reports on the recidivism risk on prison sentences</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Niang, Anta ; Leclerc, Chloé ; Testé, Benoît</creator><creatorcontrib>Niang, Anta ; Leclerc, Chloé ; Testé, Benoît</creatorcontrib><description>This research examined whether an individual's endorsement of punishment goals moderates and mediates the effect of a clinical assessment of recidivism risk on the length of prison sentences. We measured participants' endorsement of punishment goals, both before they read a criminal case (i.e. a priori endorsement), and after they had read it (i.e. case-specific endorsement). As expected, the effect of the clinical report's conclusion on participants' sentencing decisions was moderated by a priori endorsement of incapacitation as a punishment goal. Participants who expressed strong (versus weak) a priori endorsement of this punishment goal were influenced by the report's conclusion on the risk of recidivism. In addition, when the clinical report concluded that the offender had a high risk of recidivating, participants expressed greater case-specific motivation to incapacitate him. Finally, the clinical report's conclusion had an indirect effect on the severity of the sentence through case-specific endorsement of the incapacitation punishment goal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1321-8719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-1687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1805811</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35558147</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Clinical assessment ; clinical report ; Criminal sentences ; Decision making ; Evaluation ; High risk ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Incapacitation ; Jury ; jury decision making ; Motivation ; Objectives ; Prison sentences ; Punishment ; punishment goals ; Recidivism ; Risk assessment ; risk of recidivism ; sentence</subject><ispartof>Psychiatry, psychology, and law, 2021-08, Vol.28 (4), p.531-545</ispartof><rights>2020 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 2020</rights><rights>2020 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law.</rights><rights>2020 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>2020 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 2020 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c733t-aae0ee7299f5012d48987d10f649222fc11dc4f606d3bc9ea73323c23c175d5a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c733t-aae0ee7299f5012d48987d10f649222fc11dc4f606d3bc9ea73323c23c175d5a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1451-5553</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9090404/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9090404/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,30999,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35558147$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04344204$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Niang, Anta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leclerc, Chloé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Testé, Benoît</creatorcontrib><title>When punishment goals moderate and mediate the effect of clinical reports on the recidivism risk on prison sentences</title><title>Psychiatry, psychology, and law</title><addtitle>Psychiatr Psychol Law</addtitle><description>This research examined whether an individual's endorsement of punishment goals moderates and mediates the effect of a clinical assessment of recidivism risk on the length of prison sentences. We measured participants' endorsement of punishment goals, both before they read a criminal case (i.e. a priori endorsement), and after they had read it (i.e. case-specific endorsement). As expected, the effect of the clinical report's conclusion on participants' sentencing decisions was moderated by a priori endorsement of incapacitation as a punishment goal. Participants who expressed strong (versus weak) a priori endorsement of this punishment goal were influenced by the report's conclusion on the risk of recidivism. In addition, when the clinical report concluded that the offender had a high risk of recidivating, participants expressed greater case-specific motivation to incapacitate him. Finally, the clinical report's conclusion had an indirect effect on the severity of the sentence through case-specific endorsement of the incapacitation punishment goal.</description><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>clinical report</subject><subject>Criminal sentences</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>High risk</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Incapacitation</subject><subject>Jury</subject><subject>jury decision making</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Prison sentences</subject><subject>Punishment</subject><subject>punishment goals</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>risk of recidivism</subject><subject>sentence</subject><issn>1321-8719</issn><issn>1934-1687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-BCXgjb3Ymq_5yI1YSnWFhd4oXoY0HztZZ5I1ya7033umsy21ggiBHE6e874nyamq1wSfEdzh94RR0rVEnFFMIdXhuiPkSXVMBOML0nTtU4iBWUzQUfUi5w3GRAD4vDpidQ04b4-r8r23AW13wed-tKGgdVRDRmM0NqlikQoGjdb4KS69RdY5qwuKDunBB6_VgJLdxlQyiuGWSFZ74_c-jyj5_GNKbyGALYO-Ddrml9UzBy721WE_qb59uvx6sVysrj5_uThfLXTLWFkoZbG1LRXC1ZhQwzvRtYZg13BBKXWaEKO5a3Bj2LUWVkEVZRoWaWtTK3ZSfZh1t7truIQG_6QGCe2MKt3IqLz88yT4Xq7jXgosMMccBE5ngf5R2fJ8JaccMJxTzPcE2HcHsxR_7mwucvRZ22FQwcZdlrRpeNt1vG0AffsI3cRdCvAUQNWiY4LgiapnSqeYc7LuvgOC5TQD8m4G5DQD8jADUPfm4a3vq-4-HYCrGUijL1LHYYAv9THkjSpZZquS7qUPLt6ex7SWJvrJlDHSSLX2eTKkuCbQZtO0GBSXDxQnYlv-Swiwv6Q-zlJznfoV02BkUTdDTC6poMGd_fsBfgM7JPV_</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Niang, Anta</creator><creator>Leclerc, Chloé</creator><creator>Testé, Benoît</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Australian Academic Press Group Pty Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1451-5553</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>When punishment goals moderate and mediate the effect of clinical reports on the recidivism risk on prison sentences</title><author>Niang, Anta ; Leclerc, Chloé ; Testé, Benoît</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c733t-aae0ee7299f5012d48987d10f649222fc11dc4f606d3bc9ea73323c23c175d5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>clinical report</topic><topic>Criminal sentences</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>High risk</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Incapacitation</topic><topic>Jury</topic><topic>jury decision making</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Prison sentences</topic><topic>Punishment</topic><topic>punishment goals</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>risk of recidivism</topic><topic>sentence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Niang, Anta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leclerc, Chloé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Testé, Benoît</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Psychiatry, psychology, and law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Niang, Anta</au><au>Leclerc, Chloé</au><au>Testé, Benoît</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When punishment goals moderate and mediate the effect of clinical reports on the recidivism risk on prison sentences</atitle><jtitle>Psychiatry, psychology, and law</jtitle><addtitle>Psychiatr Psychol Law</addtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>531</spage><epage>545</epage><pages>531-545</pages><issn>1321-8719</issn><eissn>1934-1687</eissn><abstract>This research examined whether an individual's endorsement of punishment goals moderates and mediates the effect of a clinical assessment of recidivism risk on the length of prison sentences. We measured participants' endorsement of punishment goals, both before they read a criminal case (i.e. a priori endorsement), and after they had read it (i.e. case-specific endorsement). As expected, the effect of the clinical report's conclusion on participants' sentencing decisions was moderated by a priori endorsement of incapacitation as a punishment goal. Participants who expressed strong (versus weak) a priori endorsement of this punishment goal were influenced by the report's conclusion on the risk of recidivism. In addition, when the clinical report concluded that the offender had a high risk of recidivating, participants expressed greater case-specific motivation to incapacitate him. Finally, the clinical report's conclusion had an indirect effect on the severity of the sentence through case-specific endorsement of the incapacitation punishment goal.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>35558147</pmid><doi>10.1080/13218719.2020.1805811</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1451-5553</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1321-8719 |
| ispartof | Psychiatry, psychology, and law, 2021-08, Vol.28 (4), p.531-545 |
| issn | 1321-8719 1934-1687 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2664788476 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Clinical assessment clinical report Criminal sentences Decision making Evaluation High risk Humanities and Social Sciences Incapacitation Jury jury decision making Motivation Objectives Prison sentences Punishment punishment goals Recidivism Risk assessment risk of recidivism sentence |
| title | When punishment goals moderate and mediate the effect of clinical reports on the recidivism risk on prison sentences |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T06%3A27%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20punishment%20goals%20moderate%20and%20mediate%20the%20effect%20of%20clinical%20reports%20on%20the%20recidivism%20risk%20on%20prison%20sentences&rft.jtitle=Psychiatry,%20psychology,%20and%20law&rft.au=Niang,%20Anta&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=531&rft.epage=545&rft.pages=531-545&rft.issn=1321-8719&rft.eissn=1934-1687&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13218719.2020.1805811&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2664788476%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2659839106&rft_id=info:pmid/35558147&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agis.20220511066670&rfr_iscdi=true |