Nuclear‐medicine probes: Where we are and where we are going
Nuclear medicine probes turned into the key for the identification and precise location of sentinel lymph nodes and other occult lesions (i.e., tumors) by using the systemic administration of radiotracers. Intraoperative nuclear probes are key in the surgical management of some malignancies as well...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 2022-07, Vol.49 (7), p.4372-4390 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4390 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 4372 |
container_title | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Gonzalez‐Montoro, Andrea Vera‐Donoso, Cesar David Konstantinou, Georgios Sopena, Pablo Martinez, Manolo Ortiz, Juan Bautista Carles, Montserrat Benlloch, Jose Maria Gonzalez, Antonio Javier |
description | Nuclear medicine probes turned into the key for the identification and precise location of sentinel lymph nodes and other occult lesions (i.e., tumors) by using the systemic administration of radiotracers. Intraoperative nuclear probes are key in the surgical management of some malignancies as well as in the determination of positive surgical margins, thus reducing the extent and potential surgery morbidity.
Depending on their application, nuclear probes are classified into two main categories, namely, counting and imaging. Although counting probes present a simple design, are handheld (to be moved rapidly), and provide only acoustic signals when detecting radiation, imaging probes, also known as cameras, are more hardware‐complex and also able to provide images but at the cost of an increased intervention time as displacing the camera has to be done slowly.
This review article begins with an introductory section to highlight the relevance of nuclear‐based probes and their components as well as the main differences between ionization‐ (semiconductor) and scintillation‐based probes. Then, the most significant performance parameters of the probe are reviewed (i.e., sensitivity, contrast, count rate capabilities, shielding, energy, and spatial resolution), as well as the different types of probes based on the target radiation nature, namely: gamma (γ), beta (β) (positron and electron), and Cherenkov. Various available intraoperative nuclear probes are finally compared in terms of performance to discuss the state‐of‐the‐art of nuclear medicine probes.
The manuscript concludes by discussing the ideal probe design and the aspects to be considered when selecting nuclear‐medicine probes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mp.15690 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2661086291</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2661086291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3550-721a92383945f56b953305d0d81332f17c778b74c20e79fd9713221a998688ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMlOwzAQhi0EoqUg8QQoRy4pYzveOCChik0qywHE0XIcpwRlwyaqeuMReEaehJSW5cJppNE338z8CO1jGGMAclS1Y8y4gg00JImgcUJAbaIhgEpikgAboJ0QngGAUwbbaEAZI5wQGKKTm86WzviPt_fKZYUtahe1vkldOI4en5x30dxFpi-mzqL538asKerZLtrKTRnc3rqO0MP52f3kMp7eXlxNTqex7VdBLAg2ilBJVcJyxlPFKAWWQSYxpSTHwgohU5FYAk6oPFMCU7KcUZJLaVI6Qocrb3_bS-fCq66KYF1Zmto1XdCEcwySE4V_UeubELzLdeuLyviFxqCXaemq1V9p9ejB2tql_fc_4Hc8PRCvgHlRusW_In19txJ-AjLocBc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2661086291</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nuclear‐medicine probes: Where we are and where we are going</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gonzalez‐Montoro, Andrea ; Vera‐Donoso, Cesar David ; Konstantinou, Georgios ; Sopena, Pablo ; Martinez, Manolo ; Ortiz, Juan Bautista ; Carles, Montserrat ; Benlloch, Jose Maria ; Gonzalez, Antonio Javier</creator><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez‐Montoro, Andrea ; Vera‐Donoso, Cesar David ; Konstantinou, Georgios ; Sopena, Pablo ; Martinez, Manolo ; Ortiz, Juan Bautista ; Carles, Montserrat ; Benlloch, Jose Maria ; Gonzalez, Antonio Javier</creatorcontrib><description>Nuclear medicine probes turned into the key for the identification and precise location of sentinel lymph nodes and other occult lesions (i.e., tumors) by using the systemic administration of radiotracers. Intraoperative nuclear probes are key in the surgical management of some malignancies as well as in the determination of positive surgical margins, thus reducing the extent and potential surgery morbidity.
Depending on their application, nuclear probes are classified into two main categories, namely, counting and imaging. Although counting probes present a simple design, are handheld (to be moved rapidly), and provide only acoustic signals when detecting radiation, imaging probes, also known as cameras, are more hardware‐complex and also able to provide images but at the cost of an increased intervention time as displacing the camera has to be done slowly.
This review article begins with an introductory section to highlight the relevance of nuclear‐based probes and their components as well as the main differences between ionization‐ (semiconductor) and scintillation‐based probes. Then, the most significant performance parameters of the probe are reviewed (i.e., sensitivity, contrast, count rate capabilities, shielding, energy, and spatial resolution), as well as the different types of probes based on the target radiation nature, namely: gamma (γ), beta (β) (positron and electron), and Cherenkov. Various available intraoperative nuclear probes are finally compared in terms of performance to discuss the state‐of‐the‐art of nuclear medicine probes.
The manuscript concludes by discussing the ideal probe design and the aspects to be considered when selecting nuclear‐medicine probes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mp.15690</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35526220</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Gamma Rays ; Humans ; intraoperative instruments ; Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Nuclear Medicine ; nuclear probes ; radiation detectors ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Sentinel Lymph Node</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2022-07, Vol.49 (7), p.4372-4390</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3550-721a92383945f56b953305d0d81332f17c778b74c20e79fd9713221a998688ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3550-721a92383945f56b953305d0d81332f17c778b74c20e79fd9713221a998688ab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmp.15690$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmp.15690$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35526220$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez‐Montoro, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vera‐Donoso, Cesar David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konstantinou, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sopena, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Manolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz, Juan Bautista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carles, Montserrat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benlloch, Jose Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Antonio Javier</creatorcontrib><title>Nuclear‐medicine probes: Where we are and where we are going</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Nuclear medicine probes turned into the key for the identification and precise location of sentinel lymph nodes and other occult lesions (i.e., tumors) by using the systemic administration of radiotracers. Intraoperative nuclear probes are key in the surgical management of some malignancies as well as in the determination of positive surgical margins, thus reducing the extent and potential surgery morbidity.
Depending on their application, nuclear probes are classified into two main categories, namely, counting and imaging. Although counting probes present a simple design, are handheld (to be moved rapidly), and provide only acoustic signals when detecting radiation, imaging probes, also known as cameras, are more hardware‐complex and also able to provide images but at the cost of an increased intervention time as displacing the camera has to be done slowly.
This review article begins with an introductory section to highlight the relevance of nuclear‐based probes and their components as well as the main differences between ionization‐ (semiconductor) and scintillation‐based probes. Then, the most significant performance parameters of the probe are reviewed (i.e., sensitivity, contrast, count rate capabilities, shielding, energy, and spatial resolution), as well as the different types of probes based on the target radiation nature, namely: gamma (γ), beta (β) (positron and electron), and Cherenkov. Various available intraoperative nuclear probes are finally compared in terms of performance to discuss the state‐of‐the‐art of nuclear medicine probes.
The manuscript concludes by discussing the ideal probe design and the aspects to be considered when selecting nuclear‐medicine probes.</description><subject>Gamma Rays</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intraoperative instruments</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>nuclear probes</subject><subject>radiation detectors</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMlOwzAQhi0EoqUg8QQoRy4pYzveOCChik0qywHE0XIcpwRlwyaqeuMReEaehJSW5cJppNE338z8CO1jGGMAclS1Y8y4gg00JImgcUJAbaIhgEpikgAboJ0QngGAUwbbaEAZI5wQGKKTm86WzviPt_fKZYUtahe1vkldOI4en5x30dxFpi-mzqL538asKerZLtrKTRnc3rqO0MP52f3kMp7eXlxNTqex7VdBLAg2ilBJVcJyxlPFKAWWQSYxpSTHwgohU5FYAk6oPFMCU7KcUZJLaVI6Qocrb3_bS-fCq66KYF1Zmto1XdCEcwySE4V_UeubELzLdeuLyviFxqCXaemq1V9p9ejB2tql_fc_4Hc8PRCvgHlRusW_In19txJ-AjLocBc</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Gonzalez‐Montoro, Andrea</creator><creator>Vera‐Donoso, Cesar David</creator><creator>Konstantinou, Georgios</creator><creator>Sopena, Pablo</creator><creator>Martinez, Manolo</creator><creator>Ortiz, Juan Bautista</creator><creator>Carles, Montserrat</creator><creator>Benlloch, Jose Maria</creator><creator>Gonzalez, Antonio Javier</creator><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Nuclear‐medicine probes: Where we are and where we are going</title><author>Gonzalez‐Montoro, Andrea ; Vera‐Donoso, Cesar David ; Konstantinou, Georgios ; Sopena, Pablo ; Martinez, Manolo ; Ortiz, Juan Bautista ; Carles, Montserrat ; Benlloch, Jose Maria ; Gonzalez, Antonio Javier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3550-721a92383945f56b953305d0d81332f17c778b74c20e79fd9713221a998688ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Gamma Rays</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intraoperative instruments</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>nuclear probes</topic><topic>radiation detectors</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez‐Montoro, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vera‐Donoso, Cesar David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konstantinou, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sopena, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Manolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz, Juan Bautista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carles, Montserrat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benlloch, Jose Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Antonio Javier</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gonzalez‐Montoro, Andrea</au><au>Vera‐Donoso, Cesar David</au><au>Konstantinou, Georgios</au><au>Sopena, Pablo</au><au>Martinez, Manolo</au><au>Ortiz, Juan Bautista</au><au>Carles, Montserrat</au><au>Benlloch, Jose Maria</au><au>Gonzalez, Antonio Javier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nuclear‐medicine probes: Where we are and where we are going</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>4372</spage><epage>4390</epage><pages>4372-4390</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><abstract>Nuclear medicine probes turned into the key for the identification and precise location of sentinel lymph nodes and other occult lesions (i.e., tumors) by using the systemic administration of radiotracers. Intraoperative nuclear probes are key in the surgical management of some malignancies as well as in the determination of positive surgical margins, thus reducing the extent and potential surgery morbidity.
Depending on their application, nuclear probes are classified into two main categories, namely, counting and imaging. Although counting probes present a simple design, are handheld (to be moved rapidly), and provide only acoustic signals when detecting radiation, imaging probes, also known as cameras, are more hardware‐complex and also able to provide images but at the cost of an increased intervention time as displacing the camera has to be done slowly.
This review article begins with an introductory section to highlight the relevance of nuclear‐based probes and their components as well as the main differences between ionization‐ (semiconductor) and scintillation‐based probes. Then, the most significant performance parameters of the probe are reviewed (i.e., sensitivity, contrast, count rate capabilities, shielding, energy, and spatial resolution), as well as the different types of probes based on the target radiation nature, namely: gamma (γ), beta (β) (positron and electron), and Cherenkov. Various available intraoperative nuclear probes are finally compared in terms of performance to discuss the state‐of‐the‐art of nuclear medicine probes.
The manuscript concludes by discussing the ideal probe design and the aspects to be considered when selecting nuclear‐medicine probes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>35526220</pmid><doi>10.1002/mp.15690</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical physics (Lancaster), 2022-07, Vol.49 (7), p.4372-4390 |
issn | 0094-2405 2473-4209 2473-4209 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2661086291 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Gamma Rays Humans intraoperative instruments Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Nuclear Medicine nuclear probes radiation detectors Radionuclide Imaging Sentinel Lymph Node |
title | Nuclear‐medicine probes: Where we are and where we are going |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A45%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nuclear%E2%80%90medicine%20probes:%20Where%20we%20are%20and%20where%20we%20are%20going&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Gonzalez%E2%80%90Montoro,%20Andrea&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=4372&rft.epage=4390&rft.pages=4372-4390&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mp.15690&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2661086291%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2661086291&rft_id=info:pmid/35526220&rfr_iscdi=true |