Nuclear‐medicine probes: Where we are and where we are going

Nuclear medicine probes turned into the key for the identification and precise location of sentinel lymph nodes and other occult lesions (i.e., tumors) by using the systemic administration of radiotracers. Intraoperative nuclear probes are key in the surgical management of some malignancies as well...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2022-07, Vol.49 (7), p.4372-4390
Hauptverfasser: Gonzalez‐Montoro, Andrea, Vera‐Donoso, Cesar David, Konstantinou, Georgios, Sopena, Pablo, Martinez, Manolo, Ortiz, Juan Bautista, Carles, Montserrat, Benlloch, Jose Maria, Gonzalez, Antonio Javier
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4390
container_issue 7
container_start_page 4372
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 49
creator Gonzalez‐Montoro, Andrea
Vera‐Donoso, Cesar David
Konstantinou, Georgios
Sopena, Pablo
Martinez, Manolo
Ortiz, Juan Bautista
Carles, Montserrat
Benlloch, Jose Maria
Gonzalez, Antonio Javier
description Nuclear medicine probes turned into the key for the identification and precise location of sentinel lymph nodes and other occult lesions (i.e., tumors) by using the systemic administration of radiotracers. Intraoperative nuclear probes are key in the surgical management of some malignancies as well as in the determination of positive surgical margins, thus reducing the extent and potential surgery morbidity. Depending on their application, nuclear probes are classified into two main categories, namely, counting and imaging. Although counting probes present a simple design, are handheld (to be moved rapidly), and provide only acoustic signals when detecting radiation, imaging probes, also known as cameras, are more hardware‐complex and also able to provide images but at the cost of an increased intervention time as displacing the camera has to be done slowly. This review article begins with an introductory section to highlight the relevance of nuclear‐based probes and their components as well as the main differences between ionization‐ (semiconductor) and scintillation‐based probes. Then, the most significant performance parameters of the probe are reviewed (i.e., sensitivity, contrast, count rate capabilities, shielding, energy, and spatial resolution), as well as the different types of probes based on the target radiation nature, namely: gamma (γ), beta (β) (positron and electron), and Cherenkov. Various available intraoperative nuclear probes are finally compared in terms of performance to discuss the state‐of‐the‐art of nuclear medicine probes. The manuscript concludes by discussing the ideal probe design and the aspects to be considered when selecting nuclear‐medicine probes.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mp.15690
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2661086291</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2661086291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3550-721a92383945f56b953305d0d81332f17c778b74c20e79fd9713221a998688ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMlOwzAQhi0EoqUg8QQoRy4pYzveOCChik0qywHE0XIcpwRlwyaqeuMReEaehJSW5cJppNE338z8CO1jGGMAclS1Y8y4gg00JImgcUJAbaIhgEpikgAboJ0QngGAUwbbaEAZI5wQGKKTm86WzviPt_fKZYUtahe1vkldOI4en5x30dxFpi-mzqL538asKerZLtrKTRnc3rqO0MP52f3kMp7eXlxNTqex7VdBLAg2ilBJVcJyxlPFKAWWQSYxpSTHwgohU5FYAk6oPFMCU7KcUZJLaVI6Qocrb3_bS-fCq66KYF1Zmto1XdCEcwySE4V_UeubELzLdeuLyviFxqCXaemq1V9p9ejB2tql_fc_4Hc8PRCvgHlRusW_In19txJ-AjLocBc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2661086291</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nuclear‐medicine probes: Where we are and where we are going</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gonzalez‐Montoro, Andrea ; Vera‐Donoso, Cesar David ; Konstantinou, Georgios ; Sopena, Pablo ; Martinez, Manolo ; Ortiz, Juan Bautista ; Carles, Montserrat ; Benlloch, Jose Maria ; Gonzalez, Antonio Javier</creator><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez‐Montoro, Andrea ; Vera‐Donoso, Cesar David ; Konstantinou, Georgios ; Sopena, Pablo ; Martinez, Manolo ; Ortiz, Juan Bautista ; Carles, Montserrat ; Benlloch, Jose Maria ; Gonzalez, Antonio Javier</creatorcontrib><description>Nuclear medicine probes turned into the key for the identification and precise location of sentinel lymph nodes and other occult lesions (i.e., tumors) by using the systemic administration of radiotracers. Intraoperative nuclear probes are key in the surgical management of some malignancies as well as in the determination of positive surgical margins, thus reducing the extent and potential surgery morbidity. Depending on their application, nuclear probes are classified into two main categories, namely, counting and imaging. Although counting probes present a simple design, are handheld (to be moved rapidly), and provide only acoustic signals when detecting radiation, imaging probes, also known as cameras, are more hardware‐complex and also able to provide images but at the cost of an increased intervention time as displacing the camera has to be done slowly. This review article begins with an introductory section to highlight the relevance of nuclear‐based probes and their components as well as the main differences between ionization‐ (semiconductor) and scintillation‐based probes. Then, the most significant performance parameters of the probe are reviewed (i.e., sensitivity, contrast, count rate capabilities, shielding, energy, and spatial resolution), as well as the different types of probes based on the target radiation nature, namely: gamma (γ), beta (β) (positron and electron), and Cherenkov. Various available intraoperative nuclear probes are finally compared in terms of performance to discuss the state‐of‐the‐art of nuclear medicine probes. The manuscript concludes by discussing the ideal probe design and the aspects to be considered when selecting nuclear‐medicine probes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mp.15690</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35526220</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Gamma Rays ; Humans ; intraoperative instruments ; Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Nuclear Medicine ; nuclear probes ; radiation detectors ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Sentinel Lymph Node</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2022-07, Vol.49 (7), p.4372-4390</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3550-721a92383945f56b953305d0d81332f17c778b74c20e79fd9713221a998688ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3550-721a92383945f56b953305d0d81332f17c778b74c20e79fd9713221a998688ab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmp.15690$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmp.15690$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35526220$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez‐Montoro, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vera‐Donoso, Cesar David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konstantinou, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sopena, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Manolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz, Juan Bautista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carles, Montserrat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benlloch, Jose Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Antonio Javier</creatorcontrib><title>Nuclear‐medicine probes: Where we are and where we are going</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Nuclear medicine probes turned into the key for the identification and precise location of sentinel lymph nodes and other occult lesions (i.e., tumors) by using the systemic administration of radiotracers. Intraoperative nuclear probes are key in the surgical management of some malignancies as well as in the determination of positive surgical margins, thus reducing the extent and potential surgery morbidity. Depending on their application, nuclear probes are classified into two main categories, namely, counting and imaging. Although counting probes present a simple design, are handheld (to be moved rapidly), and provide only acoustic signals when detecting radiation, imaging probes, also known as cameras, are more hardware‐complex and also able to provide images but at the cost of an increased intervention time as displacing the camera has to be done slowly. This review article begins with an introductory section to highlight the relevance of nuclear‐based probes and their components as well as the main differences between ionization‐ (semiconductor) and scintillation‐based probes. Then, the most significant performance parameters of the probe are reviewed (i.e., sensitivity, contrast, count rate capabilities, shielding, energy, and spatial resolution), as well as the different types of probes based on the target radiation nature, namely: gamma (γ), beta (β) (positron and electron), and Cherenkov. Various available intraoperative nuclear probes are finally compared in terms of performance to discuss the state‐of‐the‐art of nuclear medicine probes. The manuscript concludes by discussing the ideal probe design and the aspects to be considered when selecting nuclear‐medicine probes.</description><subject>Gamma Rays</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intraoperative instruments</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>nuclear probes</subject><subject>radiation detectors</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMlOwzAQhi0EoqUg8QQoRy4pYzveOCChik0qywHE0XIcpwRlwyaqeuMReEaehJSW5cJppNE338z8CO1jGGMAclS1Y8y4gg00JImgcUJAbaIhgEpikgAboJ0QngGAUwbbaEAZI5wQGKKTm86WzviPt_fKZYUtahe1vkldOI4en5x30dxFpi-mzqL538asKerZLtrKTRnc3rqO0MP52f3kMp7eXlxNTqex7VdBLAg2ilBJVcJyxlPFKAWWQSYxpSTHwgohU5FYAk6oPFMCU7KcUZJLaVI6Qocrb3_bS-fCq66KYF1Zmto1XdCEcwySE4V_UeubELzLdeuLyviFxqCXaemq1V9p9ejB2tql_fc_4Hc8PRCvgHlRusW_In19txJ-AjLocBc</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Gonzalez‐Montoro, Andrea</creator><creator>Vera‐Donoso, Cesar David</creator><creator>Konstantinou, Georgios</creator><creator>Sopena, Pablo</creator><creator>Martinez, Manolo</creator><creator>Ortiz, Juan Bautista</creator><creator>Carles, Montserrat</creator><creator>Benlloch, Jose Maria</creator><creator>Gonzalez, Antonio Javier</creator><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Nuclear‐medicine probes: Where we are and where we are going</title><author>Gonzalez‐Montoro, Andrea ; Vera‐Donoso, Cesar David ; Konstantinou, Georgios ; Sopena, Pablo ; Martinez, Manolo ; Ortiz, Juan Bautista ; Carles, Montserrat ; Benlloch, Jose Maria ; Gonzalez, Antonio Javier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3550-721a92383945f56b953305d0d81332f17c778b74c20e79fd9713221a998688ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Gamma Rays</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intraoperative instruments</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>nuclear probes</topic><topic>radiation detectors</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez‐Montoro, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vera‐Donoso, Cesar David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konstantinou, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sopena, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Manolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz, Juan Bautista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carles, Montserrat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benlloch, Jose Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Antonio Javier</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gonzalez‐Montoro, Andrea</au><au>Vera‐Donoso, Cesar David</au><au>Konstantinou, Georgios</au><au>Sopena, Pablo</au><au>Martinez, Manolo</au><au>Ortiz, Juan Bautista</au><au>Carles, Montserrat</au><au>Benlloch, Jose Maria</au><au>Gonzalez, Antonio Javier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nuclear‐medicine probes: Where we are and where we are going</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>4372</spage><epage>4390</epage><pages>4372-4390</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><abstract>Nuclear medicine probes turned into the key for the identification and precise location of sentinel lymph nodes and other occult lesions (i.e., tumors) by using the systemic administration of radiotracers. Intraoperative nuclear probes are key in the surgical management of some malignancies as well as in the determination of positive surgical margins, thus reducing the extent and potential surgery morbidity. Depending on their application, nuclear probes are classified into two main categories, namely, counting and imaging. Although counting probes present a simple design, are handheld (to be moved rapidly), and provide only acoustic signals when detecting radiation, imaging probes, also known as cameras, are more hardware‐complex and also able to provide images but at the cost of an increased intervention time as displacing the camera has to be done slowly. This review article begins with an introductory section to highlight the relevance of nuclear‐based probes and their components as well as the main differences between ionization‐ (semiconductor) and scintillation‐based probes. Then, the most significant performance parameters of the probe are reviewed (i.e., sensitivity, contrast, count rate capabilities, shielding, energy, and spatial resolution), as well as the different types of probes based on the target radiation nature, namely: gamma (γ), beta (β) (positron and electron), and Cherenkov. Various available intraoperative nuclear probes are finally compared in terms of performance to discuss the state‐of‐the‐art of nuclear medicine probes. The manuscript concludes by discussing the ideal probe design and the aspects to be considered when selecting nuclear‐medicine probes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>35526220</pmid><doi>10.1002/mp.15690</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2022-07, Vol.49 (7), p.4372-4390
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2661086291
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Gamma Rays
Humans
intraoperative instruments
Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Nuclear Medicine
nuclear probes
radiation detectors
Radionuclide Imaging
Sentinel Lymph Node
title Nuclear‐medicine probes: Where we are and where we are going
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A45%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nuclear%E2%80%90medicine%20probes:%20Where%20we%20are%20and%20where%20we%20are%20going&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Gonzalez%E2%80%90Montoro,%20Andrea&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=4372&rft.epage=4390&rft.pages=4372-4390&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mp.15690&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2661086291%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2661086291&rft_id=info:pmid/35526220&rfr_iscdi=true