Postharvest Bee Diversity is High but Declines Rapidly with Stand Age in Regenerating Douglas-Fir Forest
Abstract Concerns about long-term pollinator declines have made assessing bee communities a priority in nonagricultural ecosystems, including managed forests. We assessed wild bee communities in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) stands one to 15 years after clearcut harvest in weste...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Forest science 2021-06, Vol.67 (3), p.275-285 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 285 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 275 |
container_title | Forest science |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Rivers, James W Betts, Matthew G |
description | Abstract
Concerns about long-term pollinator declines have made assessing bee communities a priority in nonagricultural ecosystems, including managed forests. We assessed wild bee communities in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) stands one to 15 years after clearcut harvest in western Oregon, USA, testing the hypothesis that bee diversity would be high initially and then decline with time-dependent reductions in floral resources. We captured 2,009 individual bees that represented 67 distinct species/morphospecies in 20 genera and five families. Asymptotic estimators of bee diversity representing Shannon and Simpson diversity were greater in communities during the second half of the early seral period, indicating older early seral stands were less diverse and contained more common and dominant bee species. In addition, observed species richness and bee abundance peaked at approximately three years postharvest and declined thereafter by 20% and 30% per year, respectively. Because floral resources declined in concert with reductions in bee diversity as stands aged, food appears to be a key driver of forest bee communities. Our results indicate that postharvest Douglas-fir stands supported a diversity of bees, including important crop pollinators, but their value to bees was restricted to a relatively short window at the beginning of the early seral period. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/forsci/fxab002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2661040650</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/forsci/fxab002</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2549302167</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-66d83f4095e9f093479e95b485367cd4b0299206eaa997a203941c9eff95f7c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwMltigSHtJXY-PJaWUqRKoAISW-Sk59RVGgc7KfTfE5ROLEy3PO97dw8h1z6MfBBsrIx1uR6rb5kBBCdk4AuWeCxmySkZAPihF3PxcU4unNsCQMIgGJDNi3HNRto9uobeI9KZ3qN1ujlQ7ehCFxuatQ2dYV7qCh1dyVqvywP90s2GvjayWtNJgVRXdIUFVmhlo6uCzkxblNJ5c23p3Niu_JKcKVk6vDrOIXmfP7xNF97y-fFpOll6OQPeeFG0TpjiIEIUqvuKxwJFmPEkZFGcr3kGgRABRCilELEMgAnu5wKVEqGKc86G5Lbvra35bLvF6U67HMtSVmhalwZR5AOHKIQOvfmDbk1rq-66NAi56Pz4UdxRo57KrXHOokprq3fSHlIf0l_xaS8-PYrvAnd9wLT1f-wPmXCGBw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2549302167</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Postharvest Bee Diversity is High but Declines Rapidly with Stand Age in Regenerating Douglas-Fir Forest</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Rivers, James W ; Betts, Matthew G</creator><creatorcontrib>Rivers, James W ; Betts, Matthew G</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Concerns about long-term pollinator declines have made assessing bee communities a priority in nonagricultural ecosystems, including managed forests. We assessed wild bee communities in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) stands one to 15 years after clearcut harvest in western Oregon, USA, testing the hypothesis that bee diversity would be high initially and then decline with time-dependent reductions in floral resources. We captured 2,009 individual bees that represented 67 distinct species/morphospecies in 20 genera and five families. Asymptotic estimators of bee diversity representing Shannon and Simpson diversity were greater in communities during the second half of the early seral period, indicating older early seral stands were less diverse and contained more common and dominant bee species. In addition, observed species richness and bee abundance peaked at approximately three years postharvest and declined thereafter by 20% and 30% per year, respectively. Because floral resources declined in concert with reductions in bee diversity as stands aged, food appears to be a key driver of forest bee communities. Our results indicate that postharvest Douglas-fir stands supported a diversity of bees, including important crop pollinators, but their value to bees was restricted to a relatively short window at the beginning of the early seral period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-749X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/forsci/fxab002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Agricultural production ; Animal behavior ; Bees ; Clearcutting ; Ecosystem management ; Ecosystems ; Forest ecosystems ; Forest management ; Forests ; Harvest ; Harvesting ; Hypotheses ; Insects ; morphospecies ; Oregon ; Plant reproduction ; Pollinators ; Pseudotsuga menziesii ; Species richness ; stand age ; Timber ; Time dependence</subject><ispartof>Forest science, 2021-06, Vol.67 (3), p.275-285</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of American Foresters. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2021</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Jun 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-66d83f4095e9f093479e95b485367cd4b0299206eaa997a203941c9eff95f7c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-66d83f4095e9f093479e95b485367cd4b0299206eaa997a203941c9eff95f7c43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5041-6002 ; 0000-0002-7100-2551</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rivers, James W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betts, Matthew G</creatorcontrib><title>Postharvest Bee Diversity is High but Declines Rapidly with Stand Age in Regenerating Douglas-Fir Forest</title><title>Forest science</title><description>Abstract
Concerns about long-term pollinator declines have made assessing bee communities a priority in nonagricultural ecosystems, including managed forests. We assessed wild bee communities in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) stands one to 15 years after clearcut harvest in western Oregon, USA, testing the hypothesis that bee diversity would be high initially and then decline with time-dependent reductions in floral resources. We captured 2,009 individual bees that represented 67 distinct species/morphospecies in 20 genera and five families. Asymptotic estimators of bee diversity representing Shannon and Simpson diversity were greater in communities during the second half of the early seral period, indicating older early seral stands were less diverse and contained more common and dominant bee species. In addition, observed species richness and bee abundance peaked at approximately three years postharvest and declined thereafter by 20% and 30% per year, respectively. Because floral resources declined in concert with reductions in bee diversity as stands aged, food appears to be a key driver of forest bee communities. Our results indicate that postharvest Douglas-fir stands supported a diversity of bees, including important crop pollinators, but their value to bees was restricted to a relatively short window at the beginning of the early seral period.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Clearcutting</subject><subject>Ecosystem management</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>morphospecies</subject><subject>Oregon</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Pseudotsuga menziesii</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>stand age</subject><subject>Timber</subject><subject>Time dependence</subject><issn>0015-749X</issn><issn>1938-3738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwMltigSHtJXY-PJaWUqRKoAISW-Sk59RVGgc7KfTfE5ROLEy3PO97dw8h1z6MfBBsrIx1uR6rb5kBBCdk4AuWeCxmySkZAPihF3PxcU4unNsCQMIgGJDNi3HNRto9uobeI9KZ3qN1ujlQ7ehCFxuatQ2dYV7qCh1dyVqvywP90s2GvjayWtNJgVRXdIUFVmhlo6uCzkxblNJ5c23p3Niu_JKcKVk6vDrOIXmfP7xNF97y-fFpOll6OQPeeFG0TpjiIEIUqvuKxwJFmPEkZFGcr3kGgRABRCilELEMgAnu5wKVEqGKc86G5Lbvra35bLvF6U67HMtSVmhalwZR5AOHKIQOvfmDbk1rq-66NAi56Pz4UdxRo57KrXHOokprq3fSHlIf0l_xaS8-PYrvAnd9wLT1f-wPmXCGBw</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Rivers, James W</creator><creator>Betts, Matthew G</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5041-6002</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7100-2551</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Postharvest Bee Diversity is High but Declines Rapidly with Stand Age in Regenerating Douglas-Fir Forest</title><author>Rivers, James W ; Betts, Matthew G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-66d83f4095e9f093479e95b485367cd4b0299206eaa997a203941c9eff95f7c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Clearcutting</topic><topic>Ecosystem management</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>morphospecies</topic><topic>Oregon</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Pseudotsuga menziesii</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>stand age</topic><topic>Timber</topic><topic>Time dependence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rivers, James W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betts, Matthew G</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Forest science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rivers, James W</au><au>Betts, Matthew G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Postharvest Bee Diversity is High but Declines Rapidly with Stand Age in Regenerating Douglas-Fir Forest</atitle><jtitle>Forest science</jtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>275</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>275-285</pages><issn>0015-749X</issn><eissn>1938-3738</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Concerns about long-term pollinator declines have made assessing bee communities a priority in nonagricultural ecosystems, including managed forests. We assessed wild bee communities in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) stands one to 15 years after clearcut harvest in western Oregon, USA, testing the hypothesis that bee diversity would be high initially and then decline with time-dependent reductions in floral resources. We captured 2,009 individual bees that represented 67 distinct species/morphospecies in 20 genera and five families. Asymptotic estimators of bee diversity representing Shannon and Simpson diversity were greater in communities during the second half of the early seral period, indicating older early seral stands were less diverse and contained more common and dominant bee species. In addition, observed species richness and bee abundance peaked at approximately three years postharvest and declined thereafter by 20% and 30% per year, respectively. Because floral resources declined in concert with reductions in bee diversity as stands aged, food appears to be a key driver of forest bee communities. Our results indicate that postharvest Douglas-fir stands supported a diversity of bees, including important crop pollinators, but their value to bees was restricted to a relatively short window at the beginning of the early seral period.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/forsci/fxab002</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5041-6002</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7100-2551</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0015-749X |
ispartof | Forest science, 2021-06, Vol.67 (3), p.275-285 |
issn | 0015-749X 1938-3738 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2661040650 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Abundance Agricultural production Animal behavior Bees Clearcutting Ecosystem management Ecosystems Forest ecosystems Forest management Forests Harvest Harvesting Hypotheses Insects morphospecies Oregon Plant reproduction Pollinators Pseudotsuga menziesii Species richness stand age Timber Time dependence |
title | Postharvest Bee Diversity is High but Declines Rapidly with Stand Age in Regenerating Douglas-Fir Forest |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T19%3A12%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postharvest%20Bee%20Diversity%20is%20High%20but%20Declines%20Rapidly%20with%20Stand%20Age%20in%20Regenerating%20Douglas-Fir%20Forest&rft.jtitle=Forest%20science&rft.au=Rivers,%20James%20W&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=275&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=275-285&rft.issn=0015-749X&rft.eissn=1938-3738&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/forsci/fxab002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2549302167%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2549302167&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/forsci/fxab002&rfr_iscdi=true |