Are resident research projects correlated to future subspecialty choice in orthopaedic surgery? A ten-year retrospective review of a single centre’s experience

Aim To determine (1) frequency of resident research projects being in the same orthopaedic subspecialty that they ultimately choose for fellowship and practice; (2) percentage of research projects that were published. Methods Resident Thesis Day programs were independently assessed by two reviewers...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International orthopaedics 2022-07, Vol.46 (7), p.1459-1463
Hauptverfasser: David Piche, Joshua, Selzer, Carter J., Hake, Mark E., Caird, Michelle S., Aleem, Ilyas S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1463
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1459
container_title International orthopaedics
container_volume 46
creator David Piche, Joshua
Selzer, Carter J.
Hake, Mark E.
Caird, Michelle S.
Aleem, Ilyas S.
description Aim To determine (1) frequency of resident research projects being in the same orthopaedic subspecialty that they ultimately choose for fellowship and practice; (2) percentage of research projects that were published. Methods Resident Thesis Day programs were independently assessed by two reviewers from 2010 to 2020. Reviewers classified projects based on orthopaedic subspecialty: Spine, Joints, Trauma, Hand, Foot and Ankle, Sports, Pediatrics, Oncology, and Shoulder Elbow. Presenting residents’ fellowship subspecialty, current practice specialty, and geographic state of current practice were collected using internet searches. Correlation of residents who completed a thesis day project in the same subspecialty as their fellowship and current practice was calculated. Results A total of 81 resident physicians, 11 (13.6%) female, were included. In the entire cohort, 50.6% did a thesis day project in a different field than their current or projected subspecialty. Of those who completed, or are currently completing fellowship, 33 (52.4%) did their thesis day project in the same subspecialty as their fellowship. Of the current residents who have matched into fellowship, 46.7% did a thesis day project in the same subspecialty. A total of 51 (63.0%) projects were published. Conclusion The majority of resident research projects were published, and about 50% of orthopaedic residents went on to complete a fellowship and practice in the same subspecialty as their research project. As residents often spend a considerable amount of time and effort on their projects, these findings may help tailor resident education and research curriculums to focus more on research principles than specific orthopedic content.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00264-022-05417-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2660100668</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2660100668</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-d88d5233f3679596a0b5bd6d97a9a6a76c70fd575fdb7546a7837d570a330cf73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kb1uFDEUhS0EIpvAC1AglzQG_4ztmQqtIhKQItGE2vLYd7JezY4H2xN2u7wGJa_Gk8TLBkoq_333XJ97EHrD6HtGqf6QKeWqIZRzQmXDNNk_QyvWCE4k6-RztKKiYYSrTp6h85y3lDKtWvYSnQkpaduyZoV-rRPgBDl4mMpxAza5DZ5T3IIrGbuYEoy2gMcl4mEpS-Xz0ucZXLBjOWC3icEBDhOOqWzibMEHV5F0B-nwEa9xgYkcqmxVLykeC0u4Pza9D_ADxwFbnMN0NwJ29Q8Jfj_8zBj2M6QAk4NX6MVgxwyvn9YL9O3q0-3lZ3Lz9frL5fqGOK51Ib5tveRCDELpTnbK0l72XvlO284qq5XTdPBSy8H3Wjb1phW6nqkVgrpBiwv07qRbvX9fIBezC9nBONoJ4pINV4rWsSvVVpSfUFf95ASDmVPY2XQwjJpjNOYUjanRmD_RmH0tevukv_Q78P9K_mZRAXECcn2a6vTMNi5pqp7_J_sIwBafJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2660100668</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are resident research projects correlated to future subspecialty choice in orthopaedic surgery? A ten-year retrospective review of a single centre’s experience</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>David Piche, Joshua ; Selzer, Carter J. ; Hake, Mark E. ; Caird, Michelle S. ; Aleem, Ilyas S.</creator><creatorcontrib>David Piche, Joshua ; Selzer, Carter J. ; Hake, Mark E. ; Caird, Michelle S. ; Aleem, Ilyas S.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim To determine (1) frequency of resident research projects being in the same orthopaedic subspecialty that they ultimately choose for fellowship and practice; (2) percentage of research projects that were published. Methods Resident Thesis Day programs were independently assessed by two reviewers from 2010 to 2020. Reviewers classified projects based on orthopaedic subspecialty: Spine, Joints, Trauma, Hand, Foot and Ankle, Sports, Pediatrics, Oncology, and Shoulder Elbow. Presenting residents’ fellowship subspecialty, current practice specialty, and geographic state of current practice were collected using internet searches. Correlation of residents who completed a thesis day project in the same subspecialty as their fellowship and current practice was calculated. Results A total of 81 resident physicians, 11 (13.6%) female, were included. In the entire cohort, 50.6% did a thesis day project in a different field than their current or projected subspecialty. Of those who completed, or are currently completing fellowship, 33 (52.4%) did their thesis day project in the same subspecialty as their fellowship. Of the current residents who have matched into fellowship, 46.7% did a thesis day project in the same subspecialty. A total of 51 (63.0%) projects were published. Conclusion The majority of resident research projects were published, and about 50% of orthopaedic residents went on to complete a fellowship and practice in the same subspecialty as their research project. As residents often spend a considerable amount of time and effort on their projects, these findings may help tailor resident education and research curriculums to focus more on research principles than specific orthopedic content.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0341-2695</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-5195</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05417-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35508814</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Original Paper ; Orthopedics</subject><ispartof>International orthopaedics, 2022-07, Vol.46 (7), p.1459-1463</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-d88d5233f3679596a0b5bd6d97a9a6a76c70fd575fdb7546a7837d570a330cf73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-d88d5233f3679596a0b5bd6d97a9a6a76c70fd575fdb7546a7837d570a330cf73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6859-6478</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00264-022-05417-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00264-022-05417-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35508814$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>David Piche, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selzer, Carter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hake, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caird, Michelle S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aleem, Ilyas S.</creatorcontrib><title>Are resident research projects correlated to future subspecialty choice in orthopaedic surgery? A ten-year retrospective review of a single centre’s experience</title><title>International orthopaedics</title><addtitle>International Orthopaedics (SICOT)</addtitle><addtitle>Int Orthop</addtitle><description>Aim To determine (1) frequency of resident research projects being in the same orthopaedic subspecialty that they ultimately choose for fellowship and practice; (2) percentage of research projects that were published. Methods Resident Thesis Day programs were independently assessed by two reviewers from 2010 to 2020. Reviewers classified projects based on orthopaedic subspecialty: Spine, Joints, Trauma, Hand, Foot and Ankle, Sports, Pediatrics, Oncology, and Shoulder Elbow. Presenting residents’ fellowship subspecialty, current practice specialty, and geographic state of current practice were collected using internet searches. Correlation of residents who completed a thesis day project in the same subspecialty as their fellowship and current practice was calculated. Results A total of 81 resident physicians, 11 (13.6%) female, were included. In the entire cohort, 50.6% did a thesis day project in a different field than their current or projected subspecialty. Of those who completed, or are currently completing fellowship, 33 (52.4%) did their thesis day project in the same subspecialty as their fellowship. Of the current residents who have matched into fellowship, 46.7% did a thesis day project in the same subspecialty. A total of 51 (63.0%) projects were published. Conclusion The majority of resident research projects were published, and about 50% of orthopaedic residents went on to complete a fellowship and practice in the same subspecialty as their research project. As residents often spend a considerable amount of time and effort on their projects, these findings may help tailor resident education and research curriculums to focus more on research principles than specific orthopedic content.</description><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><issn>0341-2695</issn><issn>1432-5195</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kb1uFDEUhS0EIpvAC1AglzQG_4ztmQqtIhKQItGE2vLYd7JezY4H2xN2u7wGJa_Gk8TLBkoq_333XJ97EHrD6HtGqf6QKeWqIZRzQmXDNNk_QyvWCE4k6-RztKKiYYSrTp6h85y3lDKtWvYSnQkpaduyZoV-rRPgBDl4mMpxAza5DZ5T3IIrGbuYEoy2gMcl4mEpS-Xz0ucZXLBjOWC3icEBDhOOqWzibMEHV5F0B-nwEa9xgYkcqmxVLykeC0u4Pza9D_ADxwFbnMN0NwJ29Q8Jfj_8zBj2M6QAk4NX6MVgxwyvn9YL9O3q0-3lZ3Lz9frL5fqGOK51Ib5tveRCDELpTnbK0l72XvlO284qq5XTdPBSy8H3Wjb1phW6nqkVgrpBiwv07qRbvX9fIBezC9nBONoJ4pINV4rWsSvVVpSfUFf95ASDmVPY2XQwjJpjNOYUjanRmD_RmH0tevukv_Q78P9K_mZRAXECcn2a6vTMNi5pqp7_J_sIwBafJQ</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>David Piche, Joshua</creator><creator>Selzer, Carter J.</creator><creator>Hake, Mark E.</creator><creator>Caird, Michelle S.</creator><creator>Aleem, Ilyas S.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6859-6478</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Are resident research projects correlated to future subspecialty choice in orthopaedic surgery? A ten-year retrospective review of a single centre’s experience</title><author>David Piche, Joshua ; Selzer, Carter J. ; Hake, Mark E. ; Caird, Michelle S. ; Aleem, Ilyas S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-d88d5233f3679596a0b5bd6d97a9a6a76c70fd575fdb7546a7837d570a330cf73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>David Piche, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selzer, Carter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hake, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caird, Michelle S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aleem, Ilyas S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International orthopaedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>David Piche, Joshua</au><au>Selzer, Carter J.</au><au>Hake, Mark E.</au><au>Caird, Michelle S.</au><au>Aleem, Ilyas S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are resident research projects correlated to future subspecialty choice in orthopaedic surgery? A ten-year retrospective review of a single centre’s experience</atitle><jtitle>International orthopaedics</jtitle><stitle>International Orthopaedics (SICOT)</stitle><addtitle>Int Orthop</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1459</spage><epage>1463</epage><pages>1459-1463</pages><issn>0341-2695</issn><eissn>1432-5195</eissn><abstract>Aim To determine (1) frequency of resident research projects being in the same orthopaedic subspecialty that they ultimately choose for fellowship and practice; (2) percentage of research projects that were published. Methods Resident Thesis Day programs were independently assessed by two reviewers from 2010 to 2020. Reviewers classified projects based on orthopaedic subspecialty: Spine, Joints, Trauma, Hand, Foot and Ankle, Sports, Pediatrics, Oncology, and Shoulder Elbow. Presenting residents’ fellowship subspecialty, current practice specialty, and geographic state of current practice were collected using internet searches. Correlation of residents who completed a thesis day project in the same subspecialty as their fellowship and current practice was calculated. Results A total of 81 resident physicians, 11 (13.6%) female, were included. In the entire cohort, 50.6% did a thesis day project in a different field than their current or projected subspecialty. Of those who completed, or are currently completing fellowship, 33 (52.4%) did their thesis day project in the same subspecialty as their fellowship. Of the current residents who have matched into fellowship, 46.7% did a thesis day project in the same subspecialty. A total of 51 (63.0%) projects were published. Conclusion The majority of resident research projects were published, and about 50% of orthopaedic residents went on to complete a fellowship and practice in the same subspecialty as their research project. As residents often spend a considerable amount of time and effort on their projects, these findings may help tailor resident education and research curriculums to focus more on research principles than specific orthopedic content.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>35508814</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00264-022-05417-x</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6859-6478</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0341-2695
ispartof International orthopaedics, 2022-07, Vol.46 (7), p.1459-1463
issn 0341-2695
1432-5195
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2660100668
source SpringerLink Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original Paper
Orthopedics
title Are resident research projects correlated to future subspecialty choice in orthopaedic surgery? A ten-year retrospective review of a single centre’s experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T14%3A53%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20resident%20research%20projects%20correlated%20to%20future%20subspecialty%20choice%20in%20orthopaedic%20surgery?%20A%20ten-year%20retrospective%20review%20of%20a%20single%20centre%E2%80%99s%20experience&rft.jtitle=International%20orthopaedics&rft.au=David%20Piche,%20Joshua&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1459&rft.epage=1463&rft.pages=1459-1463&rft.issn=0341-2695&rft.eissn=1432-5195&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00264-022-05417-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2660100668%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2660100668&rft_id=info:pmid/35508814&rfr_iscdi=true