Attending to the Positive: A Retrospective Validation of the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors-Sexual Offence Version
Sexual recidivism risk assessment tools focus almost exclusively on risk factors associated with increased rates of recidivism and do not attend to protective factors that might mitigate reoffense risk. The present study investigated the predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Protective...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sexual abuse 2023-03, Vol.35 (2), p.241-260 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 260 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 241 |
container_title | Sexual abuse |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Nolan, Thomas Willis, Gwenda M. Thornton, David Kelley, Sharon M. Christofferson, Sarah Beggs |
description | Sexual recidivism risk assessment tools focus almost exclusively on risk factors associated with increased rates of recidivism and do not attend to protective factors that might mitigate reoffense risk. The present study investigated the predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors - Sexual Offence version (SAPROF-SO), developed to assess hypothesised protective factors against sexual recidivism in adult males. The SAPROF-SO pilot version contains 24 items across two domains: Personal and Professionally Provided Support. SAPROF-SO scores were rated retrospectively from a review of archived case files of 210 men with convictions for child sexual offenses, using the SAPROF-SO pilot manual and a supplementary retrospective scoring guide developed for the current study. SAPROF-SO Total and Personal domain scores were significantly predictive of sexual recidivism after an average follow-up period of 12.24 years (AUC = .81), and to a lesser extent, violent and general recidivism. SAPROF-SO Total and Personal scores additionally provided significant incremental validity over Static-99R scores in the prediction of sexual recidivism. Results support the predictive validity of protective factors for reduced sexual recidivism and invite future research examining how to integrate the SAPROF-SO alongside contemporary sexual recidivism risk assessment tools. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/10790632221098354 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2660099673</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_10790632221098354</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2777670939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-4f117fbcb85f05c05984a32ce81f8ebcd83cf2b803e36401eb3b97e8dc1a05633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFP3DAQhS0EKpT2B3BBlrhwCYztje1wWyEolZBAQKveIscZQ1A23tpOVU78dZzuAlKrnsaa-d6zPY-QPQZHjCl1zEBVIAXnnEGlRTnbIDusVKLgWv7YzOc8LyZgm3yM8REAlFT8A9kWZQlKSdghz_OUcGi74Z4mT9MD0msfu9T9whM6pzeYgo9LtFODfjd915rU-YF694e9TWG0aQzY0nmMGOMChzQNr4NPa9W5scmHWNzi79H09Mo5HGw2wxCz0yey5Uwf8fO67pJv52d3pxfF5dWXr6fzy8IKqVMxc_nDrrGNLh2UFspKz4zgFjVzGhvbamEdbzQIFHIGDBvRVAp1a5mBUgqxSw5Xvsvgf44YU73oosW-NwP6MdZcSoCqkmpCD_5CH_0Yhvy6mqu8NQWVqDLFVpTNG4oBXb0M3cKEp5pBPaVT_5NO1uyvncdmge2b4jWODBytgGju8f3a_zu-ABnEmGk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2777670939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attending to the Positive: A Retrospective Validation of the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors-Sexual Offence Version</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Nolan, Thomas ; Willis, Gwenda M. ; Thornton, David ; Kelley, Sharon M. ; Christofferson, Sarah Beggs</creator><creatorcontrib>Nolan, Thomas ; Willis, Gwenda M. ; Thornton, David ; Kelley, Sharon M. ; Christofferson, Sarah Beggs</creatorcontrib><description>Sexual recidivism risk assessment tools focus almost exclusively on risk factors associated with increased rates of recidivism and do not attend to protective factors that might mitigate reoffense risk. The present study investigated the predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors - Sexual Offence version (SAPROF-SO), developed to assess hypothesised protective factors against sexual recidivism in adult males. The SAPROF-SO pilot version contains 24 items across two domains: Personal and Professionally Provided Support. SAPROF-SO scores were rated retrospectively from a review of archived case files of 210 men with convictions for child sexual offenses, using the SAPROF-SO pilot manual and a supplementary retrospective scoring guide developed for the current study. SAPROF-SO Total and Personal domain scores were significantly predictive of sexual recidivism after an average follow-up period of 12.24 years (AUC = .81), and to a lesser extent, violent and general recidivism. SAPROF-SO Total and Personal scores additionally provided significant incremental validity over Static-99R scores in the prediction of sexual recidivism. Results support the predictive validity of protective factors for reduced sexual recidivism and invite future research examining how to integrate the SAPROF-SO alongside contemporary sexual recidivism risk assessment tools.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1079-0632</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-286X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/10790632221098354</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35507760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Child ; Criminals ; Evaluation ; Humans ; Male ; Offenses ; Predictions ; Protective Factors ; Recidivism ; Recidivism - prevention & control ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk assessment ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Risk factors ; Scores ; Sex crimes ; Sex offenders ; Sex Offenses - prevention & control ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Sexual abuse, 2023-03, Vol.35 (2), p.241-260</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-4f117fbcb85f05c05984a32ce81f8ebcd83cf2b803e36401eb3b97e8dc1a05633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-4f117fbcb85f05c05984a32ce81f8ebcd83cf2b803e36401eb3b97e8dc1a05633</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9827-3397 ; 0000-0003-0127-1104</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10790632221098354$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10790632221098354$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35507760$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nolan, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willis, Gwenda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornton, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelley, Sharon M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christofferson, Sarah Beggs</creatorcontrib><title>Attending to the Positive: A Retrospective Validation of the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors-Sexual Offence Version</title><title>Sexual abuse</title><addtitle>Sex Abuse</addtitle><description>Sexual recidivism risk assessment tools focus almost exclusively on risk factors associated with increased rates of recidivism and do not attend to protective factors that might mitigate reoffense risk. The present study investigated the predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors - Sexual Offence version (SAPROF-SO), developed to assess hypothesised protective factors against sexual recidivism in adult males. The SAPROF-SO pilot version contains 24 items across two domains: Personal and Professionally Provided Support. SAPROF-SO scores were rated retrospectively from a review of archived case files of 210 men with convictions for child sexual offenses, using the SAPROF-SO pilot manual and a supplementary retrospective scoring guide developed for the current study. SAPROF-SO Total and Personal domain scores were significantly predictive of sexual recidivism after an average follow-up period of 12.24 years (AUC = .81), and to a lesser extent, violent and general recidivism. SAPROF-SO Total and Personal scores additionally provided significant incremental validity over Static-99R scores in the prediction of sexual recidivism. Results support the predictive validity of protective factors for reduced sexual recidivism and invite future research examining how to integrate the SAPROF-SO alongside contemporary sexual recidivism risk assessment tools.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Criminals</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Offenses</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Protective Factors</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><subject>Recidivism - prevention & control</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><subject>Sex offenders</subject><subject>Sex Offenses - prevention & control</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1079-0632</issn><issn>1573-286X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFP3DAQhS0EKpT2B3BBlrhwCYztje1wWyEolZBAQKveIscZQ1A23tpOVU78dZzuAlKrnsaa-d6zPY-QPQZHjCl1zEBVIAXnnEGlRTnbIDusVKLgWv7YzOc8LyZgm3yM8REAlFT8A9kWZQlKSdghz_OUcGi74Z4mT9MD0msfu9T9whM6pzeYgo9LtFODfjd915rU-YF694e9TWG0aQzY0nmMGOMChzQNr4NPa9W5scmHWNzi79H09Mo5HGw2wxCz0yey5Uwf8fO67pJv52d3pxfF5dWXr6fzy8IKqVMxc_nDrrGNLh2UFspKz4zgFjVzGhvbamEdbzQIFHIGDBvRVAp1a5mBUgqxSw5Xvsvgf44YU73oosW-NwP6MdZcSoCqkmpCD_5CH_0Yhvy6mqu8NQWVqDLFVpTNG4oBXb0M3cKEp5pBPaVT_5NO1uyvncdmge2b4jWODBytgGju8f3a_zu-ABnEmGk</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Nolan, Thomas</creator><creator>Willis, Gwenda M.</creator><creator>Thornton, David</creator><creator>Kelley, Sharon M.</creator><creator>Christofferson, Sarah Beggs</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9827-3397</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0127-1104</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Attending to the Positive: A Retrospective Validation of the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors-Sexual Offence Version</title><author>Nolan, Thomas ; Willis, Gwenda M. ; Thornton, David ; Kelley, Sharon M. ; Christofferson, Sarah Beggs</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-4f117fbcb85f05c05984a32ce81f8ebcd83cf2b803e36401eb3b97e8dc1a05633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Criminals</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Offenses</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Protective Factors</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><topic>Recidivism - prevention & control</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><topic>Sex offenders</topic><topic>Sex Offenses - prevention & control</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nolan, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willis, Gwenda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornton, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelley, Sharon M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christofferson, Sarah Beggs</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Sexual abuse</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nolan, Thomas</au><au>Willis, Gwenda M.</au><au>Thornton, David</au><au>Kelley, Sharon M.</au><au>Christofferson, Sarah Beggs</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attending to the Positive: A Retrospective Validation of the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors-Sexual Offence Version</atitle><jtitle>Sexual abuse</jtitle><addtitle>Sex Abuse</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>241</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>241-260</pages><issn>1079-0632</issn><eissn>1573-286X</eissn><abstract>Sexual recidivism risk assessment tools focus almost exclusively on risk factors associated with increased rates of recidivism and do not attend to protective factors that might mitigate reoffense risk. The present study investigated the predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors - Sexual Offence version (SAPROF-SO), developed to assess hypothesised protective factors against sexual recidivism in adult males. The SAPROF-SO pilot version contains 24 items across two domains: Personal and Professionally Provided Support. SAPROF-SO scores were rated retrospectively from a review of archived case files of 210 men with convictions for child sexual offenses, using the SAPROF-SO pilot manual and a supplementary retrospective scoring guide developed for the current study. SAPROF-SO Total and Personal domain scores were significantly predictive of sexual recidivism after an average follow-up period of 12.24 years (AUC = .81), and to a lesser extent, violent and general recidivism. SAPROF-SO Total and Personal scores additionally provided significant incremental validity over Static-99R scores in the prediction of sexual recidivism. Results support the predictive validity of protective factors for reduced sexual recidivism and invite future research examining how to integrate the SAPROF-SO alongside contemporary sexual recidivism risk assessment tools.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>35507760</pmid><doi>10.1177/10790632221098354</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9827-3397</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0127-1104</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1079-0632 |
ispartof | Sexual abuse, 2023-03, Vol.35 (2), p.241-260 |
issn | 1079-0632 1573-286X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2660099673 |
source | MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Child Criminals Evaluation Humans Male Offenses Predictions Protective Factors Recidivism Recidivism - prevention & control Retrospective Studies Risk assessment Risk Assessment - methods Risk factors Scores Sex crimes Sex offenders Sex Offenses - prevention & control Validity |
title | Attending to the Positive: A Retrospective Validation of the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors-Sexual Offence Version |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A28%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attending%20to%20the%20Positive:%20A%20Retrospective%20Validation%20of%20the%20Structured%20Assessment%20of%20Protective%20Factors-Sexual%20Offence%20Version&rft.jtitle=Sexual%20abuse&rft.au=Nolan,%20Thomas&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=241&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=241-260&rft.issn=1079-0632&rft.eissn=1573-286X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/10790632221098354&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2777670939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2777670939&rft_id=info:pmid/35507760&rft_sage_id=10.1177_10790632221098354&rfr_iscdi=true |