Role of Resistance Training in Mitigating Risk for Mobility Disability in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
To examine the effects of community-based resistance training (RT) on physical function for older adults with mobility disability. Four databases (PubM, PubMed, MEDLINE, Ovid, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, Web of Science) were searched from inception to February 2, 2021. Randomized...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2022-10, Vol.103 (10), p.2023-2035 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2035 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 2023 |
| container_title | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
| container_volume | 103 |
| creator | Prevett, Christina Moncion, Kevin Phillips, Stuart M. Richardson, Julie Tang, Ada |
| description | To examine the effects of community-based resistance training (RT) on physical function for older adults with mobility disability.
Four databases (PubM, PubMed, MEDLINE, Ovid, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, Web of Science) were searched from inception to February 2, 2021.
Randomized controlled trials that examined community-based RT for improving physical function in community-dwelling older adults were included.
Two reviewers independently conducted title and abstract screening, full-text evaluation, data extraction, and risk of bias quality assessment.
Twenty-four studies (3656 participants; age range, 63-83 years) were included. RT programs ranged from 10 weeks to 18 months in duration. RT was more effective than control in improving 6-minute walk test distance (n=638; mean difference [MD], 16.1m; 95% CI, 12.27-19.94; P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.04.002 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2659605853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003999322003604</els_id><sourcerecordid>2659605853</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-c7bd14906ee118b3c1b8dbb5532b4fbd0434dfe678966b9ff90ab71e511cb2c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtBAV3Rb-AAfkI5cEf8TZBHFZbUtB6qrStkjcLH-8VF6SeLEdqv0X_GQc7dJjT34jzYzfm0HoPSUlJbT-tCvVfgglI4yVpCoJYa_QggrOiobRn6_RghDCi7Zt-Tm6iHGXYS04fYPOuRCk4pQs0N-t7wH7Dm8hupjUaAA_BOVGNz5iN-KNS-5RpRltXfyFOx_wxmvXu3TAVy6q05ipaz8M05hBcfUEfT9L7noLAa_s1Kf4Ga_w_SEmGLKdyf_9cfCE1WjxBpIq1Kj6Q17hLTrrVB_h3em9RD--Xj-svxW3dzff16vbwrCmToVZakurltQAlDaaG6obq7XI1-uq0zafV9kO6mXT1rVuu64lSi8pCEqNZkbwS_Tx6LsP_vcEMcnBRZP3ViP4KUpWi7YmohE8U9mRaoKPMUAn98ENKhwkJXJuQu7k3IScm5CkkrmJLPpw8p_0APZZ8j_6TPhyJEC-MmcRZDQOcv7WBTBJWu9e8v8H1V-cVA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2659605853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of Resistance Training in Mitigating Risk for Mobility Disability in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Prevett, Christina ; Moncion, Kevin ; Phillips, Stuart M. ; Richardson, Julie ; Tang, Ada</creator><creatorcontrib>Prevett, Christina ; Moncion, Kevin ; Phillips, Stuart M. ; Richardson, Julie ; Tang, Ada</creatorcontrib><description>To examine the effects of community-based resistance training (RT) on physical function for older adults with mobility disability.
Four databases (PubM, PubMed, MEDLINE, Ovid, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, Web of Science) were searched from inception to February 2, 2021.
Randomized controlled trials that examined community-based RT for improving physical function in community-dwelling older adults were included.
Two reviewers independently conducted title and abstract screening, full-text evaluation, data extraction, and risk of bias quality assessment.
Twenty-four studies (3656 participants; age range, 63-83 years) were included. RT programs ranged from 10 weeks to 18 months in duration. RT was more effective than control in improving 6-minute walk test distance (n=638; mean difference [MD], 16.1m; 95% CI, 12.27-19.94; P<.0001), lower extremity strength (n=785; standardized MD, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.27-2.75; P<.0001), and usual gait speed (n= 2106; MD, 0.05 m/s, 95% CI, 0.03-0.07; P<.001). In sensitivity analyses, benefits were maintained when studies with a high risk of bias were excluded. There was no effect of RT on fast gait speed or Short Physical Performance Battery score compared with control.
RT improves walking distance, lower extremity strength, and usual gait speed in older adults with mobility disability. Improvements in physical function could increase independence in activities of daily living for this at-risk population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.04.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35504310</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Mobility limitation ; Rehabilitation ; Resistance training</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2022-10, Vol.103 (10), p.2023-2035</ispartof><rights>2022 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-c7bd14906ee118b3c1b8dbb5532b4fbd0434dfe678966b9ff90ab71e511cb2c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-c7bd14906ee118b3c1b8dbb5532b4fbd0434dfe678966b9ff90ab71e511cb2c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.04.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35504310$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prevett, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moncion, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Stuart M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Ada</creatorcontrib><title>Role of Resistance Training in Mitigating Risk for Mobility Disability in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>To examine the effects of community-based resistance training (RT) on physical function for older adults with mobility disability.
Four databases (PubM, PubMed, MEDLINE, Ovid, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, Web of Science) were searched from inception to February 2, 2021.
Randomized controlled trials that examined community-based RT for improving physical function in community-dwelling older adults were included.
Two reviewers independently conducted title and abstract screening, full-text evaluation, data extraction, and risk of bias quality assessment.
Twenty-four studies (3656 participants; age range, 63-83 years) were included. RT programs ranged from 10 weeks to 18 months in duration. RT was more effective than control in improving 6-minute walk test distance (n=638; mean difference [MD], 16.1m; 95% CI, 12.27-19.94; P<.0001), lower extremity strength (n=785; standardized MD, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.27-2.75; P<.0001), and usual gait speed (n= 2106; MD, 0.05 m/s, 95% CI, 0.03-0.07; P<.001). In sensitivity analyses, benefits were maintained when studies with a high risk of bias were excluded. There was no effect of RT on fast gait speed or Short Physical Performance Battery score compared with control.
RT improves walking distance, lower extremity strength, and usual gait speed in older adults with mobility disability. Improvements in physical function could increase independence in activities of daily living for this at-risk population.</description><subject>Mobility limitation</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Resistance training</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtBAV3Rb-AAfkI5cEf8TZBHFZbUtB6qrStkjcLH-8VF6SeLEdqv0X_GQc7dJjT34jzYzfm0HoPSUlJbT-tCvVfgglI4yVpCoJYa_QggrOiobRn6_RghDCi7Zt-Tm6iHGXYS04fYPOuRCk4pQs0N-t7wH7Dm8hupjUaAA_BOVGNz5iN-KNS-5RpRltXfyFOx_wxmvXu3TAVy6q05ipaz8M05hBcfUEfT9L7noLAa_s1Kf4Ga_w_SEmGLKdyf_9cfCE1WjxBpIq1Kj6Q17hLTrrVB_h3em9RD--Xj-svxW3dzff16vbwrCmToVZakurltQAlDaaG6obq7XI1-uq0zafV9kO6mXT1rVuu64lSi8pCEqNZkbwS_Tx6LsP_vcEMcnBRZP3ViP4KUpWi7YmohE8U9mRaoKPMUAn98ENKhwkJXJuQu7k3IScm5CkkrmJLPpw8p_0APZZ8j_6TPhyJEC-MmcRZDQOcv7WBTBJWu9e8v8H1V-cVA</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Prevett, Christina</creator><creator>Moncion, Kevin</creator><creator>Phillips, Stuart M.</creator><creator>Richardson, Julie</creator><creator>Tang, Ada</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Role of Resistance Training in Mitigating Risk for Mobility Disability in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><author>Prevett, Christina ; Moncion, Kevin ; Phillips, Stuart M. ; Richardson, Julie ; Tang, Ada</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-c7bd14906ee118b3c1b8dbb5532b4fbd0434dfe678966b9ff90ab71e511cb2c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Mobility limitation</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Resistance training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prevett, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moncion, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Stuart M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Ada</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prevett, Christina</au><au>Moncion, Kevin</au><au>Phillips, Stuart M.</au><au>Richardson, Julie</au><au>Tang, Ada</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of Resistance Training in Mitigating Risk for Mobility Disability in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2023</spage><epage>2035</epage><pages>2023-2035</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><abstract>To examine the effects of community-based resistance training (RT) on physical function for older adults with mobility disability.
Four databases (PubM, PubMed, MEDLINE, Ovid, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, Web of Science) were searched from inception to February 2, 2021.
Randomized controlled trials that examined community-based RT for improving physical function in community-dwelling older adults were included.
Two reviewers independently conducted title and abstract screening, full-text evaluation, data extraction, and risk of bias quality assessment.
Twenty-four studies (3656 participants; age range, 63-83 years) were included. RT programs ranged from 10 weeks to 18 months in duration. RT was more effective than control in improving 6-minute walk test distance (n=638; mean difference [MD], 16.1m; 95% CI, 12.27-19.94; P<.0001), lower extremity strength (n=785; standardized MD, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.27-2.75; P<.0001), and usual gait speed (n= 2106; MD, 0.05 m/s, 95% CI, 0.03-0.07; P<.001). In sensitivity analyses, benefits were maintained when studies with a high risk of bias were excluded. There was no effect of RT on fast gait speed or Short Physical Performance Battery score compared with control.
RT improves walking distance, lower extremity strength, and usual gait speed in older adults with mobility disability. Improvements in physical function could increase independence in activities of daily living for this at-risk population.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35504310</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apmr.2022.04.002</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-9993 |
| ispartof | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2022-10, Vol.103 (10), p.2023-2035 |
| issn | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2659605853 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Mobility limitation Rehabilitation Resistance training |
| title | Role of Resistance Training in Mitigating Risk for Mobility Disability in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T13%3A50%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20Resistance%20Training%20in%20Mitigating%20Risk%20for%20Mobility%20Disability%20in%20Community-Dwelling%20Older%20Adults:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Prevett,%20Christina&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2023&rft.epage=2035&rft.pages=2023-2035&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.04.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2659605853%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2659605853&rft_id=info:pmid/35504310&rft_els_id=S0003999322003604&rfr_iscdi=true |