First-trimester uterine rupture: a case report and systematic review of the literature

This study aimed to present a case of first-trimester uterine rupture and perform a systematic review to identify common presentations, risk factors, and management strategies. Searches were performed in PubMed, Ovid, and Scopus using a combination of key words related to “uterine rupture,” “first t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2022-08, Vol.227 (2), p.209-217
Hauptverfasser: Perdue, Makenzie, Felder, Laura, Berghella, Vincenzo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 217
container_issue 2
container_start_page 209
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 227
creator Perdue, Makenzie
Felder, Laura
Berghella, Vincenzo
description This study aimed to present a case of first-trimester uterine rupture and perform a systematic review to identify common presentations, risk factors, and management strategies. Searches were performed in PubMed, Ovid, and Scopus using a combination of key words related to “uterine rupture,” “first trimester,” and “early pregnancy” from database inception to September 30, 2020. English language descriptions of uterine rupture at ≤14 weeks of gestation were included, and cases involving pregnancy termination and ectopic pregnancy were excluded. Outcomes for the systematic review included maternal demographics, description of uterine rupture, and specifics of uterine rupture diagnosis and management. Data were extracted to custom-made reporting forms. Median values were calculated for continuous variables, and percentages were calculated for categorical variables. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for case reports and case series. Overall, 61 cases of first-trimester uterine rupture were identified, including our novel case. First-trimester uterine ruptures occurred at a median gestation of 11 weeks. Most patients (59/61 [97%]) had abdominal pain as a presenting symptom, and previous uterine surgery was prevalent (44/61 [62%]), usually low transverse cesarean delivery (32/61 [52%]). The diagnosis of uterine rupture was generally made after surgical exploration (37/61 [61%]), with rupture noted in the fundus in 26 of 61 cases (43%) and in the lower segment in 27 of 61 cases (44%). Primary repair of the defect was possible in 40 of 61 cases (66%), whereas hysterectomy was performed in 18 of 61 cases (30%). Continuing pregnancy was possible in 4 of 61 cases (7%). Uterine rupture is an uncommon occurrence but should be considered in patients with an acute abdomen in early pregnancy, especially in women with previous uterine surgery. Surgical exploration is typically needed to confirm the diagnosis and for management. Hysterectomy is not always necessary; primary uterine repair is sufficient in more than two-thirds of the cases to achieve hemostasis. Continuing pregnancy, although uncommon, is also possible.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.035
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2658232448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937822003167</els_id><sourcerecordid>2658232448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-654e5b0471fb03e4f45a78c19c802e0e0fd6f72393b79b04e0610e26e09f5dff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLFOwzAQhi0EglJ4AQbkkSXhYjtOglhQRQGpEguwWq5zBldtU2wH1LfHUQsji607ff9J_0fIRQF5AYW8XuR60b3nDBjLQeTAywMyKqCpMlnL-pCMAIBlDa_qE3IawmIYWcOOyQkvRV1xJkbkbep8iFn0boUhoqd9etwaqe83sfd4QzU1OqQZN52PVK9bGraJXOnoTNp-OfymnaXxA-nSpbAeYmfkyOplwPP9Pyav0_uXyWM2e354mtzNMsNLGTNZCiznIKrCzoGjsKLUVW2KxtTAEBBsK23FeMPnVZM4BFkAMonQ2LK1lo_J1e7uxneffWqgVi4YXC71Grs-KCbLmqWiok4o26HGdyF4tGqTSmu_VQWowadaqMGnGnwqECr5TKHL_f1-vsL2L_IrMAG3OwBTy-TCq2Acrg22zqOJqu3cf_d_ALU1hzY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2658232448</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>First-trimester uterine rupture: a case report and systematic review of the literature</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Perdue, Makenzie ; Felder, Laura ; Berghella, Vincenzo</creator><creatorcontrib>Perdue, Makenzie ; Felder, Laura ; Berghella, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to present a case of first-trimester uterine rupture and perform a systematic review to identify common presentations, risk factors, and management strategies. Searches were performed in PubMed, Ovid, and Scopus using a combination of key words related to “uterine rupture,” “first trimester,” and “early pregnancy” from database inception to September 30, 2020. English language descriptions of uterine rupture at ≤14 weeks of gestation were included, and cases involving pregnancy termination and ectopic pregnancy were excluded. Outcomes for the systematic review included maternal demographics, description of uterine rupture, and specifics of uterine rupture diagnosis and management. Data were extracted to custom-made reporting forms. Median values were calculated for continuous variables, and percentages were calculated for categorical variables. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for case reports and case series. Overall, 61 cases of first-trimester uterine rupture were identified, including our novel case. First-trimester uterine ruptures occurred at a median gestation of 11 weeks. Most patients (59/61 [97%]) had abdominal pain as a presenting symptom, and previous uterine surgery was prevalent (44/61 [62%]), usually low transverse cesarean delivery (32/61 [52%]). The diagnosis of uterine rupture was generally made after surgical exploration (37/61 [61%]), with rupture noted in the fundus in 26 of 61 cases (43%) and in the lower segment in 27 of 61 cases (44%). Primary repair of the defect was possible in 40 of 61 cases (66%), whereas hysterectomy was performed in 18 of 61 cases (30%). Continuing pregnancy was possible in 4 of 61 cases (7%). Uterine rupture is an uncommon occurrence but should be considered in patients with an acute abdomen in early pregnancy, especially in women with previous uterine surgery. Surgical exploration is typically needed to confirm the diagnosis and for management. Hysterectomy is not always necessary; primary uterine repair is sufficient in more than two-thirds of the cases to achieve hemostasis. Continuing pregnancy, although uncommon, is also possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.035</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35487324</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>early pregnancy ; first-trimester pregnancy ; uterine rupture</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2022-08, Vol.227 (2), p.209-217</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-654e5b0471fb03e4f45a78c19c802e0e0fd6f72393b79b04e0610e26e09f5dff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-654e5b0471fb03e4f45a78c19c802e0e0fd6f72393b79b04e0610e26e09f5dff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937822003167$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35487324$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perdue, Makenzie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felder, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berghella, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><title>First-trimester uterine rupture: a case report and systematic review of the literature</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>This study aimed to present a case of first-trimester uterine rupture and perform a systematic review to identify common presentations, risk factors, and management strategies. Searches were performed in PubMed, Ovid, and Scopus using a combination of key words related to “uterine rupture,” “first trimester,” and “early pregnancy” from database inception to September 30, 2020. English language descriptions of uterine rupture at ≤14 weeks of gestation were included, and cases involving pregnancy termination and ectopic pregnancy were excluded. Outcomes for the systematic review included maternal demographics, description of uterine rupture, and specifics of uterine rupture diagnosis and management. Data were extracted to custom-made reporting forms. Median values were calculated for continuous variables, and percentages were calculated for categorical variables. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for case reports and case series. Overall, 61 cases of first-trimester uterine rupture were identified, including our novel case. First-trimester uterine ruptures occurred at a median gestation of 11 weeks. Most patients (59/61 [97%]) had abdominal pain as a presenting symptom, and previous uterine surgery was prevalent (44/61 [62%]), usually low transverse cesarean delivery (32/61 [52%]). The diagnosis of uterine rupture was generally made after surgical exploration (37/61 [61%]), with rupture noted in the fundus in 26 of 61 cases (43%) and in the lower segment in 27 of 61 cases (44%). Primary repair of the defect was possible in 40 of 61 cases (66%), whereas hysterectomy was performed in 18 of 61 cases (30%). Continuing pregnancy was possible in 4 of 61 cases (7%). Uterine rupture is an uncommon occurrence but should be considered in patients with an acute abdomen in early pregnancy, especially in women with previous uterine surgery. Surgical exploration is typically needed to confirm the diagnosis and for management. Hysterectomy is not always necessary; primary uterine repair is sufficient in more than two-thirds of the cases to achieve hemostasis. Continuing pregnancy, although uncommon, is also possible.</description><subject>early pregnancy</subject><subject>first-trimester pregnancy</subject><subject>uterine rupture</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kLFOwzAQhi0EglJ4AQbkkSXhYjtOglhQRQGpEguwWq5zBldtU2wH1LfHUQsji607ff9J_0fIRQF5AYW8XuR60b3nDBjLQeTAywMyKqCpMlnL-pCMAIBlDa_qE3IawmIYWcOOyQkvRV1xJkbkbep8iFn0boUhoqd9etwaqe83sfd4QzU1OqQZN52PVK9bGraJXOnoTNp-OfymnaXxA-nSpbAeYmfkyOplwPP9Pyav0_uXyWM2e354mtzNMsNLGTNZCiznIKrCzoGjsKLUVW2KxtTAEBBsK23FeMPnVZM4BFkAMonQ2LK1lo_J1e7uxneffWqgVi4YXC71Grs-KCbLmqWiok4o26HGdyF4tGqTSmu_VQWowadaqMGnGnwqECr5TKHL_f1-vsL2L_IrMAG3OwBTy-TCq2Acrg22zqOJqu3cf_d_ALU1hzY</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Perdue, Makenzie</creator><creator>Felder, Laura</creator><creator>Berghella, Vincenzo</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>First-trimester uterine rupture: a case report and systematic review of the literature</title><author>Perdue, Makenzie ; Felder, Laura ; Berghella, Vincenzo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-654e5b0471fb03e4f45a78c19c802e0e0fd6f72393b79b04e0610e26e09f5dff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>early pregnancy</topic><topic>first-trimester pregnancy</topic><topic>uterine rupture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perdue, Makenzie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felder, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berghella, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perdue, Makenzie</au><au>Felder, Laura</au><au>Berghella, Vincenzo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>First-trimester uterine rupture: a case report and systematic review of the literature</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>227</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>217</epage><pages>209-217</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to present a case of first-trimester uterine rupture and perform a systematic review to identify common presentations, risk factors, and management strategies. Searches were performed in PubMed, Ovid, and Scopus using a combination of key words related to “uterine rupture,” “first trimester,” and “early pregnancy” from database inception to September 30, 2020. English language descriptions of uterine rupture at ≤14 weeks of gestation were included, and cases involving pregnancy termination and ectopic pregnancy were excluded. Outcomes for the systematic review included maternal demographics, description of uterine rupture, and specifics of uterine rupture diagnosis and management. Data were extracted to custom-made reporting forms. Median values were calculated for continuous variables, and percentages were calculated for categorical variables. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for case reports and case series. Overall, 61 cases of first-trimester uterine rupture were identified, including our novel case. First-trimester uterine ruptures occurred at a median gestation of 11 weeks. Most patients (59/61 [97%]) had abdominal pain as a presenting symptom, and previous uterine surgery was prevalent (44/61 [62%]), usually low transverse cesarean delivery (32/61 [52%]). The diagnosis of uterine rupture was generally made after surgical exploration (37/61 [61%]), with rupture noted in the fundus in 26 of 61 cases (43%) and in the lower segment in 27 of 61 cases (44%). Primary repair of the defect was possible in 40 of 61 cases (66%), whereas hysterectomy was performed in 18 of 61 cases (30%). Continuing pregnancy was possible in 4 of 61 cases (7%). Uterine rupture is an uncommon occurrence but should be considered in patients with an acute abdomen in early pregnancy, especially in women with previous uterine surgery. Surgical exploration is typically needed to confirm the diagnosis and for management. Hysterectomy is not always necessary; primary uterine repair is sufficient in more than two-thirds of the cases to achieve hemostasis. Continuing pregnancy, although uncommon, is also possible.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35487324</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.035</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2022-08, Vol.227 (2), p.209-217
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2658232448
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects early pregnancy
first-trimester pregnancy
uterine rupture
title First-trimester uterine rupture: a case report and systematic review of the literature
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T02%3A34%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=First-trimester%20uterine%20rupture:%20a%20case%20report%20and%20systematic%20review%20of%20the%20literature&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Perdue,%20Makenzie&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=227&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=217&rft.pages=209-217&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2658232448%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2658232448&rft_id=info:pmid/35487324&rft_els_id=S0002937822003167&rfr_iscdi=true