Substantial variability in ovarian conservation at hysterectomy for endometrial hyperplasia

Although ovarian conservation at hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease has demonstrated mortality benefit in young patients and this benefit may be sustained up to age 65 years, there is a scarcity of data regarding ovarian conservation in those with a diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia, a p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2022-08, Vol.227 (2), p.255.e1-255.e18
Hauptverfasser: Matsuo, Koji, Violette, Caroline J., Mandelbaum, Rachel S., Harris, Chelsey A., Tavakoli, Amin, Klar, Maximilian, Shoupe, Donna, Roman, Lynda D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 255.e18
container_issue 2
container_start_page 255.e1
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 227
creator Matsuo, Koji
Violette, Caroline J.
Mandelbaum, Rachel S.
Harris, Chelsey A.
Tavakoli, Amin
Klar, Maximilian
Shoupe, Donna
Roman, Lynda D.
description Although ovarian conservation at hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease has demonstrated mortality benefit in young patients and this benefit may be sustained up to age 65 years, there is a scarcity of data regarding ovarian conservation in those with a diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia, a premalignant uterine condition. This study aimed to examine patient, hospital, treatment, and histology characteristics related to ovarian conservation at the time of inpatient hysterectomy for endometrial hyperplasia. The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project’s National Inpatient Sample was retrospectively queried to examine patients aged ≤65 years with endometrial hyperplasia who had inpatient hysterectomy from January 2016 to December 2019. The exclusion criteria included concurrent gynecologic malignancy, adnexal pathology, and lymphadenectomy. Cases were grouped by adnexal surgery status (ovarian conservation or oophorectomy). A multivariable binary logistic regression model was used to identify independent characteristics for ovarian conservation. A classification tree was constructed with recursive partitioning analysis to examine utilization patterns of ovarian conservation. Overall, 3105 patients (31.1%) underwent ovarian conservation at hysterectomy among 9975 patients. The utilization of ovarian conservation decreased gradually until age 45 years and then markedly decreased by age 52 years (63.3%–15.3%; P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2658232444</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937822003131</els_id><sourcerecordid>2658232444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-40e83383118a619550674a747d7cd1618b8bf4014b128b8eeecd05efd4a682a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwBxhQRpYEf8VxJRZU8SVVYgAmBstxLtRVEhfbrZR_T0ILI9PdSc_7SvcgdElwRjARN-tMr91nRjGlGeYZZvQITQmeF6mQQh6jKcaYpnNWyAk6C2E9nnROT9GE5VwWjIop-njdliHqLlrdJDvtrS5tY2Of2C5xP3eXGNcF8DsdresSHZNVHyJ4MNG1fVI7n0BXuRaiHztW_Qb8ptHB6nN0UusmwMVhztD7w_3b4ildvjw-L-6WqWE5jSnHIBmTjBCpBZnnORYF1wUvqsJURBBZyrLmmPCS0GEHAFPhHOqKayGppmyGrve9G---thCiam0w0DS6A7cNiopcUkY55wNK96jxLgQPtdp422rfK4LVKFWt1ShVjVIV5mqQOoSuDv3bsoXqL_JrcQBu9wAMX-4seBWMhc5AZUdNqnL2v_5vyDuJuw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2658232444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Substantial variability in ovarian conservation at hysterectomy for endometrial hyperplasia</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Matsuo, Koji ; Violette, Caroline J. ; Mandelbaum, Rachel S. ; Harris, Chelsey A. ; Tavakoli, Amin ; Klar, Maximilian ; Shoupe, Donna ; Roman, Lynda D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Matsuo, Koji ; Violette, Caroline J. ; Mandelbaum, Rachel S. ; Harris, Chelsey A. ; Tavakoli, Amin ; Klar, Maximilian ; Shoupe, Donna ; Roman, Lynda D.</creatorcontrib><description>Although ovarian conservation at hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease has demonstrated mortality benefit in young patients and this benefit may be sustained up to age 65 years, there is a scarcity of data regarding ovarian conservation in those with a diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia, a premalignant uterine condition. This study aimed to examine patient, hospital, treatment, and histology characteristics related to ovarian conservation at the time of inpatient hysterectomy for endometrial hyperplasia. The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project’s National Inpatient Sample was retrospectively queried to examine patients aged ≤65 years with endometrial hyperplasia who had inpatient hysterectomy from January 2016 to December 2019. The exclusion criteria included concurrent gynecologic malignancy, adnexal pathology, and lymphadenectomy. Cases were grouped by adnexal surgery status (ovarian conservation or oophorectomy). A multivariable binary logistic regression model was used to identify independent characteristics for ovarian conservation. A classification tree was constructed with recursive partitioning analysis to examine utilization patterns of ovarian conservation. Overall, 3105 patients (31.1%) underwent ovarian conservation at hysterectomy among 9975 patients. The utilization of ovarian conservation decreased gradually until age 45 years and then markedly decreased by age 52 years (63.3%–15.3%; P&lt;.001). In a multivariable analysis, younger age, non-White, urban nonteaching centers, and vaginal hysterectomy were associated with increased utilization of ovarian conservation, whereas endometrial hyperplasia with atypia, obesity, comorbidity, large bed capacity centers, and Midwest and South regions were associated with decreased utilization of ovarian conservation (all, P&lt;.05). A classification tree identified 17 utilization patterns for ovarian conservation, ranging from 7.8% to 100.0% (absolute rate difference, 92.2%). The utilization of ovarian conservation at the time of inpatient hysterectomy in patients undergoing surgical management for endometrial hyperplasia started decreasing in their mid-40s and seemed to occur earlier than in benign hysterectomy. There was substantial variability in ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy for endometrial hyperplasia based on patient, hospital, surgical, and histology factors, suggesting the possible benefit of clinical practice guidelines for ovarian conservation in this population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35487326</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>characteristics ; endometrial hyperplasia ; hysterectomy ; ovarian conservation ; utilization</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2022-08, Vol.227 (2), p.255.e1-255.e18</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-40e83383118a619550674a747d7cd1618b8bf4014b128b8eeecd05efd4a682a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-40e83383118a619550674a747d7cd1618b8bf4014b128b8eeecd05efd4a682a23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6232-8701</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.032$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35487326$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matsuo, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Violette, Caroline J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandelbaum, Rachel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Chelsey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavakoli, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klar, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoupe, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roman, Lynda D.</creatorcontrib><title>Substantial variability in ovarian conservation at hysterectomy for endometrial hyperplasia</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Although ovarian conservation at hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease has demonstrated mortality benefit in young patients and this benefit may be sustained up to age 65 years, there is a scarcity of data regarding ovarian conservation in those with a diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia, a premalignant uterine condition. This study aimed to examine patient, hospital, treatment, and histology characteristics related to ovarian conservation at the time of inpatient hysterectomy for endometrial hyperplasia. The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project’s National Inpatient Sample was retrospectively queried to examine patients aged ≤65 years with endometrial hyperplasia who had inpatient hysterectomy from January 2016 to December 2019. The exclusion criteria included concurrent gynecologic malignancy, adnexal pathology, and lymphadenectomy. Cases were grouped by adnexal surgery status (ovarian conservation or oophorectomy). A multivariable binary logistic regression model was used to identify independent characteristics for ovarian conservation. A classification tree was constructed with recursive partitioning analysis to examine utilization patterns of ovarian conservation. Overall, 3105 patients (31.1%) underwent ovarian conservation at hysterectomy among 9975 patients. The utilization of ovarian conservation decreased gradually until age 45 years and then markedly decreased by age 52 years (63.3%–15.3%; P&lt;.001). In a multivariable analysis, younger age, non-White, urban nonteaching centers, and vaginal hysterectomy were associated with increased utilization of ovarian conservation, whereas endometrial hyperplasia with atypia, obesity, comorbidity, large bed capacity centers, and Midwest and South regions were associated with decreased utilization of ovarian conservation (all, P&lt;.05). A classification tree identified 17 utilization patterns for ovarian conservation, ranging from 7.8% to 100.0% (absolute rate difference, 92.2%). The utilization of ovarian conservation at the time of inpatient hysterectomy in patients undergoing surgical management for endometrial hyperplasia started decreasing in their mid-40s and seemed to occur earlier than in benign hysterectomy. There was substantial variability in ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy for endometrial hyperplasia based on patient, hospital, surgical, and histology factors, suggesting the possible benefit of clinical practice guidelines for ovarian conservation in this population.</description><subject>characteristics</subject><subject>endometrial hyperplasia</subject><subject>hysterectomy</subject><subject>ovarian conservation</subject><subject>utilization</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwBxhQRpYEf8VxJRZU8SVVYgAmBstxLtRVEhfbrZR_T0ILI9PdSc_7SvcgdElwRjARN-tMr91nRjGlGeYZZvQITQmeF6mQQh6jKcaYpnNWyAk6C2E9nnROT9GE5VwWjIop-njdliHqLlrdJDvtrS5tY2Of2C5xP3eXGNcF8DsdresSHZNVHyJ4MNG1fVI7n0BXuRaiHztW_Qb8ptHB6nN0UusmwMVhztD7w_3b4ildvjw-L-6WqWE5jSnHIBmTjBCpBZnnORYF1wUvqsJURBBZyrLmmPCS0GEHAFPhHOqKayGppmyGrve9G---thCiam0w0DS6A7cNiopcUkY55wNK96jxLgQPtdp422rfK4LVKFWt1ShVjVIV5mqQOoSuDv3bsoXqL_JrcQBu9wAMX-4seBWMhc5AZUdNqnL2v_5vyDuJuw</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Matsuo, Koji</creator><creator>Violette, Caroline J.</creator><creator>Mandelbaum, Rachel S.</creator><creator>Harris, Chelsey A.</creator><creator>Tavakoli, Amin</creator><creator>Klar, Maximilian</creator><creator>Shoupe, Donna</creator><creator>Roman, Lynda D.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6232-8701</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Substantial variability in ovarian conservation at hysterectomy for endometrial hyperplasia</title><author>Matsuo, Koji ; Violette, Caroline J. ; Mandelbaum, Rachel S. ; Harris, Chelsey A. ; Tavakoli, Amin ; Klar, Maximilian ; Shoupe, Donna ; Roman, Lynda D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-40e83383118a619550674a747d7cd1618b8bf4014b128b8eeecd05efd4a682a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>characteristics</topic><topic>endometrial hyperplasia</topic><topic>hysterectomy</topic><topic>ovarian conservation</topic><topic>utilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matsuo, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Violette, Caroline J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandelbaum, Rachel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Chelsey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavakoli, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klar, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoupe, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roman, Lynda D.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matsuo, Koji</au><au>Violette, Caroline J.</au><au>Mandelbaum, Rachel S.</au><au>Harris, Chelsey A.</au><au>Tavakoli, Amin</au><au>Klar, Maximilian</au><au>Shoupe, Donna</au><au>Roman, Lynda D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Substantial variability in ovarian conservation at hysterectomy for endometrial hyperplasia</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>227</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>255.e1</spage><epage>255.e18</epage><pages>255.e1-255.e18</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Although ovarian conservation at hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease has demonstrated mortality benefit in young patients and this benefit may be sustained up to age 65 years, there is a scarcity of data regarding ovarian conservation in those with a diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia, a premalignant uterine condition. This study aimed to examine patient, hospital, treatment, and histology characteristics related to ovarian conservation at the time of inpatient hysterectomy for endometrial hyperplasia. The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project’s National Inpatient Sample was retrospectively queried to examine patients aged ≤65 years with endometrial hyperplasia who had inpatient hysterectomy from January 2016 to December 2019. The exclusion criteria included concurrent gynecologic malignancy, adnexal pathology, and lymphadenectomy. Cases were grouped by adnexal surgery status (ovarian conservation or oophorectomy). A multivariable binary logistic regression model was used to identify independent characteristics for ovarian conservation. A classification tree was constructed with recursive partitioning analysis to examine utilization patterns of ovarian conservation. Overall, 3105 patients (31.1%) underwent ovarian conservation at hysterectomy among 9975 patients. The utilization of ovarian conservation decreased gradually until age 45 years and then markedly decreased by age 52 years (63.3%–15.3%; P&lt;.001). In a multivariable analysis, younger age, non-White, urban nonteaching centers, and vaginal hysterectomy were associated with increased utilization of ovarian conservation, whereas endometrial hyperplasia with atypia, obesity, comorbidity, large bed capacity centers, and Midwest and South regions were associated with decreased utilization of ovarian conservation (all, P&lt;.05). A classification tree identified 17 utilization patterns for ovarian conservation, ranging from 7.8% to 100.0% (absolute rate difference, 92.2%). The utilization of ovarian conservation at the time of inpatient hysterectomy in patients undergoing surgical management for endometrial hyperplasia started decreasing in their mid-40s and seemed to occur earlier than in benign hysterectomy. There was substantial variability in ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy for endometrial hyperplasia based on patient, hospital, surgical, and histology factors, suggesting the possible benefit of clinical practice guidelines for ovarian conservation in this population.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35487326</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.032</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6232-8701</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2022-08, Vol.227 (2), p.255.e1-255.e18
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2658232444
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects characteristics
endometrial hyperplasia
hysterectomy
ovarian conservation
utilization
title Substantial variability in ovarian conservation at hysterectomy for endometrial hyperplasia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A04%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Substantial%20variability%20in%20ovarian%20conservation%20at%20hysterectomy%20for%20endometrial%20hyperplasia&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Matsuo,%20Koji&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=227&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=255.e1&rft.epage=255.e18&rft.pages=255.e1-255.e18&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2658232444%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2658232444&rft_id=info:pmid/35487326&rft_els_id=S0002937822003131&rfr_iscdi=true