Outcomes of endoscopic endonasal resection of pediatric craniopharyngiomas
Background Craniopharyngiomas have traditionally been treated via open transcranial approaches. More recent, endoscopic endonasal approaches have been increasingly used; however, there has been limited evaluation of long‐term outcomes for this approach. Methods A retrospective review was performed t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International forum of allergy & rhinology 2022-12, Vol.12 (12), p.1517-1526 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1526 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1517 |
container_title | International forum of allergy & rhinology |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Patel, Tapan D. Rullan‐Oliver, Bianca Ungerer, Heather Storm, Phillip B. Kohanski, Michael A. Adappa, Nithin D. Palmer, James N. |
description | Background
Craniopharyngiomas have traditionally been treated via open transcranial approaches. More recent, endoscopic endonasal approaches have been increasingly used; however, there has been limited evaluation of long‐term outcomes for this approach.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed to analyze patients with pediatric craniopharyngioma undergoing endonasal endoscopic resection from 2012 to 2020. Demographic information, clinicopathologic factors, and outcomes including follow‐up and recurrences were analyzed.
Results
All 42 patients, with a mean age of 8.0 years, were included. The median follow‐up time was 49 months. Mean tumor diameter was 3.6 cm. All of the tumors had sellar and suprasellar components. The most common presenting symptoms were headaches (64.3%), visual changes (59.5%), and nausea/vomiting (38.1%). Most patients (73.3%) had resolution of their presenting symptoms by their first postoperative visit. Vision improved or remained normal in 69.0% of patients. Postoperatively, incidence of panhypopituitarism or diabetes insipidus developed in 89.7% and 77.8% of patients, respectively. The postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak rate was 7.1%. The recurrence rate was 9.5%.
Conclusion
Endoscopic endonasal resection for pediatric craniopharyngiomas can achieve high rates of resection with low rates of disease recurrence when compared with the outcomes of open transcranial resection reported in the literature. However, hypothalamic‐pituitary dysfunction remains a significant postoperative morbidity in both approaches. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/alr.23009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2658231122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2658231122</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2839-f31044669b11c187073b0f6806547bc32935e3a30dc7fe2711c528700b66ba0c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LwzAYB_AgipO5g19ABl700C3vaY9j-MpgIHoOaZpqRtvUpEX27c3WuYPgc8lz-PEnzx-AKwRnCEI8V5WfYQJhdgIuMKQ44VlKT4-74CMwCWED4zDEGBLnYEQYTRlF9AK8rPtOu9qEqSunpilc0K61er82Kqhq6k0wurOu2YnWFFZ1PgLtVWNd-6n8tvmwrlbhEpyVqgpmcnjH4P3h_m35lKzWj8_LxSrROCVZUhIEKeU8yxHSKBVQkByWPIWcUZFrgjPCDFEEFlqUBouoGI4M5pznCmoyBrdDbuvdV29CJ2sbtKkq1RjXB4k5SzFBCONIb_7Qjet9E38nsaAICxH7iOpuUNq7ELwpZettHQ-TCMpdxzJ2LPcdR3t9SOzz2hRH-dtoBPMBfNvKbP9PkovV6xD5A_CVg6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2741277517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcomes of endoscopic endonasal resection of pediatric craniopharyngiomas</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Patel, Tapan D. ; Rullan‐Oliver, Bianca ; Ungerer, Heather ; Storm, Phillip B. ; Kohanski, Michael A. ; Adappa, Nithin D. ; Palmer, James N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Patel, Tapan D. ; Rullan‐Oliver, Bianca ; Ungerer, Heather ; Storm, Phillip B. ; Kohanski, Michael A. ; Adappa, Nithin D. ; Palmer, James N.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Craniopharyngiomas have traditionally been treated via open transcranial approaches. More recent, endoscopic endonasal approaches have been increasingly used; however, there has been limited evaluation of long‐term outcomes for this approach.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed to analyze patients with pediatric craniopharyngioma undergoing endonasal endoscopic resection from 2012 to 2020. Demographic information, clinicopathologic factors, and outcomes including follow‐up and recurrences were analyzed.
Results
All 42 patients, with a mean age of 8.0 years, were included. The median follow‐up time was 49 months. Mean tumor diameter was 3.6 cm. All of the tumors had sellar and suprasellar components. The most common presenting symptoms were headaches (64.3%), visual changes (59.5%), and nausea/vomiting (38.1%). Most patients (73.3%) had resolution of their presenting symptoms by their first postoperative visit. Vision improved or remained normal in 69.0% of patients. Postoperatively, incidence of panhypopituitarism or diabetes insipidus developed in 89.7% and 77.8% of patients, respectively. The postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak rate was 7.1%. The recurrence rate was 9.5%.
Conclusion
Endoscopic endonasal resection for pediatric craniopharyngiomas can achieve high rates of resection with low rates of disease recurrence when compared with the outcomes of open transcranial resection reported in the literature. However, hypothalamic‐pituitary dysfunction remains a significant postoperative morbidity in both approaches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2042-6976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-6984</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/alr.23009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35485414</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid ; Diabetes insipidus ; endonasal ; endoscopic ; Endoscopy ; Hypothalamus ; Morbidity ; Neoplasia ; outcomes ; Patients ; pediatric craniopharyngioma ; Pediatrics ; Pituitary ; Tumors ; Vomiting</subject><ispartof>International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2022-12, Vol.12 (12), p.1517-1526</ispartof><rights>2022 ARS‐AAOA, LLC.</rights><rights>2022 ARS-AAOA, LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2839-f31044669b11c187073b0f6806547bc32935e3a30dc7fe2711c528700b66ba0c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2839-f31044669b11c187073b0f6806547bc32935e3a30dc7fe2711c528700b66ba0c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9341-0126 ; 0000-0002-5347-0167</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Falr.23009$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Falr.23009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35485414$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Patel, Tapan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rullan‐Oliver, Bianca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ungerer, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storm, Phillip B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohanski, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adappa, Nithin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, James N.</creatorcontrib><title>Outcomes of endoscopic endonasal resection of pediatric craniopharyngiomas</title><title>International forum of allergy & rhinology</title><addtitle>Int Forum Allergy Rhinol</addtitle><description>Background
Craniopharyngiomas have traditionally been treated via open transcranial approaches. More recent, endoscopic endonasal approaches have been increasingly used; however, there has been limited evaluation of long‐term outcomes for this approach.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed to analyze patients with pediatric craniopharyngioma undergoing endonasal endoscopic resection from 2012 to 2020. Demographic information, clinicopathologic factors, and outcomes including follow‐up and recurrences were analyzed.
Results
All 42 patients, with a mean age of 8.0 years, were included. The median follow‐up time was 49 months. Mean tumor diameter was 3.6 cm. All of the tumors had sellar and suprasellar components. The most common presenting symptoms were headaches (64.3%), visual changes (59.5%), and nausea/vomiting (38.1%). Most patients (73.3%) had resolution of their presenting symptoms by their first postoperative visit. Vision improved or remained normal in 69.0% of patients. Postoperatively, incidence of panhypopituitarism or diabetes insipidus developed in 89.7% and 77.8% of patients, respectively. The postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak rate was 7.1%. The recurrence rate was 9.5%.
Conclusion
Endoscopic endonasal resection for pediatric craniopharyngiomas can achieve high rates of resection with low rates of disease recurrence when compared with the outcomes of open transcranial resection reported in the literature. However, hypothalamic‐pituitary dysfunction remains a significant postoperative morbidity in both approaches.</description><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Diabetes insipidus</subject><subject>endonasal</subject><subject>endoscopic</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Hypothalamus</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Neoplasia</subject><subject>outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>pediatric craniopharyngioma</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pituitary</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Vomiting</subject><issn>2042-6976</issn><issn>2042-6984</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E1LwzAYB_AgipO5g19ABl700C3vaY9j-MpgIHoOaZpqRtvUpEX27c3WuYPgc8lz-PEnzx-AKwRnCEI8V5WfYQJhdgIuMKQ44VlKT4-74CMwCWED4zDEGBLnYEQYTRlF9AK8rPtOu9qEqSunpilc0K61er82Kqhq6k0wurOu2YnWFFZ1PgLtVWNd-6n8tvmwrlbhEpyVqgpmcnjH4P3h_m35lKzWj8_LxSrROCVZUhIEKeU8yxHSKBVQkByWPIWcUZFrgjPCDFEEFlqUBouoGI4M5pznCmoyBrdDbuvdV29CJ2sbtKkq1RjXB4k5SzFBCONIb_7Qjet9E38nsaAICxH7iOpuUNq7ELwpZettHQ-TCMpdxzJ2LPcdR3t9SOzz2hRH-dtoBPMBfNvKbP9PkovV6xD5A_CVg6A</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Patel, Tapan D.</creator><creator>Rullan‐Oliver, Bianca</creator><creator>Ungerer, Heather</creator><creator>Storm, Phillip B.</creator><creator>Kohanski, Michael A.</creator><creator>Adappa, Nithin D.</creator><creator>Palmer, James N.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9341-0126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5347-0167</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Outcomes of endoscopic endonasal resection of pediatric craniopharyngiomas</title><author>Patel, Tapan D. ; Rullan‐Oliver, Bianca ; Ungerer, Heather ; Storm, Phillip B. ; Kohanski, Michael A. ; Adappa, Nithin D. ; Palmer, James N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2839-f31044669b11c187073b0f6806547bc32935e3a30dc7fe2711c528700b66ba0c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Diabetes insipidus</topic><topic>endonasal</topic><topic>endoscopic</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Hypothalamus</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Neoplasia</topic><topic>outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>pediatric craniopharyngioma</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pituitary</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Vomiting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patel, Tapan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rullan‐Oliver, Bianca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ungerer, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storm, Phillip B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohanski, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adappa, Nithin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, James N.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International forum of allergy & rhinology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patel, Tapan D.</au><au>Rullan‐Oliver, Bianca</au><au>Ungerer, Heather</au><au>Storm, Phillip B.</au><au>Kohanski, Michael A.</au><au>Adappa, Nithin D.</au><au>Palmer, James N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcomes of endoscopic endonasal resection of pediatric craniopharyngiomas</atitle><jtitle>International forum of allergy & rhinology</jtitle><addtitle>Int Forum Allergy Rhinol</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1517</spage><epage>1526</epage><pages>1517-1526</pages><issn>2042-6976</issn><eissn>2042-6984</eissn><abstract>Background
Craniopharyngiomas have traditionally been treated via open transcranial approaches. More recent, endoscopic endonasal approaches have been increasingly used; however, there has been limited evaluation of long‐term outcomes for this approach.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed to analyze patients with pediatric craniopharyngioma undergoing endonasal endoscopic resection from 2012 to 2020. Demographic information, clinicopathologic factors, and outcomes including follow‐up and recurrences were analyzed.
Results
All 42 patients, with a mean age of 8.0 years, were included. The median follow‐up time was 49 months. Mean tumor diameter was 3.6 cm. All of the tumors had sellar and suprasellar components. The most common presenting symptoms were headaches (64.3%), visual changes (59.5%), and nausea/vomiting (38.1%). Most patients (73.3%) had resolution of their presenting symptoms by their first postoperative visit. Vision improved or remained normal in 69.0% of patients. Postoperatively, incidence of panhypopituitarism or diabetes insipidus developed in 89.7% and 77.8% of patients, respectively. The postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak rate was 7.1%. The recurrence rate was 9.5%.
Conclusion
Endoscopic endonasal resection for pediatric craniopharyngiomas can achieve high rates of resection with low rates of disease recurrence when compared with the outcomes of open transcranial resection reported in the literature. However, hypothalamic‐pituitary dysfunction remains a significant postoperative morbidity in both approaches.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35485414</pmid><doi>10.1002/alr.23009</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9341-0126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5347-0167</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2042-6976 |
ispartof | International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2022-12, Vol.12 (12), p.1517-1526 |
issn | 2042-6976 2042-6984 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2658231122 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Cerebrospinal fluid Diabetes insipidus endonasal endoscopic Endoscopy Hypothalamus Morbidity Neoplasia outcomes Patients pediatric craniopharyngioma Pediatrics Pituitary Tumors Vomiting |
title | Outcomes of endoscopic endonasal resection of pediatric craniopharyngiomas |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T00%3A35%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes%20of%20endoscopic%20endonasal%20resection%20of%20pediatric%20craniopharyngiomas&rft.jtitle=International%20forum%20of%20allergy%20&%20rhinology&rft.au=Patel,%20Tapan%20D.&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1517&rft.epage=1526&rft.pages=1517-1526&rft.issn=2042-6976&rft.eissn=2042-6984&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/alr.23009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2658231122%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2741277517&rft_id=info:pmid/35485414&rfr_iscdi=true |