Peripheral nerve injuries of the upper extremity in a pediatric population: Outcomes and prognostic factors

Peripheral nerve injuries of the upper limb are rare in children and poorly documented. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze long-term sensory and motor results, and to determine predictive factors for recovery after surgery. Eleven children, with a mean age at injury of 9.7 years (5–1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hand surgery and rehabilitation 2022-09, Vol.41 (4), p.481-486
Hauptverfasser: Fleurette, J., Gaume, M., De Tienda, M., Dana, C., Pannier, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Peripheral nerve injuries of the upper limb are rare in children and poorly documented. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze long-term sensory and motor results, and to determine predictive factors for recovery after surgery. Eleven children, with a mean age at injury of 9.7 years (5–15), operated on between 2006 and 2018, were included. Sensory perception was measured on monofilament test and static 2-point discrimination test. Grip strength was measured with a dynamometer and motor strength was assessed on the Medical Research Council scale. Quality of life was assessed on QuickDASH. The injury involved the radial (n = 1), median (n = 9), or combined median and ulnar (n = 1) nerves and was repaired by primary direct suture (n = 11). The mechanism involved glass laceration (n = 10) or a road accident (n = 1). The dominant limb was involved in 7 cases. At a mean 7.7 years’ follow-up, touch sensitivity was normal or slightly deficient on monofilament test. Discrimination test was normal or adequate. Strength was complete in 10 patients. Mean QuickDASH score was 5.99 (range, 0–18.18). There was no significant difference in sensory or motor recovery according to partial or complete lesion or to injury location. There was better sensory recovery in children
ISSN:2468-1229
2468-1210
DOI:10.1016/j.hansur.2022.04.003