In Vitro Biomechanics of the Cervical Spine: A Systematic Review

In vitro testing has been conducted to provide a comprehensive understanding of the biomechanics of the cervical spine. This has allowed a characterization of the stability of the spine as influenced by the intrinsic properties of its tissue constituents and the severity of degeneration or injury. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomechanical engineering 2022-10, Vol.144 (10)
Hauptverfasser: Ansaripour, Hossein, Ferguson, Stephen J., Flohr, Markus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page
container_title Journal of biomechanical engineering
container_volume 144
creator Ansaripour, Hossein
Ferguson, Stephen J.
Flohr, Markus
description In vitro testing has been conducted to provide a comprehensive understanding of the biomechanics of the cervical spine. This has allowed a characterization of the stability of the spine as influenced by the intrinsic properties of its tissue constituents and the severity of degeneration or injury. This also enables the preclinical estimation of spinal implant functionality and the success of operative procedures. The purpose of this review paper was to compile methodologies and results from various studies addressing spinal kinematics in pre- and postoperative conditions so that they could be compared. The reviewed literature was evaluated to provide suggestions for a better approach for future studies, to reduce the uncertainties and facilitate comparisons among various results. The overview is presented in a way to inform various disciplines, such as experimental testing, design development, and clinical treatment. The biomechanical characteristics of the cervical spine, mainly the segmental range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure (IDP), and facet joint load (FJL), have been assessed by testing functional spinal units (FSUs). The relative effects of pathologies including disc degeneration, muscle dysfunction, and ligamentous transection have been studied by imposing on the specimen complex load scenarios imitating physiological conditions. The biomechanical response is strongly influenced by specimen type, test condition, and the different types of implants utilized in the different experimental groups.
doi_str_mv 10.1115/1.4054439
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2656753282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2656753282</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a306t-a7eefc3c649b7c5d72f313a20ff12303bcc624356366dccc8debc6dd5a74a3693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLw0AURgdRbH0s3IvMUhepc-eVxJW1-CgUBKtuw2RyQ6c0SZ1JKv33Rlpd3cU9HPgOIRfARgCgbmEkmZJSpAdkCIonUZIqOCRDBjKJWCxgQE5CWDIGkEh2TAZCyYQzSIfkflrTT9f6hj64pkK7MLWzgTYlbRdIJ-g3zpoVna9djXd0TOfb0GJlWmfpG24cfp-Ro9KsAp7v7yn5eHp8n7xEs9fn6WQ8i4xguo1MjFhaYbVM89iqIualAGE4K0vggoncWs2lUFpoXVhrkwJzq4tCmVgaoVNxSq533rVvvjoMbVa5YHG1MjU2Xci4VjpWgie8R292qPVNCB7LbO1dZfw2A5b9Bssg2wfr2au9tssrLP7Jv0I9cLkDTKgwWzadr_uZvaY39O8fZoVs9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2656753282</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Vitro Biomechanics of the Cervical Spine: A Systematic Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>ASME Transactions Journals (Current)</source><creator>Ansaripour, Hossein ; Ferguson, Stephen J. ; Flohr, Markus</creator><creatorcontrib>Ansaripour, Hossein ; Ferguson, Stephen J. ; Flohr, Markus</creatorcontrib><description>In vitro testing has been conducted to provide a comprehensive understanding of the biomechanics of the cervical spine. This has allowed a characterization of the stability of the spine as influenced by the intrinsic properties of its tissue constituents and the severity of degeneration or injury. This also enables the preclinical estimation of spinal implant functionality and the success of operative procedures. The purpose of this review paper was to compile methodologies and results from various studies addressing spinal kinematics in pre- and postoperative conditions so that they could be compared. The reviewed literature was evaluated to provide suggestions for a better approach for future studies, to reduce the uncertainties and facilitate comparisons among various results. The overview is presented in a way to inform various disciplines, such as experimental testing, design development, and clinical treatment. The biomechanical characteristics of the cervical spine, mainly the segmental range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure (IDP), and facet joint load (FJL), have been assessed by testing functional spinal units (FSUs). The relative effects of pathologies including disc degeneration, muscle dysfunction, and ligamentous transection have been studied by imposing on the specimen complex load scenarios imitating physiological conditions. The biomechanical response is strongly influenced by specimen type, test condition, and the different types of implants utilized in the different experimental groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0731</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-8951</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1115/1.4054439</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35482019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: ASME</publisher><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena ; Cervical Vertebrae ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc - physiology ; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Zygapophyseal Joint - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2022-10, Vol.144 (10)</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 by ASME.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a306t-a7eefc3c649b7c5d72f313a20ff12303bcc624356366dccc8debc6dd5a74a3693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a306t-a7eefc3c649b7c5d72f313a20ff12303bcc624356366dccc8debc6dd5a74a3693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,38499</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35482019$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ansaripour, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flohr, Markus</creatorcontrib><title>In Vitro Biomechanics of the Cervical Spine: A Systematic Review</title><title>Journal of biomechanical engineering</title><addtitle>J Biomech Eng</addtitle><addtitle>J Biomech Eng</addtitle><description>In vitro testing has been conducted to provide a comprehensive understanding of the biomechanics of the cervical spine. This has allowed a characterization of the stability of the spine as influenced by the intrinsic properties of its tissue constituents and the severity of degeneration or injury. This also enables the preclinical estimation of spinal implant functionality and the success of operative procedures. The purpose of this review paper was to compile methodologies and results from various studies addressing spinal kinematics in pre- and postoperative conditions so that they could be compared. The reviewed literature was evaluated to provide suggestions for a better approach for future studies, to reduce the uncertainties and facilitate comparisons among various results. The overview is presented in a way to inform various disciplines, such as experimental testing, design development, and clinical treatment. The biomechanical characteristics of the cervical spine, mainly the segmental range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure (IDP), and facet joint load (FJL), have been assessed by testing functional spinal units (FSUs). The relative effects of pathologies including disc degeneration, muscle dysfunction, and ligamentous transection have been studied by imposing on the specimen complex load scenarios imitating physiological conditions. The biomechanical response is strongly influenced by specimen type, test condition, and the different types of implants utilized in the different experimental groups.</description><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc - physiology</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc Degeneration</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Zygapophyseal Joint - physiology</subject><issn>0148-0731</issn><issn>1528-8951</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtLw0AURgdRbH0s3IvMUhepc-eVxJW1-CgUBKtuw2RyQ6c0SZ1JKv33Rlpd3cU9HPgOIRfARgCgbmEkmZJSpAdkCIonUZIqOCRDBjKJWCxgQE5CWDIGkEh2TAZCyYQzSIfkflrTT9f6hj64pkK7MLWzgTYlbRdIJ-g3zpoVna9djXd0TOfb0GJlWmfpG24cfp-Ro9KsAp7v7yn5eHp8n7xEs9fn6WQ8i4xguo1MjFhaYbVM89iqIualAGE4K0vggoncWs2lUFpoXVhrkwJzq4tCmVgaoVNxSq533rVvvjoMbVa5YHG1MjU2Xci4VjpWgie8R292qPVNCB7LbO1dZfw2A5b9Bssg2wfr2au9tssrLP7Jv0I9cLkDTKgwWzadr_uZvaY39O8fZoVs9g</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Ansaripour, Hossein</creator><creator>Ferguson, Stephen J.</creator><creator>Flohr, Markus</creator><general>ASME</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>In Vitro Biomechanics of the Cervical Spine: A Systematic Review</title><author>Ansaripour, Hossein ; Ferguson, Stephen J. ; Flohr, Markus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a306t-a7eefc3c649b7c5d72f313a20ff12303bcc624356366dccc8debc6dd5a74a3693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc - physiology</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc Degeneration</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Zygapophyseal Joint - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ansaripour, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flohr, Markus</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanical engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ansaripour, Hossein</au><au>Ferguson, Stephen J.</au><au>Flohr, Markus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Vitro Biomechanics of the Cervical Spine: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanical engineering</jtitle><stitle>J Biomech Eng</stitle><addtitle>J Biomech Eng</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>10</issue><issn>0148-0731</issn><eissn>1528-8951</eissn><abstract>In vitro testing has been conducted to provide a comprehensive understanding of the biomechanics of the cervical spine. This has allowed a characterization of the stability of the spine as influenced by the intrinsic properties of its tissue constituents and the severity of degeneration or injury. This also enables the preclinical estimation of spinal implant functionality and the success of operative procedures. The purpose of this review paper was to compile methodologies and results from various studies addressing spinal kinematics in pre- and postoperative conditions so that they could be compared. The reviewed literature was evaluated to provide suggestions for a better approach for future studies, to reduce the uncertainties and facilitate comparisons among various results. The overview is presented in a way to inform various disciplines, such as experimental testing, design development, and clinical treatment. The biomechanical characteristics of the cervical spine, mainly the segmental range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure (IDP), and facet joint load (FJL), have been assessed by testing functional spinal units (FSUs). The relative effects of pathologies including disc degeneration, muscle dysfunction, and ligamentous transection have been studied by imposing on the specimen complex load scenarios imitating physiological conditions. The biomechanical response is strongly influenced by specimen type, test condition, and the different types of implants utilized in the different experimental groups.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>ASME</pub><pmid>35482019</pmid><doi>10.1115/1.4054439</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0731
ispartof Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2022-10, Vol.144 (10)
issn 0148-0731
1528-8951
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2656753282
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; ASME Transactions Journals (Current)
subjects Biomechanical Phenomena
Cervical Vertebrae
Humans
Intervertebral Disc - physiology
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
Range of Motion, Articular - physiology
Zygapophyseal Joint - physiology
title In Vitro Biomechanics of the Cervical Spine: A Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T09%3A47%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Vitro%20Biomechanics%20of%20the%20Cervical%20Spine:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanical%20engineering&rft.au=Ansaripour,%20Hossein&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=10&rft.issn=0148-0731&rft.eissn=1528-8951&rft_id=info:doi/10.1115/1.4054439&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2656753282%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2656753282&rft_id=info:pmid/35482019&rfr_iscdi=true